|
Quotes & Info
|
| IO > SEC Filings for IO > Form 10-K on 19-Feb-2013 | All Recent SEC Filings |
19-Feb-2013
Annual Report
Executive Summary
Our Business
We are a technology-focused seismic solutions company that provides planning and
seismic processing services, software and advanced acquisition equipment to the
global energy industry. Our services, technologies and products are used by oil
and gas exploration and production ("E&P") companies and seismic acquisition
contractors to generate high-resolution images of the Earth's subsurface during
exploration, exploitation, and production operations. Our services and products
are intended to measure and interpret seismic data about rock and fluid
properties within the Earth's subsurface to enable oil and gas companies to make
improved drilling and production decisions.
We acquire and process seismic data from seismic surveys in regional data
programs, which then become part of our seismic data library. The seismic
surveys for our data library business are pre-funded, or underwritten, in part
by our customers, and we contract with third party seismic data acquisition
companies to shoot and acquire the seismic data, all of which is intended to
minimize our risk exposure. We serve customers in all major energy-producing
regions of the world from strategically located offices in 20 cities on five
continents.
In 2010, we formed a joint venture with BGP, Inc., China National Petroleum
Corporation ("BGP"), a subsidiary of China National Petroleum Corporation, and
contributed most of our land seismic equipment businesses to INOVA Geophysical
Equipment Limited ("INOVA Geophysical"), the joint venture entity. In a related
transaction, we issued to BGP 23.8 million shares of our common stock, which
represents approximately 15.2% of our outstanding shares at December 31, 2012.
BGP is generally regarded as the world's largest land geophysical service
contractor. BGP owns a 51% interest in INOVA Geophysical and we own a 49%
interest.
Our services and products include the following:
• Seismic data processing and reservoir imaging services,
• Seismic data libraries,
• Planning services for survey design and optimization,
• Navigation, command & control, and data management software products,
• Marine seismic data acquisition equipment, and
• Land seismic data acquisition equipment (principally through our 49% ownership in INOVA Geophysical).
We operate our company through three business segments: Solutions, Systems, and
Software, and through our INOVA Geophysical joint venture.
• Solutions - advanced seismic data processing services for marine and land
environments, reservoir solutions, onboard processing and quality
control, seismic data libraries, and services by our GeoVentures services
group.
• Systems - towed streamer and redeployable ocean bottom cable seismic data acquisition systems and shipboard recorders, streamer positioning and control systems, energy sources and analog geophone sensors.
• Software - software systems and related services for navigation and data management involving towed marine streamer and seabed operations.
• INOVA Geophysical - through our interest in INOVA Geophysical, cable-based, cableless and radio-controlled seismic data acquisition systems, digital sensors, vibroseis vehicles (i.e. vibrator trucks) and source controllers for detonator and energy sources business lines.
Economic Conditions
Demand for our seismic data acquisition services and products has traditionally
been cyclical and substantially dependent upon activity levels in the oil and
gas industry, particularly our customers' willingness and ability to expend
their capital for oil and natural gas exploration and development projects. This
demand is sensitive to current and expected future crude oil and natural gas
prices. During 2012, WTI spot crude oil prices rose to approximately $110 per
barrel in the first quarter, declined to just below $80 per barrel near the end
of the second quarter, and then steadily increased to nearly $100 per barrel
near the end of the third quarter. During the fourth quarter of 2012, WTI spot
crude oil prices traded in a narrower range of $85 to $93 per barrel; finishing
the year near $90 per barrel. Brent crude oil prices followed a similar pattern
to WTI, initially rising to approximately $126 per barrel in the first quarter,
followed by a steady decline to $90 per barrel by the end of the second quarter,
then steadily rising to approximately $116 per barrel late in the third quarter;
it traded in a narrower range during 2012's fourth quarter of $106 to $114 per
barrel, finishing the year near $110 per barrel.
Energy price forecasts are by their nature highly uncertain, but external
reports indicate that WTI crude oil prices and Brent crude oil prices are
expected to remain in price ranges of $80 to $110 and $100 to $130 per barrel,
respectively, for 2013 as demand outpaces supply.
U.S. natural gas prices appeared to reverse their downward trend in 2012. U.S.
Henry Hub natural gas prices decreased to approximately $1.90 per MMBtu in April
2012, but during the third quarter, natural gas prices traded in a range from
$2.65 to $3.40 per MMBtu, and during the fourth quarter in a higher range of
$3.30 to $4.00. While it may be too early to tell if this change in price
direction is in fact a trend reversal, demand for natural gas has not
deteriorated. We believe demand for natural gas will continue to grow and that
industry investment in shale-based gas production will increase and be
facilitated by new investment in technologies to locate and extract the
reserves.
For 2012, our Solutions segment revenues increased over 2011 results, due to
improved data processing revenues and higher sales by our GeoVentures business.
During 2012, our participation in oil and gas shale plays continued to expand,
with the completion of our second land multi-client new venture project in the
Marcellus shale area, and with four other projects underway, including a land
project in Poland. In the process, we are increasing our technical understanding
of both oil and gas shale plays and we intend to leverage this expertise to
broaden our oil and gas shale footprint geographically in both the U.S. and
international markets. In addition, customer demand remains high for seismic
data acquired by our GeoVentures business in offshore areas around the globe
where E&P companies have demonstrated a strong interest for exploration,
including frontier basins offshore Latin America, Africa, and in the Arctic, as
well as ResSCAN land programs in North America. At December 31, 2012, our
Solutions segment backlog, which consists of commitments for (i) data processing
work and (ii) both multi-client new venture and proprietary projects by our
GeoVentures group that have been underwritten, was $151.3 million compared with
$134.2 million at December 31, 2011, an increase of 13%. We anticipate that the
majority of this backlog will be recognized as revenue over the first half of
2013.
Revenues for our Systems segment decreased in 2012 compared to 2011. While this
segment benefited from healthy marine repair and replacement sales and improved
ocean bottom cable sales, we experienced soft streamer positioning sales in
2012, primarily attributable to modest capital spending by our contractor
customers. This reduced level of spending was principally related to a lower
number of new vessels (on which our Systems equipment and software are often
installed) introduced in 2012, compared to the number of new vessels introduced
in 2011. In 2011, we also recognized revenue from the sale to BGP of a
DigiSTREAMER twelve-streamer system; there was no similar sale of that magnitude
in 2012. In January 2013, CGGVeritas closed its acquisition of Fugro's
geoscience division, further consolidating the marine towed streamer industry
market segment, which could lead to a reduction in the number of our potential
customers and vessel outfitting opportunities. Our Software segment revenues
increased in 2012 compared to 2011 due to steady subscription sales of Orca and
Gator software.
Our land seismic business, particularly INOVA Geophysical's business in North
America and Russia, continues to show progress, reporting a sizable increase in
revenues and gross profits for the twelve-month period from October 1, 2011 to
September 30, 2012, compared to the twelve-month period ended September 30,
2011. With the recent launches of its lower-cost cableless Hawk land system, an
improved FireFly system ("FireFly DR31") and a new cabled system (G3i), INOVA
has positive momentum heading into the next twelve-month period.
It is our view that technologies that add a competitive advantage through
improved imaging, cost reductions or improvements in well productivity will
continue to be valued in our marketplace. We believe that our newest
technologies such as DigiFIN, DigiSTREAMER, Orca, our WiBand data processing
technology and INOVA Geophysical's newest technologies (including FireFly DR31,
Hawk SN11, UNIVIB, a new VectorSeis ML21 digital sensor, upgrades to its ARIES
II product with digital sensor capabilities and its new G3i cabled system), will
continue to attract customer interest, because those technologies are designed
to deliver improvements in image quality within more productive delivery
systems.
We expect the growth in demand for seismic services to continue to remain
positive for the foreseeable future, and we remain positioned to achieve
year-over-year improvement in both our revenue and profitability for 2013 as
compared to 2012. However, in stating these expectations, we are assuming that
(i) the global and U.S. economies will not slip back into a recession, (ii) the
prices of WTI and Brent crude oil will remain predominantly above $80 and $100
per barrel, respectively, (iii) the level of exploration and development
activities in the US Gulf of Mexico will continue to increase, and (iv) there
will be increasing demand for seismic services in the Middle East and North
Africa resulting from improved geopolitical stability in those areas.
WesternGeco Legal Proceedings
The trial in this lawsuit began on July 23, 2012. A verdict was returned by the
jury on August 16, 2012, finding that we willfully infringed the claims
contained in four patents and awarding WesternGeco the sum of $105.9 million in
damages, consisting of $12.5 million in reasonable royalty and $93.4 million in
lost profits. We believe that the verdict is not consistent with applicable law
or the facts or evidence in the case and, on September 28, 2012, filed motions
with the trial court to overturn all or portions of the verdict. See further
discussion at Part I, Item 3. - "Legal Proceedings."
The ultimate outcome of the case in the trial court, and the content of the
final judgment as a whole, presently rest with the presiding trial court judge.
The next step in the case is for the trial court judge to decide post-verdict
motions filed by the parties and enter a judgment. The final judgment will
determine the result of the trial prior to appeal. When he enters a judgment in
the case, the judge can choose to follow the jury verdict or to take other
actions, such as changing to a different result or ordering an entirely new
trial. As of the filing date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Court had
not yet entered a judgment in the case. If the Court enters a judgment that is
adverse to us, we intend to appeal the judgment to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit. WesternGeco would also have the right to elect
to appeal any final judgment.
Key Financial Metrics
The following table provides an overview of key financial metrics for our
company as a whole and our three business segments during 2012, 2011 and 2010.
In order to assist with the comparability to our historical results of
operations, the financial tables and discussion below for 2010, segregate the
results of operations of our disposed legacy land seismic equipment segment
(which we refer to below as our "Legacy Land Systems" segment). For tabular
information on the operating results of our INOVA Geophysical joint venture, see
"Equity in Earnings (Losses) of INOVA Geophysical" in the discussion below.
Our "multi-client" business in our Solutions segment includes "New Venture"
activities and our "Data Library." "New Venture" activities involve acquiring
and processing data in our regional seismic data programs using advanced
geophysical technology. Once the data is processed, the program moves into our
Data Library category.
Years Ended December 31,
2012 2011 2010
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net revenues:
Solutions:
New Venture $ 147,346 $ 98,335 $ 81,293
Data Library 88,085 76,332 87,664
Total multi-client revenues 235,431 174,667 168,957
Data Processing 115,834 88,783 107,997
Total $ 351,265 $ 263,450 $ 276,954
Systems:
Towed Streamer $ 77,769 $ 111,453 $ 83,567
Ocean bottom 14,823 960 1,876
Other 39,404 40,591 28,783
Total $ 131,996 $ 153,004 $ 114,226
Software:
Software Systems $ 39,738 $ 36,031 $ 34,465
Services 3,318 2,136 2,166
Total $ 43,056 $ 38,167 $ 36,631
Legacy Land Systems (INOVA) $ - $ - $ 16,511
Total $ 526,317 $ 454,621 $ 444,322
Gross profit:
Solutions $ 132,950 $ 84,647 $ 93,804
Systems 50,790 61,109 48,557
Software 32,061 27,689 24,356
Legacy Land Systems (INOVA) - - (984 )
Total $ 215,801 $ 173,445 $ 165,733
Gross margin:
Solutions 38 % 32 % 34 %
Systems 38 % 40 % 43 %
Software 74 % 73 % 66 %
Legacy Land Systems (INOVA) - - (6 )%
Total 41 % 38 % 37 %
|
Years Ended December 31,
2012 2011 2010
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Income from operations:
Solutions $ 88,589 $ 50,620 $ 60,632
Systems 10,132 33,034 27,749
Software 28,129 24,463 21,936
Corporate and other (52,323 ) (41,322 ) (47,847 )
Legacy Land Systems (INOVA) - - (9,623 )
Total $ 74,527 $ 66,795 $ 52,847
Operating Margin:
Solutions 25 % 19 % 22 %
Systems 8 % 22 % 24 %
Software 65 % 64 % 60 %
Corporate and other (10 )% (9 )% (11 )%
Legacy Land Systems (INOVA) - - (58 )%
Total 14 % 15 % 12 %
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares $ 61,963 $ 23,422 $ (38,774 )
Basic net income (loss) per common share $ 0.40 $ 0.15 $ (0.27 )
Diluted net income per (loss) common share $ 0.39 $ 0.15 $ (0.27 )
|
We intend that the following discussion of our financial condition and results
of operations will provide information that will assist in understanding our
consolidated financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those
financial statements from year to year, and the primary factors that accounted
for those changes.
We account for our 49% interest in INOVA Geophysical as an equity method
investment and record our share of earnings of INOVA Geophysical on a one fiscal
quarter lag basis. Thus, for 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recognized in our
consolidated results of operations our share of earnings (losses) in INOVA
Geophysical of approximately $0.3 million, $(22.9) million, and $(23.7) million,
which represent joint venture operations for the periods from October 1, 2011
through September 30, 2012, October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011, and
March 26, 2010 (inception) through September 30, 2010, respectively.
We expect to file an amendment on Form 10-K/A to this Annual Report on Form 10-K
within the six-month period following December 31, 2012 in order to file
separate consolidated financial statements for INOVA Geophysical for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2012, as required under SEC Regulation S-X.
For a discussion of factors that could impact our future operating results and
financial condition, see Item 1A. "Risk Factors" above.
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2011
Years Ended December 31,
2012 2011
(In thousands)
Net revenues $ 526,317 $ 454,621
Cost of sales 310,516 281,176
Gross profit 215,801 173,445
Gross margin 41 % 38 %
Operating expenses:
Research, development and engineering 34,080 24,569
Marketing and sales 35,240 31,269
General, administrative and other operating expenses 71,954 50,812
Total operating expenses 141,274 106,650
Income from operations $ 74,527 $ 66,795
|
Our total net revenues of $526.3 million for 2012 increased $71.7 million, or 16%, compared to total net revenues for 2011. Our overall gross profit percentage for 2012 was 41%, compared to 2011's gross profit percentage of 38%. Total operating expenses as a percentage of net revenues for 2012 and 2011 were 27% and 23%, respectively. During 2012, we recorded income from operations of $74.5 million compared to $66.8 million for 2011.
Net Revenues, Gross Profits and Gross Margins
Solutions - Net revenues for 2012 increased by $87.8 million, or 33%, to $351.3
million, compared to $263.5 million for 2011. This increase was predominantly
driven by improved data processing revenues due to post-Macondo recovery in the
Gulf of Mexico and continued international expansion; higher GeoVentures revenue
related to growth in new venture activity, including programs offshore Latin
America, Africa, and in the Arctic, as well as ResSCAN land programs in North
America, and growth in data library sales related to programs offshore Latin
America, Africa, Australia and in the Arctic. Gross profit increased by $48.3
million to $133.0 million, representing a 38% gross margin, compared to $84.6
million, or a 32% gross margin, for 2011, primarily attributable to the recovery
and expansion of our data processing business during 2012 and a more profitable
mix of programs in GeoVentures.
Systems - Net revenues for 2012 decreased by $21.0 million, or 14%, to $132.0
million, compared to $153.0 million for 2011. This decrease was driven primarily
by lower volumes of towed marine streamer positioning equipment, and was offset
by improved ocean bottom cable sales. In 2011, we recognized revenue from the
sale to BGP of a DigiSTREAMER twelve-streamer system, which was not replicated
in 2012. Gross profit for 2012 decreased by $10.3 million to $50.8 million,
representing a 38% gross margin, compared to $61.1 million, representing a 40%
gross margin, for 2011. The decrease in gross margins in our Systems segment was
primarily due to reduced sales of towed marine streamer positioning equipment.
Software - Net revenues for 2012 increased by $4.9 million, or 13%, to $43.1
million, compared to $38.2 million for 2011. Excluding the effects of foreign
currency translation, revenues increased 11% due to continued demand for the
Orca and Gator software platforms. Gross profit for 2012 increased by $4.4
million to $32.1 million, representing a 74% gross margin, compared to $27.7
million, for 2011, which represented a 73% gross margin. Gross profit increased
in line with revenue while gross margins increased only slightly from 2011 to
2012. Gross margins remained high due to significantly higher software sales,
which carry a much higher gross margin than other products and services.
Software sales represented 65% of total sales in this segment for 2012 in local
currency, compared to 58% of total sales in 2011.
Operating Expenses
Research, Development and Engineering - Research, development and engineering
expense was $34.1 million, or 6% of net revenues, for 2012, an increase of $9.5
million compared to $24.6 million, or 5% of net revenues, for 2011. This
increase in research and development expense was primarily due to increased
investment of labor and technology related to product development. Related to
this, our Systems and Solutions segments increased expenditures on field tests
in 2012 versus 2011.
Marketing and Sales - Marketing and sales expense of $35.2 million, or 7% of net
revenues, for 2012, increased $4.0 million compared to $31.3 million, or 7% of
net revenues, for 2011. This increase in marketing and sales expense was
primarily due to investment in our Solutions sales teams to support the
continued growth in the Solutions segment.
General, Administrative and Other Operating Expenses - General, administrative
and other operating expenses of $72.0 million for 2012 increased $21.1 million
compared to $50.8 million, for the corresponding period of 2011. General,
administrative and other operating expenses as a percentage of net revenues for
2012 and 2011 were 14% and 11%, respectively. This increase in expense was
primarily due to significantly higher legal fees ($9.0 million) and the
write-down of marine equipment and receivables totaling $11.6 million. In 2012,
we had experienced increased legal fees and expenses defending the lawsuit
brought against us by WesternGeco and pursuing the lawsuit brought by us against
Sercel. See further discussion at Part I, Item 3. "Legal Proceedings."
Non-operating Items
Interest Expense, net - Interest expense, net, of $5.3 million for 2012
decreased slightly compared to $5.8 million for 2011. For additional
information, please refer to "- Liquidity and Capital Resources - Sources of
Capital" below.
Equity in Earnings (Losses) of INOVA Geophysical - We account for our 49%
interest in INOVA Geophysical as an equity method investment and record our
share of earnings and losses of INOVA Geophysical on a one fiscal quarter-lag
basis. Thus, our share of INOVA Geophysical's earnings (losses) for the periods
from October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2012 ("Fiscal 2012") and from October 1,
2010 to September 30, 2011 ("Fiscal 2011") were included in our consolidated
financial results for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011, respectively. For 2012 and
2011, we recorded our 49% share of equity (i) earnings of approximately $0.3
million, and (ii) losses of approximately $22.9 million (including $7.7 million
that represented our share of a write-down of excess inventory), respectively.
The following table reflects the summarized financial information for INOVA Geophysical for Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 (in thousands):
Fiscal 2012 Fiscal 2011
Total net revenues $ 188,336 $ 138,735
Gross profit $ 39,320 $ 5,765
Income (loss) from operations $ 3,241 $ (41,836 )
Net income (loss) $ 2,197 $ (46,033 )
|
Other Income (Expense) - Other income for 2012 was $17.1 million compared to
other expense of $3.4 million for 2011. The difference primarily relates to the
settlements of litigation. See further discussion at Part 1, Item 3, "Legal
Proceedings."
The following table reflects the significant items of other income (expense) is
as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31,
2012 2011
Gain on legal settlements, net $ 20,895 $ -
Write-down of investments (556 ) (1,312 )
Other income (expense) (3,215 ) (2,135 )
Total other income (expense) $ 17,124 $ (3,447 )
|
Income Tax Expense - Income tax expense for 2012 was $23.9 million compared to
$10.1 million for 2011. Our effective tax rates for 2012 and 2011 were 27.5% and
29.2%, respectively. The change in our effective tax rate between 2012 and 2011
was due to a reduction in the valuation allowance on U.S. federal net deferred
tax assets, partially offset by changes in the distribution of earnings between
U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. We continue to maintain a valuation allowance
for a portion of our U.S. federal net deferred tax assets that relate to capital
losses and basis differences that will create capital losses.
Preferred Stock Dividends - The preferred stock dividend relates to our Series D
Preferred Stock. Quarterly dividends must be paid in cash. Dividends are paid at
a rate equal to the greater of (i) 5.0% per annum or (ii) the three month LIBOR
rate on the last day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter plus 2.5% per
annum. The Series D Preferred Stock dividend rate was 5.0% at December 31, 2012.
The total amount of dividends paid on our preferred stock in 2012 was the same
as in 2011.
Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2010
Revenues, costs and expenses for 2010 that are identified as "adjusted" or "as
adjusted" in the discussion below reflect exclusion of the revenues, costs and
. . .
|
|