|
Quotes & Info
|
| BERY > SEC Filings for BERY > Form 10-Q on 5-Feb-2013 | All Recent SEC Filings |
5-Feb-2013
Quarterly Report
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations to the "Company" refer to Berry Plastics Group, Inc, and references to "we," "our" or "us" refer to Berry Plastics Group, Inc. together with its consolidated subsidiaries, after giving effect to the transactions described in the next paragraph. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries and the accompanying notes thereto, which information is included elsewhere herein. This discussion contains forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2012 in the section titled "Risk Factors" and other risk factors identified from time to time in our periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. You should read the explanation of the qualifications and limitations on these forward-looking statements referenced within this report.
Acquisitions
We have a long history of acquiring and integrating companies. We maintain an opportunistic acquisition strategy, which is focused on improving our long-term financial performance, enhancing our market positions and expanding our product lines or, in some cases, providing us with a new or complementary product line. In our acquisitions, we seek to obtain businesses for attractive post-synergy multiples, creating value for our stockholders from synergy realization, leveraging the acquired products across our customer base, creating new platforms for future growth, and assuming best practices from the businesses we acquire.
The Company has included the expected benefits of acquisition integrations within our unrealized synergies, which are in turn recognized in earnings after an acquisition has been fully integrated. While the expected benefits on earnings is estimated at the commencement of each transaction, once the execution of the plan and integration occur, we are generally unable to accurately estimate or track what the ultimate effects have been due to system integrations and movements of activities to multiple facilities. As historical business combinations have not allowed us to accurately separate realized synergies compared to what was initially identified, we measure the synergy realization based on the overall segment profitability post integration. In connection with our acquisitions, we have in the past and may in the future incur charges related to reductions and rationalizations.
We also include the expected impact of our restructuring plans within our unrealized synergies which are in turn recognized in earnings after the restructuring plans are completed. While the expected benefits on earnings is estimated at the commencement of each plan, due to the nature of the matters we are generally unable to accurately estimate or track what the ultimate effects have been due to movements of activities to multiple facilities.
Stopaq®
In June 2012, the Company acquired 100% of the shares of Frans Nooren Beheer B.V. and its operating companies ("Stopaq") for a purchase price of $65 million ($62 million, net of cash acquired). Stopaq is the inventor and manufacturer of patented visco-elastic technologies for use in corrosion prevention, sealing and insulation applications ranging from pipelines to subsea piles to rail and cable joints. The newly added business is operated in the Company's Engineered Materials reporting segment. To finance the purchase, the Company used cash on hand and existing credit facilities. The Stopaq acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the preliminary purchase price has been allocated to the identifiable assets and liabilities based on estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The Company has not finalized the purchase price allocation to the fair value on fixed assets, deferred income taxes, intangibles and is reviewing all the working capital acquired. The Company has recognized goodwill on this transaction as a result of expected synergies. A portion of the goodwill will not be deductible for tax purposes.
Prime Label
In October 2012, the Company acquired 100% of the shares of Prime Label and Screen Incorporated ("Prime Label") for a purchase price of $20 million. Prime is a leader in specialty re-sealable labels, including a patented rigid lens closure system. The newly added business is operated in the Company's Flexible Packaging reporting segment. To finance the purchase, the Company used cash on hand and existing credit facilities. The Prime Label acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the preliminary purchase price has been allocated to the identifiable assets and liabilities based on estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The
Company has not finalized the purchase price allocation to the fair value on fixed assets, deferred income taxes, intangibles and is reviewing all the working capital acquired. The Company has recognized goodwill on this transaction as a result of expected synergies. A portion of the goodwill will not be deductible for tax purposes.
Recent Developments
In October 2012, the Company completed an initial public offering and sold 29,411,764 shares of common stock at $16.00 per share. In conjunction with the initial public offering the Company executed a 12.25 for one stock split of the Company's common stock. The effect of the stock split on outstanding shares and earnings per share has been retroactively applied to all periods presented. Transaction fees totaling $33 million were included in Paid-in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Proceeds, net of transaction fees, of $438 million and cash from operations were used to repurchase $455 million of 11% Senior Subordinated Notes due September 2016. As part of the repurchase the Company paid premiums of $13 million and wrote-off $3 million of deferred financing fees.
Tax Receivable Agreement
In connection with the initial public offering, the Company entered into an income tax receivable agreement ("TRA") that provides for the payment to pre-initial public offering stockholders, option holders and holders of our stock appreciation rights, 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, foreign, state and local income tax that are actually realized (or are deemed to be realized in the case of a change of control) as a result of the utilization of our and our subsidiaries' net operating losses attributable to periods prior to the initial public offering. The Company expects to pay between $300 million and $350 million in cash related to this agreement. This range is based on the Company's assumptions using various items, including valuation analysis and current tax law. Upon the effective date of the TRA, the Company recorded an initial obligation of $300 million ($123 million in Accrued expenses and $177 million in Other long-term liabilities) which is recognized as a reduction of Paid-in capital on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 29, 2012. Changes in the recorded net deferred income tax assets will result in changes in the TRA obligation, and such changes will be recorded as Other expense (income) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Payments under the TRA are not conditioned upon the parties' continued ownership of the Company's equity.
Redeemable Common Stock
As of September 29, 2012, the Company had entered into agreements with former employees that required the Company to redeem this common stock at pre-determined dates. Historical redemption of this stock was based on the fair value of the stock on the fixed redemption date. This redeemable common stock was recorded at its fair value in temporary equity and changes in the fair value were recorded in additional paid in capital each period. Upon completion of the initial public offering, the redemption requirement terminated resulting in the Company reclassifying the shares into equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
BP Parallel Investments
In December 2012, BP Parallel LLC, a non-guarantor subsidiary of the Company, invested $21 million to purchase assignments of $21 million of our senior unsecured term loan during the quarter ended December 29, 2012. The purchase did not result in a gain or loss.
Executive Summary
Business. We operate in the following four segments: Rigid Open Top, Rigid Closed Top (together our Rigid Packaging business), Engineered Materials, and Flexible Packaging. The Rigid Packaging business sells primarily containers, foodservice items, housewares, closures, overcaps, bottles, prescription containers, and tubes. Our Engineered Materials segment sells specialty tapes, adhesives, pipeline corrosive protection solutions, polyethylene based film products, and waste bags. The Flexible Packaging segment sells primarily high barrier, multilayer film products as well as printed bags and pouches.
Raw Material Trends. Our primary raw material is plastic resin. Polypropylene and polyethylene account for approximately 90% of our plastic resin purchases based on the pounds purchased. Plastic resins are subject to price fluctuations, including those arising from supply shortages and changes in the prices of natural gas, crude oil and other petrochemical intermediates from which resins are produced. The average industry prices, as published in Chem Data, per pound were as follows by fiscal year:
Polyethylene Butene Film Polypropylene
2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011
1st quarter $ .69 $ .70 $ .68 $ .76 $ .79 $ .78
2nd quarter - .76 .72 - .88 .95
3rd quarter - .72 .79 - .85 1.08
4th quarter - .68 .73 - .71 .98
|
We expect plastic resin prices to trend upward early in the second fiscal quarter of 2013. Due to differences in the timing of passing through resin cost changes to our customers on escalator/de-escalator programs, segments are negatively impacted in the short term when plastic resin costs increase and are positively impacted when plastic resin costs decrease. Recently, the Company has made progress towards shortening these timing lags, but we still have a number of customers whose prices adjust quarterly or less frequently based on various index prices. This timing lag in passing through raw material cost changes could affect our results as plastic resin costs fluctuate.
Outlook. The Company is impacted by general economic and industrial growth, plastic resin availability and affordability, and general industrial production. Our business has both geographic and end market diversity, which reduces the effect of any one of these factors on our overall performance. Our results are affected by our ability pass through raw material cost changes to our customers, improve manufacturing productivity and adapt to volume changes of our customers. We seek to improve our overall profitability by implementing cost reduction programs for our manufacturing, selling and general and administrative expenses. Looking forward to the second fiscal quarter of 2013, we believe overall economic activity will continue to remain sluggish, but modestly positive. Despite the headwinds we will be facing and assuming volumes are in line with GDP forecasts of 2%, we anticipate profitability, as defined as adjusted EBITDA less pro forma adjustments, will improve versus the second fiscal quarter of 2012.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Quarterly Period Ended December 29, 2012 (the "Quarter") and the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2011 (the "Prior Quarter")
Net Sales. Net sales decreased from $1,137 million in the Prior Quarter to $1,072 million in the Quarter. This decrease is primarily attributed to lower selling prices of 6% as a result of lower plastic resin costs noted above. The following discussion in this section provides a comparison of net sales by business segment.
Quarterly Period Ended
December 29, 2012 December 31, 2011 $ Change % Change
Net sales:
Rigid Open Top $ 259 $ 287 $ (28 ) (10 %)
Rigid Closed Top 313 347 (34 ) (10 %)
Rigid Packaging $ 572 $ 634 $ (62 ) (10 %)
Engineered Materials 325 328 (3 ) (1 %)
Flexible Packaging 175 175 - -
Total net sales $ 1,072 $ 1,137 $ (65 ) (6 %)
|
Net sales in the Rigid Open Top business decreased from $287 million in the Prior Quarter to $259 million in the Quarter as a result of net selling price decreases of 11% due to lower resin costs partially offset by volume growth of 1%. Net sales in the Rigid Closed Top business decreased from $347 million in the Prior Quarter to $313 million in the Quarter as a result of net selling price decreases of 7% due to lower resin costs and a volume decline of 3%. The volume decline is primarily attributed to general market softness. The Engineered Materials business net sales decreased from $328 million in the Prior Quarter to $325 million in the Quarter as a result of net selling price decreases of 1% due to lower resin costs. Net sales in the Flexible Packaging business was $175 million in the Prior Quarter and the Quarter as a result of volume growth of 2% offset by net selling price decreases of 2% due to lower resin costs. The volume improvement is primarily due to a modest share gain in our sealant and barrier film.
Operating Income. Operating income increased from $29 million (3% of net sales) in Prior Quarter to $68 million (6% of net sales) in Quarter. This increase is primarily attributed to $2 million from the relationship of net selling price to raw material costs, $2 million decrease in depreciation expense, $2 million decrease in amortization expense, $13 million decrease in business integration and impairment charges, $8 million of improved manufacturing efficiencies, $1
million from acquisitions and a non-cash impairment charge of $17 million in Prior Quarter partially offset by $1 million from volume declines described above, $7 million of increased selling, general and administrative expenses due to increased spending to accelerate future organic growth. The operating loss from Prior Quarter divestiture includes a non-cash impairment charge of $17 million. The following discussion in this section provides a comparison of operating income by business segment.
Quarterly Period Ended
December 29, 2012 December 31, 2011 $ Change % Change
Operating income (loss):
Rigid Open Top $ 27 $ 31 $ (4 ) (13 %)
Rigid Closed Top 18 3 15 500 %
Rigid Packaging $ 45 $ 34 $ 11 32 %
Engineered Materials 24 2 22 1,100 %
Flexible Packaging (1 ) (7 ) 6 86 %
Total operating income $ 68 $ 29 $ 39 134 %
|
Operating income for the Rigid Open Top business decreased from $31 million (11%
of net sales) in Prior Quarter to $27 million (10% of net sales) in
Quarter. This decrease is primarily attributed to a $4 million decline in the
relationship of net selling price to raw material costs and $2 million increase
of selling, general and administrative expenses partially offset by an
improvement in manufacturing efficiencies of $2 million. Operating income for
the Rigid Closed Top business increased from $3 million (1% of net sales) in
Prior Quarter to $18 million (6% of net sales) in Quarter. This increase is
primarily attributed to a $11 million decline in business integration expenses,
$3 million improvement in the relationship of net selling price to raw material
costs, $3 million reduction of depreciation and amortization expense, $1 million
of improved operating performance in manufacturing partially offset by $2
million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses and $1 million
from volume declines described above. Operating income for the Engineered
Materials business improved from $2 million (1% of net sales) in Prior Quarter
to $24 million (7% of net sales)
Quarter. This increase is primarily attributed to a $17 million non-cash
impairment in Prior Quarter, $1 million from acquisitions, $4 million
improvement in the relationship of net selling price to raw material costs, $4
million of improved operating performance in manufacturing partially offset by
$4 million increase in business integration $1 million increase in selling,
general and administrative expenses. Operating loss for the Flexible Packaging
business improved from a loss of $7 million (-4% of net sales) in Prior Quarter
to a loss of $1 million (-1% of net sales) in Quarter. This improvement is
primarily attributed to a $5 million reduction of business integration expense,
$1 million reduction of depreciation and amortization expense, and a $2 million
improvement in manufacturing efficiencies partially offset by $1 million decline
in the relationship of net selling price to raw material costs and $1 million
increase of selling, general and administrative expenses.
Debt Extinguishment. Debt extinguishment was $16 million during the Quarter. These were related to loss on extinguishment of debt attributed to $3 million of write-off of deferred fees and $13 million of premiums paid related to the debt extinguishment of the Company's 11% Senior Subordinated Notes during the Quarter.
Other Income. Other income decreased from $4 million in the Prior Quarter to $3 million in the Quarter. The change is primarily related to the change in the fair value of derivative instruments.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased from $83 million in the Prior Quarter to $70 million in the Quarter primarily as the result of the debt extinguishment of the Company's 11% Senior Subordinated Notes.
Income Tax Benefit. For the Quarter, we recorded an income tax benefit of $5 million or an effective tax rate of 33% compared to an income tax benefit of $19 million or an effective tax rate of 38% in the Prior Quarter. The effective tax rate for the Quarter is impacted by the relative impact of discrete items.
Net Loss. Net loss improved from $31 million in the Prior Quarter to $10 million in the Quarter for the reasons discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Senior Secured Credit Facility
The Company's senior secured credit facilities consist of $1,200 million term loan and $650 million asset based revolving line of credit ("Credit Facility"). The term loan matures in April 2015 and the revolving line of credit matures in June 2016, subject to certain conditions. The availability under the revolving line of credit is the lesser of $650 million or based on a defined borrowing base which is calculated based on available accounts receivable and inventory. The revolving line of credit allows up to $130 million of letters of credit to be issued instead of borrowings under the revolving line of credit. At December 29, 2012, the Company had $44 million outstanding on the revolving
credit facility, $48 million outstanding letters of credit and a $145 million borrowing base reserve providing unused borrowing capacity of $413 million under the revolving line of credit. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of December 29, 2012.
Our fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the revolving credit facility, is calculated based on a numerator consisting of adjusted EBITDA less pro forma adjustments, income taxes paid in cash and capital expenditures, and a denominator consisting of scheduled principal payments in respect of indebtedness for borrowed money, interest expense and certain distributions. We are obligated to sustain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 under the revolving credit facility at any time when the aggregate unused capacity under the revolving credit facility is less than 10% of the lesser of the revolving credit facility commitments and the borrowing base (and for 10 business days following the date upon which availability exceeds such threshold) or during the continuation of an event of default. At December 29, 2012, the Company had unused borrowing capacity of $413 million under the revolving credit facility and thus was not subject to the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio covenant. Our fixed charge ratio was 1.7 to 1.0 at December 29, 2012.
Despite not having financial maintenance covenants, our debt agreements contain certain negative covenants. The failure to comply with these negative covenants could restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness, effect acquisitions, enter into certain significant business combinations, make distributions or redeem indebtedness. The term loan facility contains a negative covenant first lien secured leverage ratio covenant of 4.0 to 1.0 on a pro forma basis for a proposed transaction, such as an acquisition or incurrence of additional first lien debt. Our first lien secured leverage ratio was 2.8 to 1.0 at December 29, 2012.
A key financial metric utilized in the calculation of the first lien leverage ratio is Adjusted EBITDA as defined in the Company's senior secured credit facilities. The following table reconciles our Adjusted EBITDA for the four quarters and quarterly period ended December 29, 2012 to net income (loss):
December 29, 2012
Quarterly Period
Four Quarters Ended Ended
Adjusted EBITDA $ 812 $ 176
Net interest expense (315 ) (70 )
Depreciation and amortization (353 ) (87 )
Income tax benefit (expense) (16 ) 5
Business optimization and other expense (39 ) (6 )
Restructuring and impairment (13 ) (5 )
Extinguishment of debt (16 ) (16 )
Non-cash stock compensation expense (5 ) (4 )
Pro forma acquisitions (6 ) -
Unrealized cost savings (26 ) (3 )
Net income (loss) $ 23 $ (10 )
Cash flow from operating activities $ 477 $ 87
Net additions to property, plant, and equipment (206 ) (43 )
Adjusted free cash flow $ 271 $ 44
Cash flow from investing activities (281 ) (63 )
Cash flow from financing activities (193 ) (79 )
|
While the determination of appropriate adjustments in the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is subject to interpretation under the terms of the Credit Facility, management believes the adjustments described above are in accordance with the covenants in the Credit Facility. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or construed as an alternative to our net income (loss) or other measures as determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, other companies in our industry or across different industries may calculate bank covenants and related definitions differently than we do, limiting the usefulness of our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA as a comparative measure.
Tax Receivable Agreement
The Company expects to pay between $300 million and $350 million in related to the TRA over the next five years with $123 million projected to be paid during the next twelve months. The payment range is based on the Company's assumptions using various items, including valuation analysis and current tax law. Payments under the TRA are not conditioned upon the parties' continued ownership of the Company.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased from $89 million in the Prior Quarter to $87 million in the Quarter. The change is primarily attributed to additional working capital partially offset by improved operating performance.
Net cash used in investing activities increased from $37 million in the Prior Quarter to $63 million in the Quarter primarily as a result of acquisition of Prime. Our capital expenditures are forecasted at $230 million for fiscal 2013 and will be funded from cash flows from operating activities and existing liquidity.
Net cash used in financing activities was $65 million in the Prior Quarter compared to $79 million in the Quarter. The Quarter change is primarily attributed to proceeds we raised in our initial public offering, which we utilized to repurchase the 11% Senior Subordinated Notes. In the Prior Quarter, we made $65 million of payments against our outstanding debt obligation.
Based on our current level of operations, we believe that cash flow from operations and available cash, together with available borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities, will be adequate to meet our short-term liquidity needs over the next twelve months. We base such belief on historical experience and the funds available under the revolving credit facility. However, we cannot predict our future results of operations and our ability to meet our obligations involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in the "Risk Factors" section of our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended September 29, 2012. In particular, increases in the cost of resin which we are unable to pass through to our customers on a timely basis or significant acquisitions could severely impact our liquidity.
|
|