|
Quotes & Info
|
| USGT > SEC Filings for USGT > Form 10-Q on 22-Jan-2013 | All Recent SEC Filings |
22-Jan-2013
Quarterly Report
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) contains forward-looking statements that involve known and unknown risks, significant uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed, or implied, by those forward-looking statements. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of the words may, will, should, could, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, intends, potential, proposed, or continue or the negative of those terms. These statements are only predictions. In evaluating these statements, you should consider various factors which may cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the exceptions reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.
Results of Operations
Our financial statements and information for the three and nine months ended November 30, 2012 have been prepared by our Management on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. We generated no revenues during the three and nine months ended November 30, 2012 and have incurred total net losses of $245,171 from inception to November 30, 2012.
Three months Ended November 30, 2012 compared to the Three months Ended November 30, 2011
We incurred net losses of $11,967, or $0.00 per share, for the three-month
period ended November 30, 2012, as compared to a net loss of $13,089, or $0.00
per share, for the three-month period ended November 30, 2011. The decrease was
mainly attributed to reduced professional fees ($5,044 - 2012 compared to $8,970
- 2011). Our other expenses for the three-month period ended November 30, 2012
consisted of office and general expenses of $6,448 ($3,650 - 2011) and interest
expense of $475 ($470 - 2011).
Nine Months Ended November 30, 2012 compared to the Nine Months Ended November 30, 2011
We incurred net losses of $40,399, or $0.00 per share, for the nine-month period ended November 30, 2012, as compared to a net loss of $43,017, or $0.00 per share, for the nine-month period ended November 30, 2011. The decrease was mainly attributed to reduced office and general expenses ($11,040 - 2012 compared to $18,841 - 2011). Our other expenses for the nine-month period ended November 30, 2012 consisted of professional fees in the amount of $27,934 ($22,757 - 2011), and interest expense of $1,425 ($1,420 - 2011).
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At November 30, 2012, we had total assets of $2,212 consisting of cash in the bank in the amount of $12 and prepaid expenses of $2,200.
Our accounts payable and accrued liabilities at November 30, 2012 were $30,607.
There are currently no options, warrants, rights or other securities conversion rights issued and/or outstanding.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to stockholders.
Inflation
The amounts presented in the financial statements do not provide for the effect of inflation on our operations or financial position. The net operating losses shown would be greater than reported if the effects of inflation were reflected either by charging operations with amounts that represent replacement costs or by using other inflation adjustments.
|
|