Search the web
Welcome, Guest
[Sign Out, My Account]

Quotes & Info
Enter Symbol(s):
e.g. YHOO, ^DJI
Symbol Lookup | Financial Search
OPXA > SEC Filings for OPXA > Form 10-Q on 14-Nov-2012All Recent SEC Filings

Show all filings for OPEXA THERAPEUTICS, INC.



Quarterly Report

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition is as of September 30, 2012. Our results of operations and cash flows should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report and the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements" which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Statements contained in this report, other than statements of historical fact, constitute "forward-looking statements." The words "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "may," "could," "intends," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In particular, these forward-looking statements may be found, among other places, under the headings "Risk Factors" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." These forward-looking statements do not constitute guarantees of future performance. Investors are cautioned that statements which are not strictly historical statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding current or future financial payments, returns, royalties, performance and position, management's strategy, plans and objectives for future operations, plans and objectives for product development, plans and objectives for present and future clinical trials and results of such trials, plans and objectives for regulatory approval, litigation, intellectual property, product development, manufacturing plans and performance, and management's initiatives and strategies, constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those risks discussed in "Risk Factors," as well as, without limitation, risks associated with: our capital position; the rights and preferences provided to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and investors in the convertible secured notes we issued in July 2012 (including a secured interest in all of our assets); our ability to enter into and benefit from a partnering arrangement for our product candidate, Tcelna, on reasonably satisfactory terms (if at all), and our dependence (if partnered) on the resources and abilities of any partner for the further development of Tcelna; our ability to compete with larger, better financed pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies; new approaches to the treatment of our targeted diseases; our expectation of incurring continued losses; our uncertainty of developing a marketable product; our ability to raise additional capital to continue our development programs (including to undertake and complete any ongoing or further clinical studies for Tcelna), including in this regard our ability to satisfy various conditions required to access the financing potentially available under the purchase agreements with Lincoln Park (such as the minimum closing price for our common stock, the registration of the underlying shares of common stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the requirement for an ongoing trading market for our stock); the success of our clinical trials; the efficacy of Tcelna for any particular indication, such as for relapsing remitting MS or secondary progressive MS; our ability to develop and commercialize products; our ability to obtain required regulatory approvals; our compliance with all Food and Drug Administration regulations; our ability to obtain, maintain and protect intellectual property rights (including for Tcelna); the risk of litigation regarding our intellectual property rights or the rights of third parties; the success of third party development and commercialization efforts with respect to products covered by intellectual property rights that we may license or transfer; our limited manufacturing capabilities; our dependence on third-party manufacturers; our ability to hire and retain skilled personnel; our volatile stock price; and other risks detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation or undertaking to update any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any changes in expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. You should, however, review additional disclosures we make in the reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Business Overview

Unless otherwise indicated, we use "Opexa," "the Company," "we," "our" and "us" in this quarterly report to refer to the businesses of Opexa Therapeutics, Inc.

Opexa is a biopharmaceutical company developing personalized cellular therapies with the potential to treat major illnesses, including multiple sclerosis (MS). These therapies are based on our proprietary T-cell technology. The information discussed related to our product candidate is preliminary and investigative. Our product candidate has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for marketing.

Our product candidate, Tcelna™ (formerly known as Tovaxin®), is a personalized T-cell therapy licensed from Baylor College of Medicine, which is in clinical development for the treatment of MS.

- 12 -

T-Cell Therapy and Tcelna™

Tcelna™ is a novel T-cell immunotherapy in Phase IIb clinical development for the treatment of patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS). It is also positioned to enter Phase III clinical development for the treatment of patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS), subject to the availability of sufficient resources. Tcelna is a personalized therapy that is specifically tailored to each patient's disease profile. Tcelna is manufactured using ImmPathTM, our proprietary method for the production of a patient-specific T-cell immunotherapy which encompasses the collection of blood from the MS patient, isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, generation of an autologous pool of myelin-reactive T-cells (MRTCs) raised against selected peptides from myelin basic protein (MBP), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) and proteolipid protein (PLP), and the return of these expanded, irradiated T-cells back to the patient. These attenuated T-cells are reintroduced into the patient via subcutaneous injection to trigger a therapeutic immune system response.

Initiation of Phase IIb Clinical Study in Patients with SPMS

We recently initiated a Phase IIb clinical trial of Tcelna in patients with SPMS. The trial is entitled: A Phase II Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tcelna in Subjects with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis and has been named the "Abili-T" trial. The newly-initiated Abili-T trial is a double-blind, 1:1 randomized, placebo-controlled study in SPMS patients who demonstrate evidence of disease progression without associated relapses. The trial is expected to enroll 180 patients at approximately 30 leading clinical sites in the U.S. and Canada and is expected to take approximately three years to complete. According to the study protocol, patients will receive two annual courses of Tcelna treatment consisting of five subcutaneous injections per year at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and 24. The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial is the percentage of brain volume change (atrophy) at 24 months. Study investigators will also measure several important secondary outcomes commonly associated with MS including disease progression as measured by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), annualized relapse rate (ARR) and changes in disability as measured by EDSS and the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC). The Abili-T clinical trial is expected to enroll over a 12-month period and the resulting top-line data is expected by the end of 2015.

Tcelna is the first ever personalized T-cell therapy for MS patients and has received Fast Track designation from the FDA in SPMS. The FDA's Fast Track program is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of drugs intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions and that demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical need.

The costs of the Phase IIb clinical study of Tcelna in SPMS, as well as the ongoing expenses of our operations through the expected completion date of such study are estimated at approximately $35 million. Our existing resources are not adequate to permit us to proceed materially beyond the initiation of the study (i.e., the dosing of the first patients) or to continue and complete such study or any significant portion of it. We will need to secure significant additional resources to complete the trial and support our operations during the pendency of the trial. We believe we have sufficient liquidity to support our clinical trial activities into December 2012. If we are unable to obtain additional funding for operations in the immediate future, we will be forced to suspend or terminate our current ongoing clinical trial for Tcelna and curtail various aspects of our operations, as well as implement significant cost-reduction measures or potentially cease operations.

Given our need for substantial amounts of capital to continue and complete the Phase IIb clinical study in North America of Tcelna in SPMS, we intend to continue to explore potential opportunities and alternatives to obtain the additional resources that will be necessary to continue and complete the Phase IIb study and to support ongoing operations during the pendency of such study. In addition to one or more additional financings, these opportunities and alternatives may include a partnering arrangement with a large biotech or pharmaceutical company. There can be no assurance that any such financings or partnering arrangement can be consummated on acceptable terms, if at all.

SPMS Overview

SPMS is characterized by a steady accrual of irreversible disability, despite, in some cases, reversible relapses, remissions or clinical plateaus. Older age at onset of MS diagnosis is the strongest predictor of conversion to SPMS. Males have a shorter time to conversion to SPMS compared with females. Available immunomodulating and immunosuppressive therapies used for RRMS have not been effective in SPMS. In clinical trials, these therapies have demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties as measured by the reduction in number and volume of contrast-enhancing or acutely inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) lesions most commonly seen in patients with RRMS. The typical SPMS patient, however, has little or no radiographic evidence of acute inflammation. It is commonly observed that contrast-enhancing CNS lesions are uncommon among these patients, despite a clearly deteriorating neurologic course. The lack of effect of conventional MS therapeutics in SPMS suggests that the cerebral deterioration characterizing progressive disease may be driven by factors other than acute inflammation. For instance, the immunopathology of SPMS is more consistent with a transition to a chronic T-cell dependent inflammatory type, which may encompass the innate immune response and persistent activation of microglia cells. Radiographic features that stand out among patients with SPMS include significantly more atrophy of gray matter compared with RRMS patients. Of note, long-term disability in MS in general appears more closely correlated to gray matter atrophy than to white matter inflammation. Such atrophy may be suggestive of progressive clinical disability. Both clinically and radiographically, SPMS represents a disease process with certain features distinct from those of RRMS, and one with extremely limited treatment options.

- 13 -

Current Treatment Options for SPMS

Only one product, mitoxantrone, is currently approved for the indication of SPMS. However, as of 2005, this drug carries a black box warning, due to significant risks of decreased systolic function, heart failure, and leukemia. The American Academy of Neurology has issued a report indicating that these risks are even higher than suggested in the original report leading to the black box warning. Hence, a safe and effective treatment for SPMS remains a significant unmet medical need.

Tcelna Clinical Overview in SPMS

In multiple previously conducted clinical trials for the treatment of patients with MS (which have been weighted significantly toward patients with RRMS), Tcelna has demonstrated one of the safest side effect profiles for any marketed or development-stage MS therapy, as well as encouraging efficacy signals. A total of 142 MS patients have received Tcelna in previously conducted trials for RRMS and SPMS. The therapy has been well tolerated in all subjects and has demonstrated an excellent overall safety profile. The most common side effect is mild to moderate irritation at the site of injection, which is typically resolved in 24 hours. Tcelna has been administered to a total of 36 subjects with SPMS across three previous clinical studies. Based on preliminary data suggesting stabilized or improved disability among SPMS subjects receiving Tcelna, Opexa believes that further development of this product in SPMS is warranted.

Summary of TERMS Phase IIb Clinical Trial Data in RRMS

Tovaxin for Early Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (TERMS) was a Phase IIb clinical study of Tcelna in RRMS patients completed in 2008. Although the study did not show statistical significance in its primary endpoint (the cumulative number of gadolinium-enhanced brain lesions using MRI scans summed at various points in the study), the study showed compelling evidence of efficacy in various clinical and other MRI endpoints.

The TERMS study was a multi-center, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial in 150 patients with RRMS or high risk Clinically Isolated Syndrome. Patients received a total of five subcutaneous injections at weeks 0, 4, 8, 12 and 24. Key results from the TERMS trial included:

· In the modified intent to treat patient population (n=142), the ARR for Tcelna-treated patients was 0.214 as compared to 0.339 for placebo-treated patients, which represented a 37% decrease in ARR for Tcelna as compared to placebo in the general population;

· In a prospective group of patients with more active disease (ARR>1, n=50), Tcelna demonstrated a 55% reduction in ARR as compared to placebo, and a 73% reduction in relapse rate was observed in Tcelna patients in this population compared to placebo during the 24-week period following the administration of the full course of treatment; and

· In a retrospective analysis in patients naïve to previous disease modifying treatment (i.e., patients who had not previously used any drugs other than steroids to treat their disease), the results showed that patients, when treated with Tcelna, had a 64% reduction in ARR versus placebo (p=0.046, n=70).

We remain committed to further advancing Tcelna in RRMS at a later date assuming the availability of sufficient resources. For Opexa, however, progressive MS is an area which we believe represents a higher unmet medical need.

Other Opportunities

Our proprietary T-cell technology has enabled us to develop intellectual property and a comprehensive sample database that may enable discovery of novel biomarkers and other relevant peptides to be used to treat MS patients.

We have developed (and, in part, in licensed from the University of Chicago) a proprietary adult stem cell technology to produce monocyte-derived stem cells (MDSC) from blood. These MDSC can be derived from a patient's monocytes, expanded ex vivo, and then administered to the same patient. Our initial focus for this technology is the further development of this monocyte-derived stem cell technology as a platform for the in vitro generation of highly specialized cells for potential application in autologous cell therapy for patients with diabetes mellitus. The diabetes program is in an early (pre-clinical) development stage.

- 14 -

Critical Accounting Policies

General. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our most significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation. We adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 718 which establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee service. We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of employee stock based compensation at the date of grant, which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including expected volatility and expected life. Changes in these inputs and assumptions can materially affect the measure of estimated fair value of our share-based compensation. These assumptions are subjective and generally require significant analysis and judgment to develop. When estimating fair value, some of the assumptions will be based on, or determined from, external data and other assumptions may be derived from our historical experience with stock-based payment arrangements. The appropriate weight to place on historical experience is a matter of judgment, based on relevant facts and circumstances.

We estimated volatility by considering historical stock volatility. We have opted to use the simplified method for estimating expected term of options as equal to the midpoint between the vesting period and the contractual term.

Accounting for Derivative Instruments. FASB ASC 815, "Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities" ("FASB ASC 815"), specifies that a contract that would otherwise meet the definition of a derivative, but is both (a) indexed to its own stock and (b) classified in stockholders' equity in the statement of financial position would not be considered a derivative financial instrument. FASB ASC 815 provides a two-step model to be applied in determining whether a financial instrument or an embedded feature is indexed to an issuer's own stock, including evaluating the instrument's contingent exercise and settlement provisions, and thus able to qualify for the FASB ASC 815-10 scope exception.

We determined that the Series I warrants associated with the July 25, 2012 convertible secured promissory note financing qualified for treatment under FASB ASC 815. The initial fair value of $2,314,635 of these warrants as of July 25, 2012 was classified as a current derivative liability. The impact of FASB ASC 815 for the period ended September 30, 2012 resulted in an increase in the derivative liability of $136,889 with a corresponding loss on derivative instruments.

Measuring Fair Value. As defined in FASB ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. We classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. FASB ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by FASB ASC 820 are as follows:

Level 1 - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded derivatives, marketable securities and listed equities.

Level 2 - Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Instruments in this category generally include non-exchange-traded derivatives such as commodity swaps, interest rate swaps, options and collars.

- 15 -

Level 3 - Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management's best estimate of fair value.

As required by FASB ASC 820, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

We determined that the fair value of the Series I warrants associated with the July 25, 2012 convertible secured promissory note financing is classified as Level 3 on the fair value hierarchy and should be recognized as a warrant derivative liability at issuance.

Research and Development. The costs of materials and equipment or facilities that are acquired or constructed for research and development activities and that have alternative future uses are capitalized as tangible assets when acquired or constructed. The cost of such materials consumed in research and development activities and the depreciation of such equipment or facilities used in those activities are research and development costs. However, the costs of materials, equipment, or facilities acquired or constructed for research and development activities that have no alternative future uses are considered research and development costs and are expensed at the time the costs are incurred.

Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 with the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011

Net Sales. We recorded no commercial revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses were $1,455,938 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared with $654,772 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in expenses is primarily related to an increase of staff to conduct increased development activities, increases in the procurement and use of supplies for both our laboratory and our product manufacturing operations, the engagement of consultants for the clinical study of Tcelna in SPMS, increases in legal costs related to our intellectual property, stock compensation expense and facilities costs.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $532,474, compared with $584,794 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in expense is due to decreases in business development expenses and was partially offset by increases in stock compensation expense and investor outreach activities.

Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $81,514, compared with $56,888 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in expense is due to increase in depreciation for laboratory and manufacturing equipment acquired during 2011 and 2012 to support increased development activities and an increase in depreciation for information technology equipment acquired during 2011 and 2012 to replace and upgrade obsolete equipment.

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $151,029 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $638 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in interest expense was primarily related to the amortized debt discount and interest on the July 25, 2012 convertible secured promissory notes and the amortization of the financing fees over the life of the notes. Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 related solely to the financing of insurance premiums.

Interest Income. Interest income was $61 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $227 for the three months ended September 30, 2011.

- 16 -

Net loss. We had a net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2012 of approximately $2.36 million, or $0.10 per share (basic and diluted), compared with a net loss of approximately $1.30 million or $0.06 per share (basic and diluted) for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increased net loss is primarily related to increases in compensation costs, the procurement and use of supplies for both our laboratory and our product manufacturing operations, consulting expenses, facilities costs, depreciation expense and interest expense, and was partially offset by a decrease in business development expenses.

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 with the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

Net Sales. We recorded no commercial revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses were $4,504,243 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared with $2,194,141 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in expenses is primarily related to increases of staff to conduct increased development activities, the procurement and use of supplies used in both our laboratory and product manufacturing operations, the engagement of consultants in preparation for our planned clinical study, facilities costs and stock compensation expense.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $1,878,236, compared with $1,737,686 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in expense is due to . . .

  Add OPXA to Portfolio     Set Alert         Email to a Friend  
Get SEC Filings for Another Symbol: Symbol Lookup
Quotes & Info for OPXA - All Recent SEC Filings
Copyright © 2016 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
SEC Filing data and information provided by EDGAR Online, Inc. (1-800-416-6651). All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.