|
Quotes & Info
|
| SNTA > SEC Filings for SNTA > Form 10-K on 14-Mar-2013 | All Recent SEC Filings |
14-Mar-2013
Annual Report
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read together with the consolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp. is a biopharmaceutical company focused on discovering, developing, and commercializing small molecule drugs to extend and enhance the lives of patients with severe medical conditions, including cancer and chronic inflammatory diseases. We have two drug candidates in clinical trials for treating multiple types of cancer and several drug candidates in the preclinical stage of development. All of our drug candidates have been discovered and developed internally using our proprietary, unique chemical compound library and integrated discovery engine. We retain full ownership of all of our drug candidates.
We were incorporated in March 2000 and commenced operations in July 2001. Since that time, we have been principally engaged in the discovery and development of novel drug candidates. As of December 31, 2012, we have funded our operations principally with $465.2 million in net proceeds from private and public offerings of our equity, as well as $17 million in gross proceeds from two term loans, including $15 million from a term loan that was executed in September 2010 with General Electric Capital Corporation, or GECC, and one other lender, and $2 million from a term loan that was executed in March 2011 with Oxford Finance Corporation, or Oxford.
In January and February 2012, we raised approximately $33.0 million in net proceeds from the sale of an aggregate of 8,050,000 shares of our common stock in a public offering at a public offering price of $4.40 per share, including 7,000,000 shares in the initial closing in January 2012 and 1,050,000 shares in a second closing in February 2012 following the full exercise of the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters. In July 2012, we raised approximately $25.8 million in net proceeds from a registered direct offering of 3,976,702 shares of our common stock at a price of $6.49 per share to certain directors, including our largest stockholder. In December 2012, we raised approximately $59.8 million in net proceeds from a registered direct offering of 7,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $8.60 per share to investors and certain directors, including our largest stockholder.
On May 2, 2012, as amended, we entered into an at-the-market issuance sales agreement, or Sales Agreement, with MLV & Co. LLC, or MLV, pursuant to which we may issue and sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $28 million from time to time, at our option, through MLV as our sales agent, subject to certain terms and conditions. To date, no shares have been sold under the Sales Agreement.
In addition to raising capital from financing activities, we have also received substantial capital from partnering activities. In October 2007, we entered into a global collaborative development, commercialization and license agreement with GlaxoSmithKline, or GSK, for the joint development and commercialization of elesclomol. This collaboration was terminated in September 2009. In December 2008, we entered into a collaborative license agreement with Hoffman-La Roche, or Roche, for our CRACM inhibitor program. This collaboration was terminated effective on February 16, 2012. As of December 31, 2012, we have received $167.2 million in nonrefundable partnership payments under these agreements with GSK and with Roche, including $96 million in upfront payments, $50 million in operational milestones and $21.2 million in research and development funding. As of December 31, 2012, these nonrefundable partnership payments together with the cash proceeds from equity financings, the term loans from GECC and Oxford, and the exercise of common stock warrants and options, provided aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $652.5 million. We have also generated funds from government grants, equipment lease financings and investment income. We are engaged in
We have devoted substantially all of our capital resources to the research and development of our drug candidates. Since our inception, we have had no revenues from product sales. As of December 31, 2012, we had an accumulated deficit of $461.2 million. We expect to incur significant operating losses for the foreseeable future as we advance our drug candidates from discovery through preclinical development and clinical trials, and seek regulatory approval and eventual commercialization. We will need to generate significant revenues from product sales to achieve future profitability and may never do so.
Oncology Programs
We have two clinical-stage programs and one preclinical-stage program in oncology:
Ganetespib (Hsp90 Inhibitor)
Ganetespib is a potent, synthetic, small molecule inhibitor of Hsp90, a chaperone protein that is essential to the function of certain other proteins, such as tyrosine kinases and transcription factors that drive the growth, proliferation, and survival of many different types of cancer. Ganetespib is currently being evaluated in a broad range of clinical trials both in combination with other therapies and as a single agent.
In clinical trials to date, ganetespib has shown encouraging evidence of clinical activity, including, when used as monotherapy, prolonged tumor shrinkage in patients who have progressed after, or failed to respond to, treatment with commonly-used drugs for these tumors, and in combination with chemotherapy where improvements in overall survival have been seen in a randomized study. Ganetespib is currently being evaluated in a broad range of cancer clinical trials including our 800-patient GALAXY NSCLC program in combination with docetaxel chemotherapy, and as monotherapy in certain genetically-defined targeted patient populations. A favorable safety profile has been consistently observed across clinical trials, involving over 700 patients treated with ganetespib to date. Ganetespib has shown no evidence of the serious liver or common ocular toxicities reported with other Hsp90 inhibitors, or the neurotoxicity, bone marrow toxicities, and alopecia characteristic of many chemotherapies. The most common adverse event reported with ganetespib has been transient, mild or moderate diarrhea, which can be prevented or effectively managed with standard supportive care.
Ganetespib Mechanism of Action
Ganetespib potently inhibits Hsp90, a chaperone protein required for the proper folding and activation of numerous client proteins, particularly kinases, that play critical roles in tumor cell growth, differentiation and survival. A number of sensitive Hsp90 client proteins, such as ALK, HER2, AR, mutant BRAF and EGFR, have been implicated as oncogenic drivers in a variety of human tumors, including lung, breast, prostate and melanoma. Moreover, many client proteins are the targets of marketed cancer drugs such as Avastin, Erbitux, Gleevec, Herceptin, Nexavar, Sutent, Tarceva, Votrient, Xalkori, and Zelboraf.
Ganetespib is a novel small molecule that is structurally unrelated to first-generation, ansamycin-family compounds, such as 17-AAG or 17-DMAG. In preclinical studies, ganetespib has shown 10-100 times greater potency than 17-AAG across a broad range of cancer cell types as well as activity in animal models that are resistant to treatment with 17-AAG. Results published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics in December 2011 highlighted certain physicochemical properties of ganetespib we believe contribute to its improved safety and activity relative to other Hsp90 inhibitors. These properties include smaller size, greater potency in inhibiting Hsp90, improved ability to passively enter cells,
Because of the broad spectrum of biological activity conferred by ganetespib treatment, an additional approach has been to combine this agent with standard of care chemotherapeutics or other molecularly-targeted agents. In this regard, we have demonstrated a clear capacity of ganetespib to augment the cytotoxic activity of DNA damaging chemotherapeutics in multiple models. In addition, our data suggest that many relevant client proteins affected by ganetespib within this context are implicated in other critical tumorigenic processes, such as metastasis and angiogenesis. Prior work has established that regulators of tumor metastasis, such as the transcription factor HIF-1alpha, and regulators of angiogenesis, including VEGF and related receptors, are all down-regulated by ganetespib.
Ganetespib Clinical Trials
We are sponsoring four principal ongoing trials evaluating ganetespib activity:
º •
º GALAXY-1: a 300-patient global, randomized Phase 2b/3 trial designed
to evaluate ganetespib in combination with docetaxel versus docetaxel
alone as second-line therapy in advanced NSCLC patients with
adenocarcinoma histology,
º •
º GALAXY-2: a 500-patient, global, randomized, confirmatory Phase 3
clinical trial evaluating ganetepsib plus docetaxel vs. docetaxel
alone for the treatment of second-line advanced adenocarcinoma NSCLC,
as with GALAXY-1. Results from an interim analysis of the GALAXY-1
trial conducted in September 2012 were used to inform the design of
GALAXY-2, enriching for those patients who showed enhanced clinical
benefit from treatment with ganetespib in GALAXY-1,
º •
º CHIARA: a Phase 2 trial evaluating ganetespib monotherapy in NSCLC
patients whose tumors have a genetic profile characterized by
rearrangement of the ALK gene (ALK+), and
º •
º ENCHANT: a Phase 2 trial evaluating ganetespib monotherapy in patients
with newly diagnosed HER2+ and triple-negative metastatic breast
cancer.
In a June 2012 we reported top line results from a planned interim analysis of GALAXY-1. The analysis was planned for when approximately 50% of patients had been enrolled. At the time of this analysis, a total of 114 adenocarcinoma and 69 non-adenocarcinoma patients had been enrolled.
On September 29, 2012, we reported results from the second interim efficacy analysis at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2012 Congress. Overall survival results are described in the table below. Median survival for the docetaxel control arm in both the intent to treat (ITT) and the 6-month follow up groups was consistent with comparable historical results. Median survival had not yet been reached for the combination arm.
Overall survival, all adenocarcinoma patients
All patients enrolled more than
All patients in database 6 months prior to data cutoff
(N=172) (N=77)
HR 0.688 0.568
C.I. (90%) (0.417, 1.135) (0.312, 1.032)
p-Value 0.183 0.056
Median (D vs G+D) 7.4 mo vs. NR 7.4 mo vs NR
|
Progression free survival was 2.8 months vs. 4.2 months (p=0.076) and overall response rate was 8% vs. 16% (p=0.078) for docetaxel vs. ganetespib plus docetaxel, respectively. All p-values are calculated using the 1-sided stratified log-rank test for survival endpoints and using Fisher's Exact test for response rate.
In November 2012, we participated in an End-of-Phase 2 (EOP2) meeting with the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to review plans for the 500-patient, global, randomized Phase 3 GALAXY-2 clinical trial. We have incorporated comments from this meeting into the protocol, and expect enrollment to begin in the first quarter of 2013.
The GALAXY-2 trial will enroll adenocarcinoma patients with advanced NSCLC who have received one prior treatment for metastatic disease, and will randomize those patients 1:1 to treatment with docetaxel plus ganetespib, or docetaxel alone, as with GALAXY-1.
The same dose and schedule used in GALAXY-1 will be used in the Phase 3 GALAXY-2 trial. Patients on both arms will receive docetaxel generally for four to six 21-day cycles, as per standard practice at their treatment center. After completion of docetaxel treatment, patients on the ganetespib arm are eligible to continue to receive ganetespib monotherapy as maintenance treatment. The trial will be conducted in many of the 60 centers across Europe and North America that participated in the GALAXY-1 trial, together with approximately 60 additional centers.
Results from the interim analysis for GALAXY-1 were used to inform the eligibility criteria for the GALAXY-2 trial. GALAXY-2 will enroll patients who have progressed following treatment with one prior platinum-containing regimen of chemotherapy as first-line therapy, and who were diagnosed with metastatic disease at least six months prior to study entry.
The primary endpoint of GALAXY-2 will be overall survival. Two event-driven interim analyses of the overall survival primary endpoint of GALAXY-2 have been specified. Based on current projections and statistical assumptions, we expect these analyses, together with the final overall survival analysis, to occur in 2014.
In 2011, we presented results from a Phase 2 trial of ganetespib
administered as a monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC at the ASCO Annual
Meeting and the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC)
14th World Conference on Lung Cancer, respectively. Results presented at these
meetings showed a connection between single-agent ganetespib clinical activity
and certain tumor genetic profiles. Four of eight patients who were ALK+,
i.e., for whom tumor genetic testing revealed rearrangements in the ALK gene,
experienced confirmed partial responses following treatment with ganetespib (a
50% objective response rate, using the standard definition of complete response
plus partial response). To further characterize ganetespib activity in the ALK+
NSCLC treatment setting, we initiated the CHIARA trial in 2012 to evaluate
ganetespib monotherapy in ALK+ NSCLC patients who have not been previously
treated with a direct ALK inhibitor. We expect to use results from an initial
phase of enrollment, which was completed in the first quarter of 2013, to inform
our decision on whether to continue additional enrollment in this trial.
In 2012, we initiated the ENCHANT trial designed to evaluate ganetespib monotherapy as first-line treatment for both metastatic HER2+ breast cancer and TNBC. Patients in both cohorts will be assessed at baseline and at week 3, 6, and 12 with a combination of PET and CT scans. The primary endpoint of this study is overall response rate at week 12. Up to 35 patients will be enrolled in each of the HER2+ and TNBC cohorts. We expect preliminary results from the ENCHANT trial in the first half of 2013.
In addition to evaluating monotherapy administration of ganetespib in breast cancer, we and our collaborators believe that combination therapy with ganetespib has promise. MSKCC has announced that it will initiate a Phase 1/2 trial evaluating ganetespib in combination with paclitaxel and Herceptin in HER2+ breast cancer, and ganetespib in combination with paclitaxel in TNBC.
Additional clinical trials
In addition to the clinical trials we plan to initiate and continue in 2013, a number of ganetespib trials sponsored by third parties, including cooperative groups, foundations, and individual investigators, have recently been initiated or are expected to initiate in 2013. These include the following:
º •
º the trials evaluating ganetespib in breast cancer and in ALK+ lung
cancer sponsored by MSKCC described above;
º •
º a randomized trial evaluating the combination of fulvestrant and
ganetespib in patients with hormone receptor-positive, metastatic
breast cancer, being conducted at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute,
which began enrolling patients in 2012;
º •
º a trial evaluating the combination of ganetespib with capecitabine and
radiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer being
conducted at Emory University, which began enrolling patients in 2012;
º •
º a trial evaluating both ganetespib monotherapy and the combination of
ganetespib and bortezomib in multiple myeloma, which began enrolling
patients in 2012 and is supported by a grant of up to $1 million by
the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation;
º •
º a randomized trial evaluating the combination of ganetespib and low
dose ara-C chemotherapy in elderly patients with acute myeloid
leukemia (AML) being conducted at Cardiff University, which began
enrolling patients in 2012; and
º •
º a trial evaluating ganetespib in combination with pemetrexed and
cisplatin in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, being
sponsored by Cancer Research UK, which we expect to begin enrolling
patients in the first half of 2013.
In addition, a European cooperative group plans to initiate a randomized trial comparing paclitaxel with and without ganetespib in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in 2013.
Elesclomol is a first-in-class, investigational drug candidate that triggers
programmed cell death (apoptosis), in cancer cells through a novel mechanism:
disrupting cancer cell mitochondrial metabolism. In preclinical experiments,
anti-cancer activity of elesclomol has been shown to correlate with certain
biomarkers, including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which can distinguish between
active mitochondria (sufficient oxygen present) and inactive mitochondria
(insufficient oxygen present). Consistent with these findings in three
randomized clinical trials, LDH was an important predictor of elesclomol
treatment outcome.
Our current clinical program for elesclomol includes a clinical trial of elesclomol as a monotherapy in AML. In December 2009, we presented results at the American Society for Hematology (ASH) meeting showing that elesclomol was highly active against AML cell lines and primary blast cells from AML patients. In February 2011, we announced that the first patient had been treated in a Phase 1 dose escalation study of elesclomol as a single agent in patients with AML. This trial will enroll up to 36 patients with relapsed or refractory AML and total baseline serum LDH level less than 0.8 times ULN. Patients will be treated with elesclomol sodium on a once-weekly schedule at a starting dose of 200 mg/m2, with dose escalation planned based on safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic considerations. The trial is being conducted at Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto, Canada and at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York.
We are also evaluating the use of elesclomol in combination with paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. In March 2011, the Gynecological Oncology Group (GOG), initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial of elesclomol in combination with paclitaxel for the treatment of persistent or recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer for patients with total baseline serum LDH level less than 0.8 times ULN. The GOG is a non-profit organization with the purpose of promoting excellence in the quality and integrity of clinical and basic scientific research in the field of gynecologic malignancies. The National Cancer Institute is providing financial support of up to approximately $300,000 for the trial through its Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. The ovarian cancer trial has met the prespecified efficacy requirement to advance to stage 2 and full enrollment of the Phase 2 study, indicating potential activity in this difficult-to-treat patient population with limited treatment options.
STA-9584 is a novel, injectable, small molecule compound that appears to disrupt the blood vessels that supply tumors with oxygen and essential nutrients, and is in preclinical development. In March 2011, we received a $1 million grant from the United States Department of Defense (DoD) for the development of STA-9584 in advanced prostate cancer and initiated work on this study in the second quarter of 2011. We completed work covered by this grant in 2012.
Our Inflammatory Disease Programs
We have two preclinical-stage programs focusing on treatments for inflammatory diseases. Both of our inflammatory disease programs focus on oral, disease- modifying drug candidates that act through novel mechanisms and could potentially target multiple indications.
CRACM Ion Channel Inhibitors
We have developed novel, small molecule inhibitors of CRACM ion channels expressed on immune cells. Our CRACM ion channel inhibitors have shown strong anti-inflammatory activity in preclinical studies both in vitro and in vivo, inhibiting T cell and mast cell activity, including cytokine release, degranulation, and immune cell proliferation. Potential applications include a wide range of inflammatory diseases and disorders for which modulating T cell and mast cell function has been shown to be critical, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
In December 2008, as amended in February 2010, February 2011 and July 2011, we formed a strategic alliance with Roche to discover, develop, and commercialize small-molecule drugs targeting CRACM channels, which we refer to as the Roche Agreement. The goal of this alliance was to develop a novel category of oral, disease-modifying agents for the treatment of RA and other autoimmune diseases and inflammatory conditions.
On November 16, 2011, we received notice from Roche of its election to terminate the Roche Agreement, which termination became effective on February 16, 2012. Roche's termination of the agreement falls under the "Termination for Convenience" clause of the agreement. As a result of termination of the Roche Agreement, the research, development and commercialization licenses granted to Roche by us have terminated. Ownership of all rights to all Licensed Compounds (as defined in the agreement) (including the scientific data relating to those compounds) has reverted to us. We have also received an exclusive license to use Roche's patent rights and know-how to research, develop, manufacture, commercialize and import any collaboration compound, including the Licensed Compounds. We are obligated to pay a low single digit royalty on a country-by-country and Licensed Product-by-Licensed Product (as defined in the agreement) basis upon commercialization of any Licensed Product.
IL-12/23 Inhibitors
The IL-12 cytokine is an important "master switch" that triggers the immune response of the T cell known as T helper type 1 (Th1). T cells play a critical role in the coordination of the body's immune response, and while Th1 cells are normally involved in the body's defense against intracellular attack by bacteria and other microorganisms, an overactive Th1 response can lead to various autoimmune or inflammatory diseases including Crohn's disease, psoriasis, RA, multiple sclerosis, and common variable immunodeficiency. The IL-23 cytokine is critical to the generation of a class of T cells known as Th17, which produce other pro-inflammatory proteins such as IL-17, which are critical in driving chronic inflammation. We believe that the clinical trial results observed with anti-IL-12/23 antibody therapies validate the inhibition of IL-12/23 activity as a promising approach for the treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. We have identified several small molecule IL-12/23 inhibitors that represent a promising opportunity to develop drug candidates that could be administered orally and potentially address a wide range of serious inflammatory diseases with high unmet medical needs
Financial Operations Overview
Revenue
We have not yet generated any product revenue and do not expect to generate any product revenue in the foreseeable future, if at all. Our revenues to date have been generated primarily through our former collaboration agreements with GSK and Roche. The terms of these agreements included payment to us of upfront license fees, milestone payments, research and development cost sharing and royalties. We will seek to generate revenue from product sales and from future collaborative or strategic relationships. In the future, we expect any revenue we generate will fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter as a result of the timing and amount of payments received and expenses incurred under future collaborations or strategic relationships, and the amount and timing of payments we receive upon the sale of our drug candidates, to the extent any are successfully commercialized.
Research and development expense consists of costs incurred in connection with developing and advancing our drug discovery technology and identifying and developing our drug candidates. We charge all research and development expenses to operations as incurred.
Our research and development expense consists of:
º •
º internal costs associated with research, preclinical and clinical
activities;
º •
º payments to third party contract research organizations, investigative
sites and consultants in connection with our preclinical and clinical
development programs;
º •
º costs associated with drug formulation and supply of drugs for
clinical trials;
º •
º personnel related expenses, including salaries, stock-based
compensation, benefits and travel; and
º •
º overhead expenses, including rent and maintenance of our facilities,
and laboratory and other supplies.
We do not know if we will be successful in developing our drug candidates. We believe that accurately projecting total program-specific expenses through commercialization is not possible at this time. The timing and amount of these expenses will depend upon the costs associated with potential future clinical . . .
|
|