Search the web
Welcome, Guest
[Sign Out, My Account]

Quotes & Info
Enter Symbol(s):
e.g. YHOO, ^DJI
Symbol Lookup | Financial Search
INWK > SEC Filings for INWK > Form 10-K on 18-Mar-2014All Recent SEC Filings

Show all filings for INNERWORKINGS INC



Annual Report

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, which appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. It contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly under the heading "Risk Factors."


We are a leading global marketing supply chain company that provides global print management and promotional solutions to corporate clients across a wide range of industries. With proprietary technology, an extensive supplier network and deep domain expertise, the Company procures, manages and delivers printed materials and promotional products as part of a comprehensive outsourced enterprise solution. Our technology and database of information is designed to capitalize on excess manufacturing capacity and other inefficiencies in the traditional print supply chain to obtain favorable pricing and to deliver high-quality products and services for our clients. Since 2002, we have expanded from a regional focus to a national and now global focus.

Our proprietary software applications and database create a fully-integrated solution that stores, analyzes and tracks the production capabilities of our supplier network, as well as quote and price data for print jobs. As a result, we have one of the largest independent repositories of equipment profiles and price data for print suppliers in the United States. We leverage our technology to match our print jobs with suppliers that are optimally suited to meet the client's needs at a highly competitive price.

Through our network of more than 10,000 global suppliers, we offer a full range of print, fulfillment and logistics services that allow us to procure printed products on virtually any substrate. The breadth of our product offerings and services and the depth of our supplier network enable us to fulfill all of the print procurement needs of our clients. By leveraging our technology platform and data, our clients are able to reduce overhead costs, redeploy internal resources and obtain favorable pricing and service terms. In addition, our ability to track individual transactions and provide customized reports detailing print procurement activity on an enterprise-wide basis provides our clients with greater visibility and control of their print expenditures.

We generate revenue by procuring and purchasing marketing and printed products from our suppliers and selling those products to our clients. We procure marketing and printed products for clients across a wide range of industries, such as retail, financial services, hospitality, non-profits, healthcare, food and beverage, broadcasting and cable, education, transportation and utilities. Our clients fall into two categories, enterprise and middle market. We enter into arrangements with our enterprise clients to provide some, or substantially all, of their marketing and printed products, typically on a recurring basis. We provide printed products to our middle market clients on an order-by-order basis.

We were formed in 2001, commenced operations in 2002 and converted from a limited liability company to a Delaware corporation in January 2006. Our corporate headquarters are located in Chicago, Illinois. As of December 31, 2013, we had approximately 1,500 employees and independent contractors in more than 30 countries. We organize our operations into three segments based on geographic regions: North America, Latin America and EMEA. In 2013, we generated global revenue from third parties of $658.0 million in the North America segment, $88.0 million in the Latin America segment and $145.0 million in the EMEA segment. We believe the opportunity exists to expand our business into new geographic markets. Our objective is to continue to increase our sales in the major print markets in the United States and internationally. We intend to hire or acquire more account executives within close proximity to these large markets.

Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

As previously discussed in the Explanatory Note at the beginning of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and as further discussed in Note 19 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," we have restated our consolidated financial statements for the periods beginning with the fourth quarter of 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2011 through the third quarter of 2013.

The impact of these errors to the applicable line items in the consolidated financial statements resulting from the restatement is set forth in Note 19 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The restatement resulted in a net decrease in income before taxes of $2.2 million for all affected periods. The net impact includes a decrease in income before taxes of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase in income before taxes of $17.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, and a decrease in income before taxes of $19.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. For further detail on the financial statement impacts and the adjustments made as a result of the restatement, see Note 19 of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."


We generate revenue through the sale of printed products to our clients. Our annual revenue was $632.3 million, $789.6 million and $891.0 million in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively, reflecting growth rates of 24.9% and 12.8% in 2012 and 2013, respectively, as compared to the corresponding prior year. Our revenue is generated from two different types of clients: enterprise and middle market. Enterprise clients usually order printed products in higher dollar amounts and volume than our middle market clients. We categorize a client as an enterprise client if we have a contract with the client for the provision of printing services on a recurring basis; if the client has signed an open-ended purchase order, or a series of related purchase orders; or if the client has enrolled in our e-stores program, which enables the client to make online purchases of printing services on a recurring basis. We categorize all other clients as middle market. We enter into contracts with our enterprise clients to provide some or a specific portion of their printed products on a recurring basis. Our contracts with enterprise clients are generally three to five years, subject to termination by either party upon prior notice ranging from 90 days to twelve months.

Several of our enterprise clients have outsourced substantially all of their recurring print needs to us. We provide printed products to our middle market clients on an order-by-order basis. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, enterprise clients accounted for 74%, 75% and 77% of our revenue, respectively, while middle market clients accounted for 26%, 25% and 23% of our revenue, respectively.

Our revenue consists of the prices paid to us by our clients for printed products. These prices, in turn, reflect the amounts charged to us by our suppliers plus our gross profit. Our gross profit margin, in the case of some of our enterprise clients, is fixed by contract or, in the case of middle market clients, is dependent on prices negotiated on a job-by-job basis. Once either type of client accepts our pricing terms, the selling price is established and we procure the product for our own account in order to re-sell it to the client. We take full title and risk of loss for the product upon shipment. The finished product is typically shipped directly from our supplier to a destination specified by our client. Upon shipment, our supplier invoices us for its production costs and we invoice our client.

Our revenue from enterprise clients tends to generate lower gross profit margins than our revenue from middle market clients because the gross profit margins established in our contracts with large enterprise clients are generally lower than the gross profit margins typically realized in our middle market business. Although our enterprise revenue generates lower gross profit margins, our enterprise business tends to be as profitable as our middle market business on an operating profit basis because the commission expense associated with enterprise clients is generally lower.

Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit

Our cost of goods sold consists primarily of the price at which we purchase products from our suppliers. Our selling price, including our gross profit, in the case of some of our enterprise clients, is based on a fixed gross margin established by contract or, in the case of middle market clients, is determined at the discretion of the account executive or production manager within predetermined parameters. Our gross margins on our enterprise clients are typically lower than our gross margins on our middle market clients. As a result, our cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenue for our enterprise clients is typically higher than those for our middle market clients. Our gross profit for years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 was $147.4 million, $177.6 million and $202.0 million, or 23.3%, 22.5% and 22.7% of revenue, respectively.

Operating Expenses and Income (Loss) from Operations

Our selling, general and administrative expenses consist of commissions paid to our account executives, compensation costs for our management team and production managers as well as compensation costs for our finance and support employees, public company expenses, and corporate systems, legal and accounting, facilities and travel and entertainment expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue were 18.3%, 18.5% and 20.6% in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

We accrue for commissions when we recognize the related revenue. Some of our account executives receive a monthly draw to provide them with a more consistent income stream. The cash paid to our account executives in advance of commissions earned is reflected as a prepaid expense on our balance sheet. As our account executives earn commissions, a portion of their commission payment is withheld and offset against their prepaid commission balance, if any. Our prepaid commission balance, net of accrued earned commissions not yet paid, decreased to $4.1 million as of December 31, 2013 from $8.3 million as of December 31, 2012. This decrease was primarily due to restructuring activities during the third quarter of 2013 which resulted in a write off of the $2.6 million prepaid commission balances for the employees affected by the restructuring actions. For employees who had a balance and were affected by the restructuring actions, which primarily includes Small and Medium Business ("SMB") account executives, the Company included these balances as part of the severance paid to these individuals. In addition to these restructuring charges, the Company changed its compensation structure during the third quarter so that remaining employees of SMB are paid a fixed salary. This change in compensation structure resulted in the recording of an additional charge of $1.3 million for these employees. See the discussion of restructuring and asset write-down charges below for additional details.

We agree to provide our clients with printed products that conform to the industry standard of a "commercially reasonable quality," and our suppliers in turn agree to provide us with products of the same quality. In addition, the quotes we execute with our clients include customary industry terms and conditions that limit the amount of our liability for product defects. Product defects have not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We are required to make payment to our suppliers for completed print jobs regardless of whether our clients make payment to us. Our bad debt expense was approximately $2.4 million, $1.7 million and $1.3 million in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Our income (loss) from operations for 2011, 2012 and 2013 was $22.1 million, $45.7 million and $(6.0) million, respectively.

Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue upon meeting all of the following revenue recognition criteria, which is typically met upon shipment or delivery of our products to customers: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists through customer contracts and orders, (ii) the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership, (iii) the sales price charged is fixed or determinable as evidenced by customer contracts and orders, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Unbilled revenue relates to shipments that have been made to customers for which the related account receivable has not yet been billed.

In accordance with ASC 605-45, Revenue Recognition - Principal Agent Considerations, we generally report revenue on a gross basis because we are the primary obligor in our arrangements to procure printed materials and other products for our customers. Under these arrangements, we are responsible for the fulfillment, including the acceptability, of the printed materials and other products. In addition, we (i) determine which suppliers are included in our network, (ii) have discretion to select from among the suppliers within our network, (iii) are obligated to pay our suppliers regardless of whether we are paid by our customers, and (iv) have reasonable latitude to establish exchange price. In some transactions, we also have general inventory risk and are involved in the determination of the nature or characteristics of the printed materials and products. When we are not the primary obligor, revenues are reported net.

We recognize revenue for creative and other services provided to our customers which may be delivered in conjunction with the procurement of printed materials at the time when delivery and customer acceptance occur and all other revenue recognition criteria are met. We recognize revenue for creative and other services provided on a stand-alone basis upon completion of the service. Service revenue has not been material to our overall revenue to date.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reduced by an allowance that reflects management's best estimate of the amounts that will not be collected. Management individually reviews all accounts receivable balances and, based on an assessment of current creditworthiness, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be collected. These estimates of balances that will not be collected are based on historical write offs and recoveries of accounts receivables. The estimates of recovery can change based on actual experience and therefore can affect the level of reserves we place on existing accounts receivables. Fully reserved receivables are reviewed on a monthly basis and uncollectible accounts are written off when all reasonable collection efforts have been exhausted. At December 31, 2013, the gross accounts receivable balance includes approximately 2.3% of customer balances that are in excess of one year. We believe our reserve level is appropriate considering the quality of the portfolio as of December 31, 2013. While credit losses have historically been within expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee that our credit loss experience will continue to be consistent with historical experience.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired. In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, goodwill is not amortized, but instead is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a possible impairment may exist. Absent any interim indicators of impairment, we test for goodwill impairment as of December 31 of each year. The provisions of ASU 2011-08, "Testing Goodwill for Impairment," were adopted in the fourth quarter of 2012. ASU 2011-08 permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. If the quantitative test is required, in the first step, the fair value for each reporting unit is compared to its book value including goodwill. In the case that the fair value is less than the book value, a second step is performed which compares the implied fair value of goodwill to the book value of goodwill. The fair value for the goodwill is determined based on the difference between the fair value of the reporting unit and the net fair values of the identifiable assets and liabilities. If the implied fair value of the goodwill is less than the book value of the goodwill, the difference is recognized as an impairment.

We define our reportable operating segments as North America, Latin America and EMEA. For purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, we define our reporting units as the same three units. This change in the reporting units along with a decline in forecasted financial performance in 2013 compelled management to perform an interim goodwill impairment test for these reporting units as of September 30, 2013. In the first step of the impairment test, we concluded that the carrying amount of the EMEA reporting unit exceeded its fair value, requiring us to perform the second step of the impairment test to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The fair values of the North America and Latin America reporting units exceeded their carrying values, and the second step was not necessary.

Based upon fair value estimates of long-lived assets and discounted cash flows of the EMEA reporting unit, we compared the implied fair value of the goodwill in this reporting unit with the carrying value. The test resulted in a $37.9 million non-cash, goodwill impairment charge which was recognized in the third quarter of 2013. No tax benefit is recognized on the goodwill impairment. This charge had no impact on our cash flows or compliance with debt covenants.

The fair value estimates used in the goodwill impairment analysis required significant judgment. Our fair value estimates for purposes of determining the goodwill impairment charge are considered Level 3 fair value measurements. The fair value estimates were based on assumptions that management believes to be reasonable, but that are inherently uncertain, including estimates of future revenues and operating margins and assumptions about the overall economic climate and the competitive environment for the business.

At December 31, 2013, we elected to perform the quantitative impairment test for each of our three reporting units. In performing this test, we determined the fair value of the reporting units based on the income approach. Under the income approach, we calculated the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. No impairment was identified as of December 31, 2013 as a result of this test.

Intangible assets other than goodwill acquired in business combinations are recorded at fair value. We review each business acquisition to identify intangible assets other than goodwill acquired, which include customer lists, non-competition agreements, patents, trade names and trademarks. Our significant acquired intangible assets subject to estimation of fair value primarily include acquired customer lists. For customer list assets, the nature of the customer relationships makes an estimation of the reproduction or replacement costs highly subjective. As there is a specific earnings stream that can be associated exclusively with the customer relationships, we believe that the discounted cash flow method is the most appropriate valuation methodology to determine the fair value of the customer relationships.

ASC 350 also requires that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives to the estimated residual values and reviewed for impairment when impairment indicators exist. Our intangible assets consist of customer lists, trade names, noncompete agreements and patents. Our customer lists are being amortized using the economic useful life method over their estimated weighted-average useful lives of approximately 14 years. Our noncompete agreements, trade names and patents are being amortized on the straight-line basis over their estimated weighted-average useful lives. As of December 31, 2013, the net balance of our intangible assets was $56.6 million.

Contingent Purchase Consideration

In connection with certain of the Company's business acquisitions accounted for under ASC 805, contingent purchase consideration is payable in cash or stock upon the achievement of certain performance measures over future periods. For these acquisitions, the Company has estimated and recorded the fair value of the purchase consideration obligation, whereby fair value is determined based on the present value of the potential contingent purchase price. The Company has recorded $54.5 million and $87.3 million in contingent purchase consideration obligation at December 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. Changes in estimated fair value of the contingent purchase consideration obligation are recorded in the Company's results from operations. Adjustments to the estimated fair value of the contingent purchase consideration are based on estimates of probability of achievement of earnings targets based on actual results and forecasts of the earnings of the companies acquired. These forecast estimates can change based on macroeconomic conditions as well as the overall success of the business in retaining existing business and gaining new business.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation awards in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation . Compensation expense is measured by determining the fair value using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and is then recognized over the requisite service period of the awards, which is generally the vesting period, on a straight-line basis for the entire award. This valuation model requires assumptions, which impact the assumed fair value, including the expected life of the stock option, the risk-free interest rate, expected volatility of the Company's stock over the expected life and the expected dividend yield. The Company uses historical data to determine these assumptions and if these assumptions change significantly for future grants, share-based compensation expense will fluctuate in future years.

Expected term is estimated based on historical experience related to similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. We believe that historical experience provides the best estimate of future expected life. The risk-free interest rate is based on actual U.S. Treasury zero-coupon rates for bonds commensurate with the expected term. The expected volatility assumption is based on the historical volatility of our common stock over a period commensurate with the expected term.

Stock-based compensation cost recognized during the period is based on the portion of the share-based payment awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Accordingly, stock-based compensation cost recognized has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

The Company recorded $4.0 million, $6.2 million and $4.7 million in compensation expense related to stock-based compensation, for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

Income Taxes

We operate in numerous states and countries through our various subsidiaries, and must allocate our income, expenses, and earnings under the various laws and regulations of each of these taxing jurisdictions. Accordingly, our provision for income taxes represents our total estimate of the liability that we have incurred in doing business each year in all of our locations. Deferred income tax balances reflect the effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases and are stated at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. In determining whether we need to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, management must make a number of estimates, assumptions and judgments, including estimates of future earnings and taxable income. We establish a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount we believe is more likely than not to be realized. The determination to record or release valuation allowances requires significant judgment.

As a result of certain realization requirements of ASC 718, we have not recorded certain deferred tax assets that arose directly from tax deductions related to equity compensation that are greater than the compensation recognized for financial reporting. As of December 31, 2013, we have $3.1 million in tax deductions related to these stock option exercises which have not been recorded but are available to reduce taxable income in future periods. These deductions will be recorded to additional paid in capital in the period in which they are realized.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, which requires an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. These requirements are effective for public companies for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. We adopted ASU 2013-02 in the first quarter of 2013.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth our consolidated statements of income data for the periods presented as a percentage of our revenue:

                                        Years ended December 31,
                                    2011            2012          2013
                                (as restated)   (as restated)
Consolidated statements of
income data:
Revenue                                 100.0 %         100.0 %    100.0 %
Cost of goods sold                       76.7            77.5       77.3

Gross profit                             23.3            22.5       22.7
Selling, general and
administrative expenses                  18.3            18.5       20.6
Depreciation and amortization             1.6             1.4        1.5
Change in fair value of
contingent consideration                (0.3)           (3.5)      (3.5)
Preference claim settlement
charge                                    0.2             0.1          -
VAT settlement charge                       -             0.2          -
Goodwill impairment charge                  -               -        4.3
Restructuring and other
charges                                     -               -        0.5

Income (loss) from operations             3.5             5.8      (0.7)
Other income (expense)                    0.3           (0.1)      (0.4)

Income (loss) before income
taxes                                     3.8             5.7      (1.0)
Income tax expense (benefit)              1.2             0.7      (0.1)

Net income (loss)                         2.6 %           4.9 %    (1.0) %

Comparison of years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013


Our revenue by segment for each of the years presented was as follows:

. . .
  Add INWK to Portfolio     Set Alert         Email to a Friend  
Get SEC Filings for Another Symbol: Symbol Lookup
Quotes & Info for INWK - All Recent SEC Filings
Copyright © 2015 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
SEC Filing data and information provided by EDGAR Online, Inc. (1-800-416-6651). All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.