Search the web
Welcome, Guest
[Sign Out, My Account]
EDGAR_Online

Quotes & Info
Enter Symbol(s):
e.g. YHOO, ^DJI
Symbol Lookup | Financial Search
ORC > SEC Filings for ORC > Form 10-Q on 10-May-2013All Recent SEC Filings

Show all filings for ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL, INC. | Request a Trial to NEW EDGAR Online Pro

Form 10-Q for ORCHID ISLAND CAPITAL, INC.


10-May-2013

Quarterly Report


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to those statements included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. The discussion may contain certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are those that are not historical in nature. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth under "Risk Factors" in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and any subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a specialty finance company that invests in Agency RMBS. Our investment strategy focuses on, and our portfolio consists of, two categories of Agency RMBS: (i) traditional pass-through Agency RMBS and (ii) structured Agency RMBS, such as CMOs, IOs, IIOs and POs, among other types of structured Agency RMBS. From inception through the closing of the initial public offering of our common stock, we were managed by Bimini. We are currently externally managed by Bimini Advisors, a registered investment adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC").

We were formed by Bimini in August 2010 and commenced operations on November 24, 2010. At December 31, 2012, Bimini was our sole stockholder. We completed our initial public offering on February 20, 2013. In that offering we raised $35.4 million from the sale of 2,360,000 shares of our common stock.

Our business objective is to provide attractive risk-adjusted total returns over the long term through a combination of capital appreciation and the payment of regular monthly distributions. We intend to achieve this objective by investing in and strategically allocating capital between the two categories of Agency RMBS described above. We seek to generate income from (i) the net interest margin on our leveraged pass-through Agency RMBS portfolio and the leveraged portion of our structured Agency RMBS portfolio, and (ii) the interest income we generate from the unleveraged portion of our structured Agency RMBS portfolio. We intend to fund our pass-through Agency RMBS and certain of our structured Agency RMBS, such as fixed and floating rate tranches of CMOs and POs, through short-term borrowings structured as repurchase agreements. However, we do not intend to employ leverage on the securities in our structured Agency RMBS portfolio that have no principal balance, such as IOs and IIOs. We do not intend to use leverage in these instances because the securities contain structural leverage. Pass-through Agency RMBS and structured Agency RMBS typically exhibit materially different sensitivities to movements in interest rates. Declines in the value of one portfolio may be offset by appreciation in the other. The percentage of capital that we allocate to our two Agency RMBS asset categories will vary and will be actively managed in an effort to maintain the level of income generated by the combined portfolios, the stability of that income stream and the stability of the value of the combined portfolios. We believe that this strategy will enhance our liquidity, earnings, book value stability and asset selection opportunities in various interest rate environments.

We intend to qualify and will elect to be taxed as a REIT under the Code commencing with our short taxable year ending December 31, 2013. We generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax to the extent that we annually distribute all of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders and qualify as a REIT.

Factors that Affect our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

A variety of industry and economic factors may impact our results of operations and financial condition. These factors include:

interest rate trends;

prepayment rates on mortgages underlying our Agency RMBS, and credit trends insofar as they affect prepayment rates;

the difference between Agency RMBS yields and our funding and hedging costs;

competition for investments in Agency RMBS;

recent actions taken by the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury; and

other market developments.


In addition, a variety of factors relating to our business may also impact our results of operations and financial condition. These factors include:

our degree of leverage;

our access to funding and borrowing capacity;

our borrowing costs;

our hedging activities;

the market value of our investments; and

the requirements to qualify as a REIT and the requirements to qualify for a registration exemption under the Investment Company Act.

We anticipate that, for any period during which changes in the interest rates for our adjustable rate assets do not coincide with interest rate changes on the corresponding liabilities, such assets will re-price more slowly than the corresponding liabilities. Consequently, changes in interest rates, particularly short term interest rates, may significantly influence our net income.

Our net income may be affected by a difference between actual prepayment rates and our projections. Prepayments on loans and securities may be influenced by changes in market interest rates and homeowners' ability and desire to refinance their mortgages.

Results of Operations

Described below are the Company's results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to the Company's results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Net Income Summary

Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $0.4 million, or $0.20
per share. Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2012 was $0.6
million, or $0.63 per share. The components of net income for the three months
ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, along with the changes in those components, are
presented in the table below:

(in thousands)
                                                    Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                  2013            2012        Change
Interest income                                $    1,413       $     759     $   654
Interest expense                                     (201 )           (51 )      (150 )
Net interest income                                 1,212             708         504
(Losses) gains on MBS and Eurodollar futures         (413 )            75        (488 )
Net portfolio income                                  799             783          16
Expenses                                             (399 )          (166 )      (233 )
Net income                                     $      400       $     617     $  (217 )


GAAP and Non-GAAP Reconciliation

To date, we have used derivatives, specifically Eurodollar futures contracts, to hedge the interest rate risk on repurchase agreements in a rising rate environment. We have not elected to designate our derivative holdings for hedge accounting treatment under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Changes in fair value of these instruments are presented in a separate line item in our Statements of Operations. As such, for financial reporting purposes, interest expense and cost of funds are not impacted by the fluctuation in value of the Eurodollar futures contracts. In the future, we may use other derivative instruments to hedge our interest expense and/or elect to designate our derivative holdings for hedge accounting treatment.

For the purpose of computing net interest income and ratios relating to cost of funds measures throughout this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, interest expense includes gains or losses on Eurodollar futures contracts. Presenting the effects of the Eurodollar positions with the interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities reflects total economic interest expense on these obligations and the economic effect of our hedging strategy. Interest expense, including gains or losses on Eurodollar futures contracts, is referred to as economic interest expense. Net interest income, including gains or losses on Eurodollar futures contracts, is referred to as economic net interest income.

We believe that economic interest expense and economic net interest income provides meaningful information to consider, in addition to the respective amounts prepared in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP measures help us to evaluate our financial position and performance without the effects of certain transactions and GAAP adjustments that are not necessarily indicative of our current investment portfolio or operations.

Our presentation of the economic value of our hedging strategy has important limitations. First, other market participants may calculate economic interest expense and economic net interest income differently than we calculate them. Second, while we believe that the calculation of the economic value of our hedging strategy described above helps to present our financial position and performance, it may be of limited usefulness as an analytical tool. Therefore, the economic value of our investment strategy should not be viewed in isolation and is not a substitute for interest expense and net interest income computed in accordance with GAAP.

The following table presents the effect of our hedging strategy on interest expense and net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and for each quarter during 2012.

(dollars in thousands)
                                     GAAP        Eurodollar       Economic          GAAP            Economic
                                   Interest        Gains /        Interest      Net Interest      Net Interest
                                   Expense        (Losses)        Expense          Income            Income
Three Months Ended,
March 31, 2013                    $      201     $      (484 )   $      685     $       1,211     $         727
December 31, 2012                         94              (1 )           95               379               378
September 30, 2012                        58             (14 )           72               639               625
June 30, 2012                             74              (1 )           75               695               694
March 31, 2012                            51             (24 )           75               708               684


Net Interest Income

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we generated $0.7 million of economic net interest income, consisting of $1.4 million of interest income from MBS assets offset by $0.7 million of economic interest expense on repurchase liabilities. For the comparable period ended March 31, 2012, we generated $0.7 million of economic net interest income, consisting of $0.8 million of interest income from MBS assets offset by $0.1 million of economic interest expense on repurchase liabilities.

The table below provides information on our portfolio average balances, interest income, yield on assets, average repurchase agreement balances, economic interest expense, economic cost of funds, economic net interest income and economic net interest spread for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and for each quarter in 2012.

(dollars in thousands)
                           Average                         Yield on                                             Average        Economic          Net
                             MBS                           Average            Average           Economic        Economic       Portfolio       Economic
                          Securities       Interest          MBS            Repurchase          Interest        Cost of        Interest        Interest
                           Held(1)        Income(2)       Securities       Agreements(1)       Expense(3)        Funds         Income(3)        Spread
Three Months Ended,
March 31, 2013           $    237,820     $    1,412             2.38 %   $       210,194     $        685           1.30 %   $       727           1.08 %
December 31, 2012              91,094            473             2.08 %            80,256               95           0.47 %           378           1.61 %
September 30, 2012             64,378            697             4.33 %            53,698               72           0.54 %           625           3.79 %
June 30, 2012                  73,559            769             4.18 %            62,407               75           0.48 %           694           3.70 %
March 31, 2012                 70,585            759             4.30 %            59,157               75           0.50 %           684           3.80 %

(1) Portfolio yields and costs of borrowings presented in the table above and the tables on page 21 are calculated based on the average balances of the underlying investment portfolio/repurchase agreement balances and are annualized for the quarterly periods presented. Average balances for quarterly periods are calculated using two data points, the beginning and ending balances. Average balances for the year to date periods are calculated as the average of the average quarterly periods.

(2) Interest income presented in the table above includes only interest earned on the Company's MBS investments and excludes interest earned on cash balances, and excludes the impact of discounts or premiums on MBS investments, as discounts or premiums are not amortized under the fair value option. Interest income and net portfolio interest income may not agree with the information presented in the statements of operations.

(3) Economic interest expense and economic net interest income presented in the table above and the table on page 21 includes the effect of our Eurodollar futures positions that were entered into as an economic hedge against the increase in interest on repurchase agreements in a rising rate environment.

Interest Income and Average Earning Asset Yield

Our interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $1.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively. We had average MBS holdings of $237.8 million and $70.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The yield on our portfolio was 2.38% and 4.30% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012, there was a $0.7 million increase in interest income due to a $167.2 million increase in average MBS, partially offset by a 192 basis point decrease in the yield on average MBS for the three months ended March 31, 2013 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012.


The table below presents the average portfolio size, income and yields of our respective sub-portfolios, consisting of structured MBS and PT MBS.

(dollars
in
thousands)
                         Average MBS Held                            Interest Income                       Realized Yield on Average MBS
                PT          Structured                       PT        Structured                      PT            Structured
                MBS            MBS            Total         MBS            MBS          Total          MBS               MBS            Total
Three Months Ended,
March 31,
2013         $ 223,191     $     14,629     $ 237,820     $  1,415     $        (3 )   $  1,412          2.54 %             (0.06 )%       2.38 %
December
31, 2012        84,617            6,477        91,094          597            (124 )        473          2.82 %             (7.66 )%       2.08 %
September
30, 2012        56,519            7,859        64,378          410             287          697          2.90 %             14.59 %        4.33 %
June 30,
2012            65,320            8,239        73,559          593             176          769          3.63 %              8.56 %        4.18 %
March 31,
2012            61,936            8,649        70,585          530             229          759          3.43 %             10.56 %        4.30 %

Interest Expense and the Cost of Funds

We had average outstanding repurchase agreements of $210.2 million and $59.2 million and total economic interest expense of $0.7 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Our average economic cost of funds was 1.30% and 0.50% for three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. There was a 80 basis point increase in the average economic cost of funds and a $151.0 million increase in average outstanding repurchase agreements during the three months ended March 31, 2013 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Since all of our repurchase agreements are short-term, changes in market rates directly affect our interest expense. Our average economic cost of funds was 109 basis points above average one-month LIBOR and 82 basis points above average six-month LIBOR for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. The average term to maturity of the outstanding repurchase agreements increased from 15 days at December 31, 2012 to 17 days at March 31, 2013.

The table below presents the average repurchase agreements outstanding, economic interest expense and average economic cost of funds, and average one-month and six-month LIBOR rates for each quarter in 2013 and 2012.

(dollars in
thousands)
                                                                                                        Average             Average
                                                                                                       Economic            Economic
                  Average                                                                            Cost of Funds       Cost of Funds
                 Balance of       Economic          Average           Average         Average         Relative to         Relative to
                 Repurchase       Interest         Economic          One-Month       Six-Month       Average One-        Average Six-
                 Agreements       Expense        Cost of Funds         LIBOR           LIBOR          Month LIBOR         Month LIBOR
Three Months
Ended,
March 31,
2013            $    210,194     $      685                1.30 %          0.21 %          0.48 %              1.09 %              0.82 %
December 31,
2012                  80,256             95                0.47 %          0.22 %          0.59 %              0.25 %             (0.12 )%
September 30,
2012                  53,698             72                0.54 %          0.23 %          0.70 %              0.31 %             (0.16 )%
June 30, 2012         62,407             75                0.48 %          0.24 %          0.74 %              0.24 %             (0.26 )%
March 31,
2012                  59,157             75                0.50 %          0.26 %          0.76 %              0.24 %             (0.26 )%


Gains or Losses

The table below presents our gains or losses for the three months ended March
31, 2013 and 2012.

(in thousands)
                                               Three Months Ended March 31,
                                             2013            2012        Change
Realized gains (losses) on sales of MBS   $      100       $    (15 )    $   115
Unrealized losses on MBS                         (29 )          114         (143 )
Total gains on MBS                                71             99          (28 )
Losses on Eurodollar futures                    (484 )          (24 )       (460 )

During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company received proceeds of $57.8 million and $0.9 million, respectively, from the sales of MBS. We do not expect to sell assets on a frequent basis, but may from time to time sell existing assets to acquire new assets, which our management believes might have higher risk-adjusted returns or to manage our balance sheet as part of our asset/liability management strategy.

Expenses

Total operating expenses were $0.4 million and $0.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The table below provides a
breakdown of operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and
2012.

(in thousands)
                                             Three Months Ended March 31,
                                           2013          2012         Change
Directors fees and liability insurance   $  41,462     $       -     $  41,462
Legal fees                                  14,000             -        14,000
Other professional fees                    130,150        35,736        94,414
Management fees                            125,100        59,000        66,100
Other direct REIT operating expenses        64,384        50,006        14,378
Other expenses                              23,224        21,430         1,794
Total expenses                           $ 398,320     $ 166,172       232,148

Under the terms of a management agreement that was in effect during all of 2012 and through the date of the IPO, the Company paid Bimini a monthly management fee equal to 1/12 of 1.50% per annum of the Stockholders' Equity (as defined in the management agreement) of the Company. In addition, the Company paid Bimini a monthly fee of $7,200, which represents an allocation of overhead expenses for items that include, but are not limited to, occupancy costs, insurance and administrative expenses. These expenses were allocated based on the ratio of the Company's assets and Bimini's consolidated assets. At the completion of the IPO, the Company entered into a management agreement with Bimini Advisors, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bimini, which provides for an initial term through February 20, 2016 with automatic one-year extensions and is subject to certain termination rights. Under the terms of the new management agreement, overhead costs will not be allocated to the Company until its Equity, as defined, equals $100 million.


Financial Condition:

Mortgage-Backed Securities

As of March 31, 2013, our MBS portfolio consisted of $360.3 million of agency or government MBS at fair value and had a weighted average coupon on assets of 3.14%. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we received principal repayments of $6.1 million compared to $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The average prepayment speeds for the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were 20.0% and 23.8%, respectively.

The following table presents the constant prepayment rate ("CPR") experienced on our structured and PT MBS sub-portfolios, on an annualized basis, for the quarterly periods presented. Assets that were not owned for the entire quarter have been excluded from the calculation. The exclusion of certain assets during periods of high trading activity can create a very high, and often volatile, reliance on a small sample of underlying loans.

                                            Structured
                          PT MBS                MBS                Total
Three Months Ended,    Portfolio (%)       Portfolio (%)       Portfolio (%)
March 31, 2013                    9.2                33.0                20.0
December 31, 2012                 1.1                42.3                28.6
September 30, 2012                4.2                38.7                25.0
June 30, 2012                     0.2                41.4                38.7
March 31, 2012                   11.0                31.2                23.8

The following tables summarize certain characteristics of the Company's agency and government mortgage related securities as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
in thousands)

                                                   Weighted           Weighted
                               Percentage          Average            Average  Weighted Weighted
                                   of     Weighted Maturity            Coupon  Average  Average
                        Fair     Entire   Average     in     Longest  Reset in Lifetime Periodic
  Asset Category       Value   Portfolio   Coupon   Months  Maturity   Months    Cap      Cap
March 31, 2013
Adjustable Rate MBS $   6,485        1.8%    4.20%     255   1-Sep-35    2.05    10.04%    2.00%
Fixed Rate MBS        217,808       60.5%    3.27%     282   1-Mar-43       NA       NA       NA
Hybrid Adjustable
Rate MBS              112,485       31.2%    2.62%     356   1-Feb-43  106.54     7.62%    2.00%
Total
Mortgage-backed
Pass-through          336,778       93.5%    3.07%     306   1-Mar-43  100.85     7.75%    2.00%
Interest-Only
Securities             21,141        5.9%    3.94%     245  25-Dec-42       NA       NA       NA
Inverse
Interest-Only
Securities              2,341        0.6%    6.15%     306  25-Nov-40       NA    6.35%       NA
Total Structured
MBS                    23,482        6.5%    4.16%     251  25-Dec-42       NA       NA       NA
Total Mortgage
Assets              $ 360,260      100.0%    3.14%     303   1-Mar-43       NA       NA       NA
December 31, 2012
Adjustable Rate MBS $   6,531        5.7%    4.20%     258   1-Sep-35    3.46    10.04%    2.00%
Fixed Rate MBS         43,589       37.8%    3.24%     181   1-Dec-40       NA       NA       NA
Hybrid Adjustable
Rate MBS               59,485       51.6%    2.69%     357   1-Nov-42  100.51     7.69%    2.00%
Total
Mortgage-backed
Pass-through          109,605       95.0%    3.00%     281   1-Nov-42   90.91     7.93%    2.00%
Interest-Only
Securities              2,884        2.5%    3.52%     151  25-Dec-39       NA       NA       NA
Inverse
Interest-Only
Securities              2,891        2.5%    6.13%     309  25-Nov-40       NA    6.34%       NA
Total Structured
MBS                     5,775        5.0%    4.83%     230  25-Nov-40       NA       NA       NA
Total Mortgage
Assets              $ 115,380      100.0%    3.09%     278   1-Nov-42       NA       NA       NA


(in thousands)
                            March 31, 2013                        December 31, 2012
                                     Percentage of                          Percentage of
Agency             Fair Value       Entire Portfolio      Fair Value       Entire Portfolio
Fannie Mae        $    228,668                  63.47 %   $   113,235                  98.14 %
Freddie Mac            106,817                  29.65 %         2,145                   1.86 %
Ginnie Mae              24,775                   6.88 %             -                   0.00 %
Total Portfolio   $    360,260                 100.00 %   $   115,380                  100.0 %



                                                                                    December
                                                               March 31, 2013       31, 2012
. . .
  Add ORC to Portfolio     Set Alert         Email to a Friend  
Get SEC Filings for Another Symbol: Symbol Lookup
Quotes & Info for ORC - All Recent SEC Filings
Sign Up for a Free Trial to the NEW EDGAR Online Pro
Detailed SEC, Financial, Ownership and Offering Data on over 12,000 U.S. Public Companies.
Actionable and easy-to-use with searching, alerting, downloading and more.
Request a Trial Sign Up Now


Copyright © 2014 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
SEC Filing data and information provided by EDGAR Online, Inc. (1-800-416-6651). All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.