|
Quotes & Info
|
| SEIC > SEC Filings for SEIC > Form 10-K on 22-Feb-2013 | All Recent SEC Filings |
22-Feb-2013
Annual Report
Percent Percent
Year Ended December 31, 2012 2011 Change 2010 Change
Revenues $ 992,522 $ 929,727 7 % $ 900,835 3 %
Expenses 780,956 725,662 8 % 683,302 6 %
Income from operations 211,566 204,065 4 % 217,533 (6 )%
Net gain from investments 14,067 3,360 N/A 48,533 (93 )%
Interest income, net of interest
expense 5,192 5,244 (1 )% 4,848 8 %
Other expense, net - - N/A (590 ) N/A
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated affiliates 98,671 105,818 (7 )% 99,457 6 %
Income before income taxes 329,496 318,487 3 % 369,781 (14 )%
Income taxes 121,462 111,837 9 % 136,461 (18 )%
Net income 208,034 206,650 1 % 233,320 (11 )%
Less: Net income attributable to
the noncontrolling interest (1,186 ) (1,691 ) (30 )% (1,633 ) 4 %
Net income attributable to SEI
Investments Company $ 206,848 $ 204,959 1 % $ 231,687 (12 )%
Diluted earnings per common share $ 1.18 $ 1.11 6 % $ 1.22 (9 )%
|
Significant Items Impacting Our Financial Results in 2012
Revenues increased $62.8 million, or seven percent, to $992.5 million in 2012
compared to 2011. Net income attributable to SEI increased $1.9 million, or one
percent, to $206.8 million and diluted earnings per share increased to $1.18 per
share in 2012 compared to $1.11 per share in 2011. We believe the following
items were significant to our business during 2012:
• Revenue growth in 2012 was primarily driven by higher Asset management,
administration and distribution fees from improved cash flows from new and
existing clients and the net market appreciation during 2012. Our average
assets under management, excluding LSV, increased $13.5 billion, or 12
percent, to $130.5 billion during 2012 as compared to $117.0 billion during
2011.
• Sales of new business in our Institutional Investors and Investment Managers business segments as well as positive cash receipts from new and existing advisor relationships in our Investment Advisors business segment contributed to the increase in our revenues and profits.
• Our investment processing fees in our Private Banks business segment increased due to new business, higher one-time project revenue and increased fees earned on our mutual fund trading solution.
• Our proportionate share in the earnings of LSV was $100.0 million in 2012 as compared to $105.8 million in 2011. The decrease in our earnings was primarily due to lower profits caused by increased personnel costs as well as a decrease in our ownership percentage from approximately 41.2 percent to approximately 39.8 percent beginning with the second quarter 2012. The reduction in our ownership percentage is described in greater detail under the caption "Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates" later in this discussion.
• Our operating expenses related to servicing new and existing clients implemented on GWP increased during 2012 as we continue to build out the operational infrastructure. These increased operational costs, mainly related to personnel and third party service providers, primarily impacted the Private Banks business segment. The increased operational costs are primarily included in Compensation, benefits and other personnel on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
• Our consulting costs incurred for the development of GWP, excluding amounts capitalized, have declined during 2012 as compared to 2011. These consulting costs, which are expensed as incurred, are included in Consulting, outsourcing and professional fees on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
• Our operating expenses related to our hedge fund and separately managed accounts solutions of our Investment Managers business segment increased during 2012 as compared to 2011. These increased operational costs, mainly related to personnel, resulted from servicing new and existing clients and are also included in Compensation, benefits and other personnel on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
• Sales events, net of client losses, were significantly higher during 2012. These sales events resulted in an increase in sales compensation expense of $12.8 million when compared 2011. Also, incentive compensation expense increased in the 2012 as compared to 2011.
• Amortization expense related to capitalized software increased to $32.6 million during 2012 as compared to $26.2 million during 2011 primarily due to continued releases of GWP. Additionally, we decided to discontinue the use of specific functionality within the platform and incurred $2.7 million of amortization expense related to the remaining net book value of the component during 2012. This expense was recognized in our Private Banks business segment.
• We recognized gains of $13.2 million in 2012 and $3.4 million in 2011 from structured investment vehicles (SIV) securities. In November 2012, we sold our remaining SIV security, the senior notes issued by Gryphon, and recognized a gain of $5.3 million from the sale. We no longer own any SIV securities at December 31, 2012 (See Notes 5 and 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
• Our effective tax rates were 36.9 percent in 2012 and 35.2 percent in 2011. The increase in our tax rate was due to the accrual of taxes on the cumulative undistributed earnings of SEI Asset Korea (SAK) as well as the impact of the Domestic Production Activities Deduction which benefited our tax rate in 2011 (See the caption "Income Taxes" later in this discussion for more information).
• We continued our stock repurchase program during 2012 and purchased approximately 7,528,000 shares at an average price of $20.62 per share for a total cost of $155.3 million. Our stock repurchases during 2012 significantly contributed to our growth in earnings per share.
Significant Items Impacting Our Financial Results in 2011
Revenues increased $28.9 million, or three percent, to $929.7 million in 2011
compared to 2010. Net income attributable to SEI decreased $26.7 million, or 12
percent, to $205.0 million and diluted earnings per share decreased to $1.11 per
share in 2011 compared to $1.22 per share in 2010. We believe the following
items were significant to our business during 2011:
• Revenue growth was primarily driven by higher Asset management,
administration and distribution fees across the business segments from
improved capital market conditions. The majority of our asset-based revenues
are based upon average assets, which increased during the year despite the
sharp decline experienced during the third quarter. Our average assets under
management, excluding LSV, increased $9.8 billion, or nine percent, to
$117.0 billion during the year as compared to $107.2 billion during 2010.
• New business coupled with asset funding from existing clients for our hedge fund solutions and increased accounts for our separately managed accounts solutions in our Investment Managers segment also served to drive revenue growth.
• Revenues in our Private Banks business segment were negatively impacted by lower investment processing fees from price reductions provided to existing clients that recontracted for longer periods, lower transaction volumes and lower one-time project-related fees. Furthermore, the full impact of previously-announced client losses in the segment were reflected in 2011 as the associated recurring and one-time revenues from the client losses were recognized in the preceding year.
• Our proportionate share in the earnings of LSV in 2011 was $105.8 million as compared to $99.5 million in 2010, an increase of six percent. The net market appreciation in LSV's average assets under management during the first half of 2011 as well as increased performance fees resulted in an overall increase in their revenues. Although ending assets under management declined to $53.7 billion, LSV's average assets under management increased $5.2 billion, or ten percent, to $58.5 billion during the year as compared to $53.3 billion during the prior year.
• Our operating expenses related to servicing new and existing clients implemented on GWP has increased as we continue to build out the operational infrastructure and add new functionality to the platform. A higher portion of these costs are not capitalized. These increased operational costs primarily impacted the Private Banks and Investment Advisors business segments. The increased operational costs are included in Compensation, benefits and other personnel, Consulting, outsourcing and professional fees, and Data processing and computer related expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
• Our operating expenses related to servicing new and existing clients of our hedge fund and separately managed accounts solutions of our Investment Managers business segment increased during the year. These increased operational costs are also included in Compensation, benefits and other personnel, Consulting, outsourcing and professional fees, and Data processing and computer related expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
• We recognized $3.4 million in gains from SIV securities in 2011 as compared to $44.2 million in gains in 2010. Of the net gains recognized during 2011, gains of $10.6 million resulted from cash payments received from the SIV securities that had been previously written down offset by losses of $7.2 million which resulted from a decrease in fair value at December 31, 2011.
• Stock-based compensation costs declined in 2011 and reflect the return to normal levels of expense amortization as compared to the level in 2010. Stock-based compensation costs decreased during the year due to the acceleration of stock-based compensation in 2010 due to a change in management's estimates of the attainment of certain performance vesting targets, net of the reversal of $6.2 million in stock-based compensation costs in the third quarter 2010.
• We continued our stock repurchase program during 2011 and purchased approximately 11,109,000 shares at an average price of $19.01 per share for a total cost of $211.2 million.
• We made principal payments of $95.0 million during 2011, including a final payment of $20.0 million in the fourth quarter, to fully repay the outstanding balance of our credit facility.
• Our effective tax rate in 2011 declined to 35.2 percent from 37.0 percent in 2010. Our tax rate in 2011 was favorably impacted by tax planning strategies implemented during 2011.
Product Development - Global Wealth Platform
Much of our product development efforts have been focused on building and
delivering GWP. GWP is a business solution heavily supported by technology to
drive our entry into the European private bank market, improve client experience
capabilities, and strengthen operating efficiencies. GWP combines internally
built functionality and third party applications and integrates them into a
single solution with a single user experience. The goal is to provide straight
through business processing and transform the middle and back office operations
that exist today. The capabilities of GWP will expand our service offerings to
include large financial institutions, investment advisors, insurance companies,
brokerage houses, and other similar institutions. In addition, the capabilities
of GWP provide us the opportunity to enter into new global markets.
The initial version of GWP was offered in July 2007 in the United Kingdom. Since
then we have signed about 20 independent wealth advisors and other wealth
managers in the United Kingdom, converted a small, select group of investment
advisors in the United States and implemented our first U.S. bank in late 2012.
We firmly believe these are encouraging signs of progress but acknowledge GWP is
still in the early stage of deployment. We will continue to focus our
development efforts on enhancing the functionality of GWP and building the
operational infrastructure for a wider deployment of GWP to financial
institutions and investment advisors in the United States. The aggregate cost
attributable to GWP, including amortization expense, may increase in 2013.
An area of continued focus is improving the operational efficiency of GWP that
would promote scale more quickly. Our operational costs consist mainly of
third-party vendor costs and SEI personnel. We are investing in the operational
infrastructure that will attempt to provide a sustainable operating model that
minimizes cost as revenues increase. However, if we are unable to price our
services correctly and to provide an attractive value proposition for our
prospective clients, the incremental rate of revenue and profits may be
hampered.
As we progress through these initial stages of deployment of GWP to a broader
market, we expect to encounter numerous challenges; however, in our opinion, GWP
promises to provide a significant opportunity to expand our services into new
markets that will increase revenues and profits in the long-term. Until we
attain a level of revenues that technological and operational scale can be
achieved, we expect continued pressure on our operating margins in the Private
Banks business segment and a modest level of pressure on our operating margins
in the Investment Advisors business segment.
Ending Asset Balances
This table presents ending asset balances of our clients, or of our clients'
customers, for which we provide management or administrative services through
our subsidiaries and partnerships in which we have a significant interest.
Ending Asset Balances
(In millions) As of December 31,
Percent Percent
2012 2011 Change 2010 Change
Private Banks:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 18,862 $ 16,435 15 % $ 13,512 22 %
Collective trust fund programs 11 450 (98 )% 626 (28 )%
Liquidity funds 6,008 5,553 8 % 5,120 8 %
Total assets under management $ 24,881 $ 22,438 11 % $ 19,258 17 %
Client proprietary assets
under administration 12,178 10,355 18 % 10,672 (3 )%
Total assets $ 37,059 $ 32,793 13 % $ 29,930 10 %
Investment Advisors:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 31,220 $ 26,639 17 % $ 27,680 (4 )%
Collective trust fund programs 14 1,298 (99 )% 1,820 (29 )%
Liquidity funds 2,514 2,505 - % 1,641 53 %
Total assets under management $ 33,748 $ 30,442 11 % $ 31,141 (2 )%
Institutional Investors:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 62,160 $ 49,051 27 % $ 48,699 1 %
Collective trust fund programs 102 492 (79 )% 623 (21 )%
Liquidity funds 2,454 3,888 (37 )% 3,382 15 %
Total assets under management $ 64,716 $ 53,431 21 % $ 52,704 1 %
Investment Managers:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 67 $ 57 N/A $ 1 N/A
Collective trust fund programs 16,197 11,255 44 % 8,177 38 %
Liquidity funds 408 152 168 % 313 (51 )%
Total assets under management $ 16,672 $ 11,464 45 % $ 8,491 35 %
Client proprietary assets
under administration 244,671 221,198 11 % 233,079 (5 )%
Total assets $ 261,343 $ 232,662 12 % $ 241,570 (4 )%
Investments in New Businesses:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 513 $ 515 - % $ 569 (9 )%
Liquidity funds 43 37 16 % 65 (43 )%
Total assets under management $ 556 $ 552 1 % $ 634 (13 )%
LSV:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 60,947 $ 53,712 13 % $ 60,058 (11 )%
Total:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 173,769 $ 146,409 19 % $ 150,519 (3 )%
Collective trust fund programs 16,324 13,495 21 % 11,246 20 %
Liquidity funds 11,427 12,135 (6 )% 10,521 15 %
Total assets under management $ 201,520 $ 172,039 17 % $ 172,286 - %
Client proprietary assets
under administration 256,849 231,553 11 % 243,751 (5 )%
Total assets under management
and administration $ 458,369 $ 403,592 14 % $ 416,037 (3 )%
|
Average Asset Balances
This table presents average asset balances of our clients, or of our clients'
customers, for which we provide management or administrative services through
our subsidiaries and partnerships in which we have a significant interest.
Average Asset Balances
(In millions) For the Year Ended December 31,
Percent Percent
2012 2011 Change 2010 Change
Private Banks:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 17,434 $ 15,891 10 % $ 12,579 26 %
Collective trust fund programs 282 526 (46 )% 772 (32 )%
Liquidity funds 5,332 5,145 4 % 5,247 (2 )%
Total assets under management $ 23,048 $ 21,562 7 % $ 18,598 16 %
Client proprietary assets
under administration 10,873 10,672 2 % 10,907 (2 )%
Total assets $ 33,921 $ 32,234 5 % $ 29,505 9 %
Investment Advisors:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 29,611 $ 27,274 9 % $ 25,832 6 %
Collective trust fund programs 728 1,497 (51 )% 2,118 (29 )%
Liquidity funds 1,970 1,970 - % 1,986 (1 )%
Total assets under management $ 32,309 $ 30,741 5 % $ 29,936 3 %
Institutional Investors:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 56,584 $ 49,895 13 % $ 45,926 9 %
Collective trust fund programs 312 542 (42 )% 649 (16 )%
Liquidity funds 3,415 3,453 (1 )% 3,358 3 %
Total assets under management $ 60,311 $ 53,890 12 % $ 49,933 8 %
Investment Managers:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 63 $ 39 62 % $ 2 N/A
Collective trust fund programs 13,873 9,978 39 % 7,687 30 %
Liquidity funds 276 199 39 % 467 (57 )%
Total assets under management $ 14,212 $ 10,216 39 % $ 8,156 25 %
Client proprietary assets
under administration 233,024 235,096 (1 )% 225,045 4 %
Total assets $ 247,236 $ 245,312 1 % $ 233,201 5 %
Investments in New Businesses:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 537 $ 545 (1 )% $ 520 5 %
Liquidity funds 35 47 (26 )% 73 (36 )%
Total assets under management $ 572 $ 592 (3 )% $ 593 - %
LSV:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 57,935 $ 58,478 (1 )% $ 53,345 10 %
Total:
Equity and fixed-income
programs $ 162,164 $ 152,122 7 % $ 138,204 10 %
Collective trust fund programs 15,195 12,543 21 % 11,226 12 %
Liquidity funds 11,028 10,814 2 % 11,131 (3 )%
Total assets under management $ 188,387 $ 175,479 7 % $ 160,561 9 %
Client proprietary assets
under administration 243,897 245,768 (1 )% 235,952 4 %
Total assets under management
and administration $ 432,284 $ 421,247 3 % $ 396,513 6 %
|
In the preceding tables, assets under management are total assets of our clients
or their customers invested in our equity and fixed-income investment programs,
collective trust fund programs, and liquidity funds for which we provide asset
management services. Assets under management and administration also include
total assets of our clients or their customers for which we provide
administrative services, including client proprietary fund balances for which we
provide administration and/or distribution services. All assets presented in the
preceding tables are not included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets because we do not own them.
Business Segments
Revenues, Expenses, and Operating Profit (Loss) for our business segments for
the year ended 2012 compared to the year ended 2011, and for the year ended 2011
compared to the year ended 2010 are:
Percent Percent
Year Ended December 31, 2012 2011 Change 2010 Change
Private Banks:
Revenues $ 364,788 $ 348,122 5 % $ 346,668 - %
Expenses 357,001 339,339 5 % 310,633 9 %
Operating Profit $ 7,787 $ 8,783 (11 )% $ 36,035 (76 )%
Operating Margin 2 % 3 % 10 %
Investment Advisors:
Revenues 202,703 189,780 7 % 183,378 3 %
Expenses 120,146 110,438 9 % 110,388 - %
Operating Profit $ 82,557 $ 79,342 4 % $ 72,990 9 %
Operating Margin 41 % 42 % 40 %
Institutional Investors:
Revenues 227,889 210,027 9 % 206,531 2 %
Expenses 116,546 106,585 9 % 106,934 - %
Operating Profit $ 111,343 $ 103,442 8 % $ 99,597 4 %
Operating Margin 49 % 49 % 48 %
Investment Managers:
Revenues 193,484 177,975 9 % 160,159 11 %
Expenses 127,525 115,963 10 % 103,421 12 %
Operating Profit $ 65,959 $ 62,012 6 % $ 56,738 9 %
Operating Margin 34 % 35 % 35 %
Investments in New Businesses:
Revenues 3,658 3,823 (4 )% 4,099 (7 )%
Expenses 14,954 11,559 29 % 12,676 (9 )%
Operating Loss $ (11,296 ) $ (7,736 ) N/A $ (8,577 ) N/A
|
For additional information pertaining to our business segments, see Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Private Banks . . . |
|
|