Mutual Funds Center
Mutual Funds Center > How to Choose a Fund > Evaluating Performance >
Fund Lookup
   Enter Fund Symbol (Lookup)
   
  Find Funds by Name  
 
Tools
  Fund Screener
  Top Performers
  Prospectus Finder
  Calculators
  Company & Fund Index
  Funds by Family
  Morningstar Editorials
  Message Boards
Education
  Understanding Investing
  Mutual Fund Basics
  Types of Mutual Funds
  How to Choose a Fund
  Other Investing Vehicles
  Tax Issues
  Quizzes & Tools
  Glossary
 
Selecting Funds Based on Past Performance Is Risky

Excerpted from Common Sense on Mutual Funds by John C. Bogle, pages 211-212

Mark Carhart, of the University of Southern California, is another respected scholar who tackled the issue of persistence in fund performance. He evaluated 1,892 diversified equity funds over 16,109 fund years (amazing!) from 1962 to 1993. First, he found that "common factors in stock returns [value vs. growth, large cap vs. small cap, high beta vs. low beta] and investment expenses almost completely explain persistence in equity fund returns." Properly adjusting for the customary failure to consider the effect of the subaverage returns of funds that have gone out of existence, Carhart confirmed Professor Burton Malkiel's conclusion, described in Chapter 5, that survivor bias has enhanced past annual returns reported for funds over the 1982-1991 decade by about 1.4 percent per year. Dr. Malkiel also found some limited evidence of persistence during the 1970s, but none during the 1980s.

Looking at past one-year returns relative to those of the subsequent year, Carhart concluded, among other things, that relatively few funds stay in their initial decile ranking, although funds in the top and bottom deciles maintain their rankings more frequently than the 10 percent that mere chance would suggest. The 17 percent of funds repeating in decile one seems less than compelling. The 46 percent of funds repeating in decile ten, on the other hand, is quite imposing, a performance that seems largely explained by the fact that many low-decile funds tend to be trapped there by their high costs. In his conclusion, Carhart warns: "While the popular press will no doubt continue to glamorize the best-performing mutual fund managers, the mundane explanations of strategy and investment cost account for almost all of the important predictability of mutual fund returns." [Italics added] Translation: Relying on past records to select funds that will provide superior performance in the future is a challenging task.

YAHOO! FINANCE TIP
Yahoo! Finance reports a mutual fund's performance returns on its performance page. For an example, see VFINX's performance page.


Next in "Evaluating Performance"Related Articles

Excerpted from:
common_sense_book.jpg Common Sense on Mutual Funds: New Imperatives for the Intelligent Investor, by John C. Bogle, published by John Wiley & Sons (© 2000), pages 211-212
Buy Now


Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
Copyright © 2000 by John C. Bogle. All rights reserved.

Questions or Comments?