|
Quotes & Info
|
| HFFC > SEC Filings for HFFC > Form 10-Q on 1-Feb-2013 | All Recent SEC Filings |
1-Feb-2013
Quarterly Report
• descriptions of plans or objectives of management for future operations, products or services, transactions, investments and use of subordinated debentures payable to trusts.
• forecasts of future economic performance.
• use and descriptions of assumptions and estimates underlying or relating to such matters.
Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from our historical experience
and our present expectations or projections. Factors that could cause actual
results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to:
• adverse economic and market conditions of the financial services industry
in general, including, without limitation, the credit markets;
• the effect of recent legislation to help stabilize the financial markets;
• increase of non-performing loans and additional provisions for loan losses;
• the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for loan losses and other estimates;
• the failure to maintain our reputation in our market area;
• prevailing economic, political and business conditions in South Dakota and Minnesota;
• the effects of competition from a wide variety of local, regional, national and other providers of financial services;
• compliance with existing and future banking laws and regulations, including, without limitation, regulatory capital requirements and FDIC insurance coverages and costs;
• changes in the availability and cost of credit and capital in the financial markets;
• the effects of FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments;
• the risks of changes in market interest rates on the composition and costs of deposits, loan demand, net interest income, and the values and liquidity of loan collateral, and our ability or inability to manage interest rate and other risks;
• changes in the prices, values and sales volumes of residential and commercial real estate;
• an extended period of low commodity prices, significantly reduced yields on crops, reduced levels of governmental assistance to the agricultural industry, and reduced farmland values;
• soundness of other financial institutions;
• the risks of future acquisitions and other expansion opportunities, including, without limitation, the related time and costs of implementing such transactions, integrating operations as part of these transactions and possible failures to achieve expected gains, revenue growth and expense savings from such transactions;
• security and operations risks associated with the use of technology;
• the loss of one or more of our key personnel, or the failure to attract, assimilate and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future;
• changes in or interpretations of accounting standards, rules or principles; and
• other factors and risks described under Part I, Item 2-"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Item 3-Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" in this Form 10-Q.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made.
Forward-looking statements are based upon management's then-current beliefs and
assumptions, but management does not give any assurance that such beliefs and
assumptions will prove to be correct. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements included or incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-Q or to update the reasons why actual results could
differ from those contained in such statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent required by
federal securities laws. Based upon changing conditions, should any one or more
of the above risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our underlying
beliefs or assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from
those described in any forward-looking statement.
References in this Form 10-Q to "we," "our," "us" and other similar references
are to the Company, unless otherwise expressly stated or the context requires
otherwise.
Executive Summary
The Company's net income for the first six months of fiscal 2013 was $3.1
million, or $0.44 in diluted earnings per common share, compared to $2.2
million, or $0.31 in diluted earnings per common share, for the same period of
fiscal 2012. This resulted in a return on average equity (i.e., net income
divided by average equity) of 6.27% for the first six months of fiscal 2013,
compared to 4.53% for the same period of the prior fiscal year. For the same
respective periods, the return on average assets (i.e., net income divided by
average assets) was 0.53% compared to 0.36%.
Net interest income for the first six months of fiscal 2013 was $14.5 million, a
decrease of $3.3 million, or 18.6%, compared to the same period a year ago. For
the comparative time-frames, average interest-earning assets and average
interest-bearing liabilities decreased 3.2% and 5.4%, respectively. The average
yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 3.68% for the first six months of
fiscal 2013, compared to 4.47% a year ago, a decrease of 79 basis points, due
primarily to the repricing of adjustable rate loans and competitive pricing
pressures in a low interest rate environment. In addition, this economic
environment impacts the yields on investment securities and other short-term
investments and prepayment speeds of mortgage-
backed securities purchased at a premium. For the same period, cost of deposits,
which include all interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits, decreased
by 29 basis points to 0.60%, compared to 0.89% in the previous year.
The net interest margin expressed on a fully taxable equivalent basis ("Net
Interest Margin, TE") for the six months ended December 31, 2012 was 2.70%,
which is a decrease of 51 basis points from the same period of the prior fiscal
year. The margin declined primarily due to the decreases in yield associated
with the loan and investment rates in excess of the decrease in the deposit
rates paid. A sustained overall decline in the interest rate yield curve has
affected both the yield for the interest-earning assets and the interest-bearing
liabilities, and the average balances for these categories decreased when
compared to the same period of the prior year. Net Interest Margin, TE is a
non-GAAP financial measure. See "Analysis of Net Interest Income" for a
calculation of this non-GAAP financial measure and for further discussion as to
the reasons we believe this non-GAAP financial measure is useful.
Total loans decreased to $677.6 million at December 31, 2012 from $683.7 million
at June 30, 2012. Commercial real estate lending opportunities have increased,
while strong underwriting standards remain in place. Residential mortgage loan
originations continued year-over-year increased production with the majority of
these loans sold into the secondary market. Refinancing of single family loans
has contributed to a decline in the consumer home equity portfolio. We remain
cautiously optimistic that the overall strength of the local economic recovery
is reflected in increased lending activity, while also acknowledging that we
continue to operate in uncertain national conditions. The operating environment
has resulted in increased competition among financial institutions for loan
demand from creditworthy borrowers.
The allowance for loan and lease losses increased by $214,000 to $10.8 million
at December 31, 2012, compared to June 30, 2012. This resulted in a ratio of
allowance for loan and lease losses to total loans and leases of 1.59% compared
to 1.55% at June 30, 2012. The overall loan balances decreased by less than 1%
during the first six months of fiscal 2013 and the general reserve decreased in
part to the effects of the change in loan balances, historical charge-off
activity and management's assessment of environmental factors. During this time,
recoveries exceeded charge-offs resulting in a net recovery of $386,000. The net
recoveries exceeded the amounts added to the allowance for loan and lease losses
and contributed to a net benefit for the provision for loan and lease losses of
$172,000 for the first six months of fiscal 2013. Total nonperforming assets at
December 31, 2012 were $17.1 million as compared to $17.8 million at June 30,
2012. The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets decreased to 1.40% at
December 31, 2012, compared to 1.49% at June 30, 2012. The overall decrease in
nonperforming assets from June 30, 2012 was primarily affected by a decrease in
the amount of foreclosed assets. Nonperforming loans totaled $16.2 million at
December 31, 2012, which is similar to the amount reported at June 30, 2012. The
Company continues to pro-actively manage its problem assets which have been
enhanced by improving conditions in the regional commercial and agricultural
markets. The valuation allowance recorded in accordance with ASC 310 on
identified impaired loans increased slightly to $2.7 million at December 31,
2012, compared to $2.1 million at June 30, 2012. Approximately 66% of the
valuation allowance on impaired loans are agricultural loans and, more
specifically, 62% are within the dairy sector. All identified impaired loans are
reviewed to assess the borrower's ability to make payments under the terms of
the loan and/or a shortfall in collateral value that would result in charging
off the loan or the portion of the loan that was impaired.
Foreclosed real estate and other properties totaled $890,000 at December 31,
2012, compared to $1.6 million at June 30, 2012, or a decrease of $737,000. The
balance at December 31, 2012 consists primarily of residential loans that were
foreclosed and unsold at quarter end.
The allowance for loan and lease losses is calculated based on loan and lease
levels, loan and lease loss history over 12, 36, and 60 month time periods,
credit quality of the loan and lease portfolio, and environmental factors such
as economic health of the region and management experience. This risk rating
analysis is designed to give the Company a consistent and systematic methodology
to determine proper levels for the allowance at a given time. Management
intends to continue its disciplined credit administration and loan underwriting
processes and to remain focused on the creditworthiness of new loan
originations. Management believes that it has identified the most significant
nonperforming assets in the loan portfolio and is working to clarify and resolve
the credit, credit administration, and environmental factor issues related to
these assets to obtain the most favorable outcome for the Company.
Total deposits at December 31, 2012, were $933.1 million, an increase of $39.2
million from June 30, 2012. This increase was primarily due to the $67.0 million
increase in core deposits and partially offset by a $27.1 million decrease of
seasonal public fund balances. Public funds have seasonal fluctuations due to
semiannual tax collection and subsequent disbursement to entities. Interest
rates on deposits, which are one of the primary factors affecting the amount of
interest expense paid, decreased to the average rate paid of 0.70% on
interest-bearing deposits for the six month period ended December 31, 2012,
compared to 1.03% for the same period of the prior year.
On January 28, 2013, the Company announced it will pay a quarterly cash
dividend of 11.25 cents per common share for the second quarter of fiscal 2013.
The dividend will be paid on February 15, 2013, to stockholders of record on
February 8, 2013.
The total risk-based capital ratio of 16.51% at December 31, 2012, increased by
64 basis points from 15.87% at June 30, 2012. Tier I capital decreased 12 basis
points to 9.54% at December 31, 2012 when compared to 9.66% at June 30, 2012.
This continues to place the Bank in the "well-capitalized" category within
financial institution regulation at December 31, 2012 and is consistent with the
"well-capitalized" regulatory category in which the Company plans to operate.
The Company historically has been able to manage the size of its assets through
secondary market loan sales of single-family mortgages.
Noninterest income was $7.2 million for the six months ended December 31, 2012,
compared to $6.8 million for the same period in the prior fiscal year, an
increase of $381,000. This increase was due to increases in gain on sale of
loans and fees on deposits, and partially offset by the decrease in net loan
servicing income. The gain on sale of loans increased by $1.2 million due to
increased volume of originated single-family loans. Deposit fees increased
$392,000 to $3.6 million for the first six months of fiscal 2013, as compared to
the same period of the prior year. In the first quarter of fiscal 2013, $600,000
of nonrecurring vendor incentive fees were received related to a debit card
brand change for customer accounts. Security gains totaled $1.8 million for the
first six months of fiscal 2013, which is an increase of $1.5 million compared
to the same period of the prior year. The increases in security gains were
offset by a decrease in other noninterest income of $1.4 million, primarily due
to a first quarter nonrecurring charge related to the termination of hedging
activity on deposit balances, for the six months ended December 31, 2012. Net
loan servicing income decreased $1.4 million to a net loss of $490,000 for the
six months ended December 31, 2012, due primarily to an impairment provision
recorded of $970,000 and increased amortization expenses recorded of $283,000,
when compared to the same period of the prior year. These reductions in
servicing income were primarily the result of higher prepayment speeds
calculated within the servicing portfolio which have resulted from the low
interest rate environment.
Noninterest expense was $17.3 million for the six months ended December 31,
2012, as compared to $18.8 million for the same period of the prior fiscal year,
a decrease of $1.6 million, or 8.3%. The decrease was attributed primarily to
decreases in compensation and employee benefits of $907,000 and professional
fees of $725,000. In addition, FDIC insurance and occupancy and equipment
expenses decreased a total of $246,000. Compensation costs decreased due to a
reduced number of average full-time equivalents ("FTE's") for the first six
months of fiscal 2013 compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year,
while employee benefits decreased due to reduced levels of utilization of the
self-insurance health care plan. Professional fees have declined on a
year-over-year basis due to the resolution of certain employment, regulatory and
governance matters the Company faced in the first six months of fiscal 2012.
FDIC insurance decreased due to lower modified rates assessed, which fluctuate
based on asset quality, financial performance and other factors. Occupancy and
equipment decreased when compared to the same period of the prior year because
of the efficiency initiatives taken in the second through fourth quarters of
fiscal 2012 which reduced the number of branches by consolidating them with
other nearby branches to improve operating efficiencies.
During the prior fiscal year, the Company was informed by the South Dakota
Housing Development Authority ("SDHDA") that a change in business model was
necessary for SDHDA to continue to meet the financing needs of its single family
mortgage program in South Dakota. This change would include the development of a
new bond resolution, to support a mortgage-backed securities program. As such, a
request for proposal for a master servicer with a two year commitment period was
provided to interested parties, and the Company was informed that a new master
servicer would begin effective April 1, 2012. This change in business model
terminated the new flow of servicing assets from SDHDA to the Company beginning
in the fourth fiscal quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company does not expect this
event to have a material impact on the fiscal 2013 income statement. The single
family mortgage segment of the Company's SDHDA servicing portfolio is expected
to decrease in value over time, as principal is reduced, which may be offset by
increases to the Fannie Mae servicing portfolio balances through new origination
activity. The Company continues to evaluate potential acquisition of servicing
assets dependent upon market conditions and characteristics desirable by the
Company, which may include bidding as the master servicer for SDHDA after the
initial two year commitment is complete.
On November 12, 2009, the FDIC Board approved a rule requiring prepayment of the
quarterly assessments for the fourth quarter of calendar year 2009 and the
entire calendar years of 2010, 2011, and 2012. On December 30, 2009, the
Company paid $4.9 million, which was recorded as a prepaid asset and is being
proportionally expensed as each quarter elapses. At December 31, 2012, the
remaining balance recorded as a prepaid asset was $1.0 million. Effective for
each of the first two quarters of fiscal 2013, the FDIC insurance assessment
rate was modified and reduced due to the Bank's asset quality ratios and
earnings as compared to risk weighted assets. As a result, FDIC insurance
decreased by $124,000, to $411,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2012
compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year.
General
The Company is a financial services provider and, as such, has inherent risks
that must be managed in order to achieve net income. Primary risks that affect
net income include credit risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, regulatory
compliance risk and reputation risk. The Company's net income is derived by
management of the net interest margin, the ability to collect fees from services
provided, by controlling the costs of delivering services and the management of
loan and lease losses. The primary source of revenues is the net interest
margin, which represents the difference between income on interest-earning
assets (i.e. loans and investment securities) and expense on interest-bearing
liabilities (i.e. deposits and borrowed funding). The net interest margin is
affected by regulatory, economic and competitive factors that influence interest
rates, loan demand and deposit flows. Fees earned include charges for deposit
and debit card services, trust services and loan services. Personnel costs are
the primary expenses required to deliver the services to customers. Other costs
include occupancy and equipment and general and administrative expenses.
Financial Condition Data
At December 31, 2012, the Company had total assets of $1.22 billion, an increase
of $27.8 million from the level at June 30, 2012. Cash and cash equivalents
increased $54.6 million, while securities available for sale and net loans and
leases receivable decreased $18.7 million and $6.3 million, respectively. Total
liabilities increased by $25.6 million primarily due to an increase in deposits
of $39.2 million and partially offset by a decrease in advances from the FHLB
and other borrowings of $11.0 million. Stockholders' equity increased by $2.2
million since June 30, 2012, primarily due to net income and a decrease in
accumulated other comprehensive loss, which were partially offset by the payment
of dividends.
The securities available for sale decreased by $18.7 million due primarily to
the sale of securities during the first fiscal quarter of $73.0 million for a
net gain of $1.8 million. The decrease in net loans and leases receivable, which
excludes loans in process and deferred fees, was $6.3 million due to the
decrease in loan balances of $6.1 million and the increase in the allowance for
loan and lease losses of $214,000. Consumer loans decreased by 5.7% since the
prior fiscal year end, while commercial loans increased 0.6% during this same
period.
Loans held for sale increased $1.9 million, primarily due to increased mortgage
financing activity and the amount of one-to four-family loans held at
December 31, 2012.
See the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for a detailed analysis of the
change in cash and cash equivalents.
Deposits increased $39.2 million, to $933.1 million at December 31, 2012, due
primarily to the increase in core deposit accounts, exclusive of public funds
and out-of-market certificates of deposits, and partially offset by a decrease
in seasonal public fund balances. Core deposits increased $67.0 million, or 9.5%
since June 30, 2012, while public fund deposit balances decreased $27.1 million.
Advances from the FHLB and other borrowings decreased $11.0 million, to $131.4
million at December 31, 2012 as compared to June 30, 2012, due to reduced
funding needs.
Stockholders' equity increased $2.2 million at December 31, 2012 when compared
to June 30, 2012. Increases in stockholders' equity were derived from net income
of $3.1 million, and a net decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss of
$424,000. These increases to equity were partially offset by the payment of cash
dividends of $1.6 million.
Analysis of Net Interest Income
Net interest income represents the difference between income on interest-earning
assets and expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income depends
upon the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and
the interest rates earned or paid on them.
Average Balances, Interest Rates and Yields. The following tables present for
the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of interest income from average
interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, as well as the interest
expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and
rates, and the net interest margin. The tables do not reflect any effect of
income taxes. Average balances consist of daily average balances for the Bank
with simple average balances for all other subsidiaries of the Company. The
average balances include nonaccruing loans and leases. The yields on loans and
leases include origination fees, net of costs, which are considered adjustments
to yield.
Three Months Ended December 31,
2012 2011
Average Interest Average Interest
Outstanding Earned/ Yield/ Outstanding Earned/ Yield/
Balance Paid Rate Balance Paid Rate
(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans and leases receivable(1)(3) $ 699,105 $ 8,804 5.00 % $ 800,869 $ 11,114 5.52 %
Investment securities(2)(3) 372,436 974 1.04 303,022 1,042 1.37
Correspondent bank stock 7,354 54 2.91 8,170 62 3.02
Total interest-earning assets 1,078,895 $ 9,832 3.62 % 1,112,061 $ 12,218 4.37 %
Noninterest-earning assets 81,910 87,377
Total assets $ 1,160,805 $ 1,199,438
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Deposits:
Checking and money market $ 357,509 $ 251 0.28 % $ 330,229 $ 531 0.64 %
Savings 110,363 71 0.26 125,328 79 0.25
Certificates of deposit 273,635 877 1.27 322,279 1,261 1.56
Total interest-bearing deposits 741,507 1,199 0.64 777,836 1,871 0.96
FHLB advances and other borrowings 131,414 1,038 3.13 147,413 1,122 3.03
Subordinated debentures payable to
trusts 27,837 425 6.06 27,837 480 6.86
Total interest-bearing liabilities $ 900,758 $ 2,662 1.17 % $ 953,086 $ 3,473 1.45 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits 132,231 120,945
Other liabilities 28,897 30,407
Total liabilities 1,061,886 1,104,438
Equity 98,919 95,000
Total liabilities and equity $ 1,160,805 $ 1,199,438
Net interest income; interest rate
spread(4) $ 7,170 2.45 % $ 8,745 2.92 %
Net interest margin(4)(5) 2.64 % 3.13 %
Net interest margin, TE(6) 2.68 % 3.16 %
|
(1) Includes loan fees and interest on accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more.
(2) Includes federal funds sold and interest earning reserve balances at the Federal Reserve Bank.
(3) Yields do not reflect the tax-exempt nature of loans, equipment leases and municipal securities.
(4) Percentages for the three months ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 have been annualized.
(5) Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
(6) Net interest margin expressed on a fully taxable equivalent basis ("Net Interest Margin, TE") is a non-GAAP financial measure. See the following Non-GAAP Disclosure Reconciliation of Net Interest Income (GAAP) to Net Interest Margin, TE (Non-GAAP). The tax-equivalent adjustment to net interest income recognizes the income tax savings when comparing taxable and tax-exempt assets and adjusting for federal and state exemption of interest income and certain other permanent income tax differences. We believe that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest margin expressed on a fully taxable equivalent basis, and accordingly believe the presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure may be useful for peer comparison purposes. As a non-GAAP financial measure, Net Interest Margin, TE . . .
|
|