|
Quotes & Info
|
| CLCT > SEC Filings for CLCT > Form 10-Q on 7-Feb-2013 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-Feb-2013
Quarterly Report
Forward-Looking Statements
The discussion in this Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this "Report") includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "1934 Act"). Those Sections of the 1933 Act and 1934 Act provide a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their expected future financial performance so long as they provide cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause their actual results to differ from projected or anticipated results. Other than statements of historical fact, all statements in this Report and, in particular, any projections of or statements as to our expectations or beliefs with respect to our future financial performance or financial condition or as to trends in our business or in our markets, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements often include the words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "estimate," "project," or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "would," "should," "could," or "may." Our actual financial performance in future periods may differ significantly from the currently expected financial performance set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this Report due to the risks to which our business is subject and other circumstances or occurrences which are not presently predictable and over which we do not have control. Consequently, the forward-looking statements and information contained in this Report are qualified in their entirety by, and readers of this Report are urged to read the risk factors that are described in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 (the "Fiscal 2012 10-K"), which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on August 30, 2012, and the section, entitled "Factors that Can affect our Results of Operations or Financial Position," below in this Item 2.
Due to these and other possible uncertainties and risks, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained or recent trends that we describe in this Report, which speak only as of the date of this Report, or to make predictions about future performance based solely on our historical financial performance. We also disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this Report or in our Fiscal 2012 10-K or any other prior filings with the SEC, except as may be required by applicable law or applicable Nasdaq rules.
Our Business
Collectors Universe, Inc. ("we", "us" "management" "our" or the "Company") provides authentication and grading services to dealers and collectors of high-value coins, trading cards, event tickets, autographs, sports and historical memorabilia. We believe that our authentication and grading services add value to these collectibles by providing dealers and collectors with a high level of assurance as to the authenticity and quality of the collectible they seek to buy or sell; thereby enhancing their marketability and providing increased liquidity to the dealers, collectors and consumers that own, buy and sell such collectibles.
We principally generate revenues from the fees paid for our authentication and
grading services. To a lesser extent, we generate revenues from other related
services which consist of: (i) sales of advertising and commissions earned on
our websites, including the Coinflation.com website, which we acquired in
September 2011; (ii) sales of printed publications and collectibles price guides
and advertising in those publications and on our websites; (iii) sales of
membership subscriptions in our Collectors Club, which is designed primarily to
attract interest in high-value collectibles among new collectors; (iv) sales of
subscriptions to our CCE dealer-to-dealer Internet bid-ask market for certified
coins and to our CoinFacts™ website, which offers a comprehensive one-stop
source for historical U.S. numismatic information and value-added content; and
(v) the management and operation of collectibles trade shows and conventions. We
also generate revenues from sales of our collectibles inventory, which is
comprised primarily of collectible coins that we have purchased under our coin
grading warranty program; however, such product sales are neither the focus nor
an integral part of our on-going revenue generating activities.
Overview of Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2012 Operating Results
The following table sets forth comparative financial data for the three and six
months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended December 31, Six Months Ended December 31,
2012 2011 2012 2011
% of Net % of Net % of Net % of Net
Amount Revenues Amount Revenues Amount Revenues Amount Revenues
Net Revenues:
Grading authentication and related
services $ 9,595 100.0 % $ 11,307 98.6 % $ 20,275 97.4 % $ 23,207 98.6 %
Product sales - 0.0 % 165 1.4 % 550 2.6 % 337 1.4 %
9,595 100.0 % 11,472 100.0 % 20,825 100.0 % 23,544 100.0 %
Cost of Revenues:
Grading authentication and related
services 3,962 41.3 % 4,492 39.7 % 8,302 40.9 % 9,030 38.9 %
Product sales 2 - 225 136.4 % 552 100.4 % 411 122.0 %
3,964 41.3 % 4,717 41.1 % 8,854 42.5 % 9,441 40.1 %
Gross Profit:
Services 5,633 58.7 % 6,815 60.3 % 11,973 59.1 % $ 14,177 61.1 %
Product sales (2 ) - (60 ) (36.4 )% (2 ) (0.4 )% (74 ) (22.0 )%
5,631 58.7 % 6,755 58.9 % 11,971 57.5 % 14,103 59.9 %
Selling and marketing expenses 1,552 16.2 % 1,567 13.7 % 3,368 16.2 % 3,218 13.7 %
General & administrative expenses 3,108 32.4 % 3,294 28.7 % 6,342 30.4 % 6,498 27.6 %
Operating income 971 10.1 % 1,894 16.5 % 2,261 10.9 % 4,387 18.6 %
Interest and other income, net 9 0.1 % 18 0.2 % 71 0.3 % 38 0.2 %
Income before provision for income
taxes 980 10.2 % 1,912 16.7 % 2,332 11.2 % 4,425 18.8 %
Provision for income taxes 399 4.1 % 795 7.0 % 934 4.5 % 1,814 7.7 %
Income from continuing operations 581 6.1 % 1,117 9.7 % 1,398 6.7 % 2,611 11.1 %
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes (20 ) (0.3 )% (32 ) (0.2 )% (31 ) (0.1 )% (50 ) (0.2 )%
Net income $ 561 5.8 % $ 1,085 9.5 % $ 1,367 6.6 % $ 2,561 10.9 %
Net income per diluted share:
Income from continuing operations $ 0.07 $ 0.14 $ 0.17 $ 0.33
Loss from discontinued operations - - - (0.01 )
Net income $ 0.07 $ 0.14 $ 0.17 $ 0.32
|
Operating income decreased by $923,000 or 49% to $971,000 and by $2,126,000 or 48% to $2,261,000 in the three and six months ended December 31, 2012, respectively, from $1,894,000 and $4,387,000 in the same periods of the prior years, respectively. Those decreases resulted primarily from a $1.7 million or 15% and $2.9 million or 13% decrease in total service revenues in the three and six months ended December 31, 2012, compared to the same periods of the prior year. The reductions in service revenues included reductions of $1.9 million and $3.4 million in the revenues from our coin authentication and grading business in the three and six months ended December 31, 2012, respectively.
In response to this general market decline, we reduced our coin authentication and grading costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 by approximately $1.1 million on an annualized basis, to more closely align our authentication and grading capacity to current market conditions. Moreover, we will continue to closely monitor our short-term revenue trends and cost structure to improve the profitability of the business.
These, as well as other factors affecting our operating results in the three and six months ended December 31, 2012, are described in more detail below. See "Factors that Can Affect our Operating Results and Financial Condition" and "Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2012, Compared to the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2011," below.
Factors That Can Affect our Operating Results and Financial Position
Factors That Can Affect our Revenues and Gross Profit Margins. Authentication and grading fees accounted for approximately 79% of our total net revenues for the six months ended December 31, 2012. The amount of those fees and our gross profit margins are primarily driven by the volume and mix of coin and collectibles sales and purchase transactions by collectibles dealers and collectors, because our collectibles authentication and grading services generally facilitate sales and purchases of coins and other high value collectibles by providing dealers and collectors with a high level of assurance as to the authenticity and quality of the collectibles they seek to sell or buy. Consequently, dealers and collectors most often submit coins and other collectibles to us for authentication and grading at those times when they are in the market to sell or buy coins and other high-value collectibles.
In addition, our coin grading and authentication revenues are impacted by the level of modern coin submissions, which can be volatile, primarily depending on the timing and size of modern coin marketing programs by the United States Mint and by customers or dealers who specialize in sales of such coins.
Our authentication and grading revenues and gross profit margins are affected by
(i) the volume and mix of authentication and grading submissions among coins and
trading cards, on the one hand, and other collectibles on the other hand;
(ii) in the case of coins and trading cards, the "turnaround" times requested by
our customers, because we charge higher fees for faster service times; and
(iii) the mix of authentication and grading submissions between vintage or
"classic" coins and trading cards, on the one hand, and modern coins and trading
cards, on the other hand, because dealers generally request faster turnaround
times for vintage or classic coins and trading cards than they do for modern
submissions, as vintage or classic collectibles are of significantly higher
value and are more saleable by dealers than modern coins and trading cards; and
(iv) as discussed above, the volume and timing of marketing programs for modern
coins. Furthermore, because a significant portion of our costs of sales are
relatively fixed in nature in the short term, our gross profit margin is also
affected by the overall volume of collectibles that we authenticate and grade in
any period.
Our revenues and gross profit margin are also affected by the level of coin authentication and grading submissions we receive at collectibles trade shows where we provide on-site authentication and grading services to show attendees, because they typically request higher priced same-day turnaround for the coins they submit to us for authentication and grading at those shows. The level of trade show submissions varies from period to period depending upon a number of factors, including the number and the timing of the shows in each period and the volume of collectible coins that are bought and sold at those shows by dealers and collectors. In addition, the number of such submissions and, therefore, the revenues and gross profit margin we generate from the authentication and grading of coins at trade shows can be impacted by short-term changes in the prices of gold that sometimes occur around the time of the shows, because gold prices can affect the willingness of dealers and collectors to sell and purchase coins at the shows.
Five of our coin authentication and grading customers represented, in the aggregate, approximately 12% of our total net revenues in the three and six months ended December 31, 2012, respectively. As a result, the loss of any of those customers, or a significant decrease in the volume of grading submissions from any of them to us, could cause our net revenues to decline and, therefore, could adversely affect our results of operations.
The following tables provide information regarding the respective numbers of coins, trading cards, autographs, and stamps that were authenticated and graded by us in the three and six months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and their estimated values, which are the amounts at which those coins, trading cards and stamps are declared for insurance purposes by the dealers and collectors who submitted them to us for grading and authentication:
Units Processed Declared Value (000)
Three Months Ended December 31, Three Months Ended December 31,
2012 2011 2012 2011
Coins 359,500 49.5 % 428,900 54.8 % $ 293,491 90.9 % $ 298,057 91.9 %
Trading cards and
autographs(1) 366,400 50.5 % 349,500 44.7 % 29,224 9.1 % 24,723 7.6 %
Stamps(2) - - 4,100 0.5 % - - 1,513 0.5 %
Total 725,900 100.0 % 782,500 100.0 % $ 322,715 100.0 % $ 324,293 100.0 %
Units Processed Declared Value (000)
Six Months Ended December 31, Six Months Ended December 31,
2012 2011 2012 2011
Coins 702,500 48.4 % 907,700 56.1 % $ 592,235 90.4 % $ 634,616 91.2 %
Trading cards and
autographs(1) 748,900 51.6 % 703,000 43.4 % 63,002 9.6 % 57,450 8.3 %
Stamps - - 7,600 0.5 % - - 3,404 0.5 %
Total 1,451,400 100.0 % 1,618,300 100.0 % $ 655,237 100.0 % $ 695,470 100.0 %
|
(2) We sold our stamp authentication and grading business in June 2012.
Impact of Economic Conditions on our Financial Performance. As discussed above,
our operating results are primarily affected by the volume of collectibles
transactions by collectibles dealers and collectors which, in turn, is primarily
affected by (i) the cash flows generated by collectibles dealers and their
confidence about future economic conditions, which affect their ability and
willingness to purchase collectibles for resale; (ii) the availability and cost
of borrowings because collectibles dealers often rely on borrowings to fund
their purchases of collectibles, (iii) the disposable income available to
collectors and their confidence about future economic conditions, because
high-value collectibles are generally viewed as luxury goods and are purchased
with disposable income; (iv) prevailing and anticipated rates of inflation and
the strength or weakness of the U.S. dollar, because the threat of increased
inflation or concerns about the weakening of the U.S. dollar often lead
investors and consumers to purchase gold and silver coins as hedges against
inflation and reductions in the purchasing power of the U.S. currency; and
(v) the performance and volatility of the gold and other precious metals
markets, which can affect the level of purchases and sales of collectible coins,
because investors and consumers will often increase their purchases of hard
assets, including gold coins, if they believe that the market prices of hard
assets will increase. By contrast, collectibles transactions and, therefore, the
demand for our services generally decline during periods characterized by
economic downturns or recessions, declines in consumer and business confidence,
an absence of inflationary pressure, or declines or stagnation in the market
price of gold. However, these conditions can sometimes counteract each other as
it is not uncommon, for example, for investors to shift funds from gold to other
investments during periods of economic growth and growing consumer and business
confidence.
Factors That Can Affect our Financial Position. A substantial number of our authentication and grading customers prepay our authentication and grading fees when they submit their collectibles to us for authentication and grading. As a result, historically, we have been able to rely on internally generated cash and have never incurred borrowings to fund our continuing operations. We currently expect that internally generated cash flows and current cash and cash equivalent balances will be sufficient to fund our continuing operations at least through the end of fiscal 2013.
In addition to the day-to-day operating performance of our business, our overall financial position can also be affected by the dividend policy adopted by the Board of Directors from time to time, the Company's decisions to invest in and to fund the acquisition of established and/or early stage businesses and any capital raising activities or stock repurchases. In addition, our financial position is impacted by the Company's tax position. Through June 30, 2012, the Company had fully utilized all of its federal net operating losses and other tax attributes, and therefore we will pay federal income taxes at 34% of taxable income on an annual basis in future periods. The Company continues to have net operating losses and other tax credits available for state income tax purposes in California, which should allow us to pay taxes at minimum levels in California for the foreseeable future.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Except as discussed below, during the six months ended December 31, 2012, there were no changes in our critical accounting policies or estimates which are described in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012. Readers of this report are urged to read that Section of that Annual Report for a more complete understanding and detailed discussion of our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.
Goodwill. We test the carrying value of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually on their respective acquisition anniversary dates, or more frequently if indicators of impairment are determined to exist. When testing for impairment, in accordance with Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08, we consider qualitative factors, and where determined necessary by management, we proceed to a two-step goodwill impairment test. When conducting the two-step impairment test, we apply a discounted cash flow model or an income approach in determining a fair value that is used to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit on a total basis, which is then compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the reporting unit, no impairment of goodwill exists as of the measurement date. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, then there is the possibility of goodwill impairment and the second step of the test, which involves further testing and re-measurement of goodwill, is required.
During the first quarter ended September 30, 2012, we completed the annual goodwill impairment assessment with respect to the goodwill acquired in our fiscal year 2006 purchases of CCE and CoinFacts. We assessed qualitative factors, including the significant excess of fair value over carrying value in prior years, and any material changes in the estimated cash flows of the reporting unit, and determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value of CCE and CoinFacts was greater than the carrying value, including goodwill, and therefore it was not necessary to proceed to the second-step impairment test.
With respect to our Expos trade show business, as previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012, we determined that no further impairment existed at both June 30, 2012 and there were no triggering events in the six months ended December 31, 2012.
Stock-Based Compensation. We recognize share-based compensation attributable to service-based equity grants over the service period based on the grant date fair value. For performance-based equity grants with a financial performance goal, we begin to recognize compensation expense based on the grant date fair value when it becomes probable that we will achieve the financial performance goal.
(i) Fiscal 2013 Expense. Stock-based compensation in the three and six months ended December 31, 2012, represents expenses attributable to (i) prior year grants of restricted stock for which compensation is being recognized over the remaining service periods of those grants; (ii) grants of 84,000 shares of restricted stock granted in the six months ended December 31, 2012 (including 40,000 shares granted to the Company's new Chief Executive Officer, 12,500 shares granted the Company's Chief Financial Officer and 24,000 shares granted to the Company's outside directors), all of which are service-based grants and, therefore, required recognition of stock-based compensation for those awards from the respective grant dates; and (iii) $103,000 in connection with accelerated vesting of restricted shares for the Company's former CEO.
The accelerated vesting of restricted shares held by our former CEO was in exchange for his early termination, effective October 15, 2012, of his employment agreement, which would otherwise have continued in effect until June 30, 2013.
(ii) Fiscal 2013 Long-Term Performance-Based Equity Incentive Program
On December 28, 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors adopted a Long-Term Performance-Based Equity Incentive Program ("LTIP") for the Company's executive officers (including the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Deuster, and the Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Wallace) and certain management employees ("Participants") and granted approximately 300,000 shares of restricted stock (the "restricted shares"), including 108,880 shares to Mr. Deuster and 40,830 shares to Mr. Wallace, pursuant to the Company's stockholder-approved 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2006 Plan").
The primary purposes of this program are (i) to focus executive management on achieving substantial increases in the Company's operating income, and thereby increase internally generated cash flows, and (ii) to align the longer-term financial interests of executive management with the longer-term interests of the Company's stockholders. For purposes of this program, operating income is defined as the Company's operating income before non-cash stock-based compensation expense.
The Compensation Committee had intended to grant a total of approximately 550,000 restricted shares to the Participants (including 200,000 restricted shares to Mr. Deuster and 75,000 restricted shares to Mr. Wallace) under the LTIP. However, it was not able to do so, because there were not a sufficient number of shares available for such grants under the 2006 Plan. As a result, the Compensation Committee expects to approve grants of additional shares to the Participants under this LTIP, if the Board of Directors adopts a new equity incentive plan and that plan is approved by the Company's stockholders at the next Annual Meeting, which is scheduled to be held in December, 2013. The additional number of restricted shares to be granted at that time has not yet been determined, but could be as many as 250,000 additional shares, including 91,120 to Mr. Deuster and 34,170 to Mr. Wallace.
The vesting of those restricted shares is conditioned on the Company's achievement of increasing annual operating income during any fiscal year within a six-year period commencing with fiscal 2013 and continuing through the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018, as indicated in the following table:
Cumulative Percent of
Shares Vested
If in any fiscal year during the term of the Program:
The Threshold Performance Goal is Achieved 10 %
Intermediate Performance Goal #1 is Achieved 25 %
Intermediate Performance Goal #2 is Achieved 45 %
Intermediate Performance Goal #3 is Achieved 70 %
The Maximum Performance Goal is Achieved 100 %
|
Upon the determination that a milestone has been achieved for a fiscal year, 50% of the shares related to achieving that milestone will vest immediately and the remaining 50% will vest at June 30 of the following fiscal year, provided that the Participant is still in the service of the Company.
If the Company never achieves the Threshold Performance Goal during the term of the Program, all of the restricted shares will be forfeited effective June 30, 2018. If, instead, the Threshold Performance Goal is achieved or exceeded, but . . .
|
|