|
Quotes & Info
|
| BRLI > SEC Filings for BRLI > Form 10-K on 14-Jan-2013 | All Recent SEC Filings |
14-Jan-2013
Annual Report
You are encouraged to read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes included at the end of this Annual Report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See "Risk Factors" included elsewhere in this Annual Report for a discussion of some of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis. See "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" included elsewhere in this Annual Report.
All amounts are presented in thousands, except share and per share amounts and per patient data.
Overview
We are a national clinical diagnostic laboratory located in northeastern New Jersey. We are a national laboratory in certain focused areas of laboratory testing and a full service laboratory in the New York super-region. We have developed a national reputation for our expertise in certain focused areas of clinical testing. GenPath, the name by which we are known for our cancer and oncology services, is recognized for the superior hematopathology services it provides throughout the country. Our Women's Health initiative, through which we provide dedicated services for obstetrics and gynecology practices, including a unique, technically advanced multiplex process for identifying sexually transmitted infections, is also offered as GenPath. Our regional footprint lays within the New York City metropolitan area and the surrounding areas of New Jersey and southern New York State as well eastern Pennsylvania and some areas of western Connecticut; we also provide services further into New York State, Pennsylvania, Delaware and Maryland. As a regional provider, we are a full-service laboratory that primarily services physician office practices; our drivers pick up samples and deliver reports and supplies, we provide sophisticated technical support, phlebotomy services or patient service centers where appropriate, and electronic communication services in many cases. Physicians outside of our regional footprint send samples to our laboratory in order to take advantage of the expertise that we are able to provide in blood-based cancer pathology and associated diagnostics or to take advantage of the superior service, support and technologically
advanced testing we offer in our Women's Health initiative. These accounts frequently send routine testing to us for processing along with specialized testing in order to simplify their diagnostic ordering and review procedures and to take advantage of our outstanding capability, service and support. Our correctional healthcare services are used throughout the country at prisons and jails. The focused markets we serve on a national basis outside of our regional footprint do not require many of the logistical and other ancillary support services required within the region. Even within our regional footprint, we provide the same services that we provide on a national basis as well as some regional focused diagnostic services, such as histology and pathology support services, substance abuse testing, fertility testing, hemostasis testing, women's health testing, and molecular diagnostics that are unavailable from many of the smaller regional competitors; testing in some of these areas may be provided outside of physician offices. In October 2012, we launched Laboratorio Buena Salud, the first national testing laboratory dedicated to serving Spanish-speaking populations in the United States. All business will be conducted in Spanish, including patient and physician interactions.
Over the last few years, there have been fundamental changes in the laboratory services industry. In the 1990s, the industry was negatively impacted by the growth of managed care, increased government regulation, and investigations into fraud and abuse. These factors led to revenue and profit declines and industry consolidations, especially among commercial laboratories. There are currently only three US publicly traded full service laboratories operating primarily in the U.S. While that means that the two national mega-laboratories and Bio-Reference Laboratories are the only remaining publicly traded full service commercial laboratories, there are numerous hospital outreach programs and smaller reference laboratories that compete for the commercial clinical laboratory business scattered throughout the country. Clinical laboratories have had to improve efficiency, leverage economies of scale, comply with government regulations and other laws and develop more profitable approaches to pricing. Moreover, there has been a proliferation of technology advancements in clinical diagnostics over the last decade that has created significant opportunities for new testing and growth.
As a full service clinical laboratory, we are constantly looking for new technologies and new methodologies that will help us to grow. Since the turn of the century, our size alone has made us attractive to companies that are driving the advances in technology. We represent a significant opportunity for these companies to market their products with a nationally recognized specialty provider in our focused areas of specialty or in one of the major population centers of the world-the New York Metropolitan area. We have had several successful strategic relationships with such technology opportunities. In addition to new technology opportunities, we have an extremely seasoned and talented management staff that has been able to identify emerging laboratory markets that are under-served or under-utilized. We have recently developed programs for cardiology, histology and women's health to go along with our existing hemostasis, hematopathology and correctional healthcare initiatives which have already been established and in which we have been increasing our market share for the past several years. We are currently preparing to launch a comprehensive pre-natal program to leverage our presence in the women's health environment and we will continue to vigilantly seek focused diagnostic marketing opportunities where we can provide information, technology, service or support that expand and grow our clinical laboratory.
On March 2, 2010, we completed the purchase of Lenetix Medical Screening Laboratory, Inc. ("Lenetix") from Lenetix and its sole stockholder. These assets were utilized in Lenetix's operation of a clinical testing laboratory located in Mineola, New York. The laboratory performs both clinical laboratory diagnostic testing and genetic testing.
On August 5, 2011, we acquired all of the authorized, issued and outstanding shares of The Genetics Center, Inc. ("GCI"), a New York corporation engaged in the clinical laboratory business with principal place of business in Smithtown, New York.
On April 27, 2012, we entered into an agreement pursuant to which we purchased preferred shares of IncellDx, Inc. ("IncellDx"), a Delaware corporation. Information about IncellDx and the agreement may be found in the Current Report on Form 8-K we filed on May 1, 2012 and in note 18 to our consolidated financial statements.
On December 21, 2012, a date subsequent to our year end, we entered into an agreement pursuant to which we agreed to purchase all of the authorized, issued and outstanding shares of Meridian Clinical Laboratory, Corp. ("Meridian"), a Florida corporation. Information about Meridian and the agreement may be found in the Form 8-K we filed.
On December 31, 2012, a date subsequent to our year end, we entered into an agreement pursuant to which we agreed to purchase all of the authorized, issued and outstanding shares of Florida Clinical Laboratory, Inc. ("FCL"), a Florida corporation. Information about FCL and the agreement may be found in the Form 8-K we filed on January 4, 2013.
While we recognize that we are a clinical laboratory that processes samples, we also understand that we are an information company that needs to effectively communicate the results of our efforts back to healthcare providers. Laboratory results play a major role in the implementation of physician healthcare. Laboratory results are used to diagnose, monitor and classify health concerns. In many cases, laboratory results represent the confirming data in diagnosing complicated health issues. Since laboratory results play such an important role in routine physician care, we have developed informatics solutions that leverage our role in healthcare. We built a web-based solution to quickly, accurately, conveniently and competitively collect ordering information and deliver results. That solution is called CareEvolve. CareEvolve has been essential to our own operations. We license the technology to other laboratories throughout the country that they utilize to more effectively compete against the national laboratories. These other laboratories licensing our technology are typically not our competitors since they are outside our regional footprint.
We have also created our PSIMedica business unit that has developed a Clinical Knowledge Management (CKM) System that takes data from enrollment, claims, pharmacy, laboratory results and any other available electronic source to provide both administrative and clinical analysis of a population. The system uses proprietary algorithms to cleanse and configure the data and transfer the resulting information into a healthcare data repository. Using advanced cube technology methodologies, the data can be analyzed from a myriad of views and from highly granular transactional detail to global trended overview. Events such as the Katrina disaster in Louisiana and general pressures from the government have made development of an electronic medical record system and Pay-for Performance reimbursement priority goals in the healthcare industry. A large portion of an individual's medical record consists of laboratory data and a key performance indicator in any Pay-for-Performance initiative is laboratory result data. Our CKM system is a mature, full functioning solution that will allow us to play a role in these important national initiatives.
To date, neither our PSIMedica business unit nor CareEvolve has produced significant revenues relative to the primary laboratory operations.
Results of Operations
Fiscal Year 2012 Compared to Fiscal Year 2011
NET REVENUES:
Net revenues for the year ended October 31, 2012 were $661,661 as compared to $558,642 for the year ended October 31, 2011; this represents an 18% increase in net revenues. This increase is due to a 16% increase in patients serviced and a 2% increase in net revenue per patient. Our laboratory operations had net revenues of $657,158 in fiscal 2012 and $554,281 in fiscal 2011.
The number of patients serviced during the year ended October 31, 2012 was 7,801, which was 16% greater when compared to the prior fiscal year. Net revenue per patient for the year ended October 31, 2012 was $84.24 compared to net revenue per patient for the year ended October 31, 2011 of $82.25, an increase of 2% as a result of increases in esoteric testing.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012, we increased our sales force by approximately 12%, mostly in the specialty testing services that we market nationally. We believe that this increase in sales personnel accounted for a majority of the 16% increase in our patient volume. This
allowed us to expand or increase our presence in a number of markets and we expect this trend to continue.
While there is always uncertainty as to the sustainability of such growth in the future, we believe that our historical performance of 20% compound annual growth rate for the past 18 years, the current demand for our services and our continued corporate focus on strategic growth, together with our expertise in the industry, should enable us to sustain continued strong growth in the near term. Going beyond that, however, our revenues and patient counts could be adversely affected by a number of factors including, but not limited to an extended downturn in general or healthcare economic conditions, an unexpected reduction in reimbursement rates, increased market penetration by our competitors, or a substantial adverse change in federal regulatory requirements governing our industry as well as a failure to continue the sizeable annual percentage increase in base business from significantly higher levels after 17 years of sustained growth.
Our net revenues for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and cumulative results for the fiscal 2012 as well as operating results during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 have been affected by the adverse weather conditions associated with the hurricane Sandy. Based on actual revenues and expenses from the period immediately preceding the storm as well as the analysis of the period following the storm, management has calculated the damage from, the hurricane Sandy resulted in a loss of net revenues of approximately $5,000 for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and approximately $3,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 2013.
COST OF SERVICES:
Cost of services for the year ended October 31, 2012 was $337,644 as compared to $287,853 for the year ended October 31, 2011, an increase of 17% as compared to an 18% increase in net revenues. The Company's medical supplies expense increased by 34% due to the higher cost of specialty testing supplies. Our medical equipment repair costs increased by 26% year over year due to higher equipment utilization rate. We expect these trends to continue.
GROSS PROFIT:
Gross profit on net revenues increased to $324,017 for the year ended October 31, 2012 from $270,789 for the year ended October 31, 2011; an increase of $53,328 (20%), primarily attributable to the increase in net revenues. Gross profit margins increased to 49% for fiscal 2012 from fiscal 2011 rate of 48%.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:
General and administrative expenses for the year ended October 31, 2012 were $247,886 as compared to $211,015 for the year ended October 31, 2011, an increase of $36,871 or 17%. This is basically in line with the increase in net revenues. We expect this trend to continue in the near future.
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest expense decreased from $1,747 during the year ended October 31, 2011 to $1,455 during the year ended October 31, 2012; a decrease of $292 or 17%. This decrease is due to a decrease in utilization of the PNC Bank line of credit. Management believes that this trend will continue in the near term due to the decrease in utilization of this credit facility.
NET INCOME:
We realized net income of $42,156 for the twelve month period ended October 31, 2012 as compared to $36,359 for the twelve month period ended October 31, 2011, an increase of 16%.
Pre-tax income for the period ended October 31, 2012 was $74,516, as compared to $64,846 for the period ended October 31, 2011, an increase of $9,670 (15%) and was caused primarily by an increase in net revenues. The provision for income taxes increased from $28,487 for the period ended October 31, 2011, to $32,360 (14%) for the current twelve month period.
Our diluted net income per share went from $1.16 on a pro-forma basis (without taking into account the following non-recurring items: the New Jersey sales tax refund, the loss on sale of corporate aircraft and the New York excess laboratory fee refund) in fiscal 2011 to $1.51in fiscal 2012.
Our operating results for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and cumulative results for the fiscal 2012 as well as operating results during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 have been affected by hurricane Sandy. Based on actual revenues and expenses from the period immediately preceding the storm as well as the analysis of the period following the storm, Management has calculated the damage from the storm resulted in a loss of earnings approximately $0.06 per share for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and approximately $0.03 per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2013.
Fiscal Year 2011 Compared to Fiscal Year 2010
NET REVENUES:
Net revenues for the year ended October 31, 2011 were $558,642 as compared to $458,024 for the year ended October 31, 2010; this represents a 22% increase in net revenues. This increase is due to a 20% increase in patients serviced and a 2% increase in net revenue per patient. Our laboratory operations had net revenues of $454,308 in fiscal 2010 and $554,281 in fiscal 2011.
The number of patients serviced during the year ended October 31, 2011 was 6,739, which was 20% greater when compared to the prior fiscal year. Net revenue per patient for the year ended October 31, 2011 was $82.25 compared to net revenue per patient for the year ended October 31, 2010 of $81.03, an increase of $1.22 or 2% as a result of increases in esoteric testing.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2011, we increased our sales force by approximately 19% in the specialty testing services that we market nationally. This increase occurred in two phases: one in January 2011 and one in July of the same year. We believe that this increase in sales personnel accounted for a majority of the 20% increase in our patient volume. This allowed us to expand or increase our presence in sixteen states and we expect this trend to continue.
While there is always uncertainty as to the sustainability of such growth in the future, we believe that our historical performance of 20% compound annual growth rate for the past 17 years, the current demand for our services and our continued corporate focus on strategic growth, together with our expertise in the industry, should enable us to sustain continued strong growth in the near term. Going beyond that, however, the Company's revenues and patient counts could be adversely affected by a number of factors including, but not limited to an extended downturn in general or healthcare economic conditions, an unexpected reduction in reimbursement rates, increased market penetration by our competitors, or a substantial adverse change in federal regulatory requirements governing our industry as well as a failure to continue the sizeable annual percentage increase in base business from significantly higher levels after 17 years of sustained growth.
COST OF SERVICES:
Cost of Services for the year ended October 31, 2011 was $287,853 as compared to $232, 252 for the year ended October 31, 2010, an increase of 24% as compared to a 22% increase in net revenues. The Company's reagents and laboratory supplies expense increased by 29% due to the higher cost of specialty testing reagents. Our vehicle operating expenses also increased by 25% due to the higher cost of fuel. Our medical equipment repair costs increased by 44% year over year due to higher equipment utilization rate. We expect these trends to continue.
GROSS PROFIT:
Gross profit on net revenues increased to $270,789 for the year ended October 31, 2011 from $225,772 for the year ended October 31, 2010; an increase of $45,017 (20%), primarily attributable to the increase in net revenues. Gross profit margins decreased to 48% for fiscal 2011 from fiscal 2010 rate of 49%.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:
General and administrative expenses for the year ended October 31, 2011 were $211,015 as compared to $177,394 for the year ended October 31, 2010, an increase of $33,621 or 19%. This is basically in line with the increase in net revenues. Marketing expenses increased by 25% due to increases in our sales force together with substantial investment in marketing materials and we expect this trend to continue in the near future.
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest expense increased from $1,566 during the year ended October 31, 2010 to $1,747 during the year ended October 31, 2011; an increase of $181 or 12%. This increase is due to an increase in utilization of the PNC Bank line of credit, acquisition debt and capital leases. Management believes that this trend will continue in the near term due to the increase in utilization rates.
NET INCOME:
We realized net income of $36,359 for the twelve month period ended October 31, 2011 as compared to $26,381 for the twelve month period ended October 31, 2010, an increase of 38%.
Pre-tax income for the period ended October 31, 2011 was $64,846, as compared to $46,963 for the period ended October 31, 2010, an increase of $17,883 (38%) and was caused primarily by an increase in net revenues. The provision for income taxes increased from $20,582 for the period ended October 31, 2010, to $28,487 (38%) for the current twelve month period.
Our diluted net income per share went from $0.94 in fiscal 2010 to $1.29 in fiscal 2011, or $1.16 on a pro-forma basis (without taking into account the following non-recurring items: the New Jersey sales tax refund, the loss on sale of corporate aircraft and the New York excess laboratory fee refund).
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our working capital at October 31, 2012 was approximately $151,625 as compared to approximately $124,266 at October 31, 2011, an increase of $27,359 (22%). Our cash position increased by approximately $2,652 during the current twelve month period. We decreased our short term borrowing by approximately $19,110 and approximately $2,076 in long term debt. We had current liabilities of approximately $71,474 at October 31, 2012. We generated approximately $53,098 in cash from operations, an increase of approximately $22,152 as compared to the year ended October 31, 2011.
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, totaled approximately $153,247 at October 31, 2012, an increase of approximately $5,187 from October 31, 2011, or 4%. This increase was primarily attributable to increased revenue. Cash collected over the twelve month period ended October 31, 2012 increased 22% over the prior twelve month period.
Net service revenues on the statements of operations are as follows:
October, 31
2012 2011 2010
Gross Revenues $ 3,052,431 $ 2,482,349 $ 1,902,573
Contractual Adjustments and Discounts:
Medicare/Medicaid Portion 320,697 293,874 281,002
All Other Third Party and Direct
Payors* 2,070,073 1,629,833 1,163,547
Total Contractual Adjustments and
Discounts 2,390,770 1,923,707 1,444,549
Net Service Revenues $ 661,661 $ 558,642 $ 458,024
Percent of Contractual Adjustments and
Discounts To Gross Revenues 78.3 % 77.5 % 75.9 %
|
The table above illustrates the relationship between contractual adjustments and gross revenues for the fiscal years 2012, 2011, and 2010. Between 2011 and 2012, contractual adjustments increased approximately 80 basis points. For example, the average "across the board" collection
percent for fiscal year 2007 was 26%, while the rate for fiscal year 2012 was 17%, a decrease in our collection rate of 9%, or a 35% reduction in the collection rate. In the aggregate, this has resulted in a change of our contractual rate, leading to larger contractual allowances and lower net revenues when computed as a percentage of gross revenues. Although individual collection rates may vary from period to period or payor to payor, based on the specific historical data analyzed, this is consistent with the current state of the economy as well as the ongoing trends in health care reimbursement.
Credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is generally diversified due to the large number of patients comprising our client base. We have significant receivable balances with government payors and various insurance carriers. Generally, we do not require collateral or other security to support customer receivables. However, we continually monitor and evaluate our client acceptance and collection procedures to minimize potential credit risks associated with our accounts receivable and to establish an allowance for uncollectible accounts. As a consequence, we believe that our accounts receivable credit risk exposure beyond such allowance is not material to the financial statements.
A number of proposals for legislation continue to be under discussion which could substantially reduce Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) reimbursements to clinical laboratories. Depending upon the nature of regulatory action, and the content of legislation, we could experience a significant decrease in revenues from Medicare and Medicaid (CMS), which could have a material adverse effect on us. We are unable to predict, however, the extent to which such actions will be taken.
LABORATORY GROSS RECEIVABLES BY PAYOR GROUP
($)
FY 2012
30 DAYS % 60 DAYS % 90 DAYS % >90 DAYS % TOTAL %
Self Pay 9,620 18 % 10,633 20 % 9,474 18 % 24,202 44 % 53,929 100 %
Medicare 25,898 56 % 6,550 14 % 2,992 6 % 11,186 24 % 46,626 100 %
Medicaid 4,881 23 % 3,804 18 % 3,829 18 % 8,714 41 % 21,228 100 %
Pro Bill 17,697 64 % 4,706 17 % 1,771 6 % 3,657 13 % 27,832 100 %
Commercial Insurance 154,294 47 % 53,097 17 % 24,752 8 % 88,747 28 % 320,889 100 %
Total 212,390 45 % 78,790 17 % 42,818 9 % 136,507 29 % 470,505 100 %
FY 2011
30 DAYS % 60 DAYS % 90 DAYS % >90 DAYS % TOTAL %
Self Pay 7,790 16 % 8,614 18 % 8,475 18 % 22,526 48 % 47,405 100 %
Medicare 25,991 45 % 11,082 19 % 4,501 8 % 15,858 28 % 57,433 100 %
Medicaid 5,664 24 % 3,476 14 % 3,419 14 % 11,534 48 % 24,093 100 %
Pro Bill 18,304 63 % 4,925 17 % 1,691 6 % 4,341 15 % 29,260 100 %
Commercial Insurance 134,372 49 % 47,903 18 % 27,542 10 % 62,768 23 % 272,585 100 %
Grand Total 192,121 45 % 76,000 18 % 45,629 11 % 117,027 27 % 430,776 100 %
|
Billing for laboratory services is complicated and we must bill various payors, such as the individual, the insurance company, the government (federal or state), the private company or the health clinic. Other factors that may complicate billing include:
Differences between fee schedules and reimbursement rates;
Incomplete or inaccurate billing information as provided by the physician;
Disparity in coverage and information requirements;
Disputes with payors; and
Internal and external compliance policies and procedures.
Significant costs are incurred as a result of our participation in government programs since billing and reimbursement for laboratory tests are subject to complex regulations. We perform the requested tests and report the results whether the information is correct or not or even missing. This adds to the . . .
|
|