|
Quotes & Info
|
| BXS > SEC Filings for BXS > Form 10-K on 25-Feb-2013 | All Recent SEC Filings |
25-Feb-2013
Annual Report
OVERVIEW
The Company is a regional financial holding company with $13.4 billion in assets
headquartered in Tupelo, Mississippi. The Company's wholly-owned banking
subsidiary has commercial banking operations in Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama,
Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, Florida, and Missouri. The Bank and its consumer
finance, credit insurance, insurance agency and brokerage subsidiaries provide
commercial banking, leasing, mortgage origination and servicing, insurance,
brokerage and trust services to corporate customers, local governments,
individuals and other financial institutions through an extensive network of
branches and offices. The Bank's insurance agency subsidiary also operates an
office in Illinois.
Management's discussion and analysis provides a narrative discussion of the
Company's financial condition and results of operations for the previous three
years. For a complete understanding of the following discussion, you should
refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes presented
elsewhere in this Report. This discussion and analysis is based on reported
financial information, and certain amounts for prior years have been
reclassified to conform with the current financial statement presentation. The
information that follows is provided to enhance comparability of financial
information between years and to provide a better understanding of the Company's
operations.
As a financial holding company, the financial condition and operating results of
the Company are heavily influenced by economic trends nationally and in the
specific markets in which the Company's subsidiaries provide financial
services. Generally, during the past several years, the pressures of the
national and regional economic cycle have created a difficult operating
environment for the financial services industry. The Company is not immune to
such pressures and the continuing economic downturn has had a negative impact on
the Company and its customers in all of the markets that it serves. While this
impact has been reflected in the Company's credit quality measures during the
past two years, the Company's allowance for credit losses, net charge-offs,
total non-performing loans and leases ("NPLs") and total non-performing assets
("NPAs") decreased at December 31, 2012, when compared to December 31, 2011 and
2010. Management believes that the Company is better positioned with respect to
overall credit quality as evidenced by the improvement in credit quality metrics
at December 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011. Management believes,
however, that continued weakness in the economic environment could adversely
affect the strength of the credit quality of the Company's assets
overall. Therefore, management will continue to focus on early identification
and resolution of any credit issues.
The largest source of the Company's revenue is derived from the operation of its
principal operating subsidiary, the Bank. The financial condition and operating
results of the Bank are affected by the level and volatility of interest rates
on loans, investment securities, deposits and other borrowed funds, and the
impact of economic downturns on loan demand, collateral value and
creditworthiness of existing borrowers. The financial services industry is
highly competitive and heavily regulated. The Company's success depends on its
ability to
compete aggressively within its markets while maintaining sufficient asset
quality and cost controls to generate net income.
During 2012, the Company's debit card revenue decreased by $10.2 million
compared to 2011 as a result of the impact of the Durbin Amendment. The $10.2
million decrease is based on management's assumptions that revenue associated
with consumer signature activity would be 58% of the level prior to the
implementation of the Durbin Amendment, revenue associated with business
signature activity would be 12% of the level prior to the implementation of the
Durbin Amendment and revenue associated with consumer and business PIN activity
would be 80% of the level prior to the implementation of the Durbin Amendment.
The information that follows is provided to enhance comparability of financial
information between periods and to provide a better understanding of the
Company's operations.
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
At or for the Year Ended December 31,
2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
Earnings Summary: (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Interest revenue $ 486,424 $ 537,853 $ 582,762 $ 615,414 $ 705,413
Interest expense 71,833 102,940 141,620 170,515 264,577
Net interest revenue 414,591 434,913 441,142 444,899 440,836
Provision for credit losses 28,000 130,081 204,016 117,324 56,176
Net interest revenue, after
provision for credit losses 386,591 304,832 237,126 327,575 384,660
Noninterest revenue 280,149 270,845 264,144 275,276 245,607
Noninterest expense 549,193 533,633 487,033 490,017 455,913
Income before income taxes 117,547 42,044 14,237 112,834 174,354
Income tax expense (benefit) 33,252 4,475 (8,705 ) 30,105 53,943
Net income $ 84,295 $ 37,569 $ 22,942 $ 82,729 $ 120,411
Balance Sheet - Year-End
Balances:
Total assets $ 13,397,198 $ 12,995,851 $ 13,615,010 $ 13,167,867 $ 13,480,218
Total securities 2,434,032 2,513,518 2,709,081 1,993,594 2,316,380
Loans and leases, net of
unearned income 8,636,989 8,870,311 9,333,107 9,775,136 9,691,277
Total deposits 11,088,146 10,955,189 11,490,021 10,677,702 9,711,872
Long-term debt 33,500 33,500 110,000 112,771 286,312
Total shareholders' equity 1,449,052 1,262,912 1,222,244 1,276,296 1,240,260
Balance Sheet - Average
Balances:
Total assets 13,067,276 13,280,047 13,304,836 13,203,659 13,200,801
Total securities 2,490,898 2,620,404 2,157,096 2,179,479 2,417,390
Loans and leases, net of
unearned income 8,719,399 9,159,431 9,621,529 9,734,580 9,429,963
Total deposits 10,936,694 11,251,406 11,107,445 10,155,730 9,803,999
Long-term debt 33,500 66,673 111,547 290,582 278,845
Total shareholders' equity 1,413,667 1,240,768 1,241,321 1,255,605 1,224,280
Common Share Data:
Basic earnings per share $ 0.90 $ 0.45 $ 0.28 $ 0.99 $ 1.46
Diluted earnings per share 0.90 0.45 0.27 0.99 1.45
Cash dividends per share 0.04 0.14 0.88 0.88 0.87
Book value per share 15.33 15.13 14.64 15.29 14.92
Tangible book value per share 12.23 11.68 11.17 11.78 11.35
Dividend payout ratio 4.44 31.11 314.29 88.89 60.00
Financial Ratios:
Return on average assets 0.65 % 0.28 % 0.17 % 0.63 % 0.91 %
Return on average shareholders'
equity 5.96 % 3.03 % 1.85 % 6.59 % 9.84 %
Total shareholders' equity to
total assets 10.82 % 9.72 % 8.98 % 9.69 % 9.20 %
Tangible shareholders' equity
to tangible assets 8.83 % 7.67 % 7.00 % 7.63 % 7.15 %
Net interest margin-fully
taxable equivalent 3.57 % 3.69 % 3.70 % 3.77 % 3.75 %
Credit Quality Ratios:
Net charge-offs to average
loans and leases 0.67 % 1.44 % 1.90 % 0.76 % 0.40 %
Provision for credit losses to
average loans and leases 0.32 % 1.42 % 2.12 % 1.21 % 0.60 %
Allowance for credit losses to
net loans and leases 1.90 % 2.20 % 2.11 % 1.80 % 1.37 %
Allowance for credit losses to
NPLs 70.42 % 60.55 % 49.93 % 94.41 % 207.45 %
Allowance for credit losses to
NPAs 48.83 % 39.33 % 37.31 % 71.64 % 120.36 %
NPLs to net loans and leases 2.70 % 3.63 % 4.23 % 1.91 % 0.66 %
NPAs to net loans and leases 3.90 % 5.59 % 5.65 % 2.51 % 1.14 %
Capital Ratios:
Tier 1 capital 13.77 % 11.77 % 10.61 % 11.17 % 10.79 %
Total capital 15.03 % 13.03 % 11.87 % 12.42 % 12.04 %
Tier 1 leverage capital 10.25 % 8.85 % 8.07 % 8.95 % 8.65 %
|
In addition to financial ratios based on measures defined by U.S. GAAP, the Company utilizes tangible shareholders' equity and tangible asset measures when evaluating the performance of the Company. Tangible shareholders' equity is defined by the Company as total shareholders' equity less goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. Tangible assets are defined by the Company as total assets less goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. Management believes the ratio of tangible shareholders' equity to tangible assets to be important to investors who are interested in evaluating the adequacy of the Company's capital levels. Tangible book value per share is defined by the Company as tangible shareholders' equity divided by total common shares outstanding. Management believes that tangible book value per share is important to investors who are interested in changes from period to period in book value per share exclusive of changes in intangible assets. The following table reconciles tangible assets and tangible shareholders' equity as presented above to U.S. GAAP financial measure as reflected in the Company's unaudited consolidated financial statements:
December 31,
2012 2011 2010 2009 2008
(In thousands)
Tangible Assets:
Total assets $ 13,397,198 $ 12,995,851 $ 13,615,010 $ 13,167,867 $ 13,480,218
Less: Goodwill 275,173 271,297 270,097 270,097 268,966
Identifiable intangible assets 17,329 16,613 19,624 23,533 28,164
Total tangible assets $ 13,104,696 $ 12,707,941 $ 13,325,289 $ 12,874,237 $ 13,183,088
Tangible Shareholders' Equity
Total shareholders' equity $ 1,449,052 $ 1,262,912 $ 1,222,244 $ 1,276,296 $ 1,240,260
Less: Goodwill 275,173 271,297 270,097 270,097 268,966
Identifiable intangible assets 17,329 16,613 19,624 23,533 28,164
Total tangible shareholders' equity $ 1,156,550 $ 975,002 $ 932,523 $ 982,666 $ 943,130
Total shares outstanding 94,437,552 83,483,796 83,481,737 83,450,296 83,105,100
Tangible shareholders' equity to
tangible assets 8.83 % 7.67 % 7.00 % 7.63 % 7.15 %
Tangible book value per share $ 12.25 $ 11.68 $ 11.17 $ 11.78 $ 11.35
|
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The Company reported net income of $84.3 million for 2012 compared to $37.6
million for 2011 and $22.9 million for 2010. The decreased provision for credit
losses was the most significant factor contributing to the increase in earnings
in both 2012 compared to 2011 and 2011 compared to 2010, as the provision for
credit losses was $28.0 million in 2012 compared to $130.1 million in 2011 and
$204.0 million in 2010. Net charge-offs decreased to $58.7 million, or 0.67% of
average loans and leases, in 2012 from $131.9 million, or 1.44% of average loans
and leases, in 2011 compared to $183.1 million, or 1.90% of average loans and
leases, in 2010. The decrease in the provision for credit losses from 2011 to
2012 and from 2010 to 2011 reflected the impact of significant decreases in NPL
formation during both 2012 and 2011, as NPLs decreased to $233.6 million at
December 31, 2012 after having decreased to $322.3 million at December 31, 2011
from $394.4 million at December 30, 2010. The impact of the economic environment
continues to be evident on real estate consumer mortgage, commercial and
construction, acquisition and development loans and more specifically on
residential construction, acquisition and development loans. Prior to 2012, many
of these loans had become collateral-dependant, requiring recognition of
additional loan loss provisions or charge-offs to reflect the decline in real
estate values. During 2012, the Company continued its focus on improving credit
quality and reducing NPLs, especially in the real estate construction,
acquisition and development loan portfolio, as evidenced by the decrease in that
portfolio's nonaccrual loans of $66.5 million to $66.6 million at December 31,
2012 from $133.1 million at December 31, 2011.
The primary source of revenue for the Company is net interest revenue earned
by the Bank. Net interest revenue is the difference between interest earned on
loans, investments and other earning assets and interest paid on
deposits and other obligations. Net interest revenue for 2012 was $414.6
million, compared to $434.9 million for 2011 and $441.1 million for 2010. Net
interest revenue is affected by the general level of interest rates, changes in
interest rates and changes in the amount and composition of interest earning
assets and interest bearing liabilities. One of the Company's long-term
objectives is to manage those assets and liabilities to maximize net interest
revenue, while balancing interest rate, credit, liquidity and capital risks. The
Company experienced an increase in lower rate savings deposits and a decrease in
higher rate average demand deposits, other time deposits and long-term
borrowing, which resulted in a decrease in interest expense of $31.1 million, or
30.2%, in 2012 compared to 2011. The 4.7% decrease in net interest revenue in
2012 compared to 2011 was a result of the decrease in interest expense being
more than offset by the decrease in interest revenue that resulted from the
declining interest rate environment combined with the low loan demand and loans
re-pricing at lower rates, both at maturity and, in some cases, prior to
maturity, as interest revenue decreased $51.4 million, or 9.6%, in 2012 compared
to 2011. While loan demand has been weak, the Company has managed to replace
some loan runoff with new loan production, primarily in its Alabama, Texas and
Louisiana markets.
The Company attempts to diversify its revenue stream by increasing the amount of
revenue received from mortgage lending operations, insurance agency activities,
brokerage and securities activities and other activities that generate fee
income. Management believes this diversification is important to reduce the
impact of fluctuations in net interest revenue on the overall operating results
of the Company. Noninterest revenue for 2012 was $280.1 million, compared to
$270.8 million for 2011 and $264.1 million for 2010. One of the primary
contributors to the increase in noninterest revenue was the increase in mortgage
lending revenue to $56.9 million in 2012 compared to $17.1 million in 2011. The
increase in mortgage lending revenue was primarily related to the increase in
mortgage originations. Mortgage origination volume increased in 2012 to $2.0
billion from $1.2 billion in 2011. The increased level of mortgage origination
volume resulted in an increase in origination revenue to $53.3 million in 2012
from $24.3 million in 2011. Also contributing to the increase in mortgage
lending revenue in 2012 compared to 2011 was the change in fair value of
MSRs. The fair value of MSRs decreased $3.2 million in 2012 compared to a
decrease of $14.0 million in 2011.
The increase in noninterest revenue was somewhat offset by the decreases in
securities gains, service charges and credit card, debit card and merchant
fees. Securities gains decreased to approximately $442,000 in 2012 from $12.1
million in 2011. During the second quarter of 2011, the Company determined that
it no longer had the intent to hold until maturity all securities that were
previously classified as held-to-maturity. As a result of this determination,
all securities were classified as available-for-sale and recorded at fair value
at December 31, 2012 and 2011.
Service charges and credit card, debit card and merchant fee income decreased
14.7% and 25.2%, respectively, in 2012 compared to 2011. Service charges
decreased primarily as a result of a lower volume of items processed and changes
in banking regulations related to overdraft fees. Credit card, debit card and
merchant fee income decreased primarily as a result of the impact of the
implementation of the Durbin Amendment, which reduced debit card revenue by
$10.2 million in 2012. Insurance commissions increased 3.7% in 2012 compared to
2011 and increased 5.8% in 2011 compared to 2010 as a result of new policies
written and growth from existing customers coupled with the revenue contributed
by the acquisition of certain assets of The Securance Group, Inc. on July 2,
2012. Other miscellaneous income decreased 8.9% in 2012 compared to 2011
primarily as a result of gains of $2.2 million on the dispositions of fixed
assets during 2011. No such gains were recognized in 2012.
Noninterest expense for 2012 was $549.2 million, an increase of 2.9% from $533.6
million for 2011, which was an increase of 9.6% from $487.0 million for
2010. The increase in noninterest expense in 2012 compared to 2011 was primarily
a result of increases in salaries and employee benefits and foreclosed property
expense. The increase in salaries and employee benefits was primarily related to
increases in employee benefits and incentive compensation during 2012 compared
to 2011, including the cost of employee health care benefits and pension
expenses. Foreclosed property expense increased $11.6 million, or 41.8%, to
$39.4 million in 2012 compared to $27.8 million in 2011 primarily as a result of
the Company experiencing losses on the sale of other real estate owned
("OREO"). This increase was somewhat offset by the decreases in prepayment
penalty on Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") borrowings, deposit insurance
assessments and other miscellaneous expense. A $9.8 million prepayment penalty
was recorded in 2011 related to the early repayment of FHLB advances during the
second quarter of 2011, and no such prepayment was recorded in 2012. The
decrease in deposit insurance assessments in 2012 compared to 2011 was a result
of improvement evidenced in various variables utilized by the FDIC in
calculating the deposit insurance assessment. Other miscellaneous expense in
2011 included $3.1 million recorded as a result of the closure of 22 branch
offices during the third quarter of 2011 under the Company's branch optimization
project with no such expense recorded in 2012. Income tax expense increased in
2012 and 2011
primarily as a result of the increase in pretax income in 2012 compared to 2011
and in 2011 compared to 2010. The major components of net income are discussed
in more detail in the various sections that follow.
The Company continued its commitment to maintaining a strong capital base as its
total shareholders' equity to total assets ratio was 10.82%, 9.72%, and 8.98% at
December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Also, noninterest bearing demand
deposits and savings deposits increased 12.1% and 15.5%, respectively, at
December 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which require the Company to make estimates and assumptions (see Note 1 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Report). Management believes that its determination of the allowance for credit losses, valuation of other real estate owned, the annual goodwill impairment assessment, the assessment for other-than-temporary impairment of securities, the valuation of mortgage servicing rights and the estimation of pension and other postretirement benefit amounts involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity than the Company's other significant accounting policies. Further, these estimates can be materially impacted by changes in market conditions or the actual or perceived financial condition of the Company's borrowers, subjecting the Company to significant volatility of earnings.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses is established through the provision for credit
losses, which is a charge against earnings. Provisions for credit losses are
made to reserve for estimated probable losses on loans and leases. The allowance
for credit losses is a significant estimate and is regularly evaluated by the
Company for adequacy by taking into consideration factors such as changes in the
nature and volume of the loan and lease portfolio; trends in actual and
forecasted portfolio credit quality, including delinquency, charge-off and
bankruptcy rates; and current economic conditions that may affect a borrower's
ability to pay. In determining an adequate allowance for credit losses,
management makes numerous assumptions, estimates and assessments. The use of
different estimates or assumptions could produce different provisions for credit
losses. See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations - Results of Operations - Provision for Credit Losses
and Allowance for Credit Losses" included herein for more information. At
December 31, 2012, the allowance for credit losses was $164.5 million,
representing 1.90% of total loans and leases, net of unearned income.
Other Real Estate Owned
OREO, consisting of assets that have been acquired through foreclosure or in
satisfaction of loans, is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less
estimated selling costs. Fair value is based on independent appraisals and other
relevant factors. OREO is revalued on an annual basis or more often if market
conditions necessitate. Valuation adjustments required at foreclosure are
charged to the allowance for credit losses. Subsequent valuation adjustments on
the periodic revaluation of the property are charged to net income as
noninterest expense. Significant judgments and complex estimates are required in
estimating the fair value of OREO, and the period of time within which such
estimates can be considered current is significantly shortened during periods of
market volatility, as experienced during the past two years. As a result, the
net proceeds realized from sales transactions could differ significantly from
appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates used to determine the fair
value of OREO.
Goodwill
The Company's policy is to assess goodwill for impairment at the reporting
segment level on an annual basis or sooner if an event occurs or circumstances
change which indicate that the fair value of a reporting segment is below its
carrying amount. Impairment is the condition that exists when the carrying
amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. Accounting standards require
management to estimate the fair value of each reporting segment in assessing
impairment at least annually. The Company's annual assessment date is during the
Company's fourth quarter. The Company's annual goodwill impairment evaluation
performed during the fourth quarter of 2012 indicated no impairment of goodwill
for its reporting segments as the estimated fair value exceeded the respective
carrying value by 23% for the Company's Community Banking reporting segment and
by 26% for the Company's Insurance Agencies reporting segment. Therefore, no
goodwill impairment was recorded during 2012.
In the current environment, forecasting cash flows, credit losses and growth in addition to valuing the Company's assets with any degree of assurance is very difficult and subject to significant changes over very short periods of time. Management will continue to update its analysis as circumstances change. If market conditions continue to be volatile and unpredictable, impairment of goodwill related to the Company's reporting segments may be necessary in future periods. Goodwill was $275.2 million at December 31, 2012.
Assessment for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Securities
Securities are evaluated periodically to determine whether a decline in
their value is other-than-temporary. The term "other-than-temporary" is not
intended to indicate a permanent decline in value. Rather, it means that the
prospects for near-term recovery of value are not necessarily
favorable. Management reviews criteria such as the magnitude and duration of the
decline, as well as the reasons for the decline, and whether the Company would
be required to sell the securities before a full recovery of costs in order to
predict whether the loss in value is other-than-temporary. Once a decline in
value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the impairment is separated into
(a) the amount of the impairment related to the credit loss and (b) the amount
of the impairment related to all other factors. The value of the security is
reduced by the other-than-temporary impairment with the amount of the impairment
related to credit loss recognized as a charge to earnings and the amount of the
impairment related to all other factors recognized in other comprehensive
income.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Company recognizes as assets the rights to service mortgage loans for
others, known as mortgage servicing rights ("MSRs"). The Company records MSRs at
fair value on a recurring basis with subsequent remeasurement of MSRs based on
change in fair value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 860, Transfers and Servicing
("FASB ASC 860"). An estimate of the fair value of the Company's MSRs is
determined utilizing assumptions about factors such as mortgage interest rates,
discount rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds, market trends and industry
. . .
|
|