|
Quotes & Info
|
| NANO > SEC Filings for NANO > Form 10-Q on 7-Nov-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-Nov-2012
Quarterly Report
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. The statements contained in this document that
are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, without
limitation, statements regarding future periods, financial results, revenues,
margins, growth, customers, tax rates, product performance, and the impact of
accounting rules on our business and the future implications of our statements
regarding goals, strategy, and similar terms. We may identify these statements
by the use of words such as "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could,"
"estimate," "expect," "intend," "likely," "may," "might," "plan," "potential,"
"predict," "project," "should," "will," "would" and other similar expressions.
All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on
information available to us on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to
update any such forward-looking statements, except as may otherwise be required
by law.
Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks, uncertainties and
changes in circumstances, many of which may be difficult to predict or beyond
our control, including those factors referenced in Part II Item 1A "Risk
Factors" and elsewhere in this document, and in Part I Item 1A "Risk Factors" in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. In
particular our results could vary significantly based on changes in customer and
industry spending; rate and extent of changes in product mix; adoption of new
products and manufacturing processes; timing of orders, shipments, acceptance of
new products; our ability to secure volume supply agreements; and general
economic conditions. In evaluating our business, investors should carefully
consider these factors in addition to any other risks and uncertainties set
forth elsewhere. The occurrence of the events described in the risk factors and
elsewhere in this report as well as other risks and uncertainties could
materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial
condition. While management believes that the discussion and analysis in this
report is adequate for a fair presentation of the information presented, we
recommend that you read this discussion and analysis in conjunction with the
(i) audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2011 which were included in our 2011 Annual Report on
Form 10-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 14, 2012
and (ii) our other filings with the SEC.
Overview
Nanometrics Incorporated and its subsidiaries ("Nanometrics" or "we") is a leading provider of advanced, high-performance process control metrology and inspection systems used primarily in the fabrication of integrated circuits, high-brightness LEDs ("HB-LED"), data storage devices and solar photovoltaics ("solar PV"). Our automated and integrated systems address numerous process control applications, including critical dimension and film thickness measurement, device topography, defect inspection, overlay registration, and analysis of various other film properties such as optical, electrical and material characteristics. Our process control solutions are deployed throughout the fabrication process, from front-end-of-line substrate manufacturing, to high-volume production of semiconductors and other devices, to advanced wafer-scale packaging applications. Our systems enable device manufacturers to improve yields, increase productivity, and lower their manufacturing costs for the photolithographic process, thin-film metrology, critical-dimension and overlay systems and provide control of device dimension and layer alignment. Advanced packaging technology requires metrology systems to control wafer scale features for through-silicon-via ("TSV") and flip-chip-technology. Our metrology systems for materials monitor the physical, optical, and electrical characteristics of materials including, compound semiconductor, LEDs, solar PVs, and silicon wafers. Our defect inspection systems locate large area and microscopic defects on patterned and unpatterned wafers. This system can be used for inspection at nearly every stage of the semiconductor production flow.
We categorize our systems as follows:
Automated Standalone Systems
Our automated systems are made up of both semi-automated and fully automated metrology systems that are employed in both high-volume and low-volume production environments. The Atlas® II, Atlas XP/Atlas XP+ and
Atlas-M represent our line of high-performance metrology systems providing optical critical dimension ("OCD"®), thin film metrology and wafer stress for transistor and interconnect metrology applications. The OCD technology is supported by our NanoCD™ suite of solutions including our NanoDiffract® software and NanoGen® scalable computing engine that enables visualization, modeling, and analysis of complex structures. The Mosaic II™ provides cost effective overlay metrology solutions for today's advanced 300mm overlay process technologies, and is available on our Lynx™ platform. The Unifire™ system enables users to measure multiple parameters at any given process step in the advanced packaging process flow for critical dimension, overlay, and topography applications. Our SPARK defect inspection system, offers ultra-fast inspection of patterned and unpatterned semiconductor wafers.
We continue to offer automated products for 200mm factories running at 90nm
nodes and above, as well as systems supporting micro-electrical mechanical
systems ("MEMS"). Our Q240AT is a 200mm overlay metrology system that
incorporates the same measurement technology as the Mosaic™, thereby extending
the technology capability of our customers' existing factories. The IVS®-185
system supports critical dimension and overlay measurements for semiconductor,
MEMS, and HB-LED manufacturing. The NanoSpec® 9100 thin film measurement system
is capable of handling wafers ranging in size from 75mm to 200 mm in diameter,
and is used in all segments of semiconductor manufacturing, including data
storage head manufacturing.
System Platform
The Lynx™ cluster metrology platform enables improved cost of ownership to our
customers by combining our Mosaic™, Atlas® II and IMPULSE® metrology systems in
configurations to provide high throughput, reduced footprint systems for leading
300mm wafer metrology applications including OCD, overlay, and thin film process
control.
Integrated Systems
Our integrated metrology ("IM") systems are installed directly onto wafer
processing equipment to provide near real-time measurements for improved process
control and maximum throughput. Our IM systems are sold directly to end
customers and through OEM channels. The IMPULSE® system is our latest metrology
platform for OCD, DBO, and thin film metrology and has been successfully
qualified on numerous OEM platforms. Our 90x0 system is qualified for OEM and
direct sales supporting thin film and OCD applications. Our NanoCD™ solutions
suite is sold in conjunction with our IMPULSE® and legacy 90x0 systems. Our
Trajectory™ system provides in-line measurement of layers in thin film thickness
and composition in solar cell and semiconductor applications.
Materials Characterization
Our materials characterization products include systems that are used to monitor
the physical, optical, electrical and material characteristics of HB-LED, solar
PV, compound semiconductor, strained silicon and silicon-on-insulator ("SOI")
devices, including composition, crystal structure, layer thickness, dopant
concentration, contamination and electron mobility.
Our Vertex™ is a photoluminescence ("PL") mapping system designed for
high-volume compound semiconductor metrology applications including power
control and photonics applications. The RPMBlue™ is our latest PL mapping system
designed specifically for the HB-LED segment. We sell Fourier-Transform Infrared
("FTIR") automated and manual systems in the QS2200/3300 and QS1200
respectively. The FTIR systems are spectrometers designed for non-destructive
wafer analysis for various applications. The NanoSpec® line of products includes
the 3000 and 6100 supporting thin film measurement across all segments in both
low volume production and research applications.
We are continually working to strengthen our competitive position by developing
new technologies and products in our market segment. In furtherance of our
goals, we have:
• Introduced new products in every core product line and primary market served;
• Diversified our product line and addressed new markets through acquisitions, such as the 2006 acquisition of Accent Optical Technologies, Inc. a supplier of overlay and thin film metrology and process control systems; the 2008 acquisition of Tevet Process Control Technologies ("Tevet"), an integrated metrology supplier serving both semiconductor and solar PV industries; the 2009 acquisition of the Unifire™ product line from Zygo Corporation ("Zygo"); and the 2011 acquisition of Nanda Technologies GmbH, a supplier of high sensitivity, high throughput defect inspection systems;
• Continued development of new measurement and inspection technologies for advanced fabrication processes; and
• Researched and developed innovative applications of existing technology to new market opportunities within the solar PV, HB-LED, and data storage industries.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of our financial statements conforms to accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, which requires management,
in applying our accounting policies, to make estimates and judgments that have
an important impact on our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue,
expenses and related disclosures at the date of our financial statements. On an
on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates including those related to
bad debts, inventory valuations, warranty obligations and income taxes.
Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on
various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ from management's estimates. Since
December 31, 2011, there have been no significant changes to our critical
accounting policies discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2011.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 of the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a
description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the respective dates
of adoption and effects or anticipated effects on results of operations and
financial condition.
Results of Operations
Three and Nine Month Periods Ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011
Total net revenues - Our net revenues were comprised of the following categories
(in thousands, except percentages):
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 29, October 1, Changes In September 29, October 1, Changes in
2012 2011 Amount % 2012 2011 Amount %
Automated systems $ 26,588 $ 33,659 $ (7,071 ) (21.0 )% $ 104,675 $ 111,770 $ (7,095 ) (6.3 )%
Integrated systems 2,663 7,540 (4,877 ) (64.7 )% 9,453 20,285 (10,832 ) (53.4 )%
Materials characterization 3,063 8,640 (5,577 ) (64.5 )% 7,600 25,994 (18,394 ) (70.8 )%
Total product revenues 32,314 49,839 (17,525 ) (35.2 )% 121,728 158,049 (36,321 ) (23.0 )%
Service revenues 11,624 8,430 3,194 37.9 % 30,883 26,735 4,148 15.5 %
Total net revenues $ 43,938 $ 58,269 $ (14,331 ) (24.6 )% $ 152,611 $ 184,784 $ (32,173 ) (17.4 )%
|
For the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2012, total product
revenues decreased by $17.5 million and $36.3 million relative to the comparable
2011 periods. The year over year decreases were principally due to a slowdown in
industry spending in the third quarter of 2012. In both the three and nine month
periods ended September 29, 2012, net revenues from automated systems decreased
by $7.1 million relative to the comparable 2011 periods principally due to a
slowdown in industry spending in the third quarter of 2012. For the three month
period ended September 29, 2012, net revenues from our integrated systems
decreased by $4.9 million relative to the comparable 2011 period due principally
to a decline in customer demand for our legacy 9010 series products. For the
nine month period ended September 29, 2012, revenues from our integrated systems
decreased by $10.8 million relative to the comparable 2011 period due
principally to the decline in customer demand for our legacy 9010 series product
being partially offset by an increase in demand for our integrated IMPULSE® OCD
systems. Net revenues from our materials characterization products decreased by
$5.6 million and $18.4 million in the three and nine month periods ended
September 29, 2012 compared to the three and nine month periods ended October 1,
2011, respectively, due principally to a decline in customer demand for our FTIR
and RPM systems, resulting from excess capacity in the HB-LED market and lack of
expansion in the bare wafer silicon end market.
For the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2012, service revenues
increased by $3.2 million and $4.1 million relative to the comparable 2011
periods, principally due to increased sales of billable upgrades, which tend to
fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on availability of new functionality
from upgrades and customer production cycles which determine when customers
purchase available upgrades.
With a significant portion of the world's semiconductor manufacturing capacity
located in Asia, a substantial portion of our revenues continue to be generated
in that region. Although sales to customers within individual countries of that
region will vary from time to time, we expect that a substantial portion of our
revenues will continue to be generated in Asia.
Gross margins. Our gross margin for product and services was as follows:
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 29, October 1, October 1,
2012 2011 September 29, 2012 2011
Product 49.2 % 53.7 % 46.5 % 56.0 %
Services 53.7 % 45.6 % 49.8 % 48.1 %
|
The calculation of product gross margin includes both cost of products and
amortization of intangible assets. Product gross margin for the three and nine
month periods ended September 29, 2012 was 49.2% and 46.5% respectively,
reflecting a decrease of 4.5 points and 9.5 points, respectively, from the
comparable periods in 2011. Although the aforementioned year over year decreases
are declining, they are driven by the same factors. For both the three and nine
month periods, approximately one-third of the decrease was due to higher costs
and resulting in lower gross margin on production of the Atlas® II, which was
launched late in the fourth quarter of 2011. Approximately one-half of the
decrease resulted from lower factory absorption due to the reduced volume of
system production in the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2012
compared with the three and nine month periods ended October 1, 2011. The
remaining decrease for the three and nine month periods ended September 29,
2012, compared with the comparable periods of 2011, results from changes in
product mix of tools sold and an increase in amortization of intangible assets
related to the acquisition of Nanda.
The gross margin for our services business was 53.7% and 49.8% for the three and
nine month periods ended September 29, 2012, respectively. The services gross
margin for the three month period ended September 29, 2012, increased 8.1 points
compared to the three month period ended October 1, 2011, due principally to
increased higher margin upgrade revenue. The services gross margin for the nine
month period ended September 29, 2012, increased 1.7 points compared to the nine
month period ended October 1, 2011, due principally to increased higher margin
upgrade revenue that was partially offset by the effects of higher labor costs
associated with increased delivery of services under contracts.
Operating expenses. Our operating expenses were comprised of the following (in
thousands, except percentages):
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
October 1, Changes in October 1, Changes in
September 29, 2012 2011 Amount % September 29, 2012 2011 Amount %
Research and
development $ 7,176 $ 6,045 $ 1,131 18.7 % $ 22,296 $ 17,312 $ 4,984 28.8 %
Selling 6,308 6,862 (554 ) (8.1 )% 20,560 20,558 2 - %
General and
administrative 4,861 5,817 (956 ) (16.4 )% 16,525 16,758 (233 ) (1.4 )%
Amortization of
intangible assets 193 126 67 53.2 % 580 469 111 23.7 %
Total operating
expenses $ 18,538 $ 18,850 $ (312 ) (1.7 )% $ 59,961 $ 55,097 $ 4,864 8.8 %
|
Research and development. Research and development expenses increased by $1.1
million for the three month period ended September 29, 2012 over the comparable
period in 2011, principally due to a $0.7 million increase in development
projects and related activities, a $0.2 million in increased equipment
depreciation, tooling, and consumable materials, and a $0.6 million increase in
labor and related costs associated with headcount increases, including those
from the Nanda acquisition. These increases were partially offset by a $0.4
million decrease in bonus expense due to lower than expected 2012 revenue and
operating profit. Investments in research and development personnel and
associated projects are part of our strategy to ensure our products are in the
forefront of current and future market demands.
Research and development expenses increased by $5.0 million for the nine month
period ended September 29, 2012 over the comparable period in 2011, principally
due to a $1.9 million increase in development projects and related activities, a
$1.1 million in increased equipment depreciation, tooling, and consumable
materials, and a $2.5 million increase in labor and related costs associated
with headcount increases, including those from the Nanda acquisition. The labor
and related cost increase was partially offset by a $0.5 million decrease in
bonus expense due to lower than expected 2012 revenue and operating profit.
Selling. Selling expenses decreased by $0.6 million for the three month period
ended September 29, 2012 as compared to the corresponding period in 2011,
principally due to an $0.8 million decrease in labor and related expenses
associated with pre-sales evaluation activities partially offset by a $0.6
million increase in labor and related costs, including those from the Nanda
acquisition. The labor and related cost increase was partially offset by a $0.3
million decrease in bonus expense due to lower than expected 2012 revenue and
operating profit.
Selling expenses were essentially flat for the nine month period ended
September 29, 2012 as compared to the corresponding period in 2011, principally
due to a $1.8 million decrease in labor and related expenses associated with
pre-sales application evaluation activities, offset by a $2.4 million increase
in labor and related costs, including those from the Nanda acquisition. The
labor and related cost increase was partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease
in bonus expense due to lower than expected 2012 revenue and operating profit.
From time to time sales application engineers expend efforts on application
development projects with the related expenses being charged to research and
development projects. The aforementioned decreases in pre-sales activities of
$0.8 million and $1.8 million represents increased charges to research and
development projects for the three and nine month periods ended September 29,
2012, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2011.
General and administrative. General and administrative expenses decreased by
$1.0 million for the three month period ended September 29, 2012, as compared to
the corresponding period in 2011, principally due to a $1.1 million decrease in
professional service fees compared to 2011, which included fees associated with
the acquisition of Nanda, and a $0.3 million decrease in bonus expense due to
lower than expected 2012 revenue and operating profit. These decreases were
partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in labor and related costs,
including those from the Nanda acquisition.
General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.2 million for the nine month
period ended September 29, 2012 compared to the corresponding period in 2011,
principally due to a $1.0 million decrease in professional service fees compared
to 2011, which included fees associated with the acquisition of Nanda, and a
$0.7 million decrease in bonus expense due to lower than expected 2012 revenue
and operating profit. These decreases were partially offset by a $1.1 million
increase in labor and related costs, including those associated with the Nanda
acquisition, and a $0.4 increase in software license and maintenance fees.
Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets increased
slightly for the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2012 when
compared to the same periods in 2011, due principally to increased amortization
associated with the Nanda acquisition, which was partially offset by reduced
amortization on certain intangible assets that became fully amortized during the
prior year.
Other Income (expense), net. Our net other income (expense) consisted of the
following categories (in thousands, except percentages):
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 29, October 1, Changes in Changes in
2012 2011 Amount % September 29, 2012 October 1, 2011 Amount %
Interest income $ 28 $ 57 $ (29 ) (50.9 )% $ 113 $ 162 $ (49 ) (30.2 )%
Interest
expense (262 ) (324 ) 62 (19.1 )% (795 ) (1,002 ) 207 (20.7 )%
Other, net (121 ) 834 (955 ) (114.5 )% (345 ) (149 ) (196 ) 131.5 %
Total other
income
(expense), net $ (355 ) $ 567 $ (922 ) (162.6 )% $ (1,027 ) $ (989 ) $ (38 ) 3.8 %
|
For the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2012 compared to the same periods of 2011, interest income declined minimally as the total balances of cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities remained relatively flat and interest rates for the three and nine months periods ended September 29, 2012 were lower than interest rates in the comparable prior year periods. Interest expense for the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2012 was lower than interest expense in the comparable prior year periods due principally to prepayments of $1.4 million and $2.0 million on the mortgage on our headquarters in July of 2012 and July 2011, respectively, in addition to ongoing monthly payments, which reduced the principal amount under the loan. Other net expenses represent principally foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from
translation of our inter-company balances between subsidiaries. Foreign exchange losses were $0.1 million for the three month periods ended September 29, 2012 while foreign exchange gains were $0.7 million for the three month period ended October 1, 2011. Foreign exchange losses were $0.4 million and $0.1 million for the nine month period ended September 29, 2012 and October 1, 2011, respectively.
Income taxes.
We account for income taxes under the provisions of ASC 740, Accounting for
Income Taxes. We adjust the effective tax rate each quarter to be consistent
with the estimated annual effective tax rate. We also record the tax effect of
unusual or infrequently occurring discrete items, including changes in judgment
about valuation allowances and effects of changes in tax laws or tax rates, in
the interim period in which they occur. Our effective tax rate reflects the
impact of a portion of its earnings being taxed in foreign jurisdictions as well
as a valuation allowance maintained on certain deferred tax assets.
We recorded a tax provision of $1.4 million and $2.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2012, respectively. We recorded a tax provision of $4.7 million and $16.1 million for the three and nine months ended October 1, 2011, respectively. The decrease in the three and nine month's provision from prior year is primarily due to a significant decrease in the our profitability as well as a $1.4 million discrete benefit for deferred tax assets recorded as a result of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) approval of certain tax elections during the three months ended June, 30 2012.
As of September 29, 2012, we continued to maintain a valuation allowance against
certain net deferred tax assets as a result of uncertainties regarding the
realization of the asset due to cumulative losses and uncertainty of future
taxable income in various tax jurisdictions. In the event that we determine that
the deferred tax assets are realizable, an adjustment to the valuation allowance
will be reflected in the tax provision for the period such determination is
made.
We are subject to taxation in the United States and various states including
. . .
|
|