Search the web
Welcome, Guest
[Sign Out, My Account]
EDGAR_Online

Quotes & Info
Enter Symbol(s):
e.g. YHOO, ^DJI
Symbol Lookup | Financial Search
NSIT > SEC Filings for NSIT > Form 10-K on 21-Feb-2014All Recent SEC Filings

Show all filings for INSIGHT ENTERPRISES INC

Form 10-K for INSIGHT ENTERPRISES INC


21-Feb-2014

Annual Report


Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of our operations should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in Part II, Item 8 of this report. Our actual results could differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including those discussed in "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A and elsewhere in this report.

Overview

We are a global provider of information technology ("IT") hardware, software and services solutions to businesses and public sector institutions in North America; Europe, the Middle East, Africa ("EMEA"); and Asia-Pacific ("APAC"). Currently, our offerings in North America and select countries in EMEA include IT hardware, software and services. Our offerings in the remainder of our EMEA segment and in APAC are almost entirely software and select software-related services.

Our vision is to be the trusted advisor to our clients, helping them enhance business performance through innovative technology solutions. Our strategy is to grow market share and profitability by delivering relevant product, service and solutions offerings to our clients on a scalable support and delivery platform.

For the full year 2013, our consolidated financial results did not meet our expectations, but we saw improvement in the second through the fourth quarter, after the slow start in the first quarter of 2013. For example:

Consolidated hardware sales for the full year 2013 declined 5%. However, we saw sequential growth each quarter beginning in the second quarter of 2013 and exited the year with a stronger run-rate in this category;

Software product sales grew year over year for the full year 2013, but reported net sales declined slightly because of a higher mix of software maintenance sales, which are reported on a net basis in our financial statements;

We executed well in mitigating the negative effects of partner program changes, realizing a decline in incentives from our largest software partner of $4 million compared to the amount we earned in 2012, a strong performance compared to our initial expected range for the reduction of gross profit of between $8 to $12 million; and

We grew our services sales by 3% year over year at higher gross margins than we saw in 2012.

On a consolidated basis, for the year ended December 31, 2013, our net sales declined 3% to $5.1 billion, as growth in the services category was more than offset by declines in hardware and software. Our resulting gross profit decreased by $20.8 million, or 3%, while gross margin remained flat at 13.6% of net sales. Selling and administrative expenses decreased $296,000, or less than 1%, in 2013 compared to 2012 as the costs of our investments in our sales and services resources in North America were offset by lower expenses in EMEA from restructuring actions taken during the year. We reported earnings from operations of $121.2 million in 2013, a decline of 18% compared to the prior year, which represented 2.4% of net sales, compared to 2.8% in the prior year. Our effective tax rate in 2013 was 38.0% compared to 35.9% in 2012 and 29.3% in 2011. The increase in the tax rate from 2012 to 2013 was primarily due to higher losses in certain foreign jurisdictions in 2013, resulting in an increase in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets related to these foreign operating losses. The 2011 effective tax rate was lower than recent years as a result of the discrete tax benefits recognized during 2011, as detailed below. Net earnings and diluted net earnings per share were $71.0 million and $1.64, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013. In 2012, we reported net earnings of $92.8 million and diluted net earnings per share of $2.07. In 2011, we reported net earnings of $100.2 million and diluted net earnings per share of $2.18.

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 include the following items:

severance and restructuring expenses of $12.7 million, $9.8 million net of tax; and

the repurchase of approximately 3.0 million shares of the Company's common stock for $57.8 million.


Table of Contents

INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 include the following items:

severance and restructuring expenses of $6.3 million, $4.3 million net of tax;

a reduction in legal expenses of approximately $2.0 million associated with the recovery of legal fees incurred in previous periods;

an operating gain of $1.2 million on the sale of a portfolio of non-core service contracts; and

a non-operating gain on bargain purchase of $2.0 million as the fair value of the net assets acquired exceeded the purchase price paid by the Company for Inmac.

The results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 include the following items:

severance and restructuring expenses of $5.1 million, $3.4 million net of tax;

tax benefits of $8.6 million primarily related to the recognition of foreign tax credits upon the reorganization of certain of our foreign operations and to other tax matters; and

the repurchase of approximately 2.9 million shares of the Company's common stock for $50.0 million.

Net of tax amounts referenced above were computed using the statutory tax rate for the taxing jurisdictions in the operating segment in which the related expenses were recorded, adjusted for the effects of valuation allowances on net operating losses in certain jurisdictions.

Effective February 1, 2012, we acquired Inmac, a broad portfolio business-to-business hardware reseller based in Frankfurt, Germany and Amsterdam, Netherlands servicing clients in Western Europe. We believe that this acquisition supports our strategic plan to expand hardware capabilities into key markets in our existing European footprint.

Effective October 1, 2011, we acquired Ensynch, a leading professional services firm with multiple Microsoft Gold competencies across the complete Microsoft solution set, including cloud migration and management. The acquisition of Ensynch did not have a significant effect on results of operations in 2011.

During 2013, we generated $76.1 million of cash flows from operations. We repurchased $57.8 million of our common stock and utilized $19.0 million to fund capital investments primarily associated with our IT systems upgrades. During the year, we made combined net repayments of $13.5 million under our senior revolving credit facility and our accounts receivable securitization financing facility. We ended the year with $126.8 million of cash and cash equivalents and $66.5 million of debt outstanding under our long-term facilities.

As previously disclosed, our largest software partner has changed its channel incentive program beginning in October 2013. The changes vary in substance and timing across this partner's offerings. Some of the changes became effective in the fourth quarter of 2013, and some become effective as client contracts renew under their stated terms over the next few years. We currently believe that we will receive between $15 and $20 million less in incentives from this partner in 2014. We are taking the necessary strategic steps to preserve our profitability and have identified actions associated with new business and cost reduction measures in 2014 that we expect will offset the adverse effect of these changes.

Details about segment results of operations can be found in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is intended to assist in the understanding of our consolidated financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those consolidated financial statements from year to year and the primary factors that contributed to those changes, as well as how certain critical accounting estimates affect our consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents

INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

Critical Accounting Estimates

General

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). For a summary of significant accounting policies, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results, however, may differ from our estimates. Members of our senior management have discussed the critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.

We consider the following to be our critical accounting estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

Sales Recognition

Sales are recognized when title and risk of loss are passed to the client, there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement for sale, delivery has occurred and/or services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Our standard sales terms are F.O.B. shipping point or equivalent, at which time title and risk of loss have passed to the client. However, because we either (i) have a general practice of covering client losses while products are in transit despite title and risk of loss contractually transferring at the point of shipment or (ii) have specifically stated F.O.B. destination contractual terms with the client, delivery is not deemed to have occurred until the point in time when the product is received by the client.

We make provisions for estimated product returns that we expect to occur under our return policy based upon historical return rates. Our manufacturers warrant most of the products we market, and it is our policy to request that clients return their defective products directly to the manufacturer for warranty service. On selected products, and for selected client service reasons, we may accept returns directly from the client and then either credit the client or ship a replacement product. We generally offer a limited 15- to 30-day return policy for unopened products and certain opened products, which are consistent with manufacturers' terms; however, for some products we may charge restocking fees. Products returned opened are processed and returned to the manufacturer or partner for repair, replacement or credit to us. We resell most unopened products returned to us. Subject to some manufacturers' restrictions, products that cannot be returned to the manufacturer for warranty processing, but are in working condition, are sold to inventory liquidators, to end users as "previously sold" or "used" products, or through other channels to reduce our losses from returned products.

We record the freight we bill to our clients as net sales and the related freight costs we pay as costs of goods sold. We report sales net of any sales-based taxes assessed by governmental authorities that are imposed on and concurrent with sales transactions.

Revenue is recognized from software sales when clients acquire the right to use or copy software under license, but in no case prior to the commencement of the term of the initial software license agreement, provided that all other revenue recognition criteria have been met (i.e., evidence of the arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility of the fee is probable).

The sale of hardware and software products may also include the provision of services, and the associated contracts may contain multiple elements or non-standard terms and conditions. Services that are performed by us in conjunction with hardware and software sales that are completed in our facilities prior to shipment of the product are recognized upon delivery, when title passes to the client, for the hardware sale. Net sales of services that are performed at client locations are often service-only contracts and are recorded as sales when the services are performed. If the services are performed at a client location in conjunction with a hardware, software or other services sale, we recognize net sales for each portion of the overall arrangement fee that is attributable to the items as they are delivered or the services are performed. At the inception of the arrangement, the total consideration for the arrangement is allocated to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. The relative selling price method allocates any discount in the arrangement proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverable's selling price. We determine our best estimate of selling price in a manner that is consistent with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis. The revenue allocation is based on vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value of the products. We currently do not have any material instances in which we account for revenue from multiple element arrangements when vendor-specific evidence does not exist. If vendor-specific objective evidence were not available, we would utilize third-party evidence to allocate the selling price. If neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence were available, estimated selling price would be used for allocation purposes.


Table of Contents

INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

We sell certain third-party service contracts and software maintenance or subscription products for which we are not the primary obligor. These sales do not meet the criteria for gross sales recognition and, thus, are recorded on a net sales recognition basis. As we enter into contracts with third-party service providers or vendors and our clients, we evaluate whether the subsequent sales of such services should be recorded as gross sales or net sales. We determine whether we act as a principal in the transaction and assume the risks and rewards of ownership or if we are simply acting as an agent or broker. Under gross sales recognition, the selling price is recorded in sales and our cost to the third-party service provider or vendor is recorded in costs of goods sold. Under net sales recognition, the cost to the third-party service provider or vendor is recorded as a reduction to sales, resulting in net sales equal to the gross profit on the transaction, and there are no costs of goods sold.

We recognize revenue for sales of services ratably over the time period over which the service will be provided if there is no discernible pattern of recognition of the cost to perform the service. Billings for such services that are made in advance of the related revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized as revenue ratably over the billing coverage period. Revenue from certain arrangements that allow for the use of a product or service over a period of time without taking possession of software are also accounted for ratably over the time period over which the service will be provided.

We recognize revenue for professional services engagements that are on a time and materials basis based upon hours incurred as the services are performed and amounts are earned.

Additionally, we sell certain professional services contracts on a fixed fee basis. Revenues for fixed fee professional services contracts are recognized based on the ratio of costs incurred to total estimated costs. Net sales for these service contracts are not a significant portion of our consolidated net sales.

Partner Funding

We receive payments and credits from partners, including consideration pursuant to volume sales incentive programs, volume purchase incentive programs and shared marketing expense programs. Partner funding received pursuant to volume sales incentive programs is recognized as it is earned as a reduction to costs of goods sold. Partner funding received pursuant to volume purchase incentive programs is allocated as a reduction to inventories based on the applicable incentives earned from each partner and is recorded in costs of goods sold as the related inventory is sold. Partner funding received pursuant to shared marketing expense programs is recorded as it is earned as a reduction of the related selling and administrative expenses in the period the program takes place only if the consideration represents a reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs. Consideration that exceeds the specific, incremental, identifiable costs is classified as a reduction of costs of goods sold. Changes in estimates of anticipated achievement levels under individual partner programs may materially affect our results of operations and our cash flows.

See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further discussion of our accounting policies related to partner funding.

Stock-Based Compensation

We recognize stock-based compensation net of an estimated forfeiture rate and only recognize compensation expense for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award. We primarily issue service-based and performance-based restricted stock units ("RSUs"). The number of RSUs ultimately awarded under performance-based RSUs varies based on whether we achieve certain financial results. We record compensation expense each period based on our estimate of the most probable number of RSUs that will be issued under the grants of performance-based RSUs. For any stock options awarded, modifications to previous awards or awards of RSUs that are tied to specified market conditions, we use option pricing models or lattice (binomial) models to determine fair value of the awards.


Table of Contents

INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

No stock options were granted and no stock-based compensation expense related to stock options was recognized during the three years ended December 31, 2013. All previously granted unexercised stock options expired in December 2012. If we decide to issue stock options in the future, the estimated fair value of stock options will be determined on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton ("Black-Scholes") option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes model requires us to apply highly subjective assumptions, including expected stock price volatility, expected life of the option and the risk-free interest rate. A change in one or more of the assumptions used in the option-pricing model could result in a material change to the estimated fair value of the stock-based compensation.

See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further discussion of stock-based compensation.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Our allowance for doubtful accounts is determined using estimated losses on accounts receivable based on evaluation of the aging of the receivables, historical write-offs and the current economic environment. Should our clients' or vendors' circumstances change or actual collections of client and vendor receivables differ from our estimates, adjustments to the provision for losses on accounts receivable and the related allowances for doubtful accounts would be recorded. See further information on our allowance for doubtful accounts in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

Inventories

We evaluate inventories for excess, obsolescence or other factors that may render inventories unmarketable at expected margins. Write-downs are recorded so that inventories reflect the approximate net realizable value and take into account our contractual provisions with our partners governing price protection, stock rotation and return privileges relating to obsolescence. Because of the large number of transactions and the complexity of managing the price protection and stock rotation process, estimates are made regarding write-downs of the carrying amount of inventories. Additionally, assumptions about future demand, market conditions and decisions by manufacturers/publishers to discontinue certain products or product lines can affect our decision to write down inventories. If our assumptions about future demand change or actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected, additional write-downs of inventories may be required. In any case, actual values could be different from those estimated.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets Including Purchased Intangible Assets and Goodwill

We review property, plant and equipment and purchased intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. If such events or changes in circumstances indicate a possible impairment, our asset impairment review assesses the recoverability of the assets based on the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset plus net proceeds expected from disposition of the asset (if any) and compares that value to the carrying value. Such impairment test is based on the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets and liabilities. If the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between fair value and the carrying amount. This approach uses our estimates of future market growth, forecasted net sales and costs, expected periods the assets will be utilized and appropriate discount rates.

We perform an annual review of our goodwill in the fourth quarter of every year, or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist, to determine if the carrying value of our recorded goodwill is impaired. We continually assess whether any indicators of impairment exist, and that assessment requires a significant amount of judgment. Events or circumstances that could trigger an impairment review include a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, unanticipated competition, significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business, significant negative industry or economic trends, significant declines in our stock price for a sustained period or significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future cash flows or results of operations. Any adverse change in these factors, among others, could have a significant effect on the recoverability of goodwill and could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents

INSIGHT ENTERPRISES, INC.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)

The goodwill impairment test is performed at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a "component"). A component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and management of the segment regularly reviews the operating results of that component. When two or more components of an operating segment have similar economic characteristics, the components may be aggregated and deemed a single reporting unit. An operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar, if none of its components is a reporting unit, or if the segment comprises only a single component. Insight has three reporting units, which are equivalent to our operating segments.

We may first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is necessary to perform a quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test. Otherwise, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. In completing a quantitative test for a potential impairment of goodwill, we first compare the estimated fair value of each reporting unit in which the goodwill resides to its book value, including goodwill. Management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of our reporting units. Multiple valuation techniques can be used to assess the fair value of the reporting unit, including the market and income approaches. All of these techniques include the use of estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value or goodwill impairment, or both. These estimates and assumptions primarily include, but are not limited to, an appropriate control premium in excess of the market capitalization of the Company, future market growth, forecasted sales and costs and appropriate discount rates. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making these estimates, actual results could differ from those estimates. Management evaluates the merits of each significant assumption, both individually and in the aggregate, used to determine the fair value of the reporting units. If the estimated fair value exceeds book value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired and no additional steps are necessary. To ensure the reasonableness of the estimated fair values of our reporting units, we perform a reconciliation of our total market capitalization to the estimated fair value of all of our reporting units.

If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its book value, then we are required to perform the second step of the impairment analysis by comparing the carrying amount of the goodwill with its implied fair value. In step two of the analysis, we utilize the fair value of the reporting unit computed in the first step to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. The difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in step one and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill. Management must also apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of these individual assets and liabilities and may include independent valuations of certain internally generated and unrecognized intangible assets, such as trademarks. Management also evaluates the merits of each significant assumption, both individually and in the aggregate, used to determine the fair values of these individual assets and . . .

  Add NSIT to Portfolio     Set Alert         Email to a Friend  
Get SEC Filings for Another Symbol: Symbol Lookup
Quotes & Info for NSIT - All Recent SEC Filings
Copyright © 2014 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
SEC Filing data and information provided by EDGAR Online, Inc. (1-800-416-6651). All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.