|
Quotes & Info
|
| WFT > SEC Filings for WFT > Form 10-K/A on 17-Dec-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
17-Dec-2012
Annual Report
Our Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations ("MD&A") begins with an executive overview which provides a general
description of our Company today, a synopsis of industry market trends, insight
into management's perspective of the opportunities and challenges we face and
our outlook for 2012. Next, we analyze the results of our operations for the
last three years, including the trends in our business. Then we review our cash
flows and liquidity, capital resources and contractual commitments. We conclude
with an overview of our critical accounting judgments and estimates and a
summary of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
The "Company," "we," "us" and "our" refer to Weatherford International Ltd., a
Swiss joint-stock corporation, or, prior to February 26, 2009, to Weatherford
International Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company, which, as of that date, became a
direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Weatherford International Ltd., a Swiss
joint-stock corporation, in either case on a consolidated basis.
As discussed in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 2 - Restatement of the Consolidated
Financial Statements," we have restated our previously issued audited
consolidated financial statements for fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, 2010
and 2009 and our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for each
of the quarters within 2011 and 2010. Accordingly, Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations have been revised for
the effects of the restatement.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our restated
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in "Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data." Our discussion includes various
forward-looking statements about our markets, the demand for our products and
services and our future results. These statements are based on certain
assumptions we consider reasonable. For information about these assumptions,
you should refer to the section entitled "Item 1. Business - Forward-Looking
Statements" and the section "Item 1A. - Risk Factors".
Overview
General
Our principal business is to provide equipment and services to the oil and
natural gas exploration and production industry both on land and offshore,
through our ten product and service lines: (1) artificial lift systems, (2)
stimulation and chemicals services, (3) drilling services, (4) well
construction, (5) integrated drilling, (6) completion systems, (7) drilling
tools, (8) wireline and evaluation services, (9) re-entry and fishing and (10)
pipeline and specialty services. We may sell our products and services
separately or may bundle them together to provide integrated solutions, up to
and including integrated well construction where we are responsible for the
entire process of drilling, constructing and completing a well. Our customers
include both exploration and production companies and other oilfield service
companies. Depending on the service line, customer and location, our contracts
vary in their terms, provisions and indemnities. We earn revenues under our
contracts when products and services are delivered. Typically, we provide
products and services at a well site where our personnel and equipment may be
located together with personnel and equipment of our customer and third parties,
such as other service providers.
We conduct operations in over 100 countries and have service and sales locations
in nearly all of the oil and natural gas producing regions in the world. Our
operational performance is segmented and reviewed on a geographic basis and we
report the following regions as separate, distinct reporting segments: (1) North
America; (2) Latin America; (3) Europe/SSA/Russia; and (4) MENA/Asia Pacific.
Industry Trends
Changes in the current price and expected future prices of oil and natural gas
influence the level of energy industry spending. Changes in expenditures result
in an increased or decreased demand for our products and services. Rig count is
an indicator of the level of spending for the exploration for and production of
oil and natural gas reserves. The following chart sets forth certain statistics
that reflect historical market conditions:
North American International Rig
WTI Oil (a) Henry Hub Gas (b) Rig Count (c) Count (c)
2011 $ 98.83 $ 2.99 2,432 1,180
2010 91.38 4.41 2,108 1,118
2009 79.36 5.57 1,485 1,113
|
(a) Price per barrel as of the last business day of the year indicated - Source:
Thomson Reuters
(b) Price per MM/BTU as of the last business day of the year indicated - Source:
Thomson Reuters
(c) Average rig count for December - Source: Baker Hughes Rig Count and other third-party data
Oil prices fluctuated during 2011, ranging from a high of $113.93 per barrel at
the end of April to a low of $75.67 per barrel in early October. Natural gas
ranged from a high of $4.87 MM/BTU in early June to a low of $2.99 MM/BTU at the
end of December. Factors influencing oil and natural gas prices during the
period include hydrocarbon inventory levels, realized and expected global
economic growth, realized and expected levels of hydrocarbon demand, levels of
spare production capacity within the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries ("OPEC"), weather and geopolitical uncertainty.
Opportunities and Challenges
Our industry offers many opportunities and challenges. The cyclicality of the
energy industry impacts the demand for our products and services. Certain of
our products and services, such as our drilling and evaluation services, well
installation services and well completion services, depend on the level of
exploration and development activity and the completion phase of the well life
cycle. Other products and services, such as our production optimization and
artificial lift systems, are dependent on production activity. We have created
a long-term strategy aimed at growing our businesses, servicing our customers,
and most importantly, creating value for our shareholders. The success of our
long-term strategy will be determined by our ability to manage effectively any
industry cyclicality, respond to industry demands and successfully maximize the
benefits from our acquisitions.
Outlook
We believe the long-term outlook for our businesses is favorable. As decline
rates accelerate and reservoir productivity complexities increase, our clients
will face growing challenges securing desired rates of production growth. These
challenges increase our customers' requirements for technologies that improve
productivity and efficiency and increase demand for our products and services.
These phenomena provide us with a positive outlook over the longer term.
The level of improvement in our businesses in 2012 will continue to depend
heavily on pricing and volume increases, our control of costs and our ability to
further penetrate existing markets with our younger technologies, as well as to
successfully introduce these technologies to new markets.
For 2012, we maintain a positive outlook with respect to increases in North
American revenue and profitability. Assuming a flat rig count, we expect our
fourth quarter 2012 revenue to increase modestly compared to 2011 exit rates and
also expect operating profit to increase, comparing the same periods. We
believe the predominance of oil activity in Canada and the strength of oil-based
activity in the United States will more than offset likely declines in natural
gas related activity in the North American market. As a result, our artificial
lift, production optimization, formation evaluation, open hole completion and
wireline product lines should show meaningful growth compared to 2011. However,
in our stimulation and chemicals product lines, we anticipate comparative
weakness and a correction due to low barriers to entry, rapid expansion of
capacity, a migration from natural gas activity to oil activity and improvements
in stimulation efficiency.
Similar to 2011, Latin America should continue to grow revenue and profitability
in 2012 with activity improvements expected in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia,
Mexico and Venezuela. In the Eastern Hemisphere, we expect 2012 to be a better
year than 2011 with revenue growth in Europe and Russia and stronger activity
levels in Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, as well as Australia and China. In
addition, our ability to grow our business aggressively will rely on our
demonstration of a high level of operational efficacy for our clients including
the efficiency of mobilization related to planned startups. The recruitment,
training and retention of personnel will also be a critical factor in growing
our businesses. The continued and increasing strength of the industry, including
client spending, will be highly dependent on many external factors, such as
world economic and political conditions, member-country quota compliance within
OPEC and weather conditions, including the factors described under
"-Forward-Looking Statements."
Results of Operations
The following charts contain selected financial data comparing our consolidated and segment results from operations for 2011, 2010 and 2009. See "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 18 - Segment Information" for additional information regarding variances in operating income.
Year Ended December 31,
2011 2010 2009
(Restated) (Restated) (Restated)
(In millions, except per share data)
Revenues:
North America $ 6,023 $ 4,167 $ 2,762
MENA/Asia Pacific 2,441 2,451 2,373
Europe/SSA/Russia 2,298 1,984 1,619
Latin America 2,226 1,619 2,079
12,988 10,221 8,833
Operating Income (Expense):
North America 1,259 693 191
MENA/Asia Pacific 25 264 445
Europe/SSA/Russia 287 240 223
Latin America 254 51 277
Research and Development (245 ) (216 ) (196 )
Corporate (177 ) (172 ) (177 )
Revaluation of Contingent Consideration - 13 24
Other Items (96 ) (99 ) (100 )
1,307 774 687
Interest Expense, Net (453 ) (406 ) (367 )
Bond Tender Premium - (54 ) -
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar - (64 ) -
Other, Net (107 ) (53 ) (44 )
Provision for Income Tax (542 ) (396 ) (163 )
Net Income per Diluted Share 0.25 (0.29 ) 0.12
Depreciation and Amortization 1,136 1,048 909
|
Revenues
The following chart contains the percentage distribution of our consolidated
revenues by product line for 2011, 2010 and 2009:
Year Ended December 31,
2011 2010 2009
Artificial Lift Systems 17 % 15 % 14 %
Stimulation and Chemicals Services 17 12 8
Drilling Services 17 17 16
Well Construction 12 14 15
Integrated Drilling 11 12 14
Completion Systems. 8 8 11
Drilling Tools 6 8 8
Wireline and Evaluation Services 6 6 6
Re-entry and Fishing 5 6 6
Pipeline and Specialty Services 1 2 2
Total 100 % 100 % 100 %
|
Consolidated revenues increased $2.8 billion, or 27%, in 2011 compared to 2010.
North American revenues increased $1.9 billion, or 45%, compared to the prior
year, on a 15% increase in rig count. International revenues increased $911
million, or 15%, on a 6% rig count increase. Latin America was the strongest
contributor to our year-over-year international revenue growth. From a product
line perspective, our artificial lift, drilling services and stimulation and
chemicals product lines experienced the strongest growth in 2011.
Consolidated revenues increased $1.4 billion, or 16%, in 2010 as compared to
2009. North American revenue increased $1.4 billion, or 51%, in 2010 when
compared to the prior year, on a 42% increase in rig count. International
revenues were essentially flat compared to 2009. An 11% increase in Eastern
Hemisphere revenues was offset by a decline in Latin America. Our artificial
lift, drilling services and stimulation and chemicals product lines were strong
contributors to the year-over-year increase.
Operating Income
Consolidated operating income increased $533 million, or 69%, in 2011 compared
to 2010. Our operating segments contributed $577 million of the increase. This
incremental operating income was partially offset by a $29 million increase in
research and development expenditures, a $5 million increase in corporate
general and administrative expenses and a $13 million decrease in the gain
recognized on the revaluation of contingent consideration associated with the
OFS acquisition. Research and development expenditures represented a consistent
2% of revenues in both 2010 and 2011. The increase in our corporate general and
administrative expenses is primarily attributable to increased professional
services fees. The revaluation of contingent consideration associated with the
2009 OFS acquisition resulted in the recognition of a $13 million gain in 2010
prior to our settlement of the contingent consideration terms in November 2010.
Consolidated operating income increased $87 million, or 13%, in 2010 as compared to 2009. Our operating segments contributed $112 million of incremental operating income during 2010 as compared to the prior year. This incremental income was partially offset a $20 million increase in research and development expenditures of over 2009. Research and development expenditures represented a consistent 2% of revenues in both years. The revaluation of contingent consideration associated with the OFS acquisition offset $11 million of the incremental operating income contributed by our operating segments, as we recognized a gain of $13 million in 2010 compared to a gain of $24 million in 2009.
We incurred $96 million of other items during 2011, which included income tax restatement and material weakness remediation expenses of $21 million, $10 million of costs incurred in connection with on-going investigations by the U.S. government, $9 million associated with the termination of a corporate consulting contract and severance, exit and other charges totaling $56 million.
We incurred $99 million of other items during 2010, which include a $38 million charge related to our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP") which was frozen on March 31, 2010, $61 million in severance and facility closure costs and $7 million in legal and professional fees incurred in connection with our on-going investigations. These charges were offset by a $7 million benefit related to the reversal of prior cost accruals for our exit from sanctioned countries.
We incurred $100 million of other items during 2009, comprised of $45 million in
legal and professional fees incurred in connection with our on-going
investigations, $51 million in severance and facility closure costs and $4
million for unusable assets and cost accruals in certain sanctioned countries.
Devaluation of Venezuelan Bolivar
In January 2010, the Venezuelan government announced its intention to devalue
its currency and move to a two tier exchange structure. The official exchange
moved from 2.15 to 2.60 for essential goods and 4.30 for non-essential goods and
services. In connection with this devaluation, we incurred a charge of $64
million in the first quarter of 2010 for the remeasurement of our net monetary
assets denominated in Venezuelan bolivars at the date of the devaluation.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net increased $47 million, or 12% in 2011 compared to 2010.
This increase was primarily the result of replacing our short-term debt with
higher-rate senior notes through the debt offering and bond tender completed in
the second half of 2010, as well as due to increased levels of debt.
Interest expense, net increased $39 million, or 11% in 2010 compared to 2009.
The increase in interest expense was primarily attributable to an overall
increase in our long-term debt balance when compared to 2009, as we refinanced
lower-rate short-term debt with higher interest bearing long-term debt. In
addition, in September 2010 we completed a $1.4 billion long-term debt offering,
and in October 2010, we completed a tender offer, repurchasing $700 million of
our senior notes due 2012 and 2013. This activity temporarily increased the
balance of our borrowings and contributed to the increase in interest expense.
Bond Tender Premium
In September 2010, we commenced a cash tender offer for up to $700 million
aggregate principal amount of specified series of our outstanding debt.
Pursuant to the tender-offer terms, in September 2010, we repurchased $167
million of our 6.625% senior notes due 2011 and incurred an expense of $11
million for the premium we paid on the repurchase. In October 2010, we
completed the tender offer by repurchasing $327 million and $206 million of our
5.95% senior notes due 2012 and 5.15% senior notes due 2013, respectively. We
paid a $44 million premium on these bonds tendered and incurred a charge of $43
million in the fourth quarter of 2010.
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net increased $54 million in 2011 compared to 2010, mostly due to
an increase in foreign currency exchange losses incurred as the result of the
strengthening U.S. dollar. Other expense, net increased $9 million, or 20% in
2010 compared to 2009. This increase was also due to the weakening of foreign
currencies to the U. S. dollar.
Income Taxes
We provide for income taxes based on the laws and rates in effect in the
countries in which operations are conducted, or in which we or our subsidiaries
are considered resident for income tax purposes. We are exempt from Swiss
cantonal and communal tax on income derived outside Switzerland, and are also
granted participation relief from Swiss federal tax for qualifying dividend
income and capital gains related to the sale of qualifying investments in
subsidiaries. We expect that the participation relief will result in a full
exemption of participation income from Swiss federal income tax.
Our provision for income taxes was $542 million in 2011, $396 million in 2010
and $163 million in 2009, which resulted in an effective tax rate of 73%, 201%
and 59%, respectively. Our provision for income taxes was significantly
impacted by discrete tax expense items in each of these years. In 2011, we
recognized $20 million of withholding tax on the redemption of equity in one of
our U.S. subsidiaries; in 2010, we recognized $124 million of tax expense
related to the reorganization of our operations in Latin America; and, in 2009,
we recognized a benefit of $34 million related to the reorganization of our
international operations. Our provision for income taxes was impacted by
increases in our reserves for uncertain tax positions of $77 million in 2011,
$79 million in 2010 and $62 million in 2009 and valuation allowances of $29
million recognized in 2011, $55 million recognized in 2010 and $38 million
recognized in 2009. Excluding these items, our effective tax rate was 56% in
2011, 70% in 2010 and 35% in 2009.
The relationship between our pre-tax income or loss from continuing operations
and our income tax benefit or provision varies from period to period as a result
of various factors which include, in addition to the discrete items discussed
above, changes in total pre-tax income or loss, the jurisdictions in which our
income is earned, the tax laws in those jurisdictions and in our operating
structure. Our income derived in Switzerland is taxed at a rate of 7.83%;
however, our effective rate, even after excluding the transactional and discrete
items discussed above, is substantially above the Swiss statutory tax rate as
the majority of our operations are taxed in jurisdictions with much higher tax
rates.
Our effective tax rate for these periods was further negatively impacted by the
taxing regimes in certain countries and our operating structure. Several of the
countries in which we operate, primarily in our MENA/Asia Pacific segment, tax
us based on "deemed", rather than actual, profits. We are not currently
profitable in certain of those countries, which results in us accruing and
paying taxes based on a "deemed profit" instead of recognizing no tax expense or
potentially recognizing a tax benefit. Our operating structure results in us
paying withholding taxes on intercompany charges for items such as rentals,
management fees, royalties, and interest as well as on applicable third party
transactions. Such withholding taxes were $94 million in 2011, $76 million in
2010 and $70 million in 2009. We also incur pre-tax losses in certain
jurisdictions that do not have a corporate income tax and thus we are not able
to recognize an income tax benefit on those losses.
In addition to the transaction and structural causes discussed above, our
effective tax rate decreased from 2010 to 2011 due to higher pre-tax income and
changes in our geographic earnings mix. Our effective tax rate will generally
be lower in periods of higher pre-tax earnings as the rate impact of certain of
the items discussed above is mitigated by the higher earnings. Our effective
tax rate increased from 2009 to 2010 due primarily to lower pre-tax income and
changes in our geographic earnings mix.
Restatement of Interim Financial Statements We have restated all interim quarterly periods of 2011 and 2010 to correct errors noted in the Company's accounting for income taxes. In addition to the adjustments recorded to address our income tax errors, we recorded other adjustments to correct previously identified immaterial errors affecting operating income. The following paragraphs update our Management's Discussion and Analysis for the interim periods ended March 31, June 30, September 30 and annual periods ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The tables below present the adjustments to the quarterly provision for income taxes presented in our Form 10-K filed March 15, 2012.
2011 Quarters
First Second Third Fourth Total
(In millions)
Provision for Income Taxes, as Reported $ 46 $ 76 $ 143 $ 221 $ 486
Adjustment - 24 2 30 56
Restated $ 46 $ 100 $ 145 $ 251 $ 542
2010 Quarters
First Second Third Fourth Total
(In millions)
Provision for Income Taxes, as
Reported $ 5 $ 46 $ 59 $ 229 $ 339
Adjustment 11 17 17 12 57
Restated $ 16 $ 63 $ 76 $ 241 $ 396
|
Restated results for 2011 include a decrease in net income attributable to Weatherford of approximately $7 million, $25 million, $9 million and $32 million for the first, second, third and fourth quarters, respectively. The $56 million correction of income tax expense in 2011 resulted from an additional $59 million of reserves for uncertain tax positions and a net benefit of $3 million resulting from adjustments to our current and deferred tax accounts.
The $57 million correction of income tax expense in 2010 resulted from an
additional $55 million of reserves for uncertain tax positions and a benefit of
$2 million from other net adjustments to our current and deferred tax accounts.
The correction of these tax errors and the immaterial errors impacting
operating income resulted in a reduction to net income of approximately
$13 million, $18 million, $19 million and $15 million for the first, second,
third and fourth quarters, respectively.
The following quarterly MD&A reflects the impact of the restatement adjustments.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we had a tax provision of $46 million on income before taxes of $78 million. Our tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2011 includes discrete tax benefits of $6 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we had a tax provision of $16 million on a pretax loss of $62 million that includes curtailment expense for our SERP for which no related tax benefit was recorded. Our tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2010 includes the tax impact of changes in our geographic earnings mix, which is partially offset by a tax benefit related to the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we had a tax provision of $100 million and $146 million on income before taxes of $156 million and $234 million, respectively. Our tax provision for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 includes discrete tax benefits of $12 million and $18 million, respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we had a tax provision of $63 million on a pretax loss of $6 million that includes an $82 million loss on the fair value adjustment to the put option issued in connection with the OFS acquisition . . .
|
|