|
Quotes & Info
|
| DNKN > SEC Filings for DNKN > Form 10-Q on 9-Nov-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
9-Nov-2012
Quarterly Report
We operate and report financial information on a 52- or 53-week year on a
13-week quarter (or 14-week fourth quarter, when applicable) basis with the
fiscal year ending on the last Saturday in December and fiscal quarters ending
on the 13th Saturday of each quarter (or 14th Saturday of the fourth quarter,
when applicable). The data periods contained within the three- and nine-month
periods ended September 29, 2012 and September 24, 2011 reflect the results of
operations for the 13-week and 39-week periods ended on those dates. Operating
results for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 29, 2012 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year
ending December 29, 2012.
Selected Operating and Financial Highlights
Three months ended Nine months ended
September 29, September 24, September 29, September 24,
2012 2011 2012 2011
Franchisee-reported sales (in millions):
Dunkin' Donuts U.S. $ 1,583.3 1,501.5 4,604.4 4,263.7
Dunkin' Donuts International 163.4 161.5 488.8 477.1
Baskin-Robbins U.S. 145.9 149.3 418.6 402.7
Baskin-Robbins International 409.8 389.5 1,047.3 977.5
Total franchisee-reported sales $ 2,302.4 2,201.8 6,559.1 6,121.0
Systemwide sales growth 4.7 % 8.9 % 7.3 % 7.1 %
Comparable store sales growth:
Dunkin' Donuts U.S. 2.8 % 6.0 % 4.5 % 4.3 %
Dunkin' Donuts International (a) 2.1 % n/a 2.8 % n/a
Baskin-Robbins U.S. 1.1 % 1.7 % 4.4 % (0.7 )%
Baskin-Robbins International (a) 3.0 % n/a 3.6 % n/a
Financial data (in thousands):
Total revenues $ 171,719 163,508 496,478 459,693
Operating income 70,345 54,112 171,678 160,742
Adjusted operating income 85,428 75,947 227,348 197,739
Net income attributable to Dunkin' Brands 29,526 7,412 73,973 22,851
Adjusted net income 42,118 31,343 113,066 65,582
|
(a) Comparable store sales growth data was not available for our international segments until fiscal year 2012.
Our financial results are largely driven by changes in systemwide sales, which include sales by all points of distribution, whether owned by Dunkin' Brands or by its franchisees and licensees. While we do not record sales by franchisees or licensees as revenue, we believe that this information is important in obtaining an understanding of our financial performance. We believe systemwide sales growth and franchisee-reported sales information aids in understanding how we derive royalty revenue, assists readers in evaluating our performance relative to competitors, and indicates the strength of our franchised brands. Comparable store sales growth represents the growth in average weekly sales for restaurants that have been open at least 54 weeks that have reported sales in the current and comparable prior year week.
Overall growth in systemwide sales of 4.7% and 7.3% for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012, respectively, over the same period in the prior year resulted from the following:
• Dunkin' Donuts U.S. systemwide sales growth of 5.6% and 8.2% for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012, respectively, as a result of 262 net new restaurants opened since September 24, 2011 and comparable store sales growth of 2.8% and 4.5%, respectively, driven by both increases in average ticket and transactions. Increases in average ticket and transactions resulted from our continued focus on product and marketing innovation with strong beverage sales growth, especially in cold beverages, strong breakfast sandwich sales across both core offerings and differentiated breakfast sandwiches, continued growth in bakery sandwiches, and sales of Dunkin' Donuts K-Cup® portion packs.
• Dunkin' Donuts International systemwide sales growth of 1.2% and 2.4% for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012, respectively, driven primarily by increased sales in the Middle East and South America.
• Baskin-Robbins U.S. systemwide sales decline of 2.2% for the three months ended September 29, 2012 resulting primarily from a decline in points of distribution, partially offset by comparable store sales growth of 1.1%. Baskin-Robbins U.S. systemwide sales increase of 4.0% for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 resulting primarily from comparable store sales growth of 4.4%, partially offset by a decline in points of distribution. Baskin-Robbins U.S. comparable store sales growth for both the three and nine month periods was driven by product news, custom cake sales, and new beverages.
• Baskin-Robbins International systemwide sales growth of 5.2% and 7.1% for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012, respectively, primarily as a result of increased sales in South Korea, Japan, and the Middle East.
The increase in total revenues of approximately $8.2 million, or 5.0%, for the
three months ended September 29, 2012 as compared to the comparable period of
2011 primarily resulted from increased franchise fees and royalty income of $3.3
million, a $2.8 million increase in sales at company-owned restaurants due to
additional locations acquired since the prior year, and a $1.5 million increase
in sales of ice cream products. The increase in total revenues of approximately
$36.8 million, or 8.0%, for the nine months ended September 29, 2012 as compared
to the comparable period of 2011 primarily resulted from increased franchise
fees and royalty income of $21.2 million, an $8.3 million increase in sales at
company-owned restaurants due to additional locations acquired, and increased
sales of ice cream products of $4.8 million.
Operating income for the three months ended September 29, 2012 increased $16.2
million, or 30.0%, from the comparable period of the prior year. This increase
resulted primarily from a $14.7 million expense incurred in the prior year
related to the termination of the Sponsor management agreement in connection
with the Company's initial public offering, as well as the $3.3 million increase
in franchise fees and royalty income, offset by $2.9 million of incremental
depreciation primarily resulting from the announced closure of our ice cream
manufacturing plant in Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. Operating income for the
nine months ended September 29, 2012 increased $10.9 million, or 6.8%, from the
comparable period of the prior year primarily from the $21.2 million increase in
franchise fees and royalty income, the $14.7 million expense incurred in the
prior year related to the termination of the Sponsor management agreement, and a
$5.1 million increase in income from our joint ventures, offset by a $20.7
million increase in the legal reserve related to the Bertico litigation and $8.9
million of costs associated with the announced closure of our ice cream
manufacturing plant in Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
Adjusted operating income increased $9.5 million, or 12.5%, for the three months
ended September 29, 2012 primarily as a result of the increase in revenues and
continued general and administrative expense leverage. Adjusted operating income
increased $29.6 million, or 15.0%, for the nine months ended September 29, 2012
driven by the $21.2 million increase in franchise fees and royalty income and a
$5.1 million increase in equity in net income from joint ventures.
Net income increased $22.1 million for the three months ended September 29, 2012
resulting from the $16.2 million increase in operating income, a $14.1 million
decrease in loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions due to
costs recorded in the prior year resulting from the upsizing and repricing of
long-term debt, and a $5.1 million decrease in interest expense, offset by a
$13.7 million increase in tax expense. Net income increased $51.1 million for
the nine months ended September 29, 2012 resulting from a $34.6 million decrease
in interest expense, a $30.3 million decrease in loss on debt extinguishment and
refinancing transactions, and the $10.9 million increase in operating income,
offset by a $24.7 million increase in tax expense.
Adjusted net income increased $10.8 million for the three months ended
September 29, 2012 primarily as a result of a $9.5 million increase in adjusted
operating income and a $5.1 million decrease in interest expense, offset by a
$4.2 million increase in income tax expense resulting from the higher profit.
Adjusted net income increased $47.5 million for the nine months ended
September 29, 2012 primarily as a result of a $34.6 million decrease in interest
expense and a $29.6 million increase in adjusted operating income, offset by a
$16.8 million increase in income tax expense resulting from the higher profit.
Adjusted operating income and adjusted net income are non-GAAP measures
reflecting operating income and net income adjusted for amortization of
intangible assets, impairment charges, and other non-recurring, infrequent, or
unusual charges, net of the tax impact of such adjustments in the case of
adjusted net income. The Company uses adjusted operating income and adjusted net
income as key performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance
internally. We also believe adjusted operating income and adjusted net income
provide our investors with useful information regarding our historical operating
results. These non-GAAP measurements are not intended to replace the
presentation of our financial results in accordance with GAAP. Use of the terms
adjusted operating income and adjusted net income may differ from similar
measures reported by other companies. Adjusted operating income and adjusted net
income are reconciled from operating income and net income determined under GAAP
as follows:
Three months ended Nine months ended
September 29, September 24, September 29, September 24,
2012 2011 2012 2011
(In thousands)
Operating income $ 70,345 54,112 171,678 160,742
Adjustments:
Amortization of other intangible assets 6,669 7,001 20,317 21,106
Impairment charges 564 163 950 1,220
Sponsor termination fee - 14,671 - 14,671
Secondary offering costs 2,579 - 4,774 -
Peterborough plant closure costs(a) 5,271 - 8,949 -
Bertico litigation(b) - - 20,680 -
Adjusted operating income $ 85,428 75,947 227,348 197,739
Net income attributable to Dunkin'
Brands $ 29,526 7,412 73,973 22,851
Adjustments:
Amortization of other intangible assets 6,669 7,001 20,317 21,106
Impairment charges 564 163 950 1,220
Sponsor termination fee - 14,671 - 14,671
Secondary offering costs 2,579 - 4,774 -
Peterborough plant closure costs(a) 5,271 - 8,949 -
Bertico litigation(b) - - 20,680 -
Loss on debt extinguishment and
refinancing transactions 3,963 18,050 3,963 34,222
Tax impact of adjustments, excluding
Bertico litigation(c) (7,618 ) (15,954 ) (15,581 ) (28,488 )
Tax impact of Bertico adjustment(d) 1,164 - (4,959 ) -
Adjusted net income $ 42,118 31,343 113,066 65,582
|
(a) Represents costs incurred related to the announced closure of the Baskin-Robbins ice cream manufacturing plant in Peterborough, Canada, including $1.0 million and $2.9 million of severance-related charges for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012, respectively, $2.6 million and $3.7 million of accelerated depreciation for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012, respectively, $1.1 million of incremental costs of ice cream products for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012, and other transition-related costs.
(b) Represents the incremental legal reserve recorded in the second quarter of 2012 related to the Quebec Superior Court's ruling in the Bertico litigation, in which the Court found for the Plaintiffs and issued a judgment against Dunkin' Brands in the amount of approximately $C16.4 million (approximately $15.9 million), plus costs and interest.
(c) Tax impact of adjustments, excluding the Bertico litigation, calculated at a 40% effective tax rate for each period presented.
(d) Tax impact of Bertico litigation adjustment calculated as if the incremental reserve had not been recorded. The tax impact recorded in the second quarter of 2012 was a $3.9 million tax benefit representing the actual direct tax benefit expected to be realized, as well as a $2.2 million tax benefit recorded that will fully reverse in the third and fourth quarters of 2012 based on interim tax provision requirements. The tax impact for the three months ended September 29, 2012 represents $1.2 million of the tax benefit that was expected to reverse.
Earnings per share
Earnings per share and diluted adjusted earnings per pro forma common share were
as follows:
Three months ended Nine months ended
September 29, September 24, September 29, September 24,
2012 2011 2012 2011
Earnings (loss) per share:
Class L-basic and diluted $ n/a 4.46 n/a 6.14
Common-basic 0.26 (1.01 ) 0.63 (2.00 )
Common-diluted 0.26 (1.01 ) 0.62 (2.00 )
Diluted adjusted earnings per pro
forma common share 0.37 0.28 0.94 0.64
|
On August 1, 2011, the Company completed its initial public offering.
Immediately prior to the offering, each share of the Company's Class L common
stock converted into approximately 2.4338 shares of common stock. The number of
common shares used in the calculation of diluted adjusted earnings per pro forma
common share for the three and nine months ended September 24, 2011 gives effect
to the conversion of all outstanding shares of Class L common stock at the
conversion factor of 2.4338 common shares for each Class L share, as if the
conversion was completed at the beginning of that fiscal period. The calculation
of diluted adjusted earnings per pro forma common share also includes the
dilutive effect of common restricted shares and stock options, using the
treasury stock method. No pro forma adjustments have been made to the number of
common shares used in the calculation of diluted adjusted earnings per pro forma
common share for the three or nine months ended September 29, 2012, as all Class
L common stock had converted to common shares prior to the beginning of that
fiscal period. Diluted adjusted earnings per pro forma common share is
calculated using adjusted net income, as defined above.
Diluted adjusted earnings per pro forma common share is not a presentation made
in accordance with GAAP, and our use of the term diluted adjusted earnings per
pro forma common share may vary from similar measures reported by others in our
industry due to the potential differences in the method of calculation. Diluted
adjusted earnings per pro forma common share should not be considered as an
alternative to earnings (loss) per share derived in accordance with GAAP.
Diluted adjusted earnings per pro forma common share has important limitations
as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because of these
limitations, we rely primarily on our GAAP results. However, we believe that
presenting diluted adjusted earnings per pro forma common share is appropriate
to provide additional information to investors to compare our performance prior
to and after the completion of our initial public offering and related
conversion of Class L shares into common, as well as to provide investors with
useful information regarding our historical operating results. The following
table sets forth the computation of diluted adjusted earnings per pro forma
common share:
Three months ended Nine months ended
September 29, September 24, September 29, September 24,
2012 2011 2012 2011
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
Adjusted net income available to common
shareholders:
Adjusted net income $ 42,118 31,343 113,066 65,582
Less: Adjusted net income allocated to
participating securities (36 ) (26 ) (178 ) (354 )
Adjusted net income available to common
shareholders $ 42,082 31,317 112,888 65,228
Pro forma weighted average number of
common shares-diluted:
Weighted average number of Class L
shares over period in which Class L
shares were outstanding (a) - 22,866,379 - 22,845,378
Adjustment to weight Class L shares
over respective fiscal period (a) - (15,328,012 ) - (5,104,722 )
Weighted average number of Class L
shares - 7,538,367 - 17,740,656
Class L conversion factor - 2.4338 - 2.4338
Weighted average number of converted
Class L shares - 18,347,071 - 43,177,665
Weighted average number of common
shares 112,720,961 93,529,128 117,499,678 58,807,271
Pro forma weighted average number of
common shares-basic 112,720,961 111,876,199 117,499,678 101,984,936
Incremental dilutive common shares (b) 2,354,039 1,401,643 1,959,476 735,242
Pro forma weighted average number of
common shares-diluted 115,075,000 113,277,842 119,459,154 102,720,178
Diluted adjusted earnings per pro forma
common share $ 0.37 0.28 0.94 0.64
|
(a) The weighted average number of Class L shares in the actual Class L earnings per share calculation for the three and nine months ended September 24, 2011 represents the weighted average from the beginning of the period up through the date of conversion of the Class L shares into common shares. As such, the pro forma weighted average number of common shares includes an adjustment to the weighted average number of Class L shares outstanding to reflect the length of time the Class L shares were outstanding prior to conversion relative to the respective three and nine month periods. The converted Class L shares are already included in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period after their conversion.
(b) Represents the dilutive effect of restricted shares and stock options, using the treasury stock method.
Results of operations
Consolidated results of operations
Three months ended Nine months ended
Increase Increase
September 29, September 24, (Decrease) September 29, September 24, (Decrease)
2012 2011 $ % 2012 2011 $ %
(In thousands, except percentages)
. . .
|
|
|