Item 8.01 Other Events.

On February 22, 2013, Warner Chilcott plc (together with its subsidiaries, the "Company") became aware that a qui tam action filed against the Company was unsealed by order of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts entered on February 22, 2013. The qui tam action, United States ex rel. Chris Wible v. Warner Chilcott, which was filed under seal on June 27, 2011, was brought by a former Company sales representative on behalf of the United States of America (the "United States"), 26 states, and the District of Columbia under the Federal False Claims Act and state law equivalents to the Federal False Claims Act. The complaint alleges that the Company violated Federal and state false claims acts through the promotion of its products Actonel and Atelvia by, among other things, making unsubstantiated claims concerning the products, providing kickbacks to physicians and engaging in improper conduct concerning prior authorizations. The complaint seeks, among other things, treble damages, civil penalties of up to eleven thousand dollars for each alleged false claim and attorneys' fees and costs.

On February 19, 2013, the United States filed notice of its election not to intervene in the qui tam action at this time. In this notice, which was also unsealed pursuant to the court's order entered on February 22, 2013, the United States indicated that its investigation of the allegations raised in the complaint is continuing and, as such, it was not able to decide, as of the court's seal expiration deadline, whether to intervene in the action. The United States' election not to intervene does not prevent the plaintiff/relator from litigating this action and the United States may later seek to intervene in the action. The Company has previously disclosed that beginning in February 2012, the Company, along with several current and former non-executive employees in its sales organization and certain third parties, received subpoenas from the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts concerning, among other things, sales and marketing activities relating to all of the Company's current key products. While the Company has not yet been served with the qui tam complaint, it is reviewing the allegations in the complaint and intends to vigorously defend itself in the litigation when and if served.

---