Search the web
Welcome, Guest
[Sign Out, My Account]
EDGAR_Online

Quotes & Info
Enter Symbol(s):
e.g. YHOO, ^DJI
Symbol Lookup | Financial Search
HOME > SEC Filings for HOME > Form 10-K on 17-Mar-2014All Recent SEC Filings

Show all filings for HOME FEDERAL BANCORP, INC.

Form 10-K for HOME FEDERAL BANCORP, INC.


17-Mar-2014

Annual Report


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

GENERAL

Our primary source of revenue and earnings is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, which is the income that we earn on our loans and investments, and interest expense, which is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Changes in levels of interest rates affect our net interest income. We diversify the mix of our assets by reducing the percentage of our assets that are long-term, fixed-rate one-to-four family residential loans and increasing the percentage of our assets consisting of commercial loans that we believe have higher risk-adjusted returns and less interest rate risk than long-term fixed-rate one-to-four family residential loans.

Our operating expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits, occupancy and equipment, data processing, and professional services expenses. Compensation and benefits consist primarily of the salaries and wages paid to our employees, non-cash expense related to our stock-based and deferred compensation plans, our 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (KSOP), payroll taxes, and other employee benefits. Occupancy and equipment expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of building and equipment, consist primarily of lease payments, taxes, depreciation charges, maintenance and costs of utilities.

Our results of operations may also be affected significantly by general and local economic and competitive conditions, changes in market interest rates, governmental policies and actions of regulatory authorities. See "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional discussion on the risks we face related to these items.

We entered into two purchase and assumption agreements with the FDIC to purchase certain assets and assume certain liabilities of Community First Bank, Prineville, Oregon, and LibertyBank, Eugene, Oregon, on August 7, 2009, and July 30, 2010, respectively. The acquisitions increased our total assets by $880 million, based on the fair value of assets purchased on the acquisition dates. These acquisitions have been reported on a prospective basis in the accompanying financial statements. Nearly all loans, leases and real estate owned acquired in both FDIC-assisted transactions are covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements which significantly reduce the Company's credit loss exposure. We refer to these assets as "covered assets." Loans and REO in the Bank's organic operations and purchased assets not included in the loss sharing agreements are referred to as "noncovered assets." We expect to recover 80% of losses and certain expenses associated with the covered assets of Community First Bank on the first $34 million of losses. After that, we expect to recover 95% of losses and expenses on those covered assets. We expect to recover 80% of losses and certain expenses associated with the covered assets of LibertyBank. The loss sharing agreements for covered assets that are non-single family loans and REO expire five years from the acquisition date, which will be in September 2014 for covered assets in the CFB Acquisition and September 2015 for the LibertyBank Acquisition. The loss sharing agreements provide indemnification for losses on single-family loans and REO for a period of 10 years from the acquisition date. After the expiration of the loss sharing agreements, we will no longer be protected against credit losses through FDIC indemnification.

OVERVIEW

After a year of stablization, fiscal year 2013, became a year of tremendous change for the Company. The year began with the closing of four branches located in Grants Pass, Medford and Bend, Oregon in February 2013. We determined these branches were least likely to provide profitable returns in the long-term and decided to close them and transition clients to our nearest branch upon closure. However, we opened a builder finance loan production office near Salt Lake City in 2013, which came on the heals of a new Portland loan production office in 2012 . These new offices were opened in response to a reviving residential construction environment and in recognition of the talent in our Builder Finance Team. We recognize the higher inherent risk in construction loans, but believe we have strong underwriting criteria and credit administration procedures as loan approval and construction site inspections are performed by our Credit Administration Team, which is not compensated based on loan production. Construction loans increased $22.1 million during 2013.

The most significant transaction in 2013 was the execution of a merger agreement with Cascade Bancorp (Cascade), whereby Cascade will acquire the Company and the Bank will be merged into Cascade's subsidiary, Bank of the Cascades. The Company previously entered into a merger agreement (Banner Agreement) with Banner Corporation (Banner) that included a 30-day "go shop" period, during which the Company could consider other acquisition proposals and if a proposal was determined by the Company's board of directors to be a Superior Proposal (as defined in the Banner Agreement), the termination fee under the Banner Agreement was reduced. Cascade submitted a Superior


Table of Contents

Proposal and the Company's board of directors terminated the Banner Agreement and executed the Cascade Agreement. The termination fee under the Banner Agreement was $3.0 million. We believe the merger with Cascade will be consummated in the second quarter of 2014.

Asset quality continued to improve during 2013 as nonperforming loans declined $7.9 million to $6.5 million at December 31, 2013, compared to $14.4 million at December 31, 2012. REO also declined $5.6 million during that period to $4.8 million at December 31, 2013. We also experienced declining delinquencies and fewer classified and criticized loans during 2013, which we believe provides momentum for continued improvement in asset quality in 2014. As a result of improved asset quality, we recorded a reverse provision for loan losses on noncovered loans in 2013.

In addition to the events discussed above, the following list summarizes additional key strategic initiatives undertaken by management and factors affecting the Company's performance during 2013:

         We continued to execute our strategy of reducing reliance on high-cost
          certificates of deposit and borrowings as core deposits (defined as
          interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing checking, savings and money
          market accounts) increased to 79.4% of total deposits at December 31,
          2013, compared to 75.4% at December 31, 2012;


         Nonperforming assets decreased $13.5 million from December 31, 2012 to
          December 31, 2013, and nonperforming noncovered loans declined to 1.14%
          of noncovered loans at December 31, 2013, compared to 2.88% at
          December 31, 2012;


         Economic conditions in our primary markets improved as unemployment,
          bankruptcies and foreclosures generally declined during 2013 and real
          estate values improved significantly;


         Noninterest expenses declined $0.8 million during the year ended
          December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012, but
          merger-related expenses totaled $3.7 million in 2013, masking continued
          improvement in operating efficiency;


         The Company maintained its strong capital position with a total
          risk-based capital ratio of 37.18% and a Tier-1capital ratio of 16.12%
          at December 31, 2013; and


         The Company continued paying quarterly dividends during 2013, paying
          $0.24 per share in regular dividends.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as disclosures found elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are based upon the Company's consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical in the preparation of financial statements. These factors include, among other things, whether the estimates are significant to the financial statements, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including third parties or available prices, and sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be utilized under US GAAP.

Management has identified several accounting policies that, due to the judgments, estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies, are critical to an understanding of our financial statements. These policies relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses (including the evaluation of impaired loans and the associated provision for loan losses), accounting for acquired loans and covered assets, the valuation of noncovered real estate owned, as well as deferred income taxes and the associated income tax expense. Management reviews the allowance for loan losses for adequacy on a quarterly basis and establishes a provision for loan losses that it believes is sufficient for the loan portfolio growth expected and the loan quality of the existing portfolio. The carrying value of real estate owned is also assessed on a quarterly basis. Income tax expense and deferred income taxes are calculated using an estimated tax rate and are based on management's and our tax advisor's understanding of our effective tax rate and the tax code. These estimates are reviewed by our independent auditor on an annual basis and by our regulators when they examine Home Federal Bank.

Allowance for Loan Losses. Management recognizes that losses may occur over the life of a loan and that the allowance for loan losses must be maintained at a level necessary to absorb specific losses on impaired loans and probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management assesses the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis by analyzing several factors including delinquency rates, charge-off rates and the changing risk profile of the Bank's loan portfolio,


Table of Contents

as well as local economic conditions such as unemployment rates, bankruptcies and vacancy rates of business and residential properties.

The Company believes that the accounting estimate related to the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting estimate because it is highly susceptible to change from period to period, requiring management to make assumptions about probable incurred losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The impact of a sudden large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings.

The Company's methodology for analyzing the allowance for loan losses consists of specific allocations on significant individual credits and a general allowance amount, including a range of losses. The specific allowance component is determined when management believes that the collectability of an individually reviewed loan has been impaired and a loss is probable. The general allowance component relates to assets with no well-defined deficiency or weakness and takes into consideration loss that is inherent within the portfolio but has not been identified. The general allowance is determined by applying a historical loss percentage to various types of loans with similar characteristics and classified loans that are not analyzed specifically. Adjustments are made to historical loss percentages to reflect current economic and internal environmental factors such as changes in underwriting standards and unemployment rates that may increase or decrease those loss factors. As a result of the imprecision in calculating inherent and potential losses, a range is added to the general allowance to provide an allowance for loan losses that is adequate to cover losses that may arise as a result of changing economic conditions and other qualitative factors that may alter historical loss experience.

The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is charged against current period operating results and decreased by the amount of actual loan charge-offs, net of recoveries. Provisions for losses on covered loans are recorded gross of recoverable amounts from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements. The recoverable portion of the provision for loan losses on covered loans is recorded in other income.

The allowance for loan losses on noncovered originated loans consists of specific reserves allocated to individually reviewed loans and general reserves on all other noncovered originated loans. Commencing in April 2011, management changed its accounting policy for specific allowances on noncovered originated loans in process of foreclosure. Previously, the Bank would maintain a specific reserve on these noncovered impaired loans. Since April 2011, such deficiencies on loans in process of foreclosure are classified as "Loss" under our credit grading process and the loan balance is charged down to the estimated net recoverable value, which removes the specific reserve previously recorded. A general allowance for loan losses is recorded on loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition that are not accounted for under ASC 310-30. Loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition that are accounted for under ASC 310-30 are partially charged down to the estimated net recoverable value if estimated losses exceed the fair value discount established on the acquisition date. Lastly, an allowance for loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition is not established unless the net present value of cash flows expected to be received for loans in the acquired loan pools become impaired.

The Company also estimates a reserve related to unfunded loan commitments. In assessing the adequacy of the reserve, the Company uses a similar approach used in the development of the allowance for loan losses. The reserve for unfunded loan commitments is included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The provision for unfunded commitments is charged to noninterest expense.

Acquired Loans. Loans acquired in the CFB Acquisition were valued as of the acquisition date in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. At the time of the CFB Acquisition, the Company applied SFAS No. 141, which was superseded by SFAS No. 141(R). The Company was not permitted to adopt SFAS No. 141(R) prior to its effective date, which was October 1, 2009, due to the Company's September fiscal year end. ASC Topic 310-30 applies to a loan with evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination, acquired by completion of a transfer for which it is probable, at acquisition, that the investor will be unable to collect all contractually required payments receivable. For loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition that were accounted for under ASC 310-30, management determined the value of the loan portfolio based on work provided by an appraiser. Factors considered in the valuation were projected cash flows for the loans, type of loan and related collateral, classification status and current discount rates. Management also estimated the amount of credit losses that were expected to be realized for the loan portfolio primarily by estimating the liquidation value of collateral securing loans on non-accrual status or classified as substandard or doubtful. At December 31, 2012, a majority of these loans were valued based on the liquidation value of the underlying collateral, because the expected cash flows are primarily based on the liquidation of the underlying collateral. Loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition accounted for under ASC 310-30 were not aggregated into pools


Table of Contents

and are accounted for on a loan-by-loan basis. An allowance for loan losses was established for loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition that are not accounted for under ASC 310-30.

Loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition were valued as of acquisition date in accordance with ASC 805 Business Combinations, formerly SFAS 141(R). Further, the Company elected to account for all other loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition within the scope of ASC 310-30 using the same methodology. Under ASC 805 and ASC 310-30, loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition were recorded at fair value at acquisition date, factoring in credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Accordingly, an allowance for loan losses is not carried over or recorded as of the acquisition date, unlike the loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition, which are accounted for under previous guidance as described above. In situations where loans have similar risk characteristics, loans were aggregated into pools to estimate cash flows under ASC 310-30. A pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single interest rate, cumulative loss rate and cash flow expectation. The Company aggregated all of the loans purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition into 22 different pools, based on common risk characteristics such as loan classification, loan structure, nonaccrual status and collateral type.

The cash flows expected over the life of the pools are estimated using an internal cash flow model that projects cash flows and calculates the carrying values of the pools, book yields, effective interest income and impairment, if any, based on pool level events. Assumptions as to cumulative loss rates, loss curves and prepayment speeds are utilized to calculate the expected cash flows. Under ASC 310-30, the excess of the expected cash flows at acquisition over the fair value is considered to be the accretable yield and is recognized as interest income over the life of the loan or pool. The excess of the contractual cash flows over the expected cash flows is considered to be the nonaccretable difference. Subsequent increases in cash flow over those expected at purchase date in excess of fair value are recorded as an adjustment to accretable difference on a prospective basis. Any subsequent decreases in cash flow over those expected at purchase date are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses. Any disposals of loans, including sales of loans, payments in full or foreclosures result in the removal of the loan from the ASC 310-30 portfolio at the carrying amount.

Covered Assets. All of the loans purchased in the CFB Acquisition and nearly all of loans and leases purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition are included under various loss sharing agreements with the FDIC and are referred to as "covered loans." Covered loans, and provisions for loan losses, charge offs and recoveries, are reported exclusive of the expected cash flow reimbursements expected from the FDIC. All REO acquired in the CFB Acquisition and the LibertyBank Acquisition are also included in the loss sharing agreements and are referred to as "covered REO." Covered REO is reported exclusive of expected reimbursement cash flows from the FDIC. Upon transferring covered loan collateral to covered REO status, acquisition date fair value discounts on the related loan are also transferred to covered REO. Fair value adjustments on covered REO result in a reduction of the covered REO carrying amount and a corresponding increase in the estimated FDIC reimbursement, with the estimated net loss to the Bank charged against earnings. The Bank is reimbursed by the FDIC on losses and reimbursable expenses on covered assets purchased in the CFB Acquisition at a rate of 80% on the first $34.0 million of losses and at a rate of 95% on losses thereafter. The Bank is reimbursed by the FDIC on losses and reimbursable expenses on covered assets purchased in the LibertyBank Acquisition at a rate of 80%.

FDIC Indemnification Asset. In conjunction with the CFB Acquisition and the LibertyBank Acquisition, the Bank entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC for amounts receivable under the loss sharing agreements. In some cases the FDIC indemnification agreement may be terminated on a loan by loan basis if the Bank renews or extends individual loans. At each acquisition date the Company elected to account for amounts receivable under the loss sharing agreements as an indemnification asset. Subsequent to the acquisitions the indemnification asset is tied to the loss in the covered loans and is not being accounted for under fair value. The FDIC indemnification asset is accounted for on the same basis as the related covered loans and represents the present value of the cash flows the Company expects to collect from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements. The difference between the present value and the undiscounted cash flow the Company expects to collect from the FDIC is accreted or amortized into noninterest income over the life of the FDIC indemnification asset.

The FDIC indemnification asset is adjusted for any changes in expected cash flows based on the loan performance. Any increases in cash flow of the loans over those expected will reduce the FDIC indemnification asset and any decreases in cash flow of the loans over those expected will increase the FDIC indemnification asset. The FDIC indemnification asset will be reduced as losses are recognized on covered assets, if losses in future periods are projected to decline, and loss sharing payments are received from the FDIC. Increases and decreases to the FDIC indemnification asset are recorded as adjustments to noninterest income.


Table of Contents

Noncovered Real Estate Owned. Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure that are not covered under a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC (noncovered REO) are initially recorded at fair value at the date of foreclosure minus estimated costs to sell. Any valuation adjustments required at the time of foreclosure are charged to the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure, the properties are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Any subsequent valuation adjustments, operating expenses or income, and gains and losses on disposition of such properties are recognized in current operations. The valuation allowance is established based on our historical realization of losses and adjusted for current market trends.

Deferred Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are reported for temporary differences between items of income or expense reported in the financial statements and those reported for income tax purposes. Deferred taxes are computed using the asset and liability approach as prescribed in ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. Under this method, a deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the enacted tax rates that will be in effect when the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and tax basis of existing assets and liabilities are expected to be reported in an institution's income tax returns. The deferred tax provision for the year is equal to the net change in the net deferred tax asset from the beginning to the end of the year, less amounts applicable to the change in value related to investments available-for-sale. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized as income in the period that includes the enactment date. The primary differences between financial statement income and taxable income result from depreciation expense, mortgage servicing rights, loan loss reserves, deferred compensation, mark to market adjustments on our available-for-sale securities, and dividends received from the FHLB of Seattle. Deferred income taxes do not include a liability for pre-1988 bad debt deductions allowed to thrift institutions that may be recaptured if the institution fails to qualify as a bank for income tax purposes in the future.

COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012

Total assets decreased $46.2 million, or 4.4%, since December 31, 2012 to $1.0
billion at December 31, 2013. Total liabilities decreased $35.5 million, or
4.1%, to $833.4 million at December 31, 2013. These decreases were primarily a
result of the maturity and repayment of certificates of deposit and the decline
of investments during the period.

Assets. The decrease in total assets was primarily concentrated in the following
asset categories (dollars in thousands):
                                            December 31,                    Decrease
                                         2013           2012          Amount        Percent
Cash and amounts due from depository
institutions                         $  107,000     $  115,529     $   (8,529 )        (7.4 )%
Investments available-for-sale, at
fair value                              390,648        420,505        (29,857 )        (7.1 )
Loans receivable, net of allowance
for loan losses                         407,451        409,846         (2,395 )        (0.6 )
Real estate owned and other
repossessed assets                        4,756         10,386         (5,630 )       (54.2 )
FDIC indemnification receivable, net      4,914         10,846         (5,932 )       (54.7 )

Cash and Amounts Due From Depository Institutions. The $8.5 million decrease in cash and equivalents to $107.0 million at December 31, 2013 from $115.5 million at December 31, 2012, was primarily due to maturing certificates of deposit that were not renewed, reflecting our strategy of allowing higher cost certificates of deposit to decline. We anticipate, subject to market conditions, that we will maintain higher than average liquidity in order to meet the demand of maturing certificates of deposit, prepare for the potential of rising interest rates.

Investments. Investments decreased $29.9 million, or 7.1% to $390.6 million at December 31, 2013 from $420.5 million at December 31, 2012. Our purchases of investments in 2012 and 2013, have focused on high-quality investments with an average life, of approximately 4.0 to 5.5 years. We have given preference to medium-term securities in anticipation of rising interest rates and increases in loan demand. Additionally, we believe our strategy mitigates price sensitivity to protect capital if we need to sell significant amounts of securities in the future to increase liquidity. We estimate the effective duration of our investment portfolio to be 4.7 years at December 31, 2013, compared to 3.0 years at December 31, 2012. This increase was primarily due to the purchase of a long-term U.S. Treasury bond during 2013.

We continually analyze our investment portfolio to improve and optimize total return. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we were able to purchase and sell U.S. Treasury bonds and certain mortgage-backed securities, recording pre-tax gains of $485,000 due to price volatility and a rally in the bond market in the first half of 2013. Long-term rates rose significantly during the second half of 2013 but we did not purchase investments due to the pending merger with Cascade.


Table of Contents

Nearly all of Company's mortgage-backed securities are issued by U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae. At December 31, 2013, we held one private label security with a fair value of $231,000 which carried a Moody's rating of Ba3. Management has reviewed the delinquency status, credit support and collateral coverage of the loans pooled in this security and has concluded it was not other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2013.

Loans and Leases. Loans and leases receivable, net, decreased $2.4 million to . . .

  Add HOME to Portfolio     Set Alert         Email to a Friend  
Get SEC Filings for Another Symbol: Symbol Lookup
Quotes & Info for HOME - All Recent SEC Filings
Copyright © 2014 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
SEC Filing data and information provided by EDGAR Online, Inc. (1-800-416-6651). All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.