|
Quotes & Info
|
| GTAT > SEC Filings for GTAT > Form 10-K on 1-Mar-2013 | All Recent SEC Filings |
1-Mar-2013
Annual Report
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Transition Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical consolidated financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions as described under the "Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements," that appears above in this Transition Report on Form 10-K. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under "Item 1A. Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Transition Report on Form 10-K.
Company Overview
GT Advanced Technologies Inc., through its subsidiaries (referred to collectively as "we," "us" and "our") is a diversified technology company with innovative crystal growth equipment and solutions for the global solar, LED and electronics industries. Our products are designed to accelerate the adoption of new advanced materials that improve performance and lower the cost of manufacturing.
We operate through three business segments: our polysilicon business, our photovoltaic, or PV, business and our sapphire business. Information on each of these business segments and new developments regarding our business during the nine-month transition period ended December 31, 2012 is set forth in "Item 1. Business" above.
Corporate Name Change and Change in Fiscal Year End
Effective August 8, 2011, we changed our name from GT Solar International, Inc. to GT Advanced Technologies Inc. The name change was effected pursuant to Delaware law by the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary into the Company. In addition, on April 16, 2012, we amended our amended and restated by-laws to provide that our fiscal year will end on December 31 of each year. Prior to this amendment, our by-laws had provided that our fiscal year ended on the Saturday closest to March 31st of each year. As a result of this change to our fiscal year end, we report a nine-month transition period consisting of the period from April 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012, and our 2013 fiscal year will begin on January 1, 2013 and end on December 31, 2013.
Amendment to the 2012 Credit Agreement
On January 31, 2012, the Company, our U.S. operating subsidiary and our Hong Kong subsidiary entered into a credit agreement (the "2012 Credit Agreement"), with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer and the lenders from time to time party thereto. The 2012 Credit Agreement consisted of a term loan facility provided to our US operating subsidiary in an aggregate principal amount of $75 million (which was increased to $145 million pursuant to joinder agreements entered into in June 2012), a revolving credit facility available to our U.S. operating subsidiary in an aggregate principal amount of $25 million with a final maturity date of January 31, 2016 and a revolving credit facility available to our Hong Kong subsidiary in an aggregate principal amount of $150 million with a final maturity date of January 31, 2016. The 2012 Credit Agreement contains several covenants that we are required to comply with, among these are a financial covenant that we not (i) exceed a maximum leverage ratio (as defined in the 2012 Credit Agreement) of 2.0 at the end of any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters (as calculated in the 2012 Credit Agreement, as amended in June 2012) and (ii) fall below the minimum interest coverage ratio and maximum leverage ratio (as defined in the 2012 Credit Agreement) of 3.5 at the end of any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters (as calculated in the 2012 Credit Agreement).
On February 27, 2013, the Company (our U.S. operating subsidiary and our Hong Kong subsidiary), Bank of America N.A. and certain lenders agreed to amend certain provisions of the 2012
Credit Agreement. The amendment approved on February 27, 2013 waives the
application of the leverage and interest coverage ratios though June 2014 (the
"waiver period"). Through this action we avoid the possibility of a breach to
these covenants. In addition, the amendment approved on February 22, 2013
provides that (i) we pay down the term facility by $40 million (leaving a
balance of $100 million for the term facility), (ii) the interest rate payable
on the loan is increased by 1.5% (which increase will be revised to 0.75% after
the waiver period), (iii) the revolving credit facility for our US operating
subsidiary be eliminated and reduces the revolving credit facility available to
our Hong Kong subsidiary to $125 million (and providing that such amounts may
only be used for letters of credit during the waiver period), (iv) the Company
comply with new covenants during the waiver period to maintain at all times
minimum levels of liquidity (as defined in the 2013 Amendment), and quarterly
cumulative minimum amounts of Consolidated Adjusted Earnings Before Interest,
Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (as defined in the 2013 Amendment),
(v) certain other covenants are revised, including with respect to restrictions
on the incurrence of certain additional debt, make certain investments affiliate
transactions and further restrictions on the payment of dividends and stock
repurchases (as described in the 2013 Amendment), (vi) we pay certain fees to
the Lenders. A copy of the 2013 Amendment is attached to this Transition Report
on Form 10-K as Exhibit 10.86 and (vii) that certain subsidiaries of the Hong
Kong subsidiary will provide guarantees and collateral to support the Hong Kong
Revolving Credit Facility. In addition, the undrawn fee payable on the undrawn
portion of the revolving commitments increases from 0.50% to 0.75%.
October 2012 Restructuring
As part of a program to reduce costs and increase operational efficiencies, we announced, on October 31, 2012, a plan to streamline worldwide operations to better align our cost structure with current market conditions by reducing our global workforce and closing or consolidating certain facilities. In connection with this program, we recorded $3.7 million of restructuring and asset impairment expense during the quarter ended December 31, 2012, including $2.5 million of severance and related benefits to reduce the workforce. The Company also recorded $1.0 million for the write-down of assets associated with facility consolidations.
Hazelwood Facility Idling
On January 10, 2013, we announced our plan to cease operations at its Hazelwood, Missouri facility ("Hazelwood facility"). The idling of the Hazelwood facility is part of our effort to reduce costs and optimize R&D activities and the idling of the facility is expected to be completed on or before March 30, 2013. In connection with this action, we terminated the employment of most of the Hazelwood facility employees at various dates in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. We determined that as of December 31, 2012 it was probable that employees would be entitled to receive severance and related benefits and that these amounts were estimable and accordingly recorded the expense during the quarter ended December 31, 2012. In connection with the idling of the Hazelwood facility, we recorded $29.8 million of restructuring and asset impairment expense during the quarter ended December 31, 2012 to the PV segment, comprised of approximately $0.5 million of severance and related benefits and $29.3 million for the write-down to fair value of certain long-lived, intangible assets and other assets associated with the Hazelwood facility. At December 31, 2012 the remaining fair value of the long-lived asset group of the Hazelwood facility was $5.2 million. We expect to complete the payments related to severance and related benefits in fiscal 2013. We expect to incur approximately $2.0 million to 4.0 million of additional expense, primarily lease exits costs, in 2013 related to the idling of the Hazelwood facility.
Factors Affecting the Results of Our Operations
The following are some of the factors, trends and events that we expect will affect our future results of operations:
º •
º Demand for our polysilicon and PV products and services are driven by
end-user demand for solar power and demand for our sapphire products
are driven by end-user demand for sapphire material, LED-quality
material in particular. In each of our three business segments, the
end-user demand for the output of our equipment has either declined
substantially or supply has surpassed demand. In order to decrease
inventories, we believe that companies selling polysilicon, solar
cells and wafers and sapphire material, including some of our
customers, have had to sell at prices that provide little or no
margin. In certain cases, customers' have been unable to decrease
inventories. We expect that these circumstances will continue through
calendar year 2013. As a result, much of our business for calendar
year 2013 will result from filling orders in our backlog and we do not
expect that our backlog will increase during the same period. We do
not expect to enter into any contracts, in any of our segments, for
meaningful revenue or bookings during 2013. In addition, due to the
length of the downturn impacting these industries, the continued
financial health and viability of our customers is uncertain.
º •
º The current limited demand for our products or the excess capacity in
the end markets our customers serve is exacerbated by trade tensions
between China and the U.S. Most recently, in October 2012, the U.S.
Commerce Department issued a final ruling and levied anti-dumping
duties on billions of dollars of solar panels and cells from China
(and set countervailing duties as well). This final ruling will
negatively impact our equipment customers in China. This follows a May
2012 Department of Commerce announcement of a preliminary
determination that China had violated fair trade policies by "dumping"
into the U.S. certain solar products at prices that were intended to
advantage Chinese manufacturers. The Chinese government responded by
saying these actions were deliberately provoking trade friction
between the two nations. In July 2012, the Chinese Ministry of
Commerce opened investigations on imports of solar-grade polysilicon
from the U.S. and South Korea, that may result in trade duties on
polysilicon imports from the U.S. and South Korean polysilicon
manufacturers. In addition, the European Union has commenced an
investigation into whether Chinese solar equipment manufacturers have
dumped equipment into the E.U. in violation of trade regulations. If
the E.U. imposes duties in connection with this investigation, it
could harm our business since many of our Chinese customers sell into
the E.U. This risk may be mitigated to some extent if manufacturing of
solar wafers and cells shifted from China to Europe (or locations in
other parts of the globe) as there may be increased demand in Europe
for polysilicon and PV equipment that cannot be satisfied from China
at comparable prices, the E.U. may not allow Chinese companies to
avoid the duties by transferring manufacturing operations to Europe.
In response to the E.U. investigation, in November 2012, the Chinese
Ministry of Commerce announced that it was commencing a trade
investigation into European exports of solar-grade polysilicon.
Retaliatory tariffs and trade tensions with China and the U.S. and
Europe (as well as South Korea, where some of our equipment customers
are located) is causing uncertainty in the industry and is having a
material adverse impact on our business since we sell into China and
our equipment customers sell end products into Europe and the U.S. In
particular, we believe that certain of our customers are delaying any
purchasing or expansion plans until these various trade matters are
resolved and we do not expect such resolution to take place during
2013 and, in fact, expect that they will grow more adversarial.
º •
º Many of our polysilicon, PV and sapphire equipment customers are
facing liquidity challenges due to the current state of the market. In
addition, changes in the capital markets have resulted in a more
stringent lending environment for solar and sapphire companies which
in turn has caused decreased spending within the industries we serve
as customers try to preserve their
liquidity. We believe the negative impact of a more stringent lending environment has resulted in decreased demand for all of our products. The commercial lending environment has not stabilized and if the availability of capital or credit for solar and sapphire companies remains constrained (including in China) or if capital or credit were to become even more limited, we expect that our results of operations, would continue to be negatively impacted.
º •
º We believe that the recent downturn that has impacted the PV industry
is not merely a cyclical downturn, but is the result of more
structural shifts in the industry. We expect that any growth in the
industry will be driven by technological changes that bringing greater
efficiencies and cost-savings. Due to this structural change, we
intend to discontinue any significant future investments in our DSS
product line. We do have DSS furnaces in inventory and will attempt to
sell these during 2013. We may not be able to generate a material
amount of revenue from these sales, and expect that the average
selling prices for this equipment will be well below our historical
averages. Customers may request that we renegotiate terms of existing
contracts to obtain lower prices or request that (in lieu of the
equipment they ordered) they receive newer technology that we have
developed, and such negotiations may result in reduced prices and
reduction in the number of units to be delivered and a change in other
terms, which may have an impact on our results of operations and our
reported order backlog. As margins are dropping in the solar wafer and
cell industry, PV companies may require these types of changes to
their production equipment contracts in order to continue to maintain
operations. We do not expect to release our next PV product offering,
the HiCz™ puller, until 2014 and therefore the very limited revenue
from DSS sales will be our only source of PV revenue in 2013, and
perhaps beyond.
º •
º The sovereign debt crisis in Europe has led to economic instability,
depreciation of the euro, fiscal austerity, reduction in government
support for certain programs (including solar incentives) and slowing
growth in the entire region. While we have very limited sales to
customers in Europe, a portion of the end-users of solar power and LED
materials are located in Europe, and as a result, our equipment
customers have been negatively impacted by the sovereign debt crisis.
We expect that this crisis will cause further decrease in demand for
our polysilicon, sapphire and PV equipment offerings. In addition,
there is increasing evidence that this economic instability is
impacting other regions as well, including China, and may be directly
impacting our equipment customers.
º •
º There is an excess of polysilicon manufacturing capacity and the
market price for polysilicon has significantly declined. As a result,
we expect that there will be a greater focus on reducing production
costs among polysilicon manufacturers, putting substantial pressure on
our customers to lower the cost of equipment they purchase from us or
to delay or cancel their purchases of polysilicon production
equipment. These factors may also produce consolidation in the
industry. We believe we are well positioned to capture a portion of
the future demand for polysilicon equipment among the more limited
number of manufacturers by delivering equipment with higher throughput
and lower power consumption, leading to greater efficiencies. However,
the timing of any future purchases is uncertain and it may be a
significant amount of time before we see the benefits of any purchases
of equipment, if at all.
º •
º Due to structural changes in the PV industry mentioned above, and the
limited demand for PV cells, modules and wafers, most of our PV
customers have lowered capacity utilization rates and delayed or
terminated expansion projects as they respond to weaker end market
demand. We expect that the market demand for multicrystalline PV
products will remain very limited (particularly as a result of
improvements in monocrystalline growth technologies).
º •
º Demand for PV on-grid applications (and, in turn, our PV equipment)
has historically been dependent in part on the availability and size
of government subsidies and incentives. As
governments face limited revenues and spending constraints, they are reducing or eliminating support for certain programs. We believe that governments are moving more aggressively to reduce all forms of governmental assistance to the solar industry and we expect that governmental subsidies, feed-in tariffs and similar supports will be eliminated in their entirety in the near future.
º •
º The price for sapphire material has recently experienced significant
decreases. We expect that current decreased prices will continue.
Consequently, we anticipate that demand for our ASF systems will also
remain lower than in previous quarters. Further, customers have
requested, and expect that they will continue to request, delivery of
ASF systems be delayed until the price of sapphire recovers which has
delayed the timing of which amounts attributable to ASF systems
roll-off of backlog and into revenue and the timing on which we enter
into new contracts to sell ASF systems. Additionally, we may receive
requests to cancel deliveries, which would reduce our reported
backlog.
º •
º One of the expected drivers of demand for sapphire was expected to be,
in large part, the increased use of sapphire materials in general
illumination. To this point, that broad adoption of LED in lighting is
slower than expected. As a result, the future demand for ASF systems
attributable to this market are not expected to increase markedly in
the immediate future. The use of sapphire in industrial applications
and consumer electronics has been adopted to a limited extent, and
could lead to new market opportunities for the ASF system. While the
use of sapphire in these applications is still in the very early
stages, it represents a potential market and may result in increased
demand for sapphire manufacturing equipment.
º •
º Due to the challenges faced in our industries, during three months
ended December 31, 2012, the Company incurred charges of $60,192 to
record PV inventory at its net realizable value, wrote down PV
goodwill by $57,037 and recorded impairment charges of $29,261 related
to certain long-lived, intangible and other assets located at our HiCz
Hazelwood facility. If the prospects for our business do not improve,
we could be required to recognize additional material charges.
º •
º We have made investments in developing new technology, such as our
HiCz puller, silicon carbide furnace and Hyperion™ ion implanter.
During the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013, we do not expect
receive any revenue from these investments.
º •
º In addition, our results of operations are affected by a number of
other factors including the availability and market price of
polysilicon, alumina material and certain process consumables,
availability of raw materials, foreign exchange rates, interest rates,
commodity prices (including molybdenum, steel and graphite prices) and
macroeconomic factors, including the availability of capital that may
be needed by our customers, as well as political, regulatory and legal
conditions in the international markets in which we conduct business,
including China.
Order Backlog
Our order backlog primarily consists of amounts due under written contractual commitments and signed purchase orders for PV, polysilicon and sapphire equipment not yet shipped to customers, deferred revenue (which represents amounts for equipment that has been shipped to customers but not yet recognized as revenue) and short-term contracts or sales orders for sapphire materials. Contracts in our order backlog for PV, polysilicon and sapphire equipment generally require the customer to either post a standby letter of credit in our favor and/or make advance payment prior to shipment of equipment.
From the date of a written commitment, we generally would expect to deliver PV and sapphire equipment products over a period ranging from three to nine months and polysilicon products over a
period ranging from twelve to eighteen months, however, in certain cases revenue may be recognized over longer periods. Disregarding the effect of any contract terminations or modifications, we would expect to convert approximately 30% of our December 31, 2012 order backlog into revenue during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 and approximately 70% thereafter. Although most of our orders require substantial non-refundable deposits, our order backlog as of any particular date should not be relied upon as indicative of our revenues for any future period.
If a customer fails to perform its outstanding contractual obligations on a timely basis, and such failure continues after notice of breach and a cure period, we may terminate the contract. Our contracts generally do not contain cancellation provisions and in the event of a customer breach, the customer may be liable for contractual damages. During the three-month period ended December 31, 2012, we have identified certain contracts in our order backlog that have not been terminated or modified, however, we expect that certain customers will not fulfill their obligations under these respective contacts. This is the first time that we have removed such contracts from the amount we report in our order backlog. As a result, during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2012, we terminated, modified or removed contracts from our reported order backlog resulting in a $220.5 million reduction (81% of the reduction was attributable to six contracts, of which $121.4 million related to contracts that have not been legally terminated or modified but we have removed from our reported backlog). During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, we terminated or modified contracts resulting in a $135.9 million reduction in our order backlog (74% of the reduction was from six contracts). During the nine-month period ended December 31, 2012, we recorded revenues of $8.5 million from terminated contracts and during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 we recorded revenues of $35.5 million from terminated contracts.
Although we have a reasonable expectation that most of our customers will substantially perform on their contractual obligations that are included in our reported order backlog, we attempt to monitor those contracts that we believe to be at risk. Due to recent industry market conditions, as noted above, we have removed certain amounts from our reported order backlog that are attributable to contracts that we do not believe our customers will fulfill.
We conduct negotiations with certain customers who have requested that we extend their delivery schedules or make other contract modifications, or who have not provided letters of credit or made payments in accordance with the terms of their contracts. We engage in a certain level of these negotiations in the ordinary course. We monitor the effect, if any, that these negotiations may have on our future revenue recognition. If we cannot come to an agreement with these customers or if we believe our customers cannot or will not perform their obligations, our reported order backlog could be reduced. Other customers with contracts in our order backlog that are not currently under negotiation, or that we consider to be at risk, may approach us with similar requests in the future, or may fail to provide letters of credit or to make payments when due. If we cannot come to an agreement with these customers, our order backlog could be further reduced. If we do come to an agreement with customers on extending delivery schedules, the timing of expected revenue recognition could be pushed into periods later than we had anticipated.
The table below sets forth our reported order backlog as of December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2012 by business segment:
December 31, 2012 March 31, 2012
% of % of
Product Category Amount Backlog Amount Backlog
(dollars in millions)
Photovoltaic business $ 4 1 % $ 138 8 %
Polysilicon business 529 42 % 880 49 %
Sapphire business 716 57 % 761 43 %
Total $ 1,249 100 % $ 1,779 100 %
|
Our reported order backlog attributable to our PV, polysilicon and sapphire businesses as of December 31, 2012, included deferred revenue of $121.9 million, of which $2.6 million related to our PV business, $113.4 million related to our polysilicon business and $5.9 million related to our sapphire business. Cash received in deposits related to our order backlog where deliveries have not yet occurred was $181.1 million as of December 31, 2012.
As of December 31, 2012, our order backlog consisted of contracts with 8 PV customers, contracts with 15 polysilicon customers, contracts with 5 sapphire equipment customers and contracts with 54 sapphire materials customers. Our order backlog as of December 31, 2012, included $429.4 million, $261.3 million and $155.0 million attributed to three different customers, each of which individually represents 34%, 21%, and 12%, respectively, of our order backlog.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In preparing our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), we make estimates, judgments and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts of reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as the disclosure of contingent liabilities in our financial statements and the related notes thereto. On a periodic basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue, inventory, income taxes and business combinations. We operate in competitive industries that are influenced by a variety of diverse factors including, but not limited to, technological advances, product life cycles, long customer and supplier lead times, and geographic and macroeconomic trends. Estimating product demand beyond a relatively short forecasting horizon is difficult and prone to forecasting error due to the inherent lack of visibility in the industry. Some of our accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in the selection of appropriate assumptions for determining these estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. As a result, we cannot assure you that actual results will not differ significantly from estimated results. We base our judgments and estimates on our historical experience, on our forecasts and on other available . . .
|
|