|
Quotes & Info
|
| GXP > SEC Filings for GXP > Form 10-Q on 8-Nov-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
8-Nov-2012
Quarterly Report
• a $12.7 million decrease in interest expense primarily due to a $6.9 million decrease related to GMO's $500.0 million 11.875% Senior Notes, which were repaid at maturity in July 2012, a $3.5 million decrease due to lower interest rate debt, and a $2.6 million decrease related to the release of uncertain tax positions; and
• the three months ended September 30, 2011, included the impact from flooding along the Missouri River, which decreased gross margin by an estimated $16 million due to coal conservation and increased other operating expenses $3.4 million.
These increases were partially offset by a decrease in weather-normalized retail
demand. In addition, a higher number of shares outstanding due to the issuance
of 17.1 million shares in connection with the June 2012 settlement of the
purchase contracts underlying the Equity Units diluted earnings per share by
$0.09.
Great Plains Energy's earnings available for common shareholders year to date
September 30, 2012, increased to $194.0 million or $1.34 per share from $171.1
million or $1.24 per share for the same period in 2011 driven by:
• new retail rates in Missouri effective May 4, 2011, for KCP&L and June
25, 2011, for GMO;
• favorable weather, with a 16% increase in cooling degree days partially offset by the impact of unfavorable weather during the first quarter of 2012; and
• year to date September 30, 2011, included:
• the impact from flooding along the Missouri River, which decreased
gross margin by an estimated $16 million due to coal conservation
and increased other operating expenses $3.4 million;
• an estimated $11 million decrease in gross margin from the impact
of an extended refueling outage at Wolf Creek;
|
• $12.7 million of expense relating to a voluntary separation program; and
• a $2.3 million loss relating to the impact of disallowed
construction costs for the Iatan No. 1 environmental project and
Iatan No. 2 and $3.9 million of expenses related to other
accounting effects of the KCP&L and GMO 2011 MPSC rate orders.
|
These increases were partially offset by:
• a decrease in weather-normalized retail demand;
• an estimated $20 million impact at Wolf Creek due to an unplanned outage in the first quarter of 2012, increased amortization from the 2011 extended refueling outage and increased other operating expenses; and
• a $14.8 million increase in interest expense primarily due to the deferral to a regulatory asset of $22.1 million of Iatan Nos. 1, 2 and common facilities construction accounting carrying costs during 2011, partially offset by a $5.3 million decrease related to GMO's $500.0 million 11.875% Senior Notes, which were repaid at maturity in July 2012, and a $2.6 million decrease related to the release of uncertain tax positions.
In addition, a higher number of shares outstanding due to the issuance of 17.1
million shares in connection with the June 2012 settlement of the purchase
contracts underlying the Equity Units diluted earnings per share by $0.06.
Wolf Creek Regulation and Operating Costs
On January 13, 2012, Wolf Creek experienced a loss of off-site power resulting
in an unplanned shutdown of the unit. Wolf Creek returned to service on March
27, 2012. The NRC conducted an investigation and increased its oversight of Wolf
Creek following the loss of off-site power. Operating costs at Wolf Creek
increased year to date September 30, 2012, due to the unplanned outage. Great
Plains Energy is planning to expend more resources at Wolf Creek that will
result in future increases in operating costs due to increased NRC oversight and
efforts to comply with new industry-wide regulations adopted by the NRC earlier
this year after a review of U.S. nuclear power plant safety prompted by Japan's
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant event in 2011.
As a result of the 2012 unplanned outage and the extended refueling outage that
occurred in 2011, Wolf Creek's next refueling outage was rescheduled from the
third quarter of 2012 to the first quarter of 2013.
KCP&L Kansas Rate Case Proceedings
On April 20, 2012, KCP&L filed an application with KCC to request an increase to
its retail revenues of $63.6 million, with a return on equity of 10.4% and a
rate-making equity ratio of 51.8%. In September 2012, KCP&L revised its
requested return on equity to 10.3%. The request includes recovery of costs
related to significant upgrades at its generating facilities, including
environmental upgrades at the La Cygne Station; investments in additional wind
generation; and increased investments in electrical infrastructure. KCP&L is
also requesting that KCC approve a change to depreciation rates to reflect the
increase in plant in service as well as a change to the current method of
allocating costs between its Kansas and Missouri jurisdictions to better reflect
KCP&L's summer peaking business. Testimony from KCC staff and other parties
regarding the case was filed on August 22, 2012. The KCC staff's testimony
recommended a return on equity of 9.2% and a revenue increase of approximately
$27.5 million.
In October 2012, KCP&L adjusted its requested increase to retail revenues to
$56.4 million as the net result of updates to the case, which includes a
non-unanimous stipulation and agreement filed in September 2012 by KCP&L and KCC
staff to settle a number of issues in the case. The stipulation and agreement is
pending KCC approval. The outcome of the KCP&L Kansas rate case will likely be
different than either of the positions of KCP&L or KCC staff. The decision of
the KCC cannot be predicted. The increase to retail revenues is anticipated to
be effective in January 2013.
KCP&L Missouri Rate Case Proceedings
On February 27, 2012, KCP&L filed an application with the MPSC to request an
increase to its retail revenues of $105.7 million, with a return on equity of
10.4% and a rate-making equity ratio of 52.5%. In September 2012, KCP&L revised
its requested return on equity to 10.3%. The request includes recovery of costs
related to
improving and maintaining infrastructure to continue to be able to provide
reliable electric service and also includes a lower annual offset to the revenue
requirement for the Missouri jurisdictional portion of KCP&L's annual non-firm
wholesale electric sales margin (wholesale margin offset). KCP&L currently
expects that it will not be able to achieve the $45.9 million wholesale margin
offset currently reflected in its retail rates due to transmission congestion,
regional demand and low wholesale power prices. Testimony from MPSC staff and
other parties regarding the case was filed on August 2, 2012. The MPSC staff's
testimony recommended a return on equity range of 8.0% to 9.0% and a revenue
increase range of approximately $16.5 million to $33.7 million.
In November 2012, the MPSC issued an order approving multiple stipulation and
agreements to settle a number of the issues in the case. An order on the
remaining issues in the case is anticipated to be received to accommodate the
increase to retail revenues to be effective in late January 2013. The final
outcome of the KCP&L Missouri rate case will likely be different than either of
the positions of KCP&L or MPSC staff. The final decision of the MPSC cannot be
predicted.
In a March 2011 order, the MPSC required KCP&L and GMO to apply to the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) to reallocate approximately $26.5 million of Iatan No. 2
qualifying advance coal project tax credits from KCP&L to GMO. KCP&L and GMO did
apply to the IRS but in September 2011, the IRS denied KCP&L's and GMO's
request. In November 2012, the MPSC issued an order that does not require a
reallocation of Iatan No. 2 qualifying advance coal project tax credits from
KCP&L to GMO.
GMO Missouri Rate Case Proceedings
On February 27, 2012, GMO filed an application with the MPSC to request an
increase to its retail revenues of $58.3 million for its Missouri Public Service
division and $25.2 million for its L&P division, with a return on equity of
10.4% and a rate-making equity ratio of 52.5%. In September 2012, GMO revised
its requested return on equity to 10.3% for both its Missouri Public Service and
L&P divisions. The requests include recovery of costs related to improving and
maintaining infrastructure to continue to be able to provide reliable electric
service, costs related to energy efficiency and demand side management programs,
and increased fuel costs. Testimony from MPSC staff and other parties regarding
the case was filed on August 9, 2012. The MPSC staff's testimony recommended a
return on equity range of 8.0% to 9.0%, with a revenue increase of $0.4 million
to $11.9 million for GMO's Missouri Public Service division and $0.7 million to
$4.6 million for its L&P division.
In November 2012, the MPSC issued an order approving multiple stipulation and
agreements to settle a number of the issues in the case. An order on the
remaining issues in the case is anticipated to be received to accommodate the
increase to retail revenues to be effective in late January 2013. The final
outcome of the GMO Missouri rate case will likely be different than either of
the positions of GMO or MPSC staff. The final decision of the MPSC cannot be
predicted.
In December 2011, GMO filed a request with the MPSC seeking to recover costs for
new and enhanced energy efficiency and demand side management programs under
MEEIA. In November 2012, the MPSC issued an order approving a stipulation and
agreement to settle all of the issues in the MEEIA request.
Transmission Investment Opportunities
In April 2012, Great Plains Energy announced that GPE Transmission Holding
Company LLC (GPETHC), a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains
Energy, and AEP Transmission Holding Company, LLC (AEPTHC) formed a new company
to exclusively pursue, develop, construct, own and operate competitive electric
transmission projects. The new company, Transource Energy, LLC (Transource), is
86.5% owned by AEPTHC, a subsidiary of American Electric Power Company, Inc.,
and 13.5% owned by GPETHC. Transource plans to initially pursue competitive
regional transmission projects in the PJM Interconnection, SPP and Midwest
Independent Transmission System Operator transmission regions with plans to
pursue competitive electric transmission projects in additional regions as they
mature.
GMO has an SPP-approved regional transmission project for the Missouri portion
of an approximately 175-mile, 345kV transmission line from Sibley, Missouri to
Nebraska City, Nebraska with an estimated cost of $380 million for GMO's portion
of the line and an expected 2017 in-service date. KCP&L and GMO jointly have an
SPP-
approved regional transmission project for an approximately 30-mile, 345kV
transmission line, with estimated construction costs of $65 million and an
expected 2015 in-service date, from KCP&L's and GMO's Iatan generating station
to KCP&L's Nashua substation.
On August 31, 2012, KCP&L and GMO filed a request with the MPSC to authorize the
transfer at cost of certain transmission property related to the two
SPP-approved regional transmission projects to Transource Missouri, LLC
(Transource Missouri), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Transource. On August 31,
2012, Transource Missouri filed a request with the MPSC seeking a Certificate of
Convenience and Necessity (CCN) to construct, finance, own, operate and maintain
the projects. MPSC approval is anticipated in the third quarter of 2013. Also on
August 31, 2012, Transource Missouri filed a request with FERC seeking incentive
rate treatment and acceptance of a formula transmission rate to recover the cost
of current and future projects. In October 2012, FERC issued an order approving
certain incentive rate treatments and conditionally accepting the formula
transmission rate for Transource Missouri, subject to the outcome of an
administrative hearing or settlement expected during 2013. Following approvals
from FERC and the MPSC, KCP&L and GMO must also seek approval from the SPP to
novate the projects to Transource Missouri. The SPP will then submit its
approval of the novation to FERC for final approval. Great Plains Energy expects
that final approval will be obtained so that the projects can be transferred by
the fourth quarter of 2013.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
See Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information
regarding environmental matters.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for information regarding
related party transactions.
GREAT PLAINS ENERGY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table summarizes Great Plains Energy's comparative results of
operations.
Three Months Ended Year to Date
September 30 September 30
2012 2011 2012 2011
(millions)
Operating revenues $ 746.2 $ 773.7 $ 1,829.5 $ 1,831.7
Fuel (164.7 ) (146.5 ) (422.1 ) (365.8 )
Purchased power (17.9 ) (68.1 ) (69.5 ) (178.4 )
Transmission of electricity by others (9.8 ) (8.6 ) (25.9 ) (23.1 )
Gross margin (a) 553.8 550.5 1,312.0 1,264.4
Other operating expenses (207.9 ) (221.9 ) (631.8 ) (626.3 )
Voluntary separation program - - - (12.7 )
Depreciation and amortization (68.9 ) (65.9 ) (204.2 ) (205.9 )
Operating income 277.0 262.7 476.0 419.5
Non-operating income and expenses 0.2 0.1 (4.9 ) (0.5 )
Interest charges (48.1 ) (60.8 ) (170.8 ) (156.0 )
Income tax expense (82.6 ) (75.4 ) (104.9 ) (90.6 )
Loss from equity investments (0.1 ) - (0.2 ) (0.1 )
Net income 146.4 126.6 195.2 172.3
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest (0.2 ) (0.1 ) - -
Net income attributable to Great Plains Energy 146.2 126.5 195.2 172.3
Preferred dividends (0.4 ) (0.4 ) (1.2 ) (1.2 )
Earnings available for common shareholders $ 145.8 $ 126.1 $ 194.0 $ 171.1
|
(a) Gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation of gross margin below.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to September 30, 2011
Great Plains Energy's earnings available for common shareholders for the three
months ended September 30, 2012, increased to $145.8 million or $0.95 per share
from $126.1 million or $0.91 per share for the same period in 2011.
Electric utility's net income increased $8.0 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011 driven by favorable
weather, with a 6% increase in cooling degree days, and the three months ended
September 30, 2011, included the impact from flooding along the Missouri River,
which decreased gross margin by an estimated $16 million due to coal
conservation and increased other operating expenses $3.4 million. These
increases were partially offset by a decrease in weather-normalized retail
demand.
Great Plains Energy's corporate and other activities had earnings of $3.9
million for the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared to a loss of
$7.8 million for the same period in 2011 primarily due to a $2.1 million
decrease in after-tax interest expense as a result of lower interest rate debt,
a $1.6 million decrease in after-tax interest expense related to the release of
uncertain tax positions, and a $1.5 million increase in income tax benefits
relating to the release of uncertain tax positions. In addition, the three
months ended September 30, 2011, included expenses of $2.3 million from the
resolution of certain general tax related matters.
Year to Date September 30, 2012 Compared to September 30, 2011
Great Plains Energy's earnings available for common shareholders year to date
September 30, 2012, increased to $194.0 million or $1.34 per share from $171.1
million or $1.24 per share for the same period in 2011.
Electric utility's net income increased $20.3 million year to date September 30,
2012, compared to the same period in 2011 driven by:
• new retail rates in Missouri effective May 4, 2011, for KCP&L and June
25, 2011, for GMO;
• favorable weather, with a 16% increase in cooling degree days partially offset by the impact of unfavorable weather during the first quarter of 2012; and
• year to date September 30, 2011, included:
• the impact from flooding along the Missouri River, which decreased
gross margin by an estimated $16 million due to coal conservation
and increased other operating expenses $3.4 million;
• an estimated $11 million impact from an extended refueling outage
at Wolf Creek;
|
• $12.7 million of expense relating to a voluntary separation program; and
• a $2.3 million loss relating to the impact of disallowed
construction costs for the Iatan No. 1 environmental project and
Iatan No. 2 and $3.9 million of expenses related to other
accounting effects of the KCP&L and GMO 2011 MPSC rate orders.
|
These increases were partially offset by:
• a decrease in weather-normalized retail demand;
• an estimated $20 million impact at Wolf Creek due to an unplanned outage in the first quarter of 2012, increased amortization from the 2011 extended refueling outage and increased other operating expenses; and
• a $24.7 million increase in interest expense primarily due to the deferral to a regulatory asset of $22.1 million of Iatan Nos. 1, 2 and common facilities construction accounting carrying costs during 2011, partially offset by a $5.3 million decrease related to GMO's $500.0 million 11.875% Senior Notes, which were repaid at maturity in July 2012.
Great Plains Energy's corporate and other activities loss decreased $2.6 million year to date September 30, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to a $1.6 million decrease in after-tax interest expense related to the release of uncertain tax positions and expenses of $2.3 million included in the three months ended
September 30, 2011, related to the resolution of certain general tax related
matters. These decreases were partially offset by a $1.8 million after-tax loss
on the sale of real estate property in 2012 and a $2.2 million tax benefit in
2011 from the reversal of tax valuation allowances.
Gross Margin
Gross margin is a financial measure that is not calculated in accordance with
GAAP. Gross margin, as used by Great Plains Energy and KCP&L, is defined as
operating revenues less fuel, purchased power and transmission of electricity by
others. Expenses for fuel, purchased power and transmission of electricity by
others, offset by wholesale sales margin, are subject to recovery through cost
adjustment mechanisms, except for KCP&L's Missouri retail operations. As a
result, operating revenues increase or decrease in relation to a significant
portion of these expenses. Management believes that gross margin provides a more
meaningful basis for evaluating electric utility's operations across periods
than operating revenues because gross margin excludes the revenue effect of
fluctuations in these expenses. Gross margin is used internally to measure
performance against budget and in reports for management and the Board. The
Companies' definition of gross margin may differ from similar terms used by
other companies.
ELECTRIC UTILITY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table summarizes the electric utility segment results of
operations.
Three Months Ended Year to Date
September 30 September 30
2012 2011 2012 2011
(millions)
Operating revenues $ 746.2 $ 773.7 $ 1,829.5 $ 1,831.7
Fuel (164.7 ) (146.5 ) (422.1 ) (365.8 )
Purchased power (17.9 ) (68.1 ) (69.5 ) (178.4 )
Transmission of electricity by others (9.8 ) (8.6 ) (25.9 ) (23.1 )
Gross margin (a) 553.8 550.5 1,312.0 1,264.4
Other operating expenses (207.6 ) (218.2 ) (623.8 ) (620.8 )
Voluntary separation program - - - (12.7 )
Depreciation and amortization (68.9 ) (65.9 ) (204.2 ) (205.9 )
Operating income 277.3 266.4 484.0 425.0
Non-operating income and expenses (0.5 ) 0.6 (3.7 ) (0.5 )
Interest charges (48.4 ) (50.2 ) (149.5 ) (124.8 )
Income tax expense (86.5 ) (82.9 ) (120.6 ) (109.8 )
Net income $ 141.9 $ 133.9 $ 210.2 $ 189.9
|
(a) Gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation of gross margin under Great Plains Energy's Results of Operations.
Electric Utility Gross Margin and MWh Sales The following tables summarize electric utility's gross margin and MWhs sold.
Revenues and Costs % MWhs Sold %
Three Months Ended September
30 2012 2011 Change 2012 2011 Change
Retail revenues (millions) (thousands)
Residential $ 358.5 $ 354.3 1 2,999 3,018 (1 )
Commercial 272.8 271.2 1 2,934 2,990 (2 )
Industrial 54.9 57.9 (5 ) 791 828 (5 )
Other retail revenues 4.9 5.1 (1 ) 29 29 -
Kansas property tax
surcharge 1.7 - N/A N/A N/A N/A
Fuel recovery mechanism 10.5 32.2 (67 ) N/A N/A N/A
Total retail 703.3 720.7 (2 ) 6,753 6,865 (2 )
Wholesale revenues 31.8 41.9 (24 ) 1,429 1,206 19
Other revenues 11.1 11.1 - N/A N/A N/A
Operating revenues 746.2 773.7 (4 ) 8,182 8,071 1
Fuel (164.7 ) (146.5 ) 12
Purchased power (17.9 ) (68.1 ) (74 )
Transmission of electricity
by others (9.8 ) (8.6 ) 14
Gross margin (a) $ 553.8 $ 550.5 1
|
(a) Gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation of gross margin under Great Plains Energy's Results of Operations.
Revenues and Costs % MWhs Sold %
Year to Date September 30 2012 2011 Change 2012 2011 Change
Retail revenues (millions) (thousands)
Residential $ 785.3 $ 773.0 2 7,115 7,431 (4 )
Commercial 704.1 676.4 4 8,187 8,209 -
Industrial 153.1 149.6 2 2,401 2,422 (1 )
Other retail revenues 14.8 14.4 3 89 88 1
Kansas property tax
surcharge 4.6 - N/A N/A N/A N/A
Fuel recovery mechanism 20.7 63.8 (68 ) N/A N/A N/A
Total retail 1,682.6 1,677.2 - 17,792 18,150 (2 )
Wholesale revenues 114.0 121.0 (6 ) 4,708 3,595 31
Other revenues 32.9 33.5 (2 ) N/A N/A N/A
Operating revenues 1,829.5 1,831.7 - 22,500 21,745 3
Fuel (422.1 ) (365.8 ) 15
Purchased power (69.5 ) (178.4 ) (61 )
Transmission of electricity
by others (25.9 ) (23.1 ) 12
Gross margin (a) $ 1,312.0 $ 1,264.4 4
|
(a) Gross margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. See explanation of gross margin under Great Plains Energy's Results of Operations.
Electric utility's gross margin increased $3.3 million for the three months . . .
|
|