Search the web
Welcome, Guest
[Sign Out, My Account]

Quotes & Info
Enter Symbol(s):
e.g. YHOO, ^DJI
Symbol Lookup | Financial Search
CAC > SEC Filings for CAC > Form 10-Q on 2-Aug-2013All Recent SEC Filings

Show all filings for CAMDEN NATIONAL CORP



Quarterly Report



The discussions set forth below and in the documents we incorporate by reference herein contain certain statements that may be considered forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including certain plans, exceptions, goals, projections, and statements, which are subject to numerous risks, assumptions, and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of the words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "assume," "plan," "target," or "goal" or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "may," "might," "should," "could" and other expressions which predict or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate to historical matters. Forward-looking statements should not be relied on, because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond the control of the Company. These risks, uncertainties and other factors may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from the anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the Company's forward-looking statements are reasonable, these statements involve risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on various important factors (some of which are beyond the Company's control). The following factors, among others, could cause the Company's financial performance to differ materially from the Company's goals, plans, objectives, intentions, expectations and other forward-looking statements:

continued weakness in the United States economy in general and the regional and local economies within the New England region and Maine, which could result in a deterioration of credit quality, a change in the allowance for loan losses or a reduced demand for the Company's credit or fee-based products and services;

adverse changes in the local real estate market could result in a deterioration of credit quality and an increase in the allowance for loan loss, as most of the Company's loans are concentrated in Maine, and a substantial portion of these loans have real estate as collateral;

changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System;

inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations;

competitive pressures, including continued industry consolidation, the increased financial services provided by non-banks and banking reform;

volatility in the securities markets that could adversely affect the value or credit quality of the Company's assets, impairment of goodwill, the availability and terms of funding necessary to meet the Company's liquidity needs and the Company's ability to originate loans;

changes in information technology that require increased capital spending;

changes in consumer spending and savings habits;

changes in laws and regulations, including new laws and regulations concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance; and

changes in accounting policies, practices and standards, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies as well as the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"), and other accounting standard setters.

You should carefully review all of these factors, and be aware that there may be other factors that could cause differences, including the risk factors listed in Part II, Item 1A, "Risk Factors," and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Readers should carefully review the risk factors described therein and should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.

These forward-looking statements were based on information, plans and estimates at the date of this report, and we do not promise to update any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, future events or other changes.


In preparing the Company's consolidated financial statements, management is required to make significant estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from our current estimates, as a result of changing conditions and future events. Several estimates are particularly critical and are susceptible to significant near-term change, including the allowance for credit losses, accounting for acquisitions and our review of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets for impairment, valuation of other real estate owned, other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") of investments, accounting for postretirement plans and income taxes. Our significant accounting policies and critical estimates are summarized in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses. Loans past due 30 days or more are considered delinquent. In general, consumer loans will be charged off if the loan is delinquent for 90 consecutive days. Commercial and real estate loans may be charged off in part or in full if they appear uncollectible. A loan is classified as non-accrual generally when it becomes 90 days past due as to interest or principal payments. All previously accrued but unpaid interest on non-accrual loans is reversed from interest income in the current period. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans (including impaired loans) are applied as a reduction of principal. A loan remains on non-accrual status until all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Management is committed to maintaining an allowance for loan losses ("ALL") that is appropriate to absorb likely loss exposure in the loan portfolio. Evaluating the appropriateness of the ALL is a key management function, one that requires the most significant amount of management estimates and assumptions. The ALL, which is established through a charge to the provision for credit losses, consists of two components: (1) a contra to total gross loans in the asset section of the balance sheet, and (2) the reserve for unfunded commitments included in other liabilities on the balance sheet. We regularly evaluate the ALL for adequacy by taking into consideration, among other factors, historical trends in charge-offs and delinquencies, overall risk characteristics and size of the portfolios, ongoing review of significant individual loans, trends in levels of watched or criticized assets, business and economic conditions, local industry trends, evaluation of results of examinations by regulatory authorities and other third parties, and other relevant factors.

In determining the appropriate level of the ALL, we use a methodology to systematically measure the amount of estimated loan loss exposure inherent in the loan portfolio. The methodology focuses on four key elements: (1) identification of loss allocations for specific loans, (2) loss allocation factors for certain loan types based on credit grade and loss experience, (3) general loss allocations for other environmental factors, and (4) the unallocated portion of the allowance. The specific loan component relates to loans that are impaired. For such impaired loans, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. This methodology is in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP").

We use a risk rating system to determine the credit quality of our loans and apply the related loss allocation factors. In assessing the risk rating of a particular loan, we consider, among other factors, the obligor's debt capacity, financial condition, the level of the obligor's earnings, the amount and sources of repayment, the performance with respect to loan terms, the adequacy of collateral, the level and nature of contingent liabilities, management strength, and the industry in which the obligor operates. These factors are based on an evaluation of historical information, as well as a subjective assessment and interpretation of current conditions. Emphasizing one factor over another, or considering additional factors that may be relevant in determining the risk rating of a particular loan but which are not currently an explicit part of our methodology, could impact the risk rating assigned to that loan.

Three times annually, management conducts a thorough review of adversely risk rated commercial and commercial real estate exposures exceeding certain thresholds to re-evaluate the risk rating and identify impaired loans. This extensive review takes into account the obligor's repayment history and financial condition, collateral value, guarantor support, local economic and industry trends, and other factors relevant to the particular loan relationship. Allocations for impaired loans are based upon discounted cash flows or collateral values and are made in accordance with GAAP.

We periodically reassess and revise the loss allocation factors used in the assignment of loss exposure to appropriately reflect our analysis of loss experience. Portfolios of more homogeneous populations of loans including home equity and consumer loans are analyzed as groups, taking into account delinquency rates and other economic conditions which may affect the ability of borrowers to meet debt service requirements, including interest rates and energy costs. An additional allocation is determined based on a judgmental process whereby management considers qualitative and quantitative assessments of other environmental

factors. Finally, an unallocated portion of the total allowance is maintained to allow for measurement imprecision attributable to uncertainty in the economic environment.

Because the methodology is based upon historical experience and trends as well as management's judgment, factors may arise that result in different estimations. Significant factors that could give rise to changes in these estimates may include, but are not limited to, changes in economic conditions in our market area, concentration of risk, declines in local property values, and the results of regulatory examinations. While management's evaluation of the ALL as of June 30, 2013 determined the allowance to be appropriate, under adversely different conditions or assumptions, we may need to increase the allowance. The Corporate Risk Management group reviews the ALL with the Bank's board of directors on a monthly basis. A more comprehensive review of the ALL is reviewed with the Company's board of directors, as well as the Bank's board of directors, on a quarterly basis.

The adequacy of the reserve for unfunded commitments is determined in a similar manner as the ALL, with the exception that management must also estimate the likelihood of these commitments being funded and becoming loans. This is accomplished by evaluating the historical utilization of each type of unfunded commitment and estimating the likelihood that the historical utilization rates could change in the future.

Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets for Impairment. We record all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions at fair value, which is an estimate determined by the use of internal or other valuation techniques. These valuation estimates result in goodwill and other intangible assets and are subject to ongoing periodic impairment tests and are evaluated using various fair value techniques. Goodwill impairment evaluations are required to be performed annually and may be required more frequently if certain conditions indicating potential impairment exist. Identifiable intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are subject to impairment tests if events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to realize the carrying amount. If we were to determine that our goodwill was impaired, the recognition of an impairment charge could have an adverse impact on our results of operations in the period that the impairment occurred or on our financial position. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment using several standard valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis, as well as an estimation of the impact of business conditions. The use of different estimates or assumptions could produce different estimates of carrying value.

Valuation of Other Real Estate Owned ("OREO"). Periodically, we acquire property in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of debt previously contracted. The valuation of this property is accounted for individually based on its fair value on the date of acquisition. At the acquisition date, if the fair value of the property less the costs to sell is less than the book value of the loan, a charge or reduction in the ALL is recorded. If the value of the property becomes permanently impaired, as determined by an appraisal or an evaluation in accordance with our appraisal policy, we will record the decrease in value by charging against current earnings. Upon acquisition of a property, we use a current appraisal or broker's opinion to substantiate fair value for the property.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment ("OTTI") of Investments. We record an investment impairment charge at the point we believe an investment has experienced a decrease in value that is other-than-temporary. In determining whether an OTTI has occurred, we review information about the underlying investment that is publicly available, analysts' reports, applicable industry data and other pertinent information, and assess our ability to hold the securities for the foreseeable future. The investment is written down to its current market value at the time the impairment is deemed to have occurred. Future adverse changes in market conditions, continued poor operating results of underlying investments or other factors could result in further losses that may not be reflected in an investment's current carrying value, possibly requiring an additional impairment charge in the future.

Effectiveness of Hedging Derivatives. The Company maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the use of interest rate contracts, which are generally non-leveraged generic interest rate and basis swaps, to minimize significant fluctuations in earnings that are caused by interest rate volatility. Interest rate contracts are used by the Company in the management of its interest rate risk position. The Company's goal is to manage interest rate sensitivity so that movements in interest rates do not significantly adversely affect earnings. When interest rates fluctuate, hedged assets and liabilities appreciate or depreciate in fair value or cash flows. Gains or losses on the derivative instruments that are linked to the hedged assets and liabilities are expected to substantially offset this unrealized appreciation or depreciation or changes in cash flows. The Company utilizes a third-party service to evaluate the effectiveness of its cash flow hedges on a quarterly basis. The effective portion of a gain or loss on a cash flow hedge is recorded in other comprehensive income, net of tax, and other assets or other liabilities on the consolidated statements of condition. The ineffective portions of cash flow hedging transactions are included in "other income" in the consolidated statements of income, if material.

Accounting for Postretirement Plans. We use a December 31 measurement date to determine the expenses for our postretirement plans and related financial disclosure information. Postretirement plan expense is sensitive to changes in the

number of eligible employees (and their related demographics) and to changes in the discount rate and other expected rates, such as medical cost trends rates. As with the computations on plan expense, cash contribution requirements are also sensitive to such changes.

Stock-Based Compensation. The fair value of restricted stock and stock options is determined on the date of grant and amortized to compensation expense, with a corresponding increase in common stock, over the longer of the service period or performance period, but in no event beyond an employee's retirement date. For performance-based restricted stock, we estimate the degree to which performance conditions will be met to determine the number of shares that will vest and the related compensation expense. Compensation expense is adjusted in the period such estimates change. Non-forfeitable dividends, if any, paid on shares of restricted stock are recorded to retained earnings for shares that are expected to vest and to compensation expense for shares that are not expected to vest.

Income Taxes. We account for income taxes by deferring income taxes based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the tax and book bases of assets and liabilities considering the provisions of enacted tax laws. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in the consolidated statements of condition. We must also assess the likelihood that any deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and establish a valuation allowance for those assets determined not likely to be recoverable. Judgment is required in determining the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting deferred tax assets and liabilities, including projections of future taxable income. Although we have determined a valuation allowance is not required for all deferred tax assets, there is no guarantee that these assets will be realized. Although not currently under review, income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2009 through 2011 are open to audit by federal and Maine authorities. If we, as a result of an audit, were assessed interest and penalties, the amounts would be recorded through other non-interest expense.

Non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP") Financial Measures and Reconciliation to GAAP
In addition to evaluating the Company's results of operations in accordance with GAAP, management supplements this evaluation with an analysis of certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as the efficiency and tangible equity ratios, and tax equivalent net interest income. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures help investors in understanding the Company's operating performance and trends and allow for better performance comparisons to other banks. In addition, these non-GAAP financial measures remove the impact of unusual items that may obscure trends in the Company's underlying performance. These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP operating results, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other financial institutions.

Efficiency Ratio. The efficiency ratio, which represents an approximate measure of the cost required for the Company to generate a dollar of revenue, is the ratio of (i) total non-interest expense excluding prepayment penalties and branch acquisition costs (the numerator) to (ii) net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis plus total non-interest income excluding net gains or losses on sale of securities and OTTI (the denominator).

                                                   Three Months Ended June 30,           Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)                               2013               2012              2013               2012
Non-interest expense, as presented             $      15,648       $      13,979     $     32,148       $     26,898
Less acquisition/divestiture costs                        71                   -              232                  -
Less prepayment fees on borrowings                         -                 728                -                728
Adjusted non-interest expense                  $      15,577       $      13,251     $     31,916       $     26,170

Net interest income, as presented              $      19,250       $      18,366     $     38,418       $     36,737
Effect of tax-exempt income                              205                 253              415                510
Non-interest income                                    6,376               5,754           12,712             10,982
Less net gains on sale of securities, net of
OTTI                                                       -                (751 )           (138 )             (872 )
Adjusted net interest income plus
non-interest income                            $      25,831       $      23,622     $     51,407       $     47,357

Non-GAAP efficiency ratio                              60.30 %             56.10 %          62.08 %            55.26 %
GAAP efficiency ratio                                  61.06 %             57.96 %          62.88 %            56.37 %

Tax Equivalent Net Interest Income. Tax-equivalent net interest income is net interest income plus the taxes that would have been paid had tax-exempt securities been taxable. This number attempts to enhance the comparability of the performance of assets that have different tax liabilities. The following table provides a reconciliation of tax equivalent net interest income to GAAP net interest income using a 35% tax rate.

                                                Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)                               2013            2012           2013            2012
Net interest income, as presented              $       19,250     $ 18,366     $      38,418     $ 36,737
Effect of tax-exempt income                               205          253               415          510
Net interest income, tax equivalent            $       19,455     $ 18,619     $      38,833     $ 37,247

Return on Average Tangible Equity. Return on tangible equity is the ratio of (i) net income (the numerator) to (ii) average shareholders' equity less average goodwill and other intangibles. The following table reconciles return on average tangible equity to return on average equity.

                                                    Three Months Ended           Six Months Ended
                                                          June 30,                    June 30,
(Dollars in Thousands)                              2013          2012          2013          2012
Net income, as presented                         $   6,331     $   6,412     $  11,993     $  12,995
Average shareholders' equity, as presented         237,166       224,588       235,679       222,512
Less average goodwill and other intangibles         52,860        44,696        53,007        44,871
Average tangible shareholders' equity            $ 184,306     $ 179,892     $ 182,672     $ 177,641
Return on average tangible equity (annualized)       13.78 %       14.33 %       13.24 %       14.71 %
Return on average equity (annualized)                10.71 %       11.48 %       10.26 %       11.74 %


During the second quarter of 2013, we recorded net income of $6.3 million, down slightly from $6.4 million recorded during the same period a year ago, and year-to-date earnings totaled $12.0 million, representing an 8% decline compared to the first six months of 2012. Earnings reflected the impact of costs associated with the 14 branches acquired during the fourth quarter of 2012 and the ramping up of loan volumes in these new locations.

On May 29, 2013, Camden National Bank (the "Bank"), a subsidiary of Camden National Corporation, entered into a definitive agreement for Skowhegan Savings Bank to purchase the Bank's Farmington, Kingfield, Phillips, Rangeley and Stratton branches. Included in the transaction are the branch deposits of approximately $86.9 million, business loans and certain consumer loans of $43.7 million and real estate and equipment of $600,000. The purchase price represents a 3.5% premium on deposits, par value on the loan portfolio and book value for the real estate. The sale is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2013, subject to regulatory approval.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013:

Net income of $12.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, decreased $1.0 million, or 8%, compared to the same period of 2012. Net income per diluted share decreased $0.13 to $1.56, compared to the first six months of 2012. For the first six months of 2013, the Company achieved a return on assets of 0.94%, a return on tangible equity of 13.24%, a net interest margin of 3.25%, and an efficiency ratio of 62.08%. The following were major factors contributing to the results of the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012:

Non-interest expense increased $5.3 million primarily due to incremental operating expenses related to the branch acquisition, including compensation costs, facilities expenses, data processing costs and other expenses associated with 35% more deposit accounts, 24% additional employees and 12 additional branches.

Net interest income on a fully-taxable equivalent basis of $38.8 million for the first six months ended June 30, 2013, increased $1.6 million, or 4%, primarily due to the 31 basis point reduction in the average cost of funds, as a result of lower interest rates and the addition of $287.6 million in lower cost deposits acquired with the branch acquisition in 2012.

The provision for credit losses decreased $471,000 to $1.4 million due to lower charge-offs and improved credit quality factors.

Non-interest income increased $1.7 million, or 16%, primarily due to the growth in deposit-related service fees associated with the acquired deposit accounts. In addition, mortgage banking income increased $690,000, and net gain on sale of securities and other-than-temporary impairment of securities decreased $734,000 due to fewer sales of securities.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013:

Net income of $6.3 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2013, decreased $81,000, or 1%, compared to the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. Net income per diluted share decreased one cent to $0.82, compared to the second quarter of 2012. The following were major factors contributing to the results of the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period a year ago:

Net interest income on a fully-taxable equivalent basis of $19.5 million increased $836,000, or 4%, compared to the same period of 2012 primarily due to the reduction in average cost of funds as a result of lower interest rates and the addition of $287.6 million in lower cost deposits acquired with the branch acquisition in 2012.

The provision for credit losses decreased $140,000 to $695,000 due to improved asset quality measures.

Non-interest income increased $622,000, or 11%, compared to the same period of 2012 primarily due to the growth in deposit-related service fees associated with the acquired deposit accounts and a mortgage banking income increase of $452,000, partially offset by a reduction in net security gains of $751,000.

Non-interest expense increased $1.7 million, or 12%, compared to the same period of 2012 primarily due to incremental operating expenses of $2.3 million related to the branch acquisition, partially offset by a decrease in prepayment fees on borrowings of $728,000.

. . .

  Add CAC to Portfolio     Set Alert         Email to a Friend  
Get SEC Filings for Another Symbol: Symbol Lookup
Quotes & Info for CAC - All Recent SEC Filings
Copyright © 2014 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
SEC Filing data and information provided by EDGAR Online, Inc. (1-800-416-6651). All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.