|
Quotes & Info
|
| ENSG > SEC Filings for ENSG > Form 10-Q on 7-Nov-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-Nov-2012
Quarterly Report
Leased Leased
(with a (without a
Purchase Purchase
Owned Option) Option) Total
Number of facilities 85 2 20 107
Percent of total 79.4 % 1.9 % 18.7 % 100.0 %
Operational skilled nursing, assisted living
and independent living beds 9,371 414 2,305 12,090
Percent of total 77.5 % 3.4 % 19.1 % 100.0 %
|
The Ensign Group, Inc. is a holding company with no direct operating assets, employees or revenues. All of our skilled nursing, assisted living and home health and hospice operations are operated by separate, wholly-owned, independent subsidiaries, which have their own management, employees and assets. In addition, one of our wholly-owned independent subsidiaries, which we call our Service Center, provides centralized accounting, payroll, human resources, information technology, legal, risk management and other services to each operating subsidiary through contractual relationships between such subsidiaries. In addition, we have the Captive that provides some claims-made coverage to our operating subsidiaries for general and professional liability, as well as for certain workers' compensation insurance liabilities. References herein to the consolidated "Company" and "its" assets and activities, as well as the use of the terms "we," "us," "our" and similar verbiage in this quarterly report is not meant to imply that The Ensign Group, Inc. has direct operating assets, employees or revenue, or that any of the facilities, the Service Center or the Captive are operated by the same entity.
Facility Acquisition History
December 31, September 30,
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Cumulative number of
facilities 46 57 61 63 77 82 102 107
Cumulative number of
operational skilled
nursing, assisted
living and independent
living beds 5,585 6,667 7,105 7,324 8,948 9,539 11,702 12,090
|
The following table sets forth the location of our facilities and the number of operational beds located at our facilities as of September 30, 2012:
CA AZ TX UT CO WA ID NV NE IA Total
Number of
facilities 35 13 22 11 5 3 6 3 4 5 107
Operational
skilled nursing,
assisted living
and independent
living beds 3,864 1,902 2,812 1,342 463 274 477 304 296 356 12,090
|
On February 1, 2012, we acquired an assisted living facility in Nevada for approximately $2.1 million, which was paid in cash. This acquisition added 60 operational assisted living beds to our operation. We also entered into a separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of such transaction.
On February 10, 2012, we acquired a home health operation in Oregon for
approximately $0.5 million, which was paid in cash. The acquisition did not have
an impact on the Company's operational bed count. We also entered into a
separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of such
transaction.
On March 1, 2012, we acquired a skilled nursing facility in Idaho for
approximately $2.8 million, which was paid in cash. This acquisition added 113
operational skilled nursing beds to our operations. We also entered into a
separate operations transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of such
transaction.
On April 1, 2012, we acquired a home health and hospice operation in Utah and
Arizona for approximately $3.0 million, which was paid in cash. The acquisition
did not have an impact on our operational bed count. We also entered into a
separate operations transfer agreement with the prior owner as part of this
transaction.
On June 1, 2012, we acquired a skilled nursing facility in Texas for $8.0
million, which was paid in cash. This addition added 150 operational skilled
nursing beds to our operations. We also entered into a separate operations
transfer agreement with the prior tenant as part of such transaction.
On August 1, 2012, we acquired two skilled nursing facilities in Idaho for $4.5
million, which was paid in cash. One of the skilled nursing facilities acquired
also offers assisted living services. This acquisition added 94 skilled nursing
beds and 24 assisted living units to our operations.
In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we purchased the
underlying assets of three of our skilled nursing facilities in California which
we previously operated under long-term lease agreements, which contained options
to purchase, for $11.4 million, which was paid in cash. These acquisitions did
not impact our operational bed count.
See further discussion of facility acquisitions in Note 6 in Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Developments
Board of Directors - Effective June 15, 2012, Mr. Daren J. Shaw was appointed by the board of directors, at the recommendation of the nomination and corporate governance committee, to serve on the audit committee with Mr. John Nackel and Mr. Thomas Maloof (Chair). Mr. Shaw has also been appointed by the board of directors to serve on the nomination and corporate governance committee and the compensation committee. On July 26, 2012, the board of directors appointed Mr. Shaw to serve as the chair of the audit committee effective September 1, 2012.
Joint Venture - Urgent Care
Immediate Clinic (IC) - On January 10, 2012, we announced a joint venture to develop and operate urgent care facilities and related businesses. Immediate Clinic (IC) will offer daily access to healthcare for minor injuries and illnesses, including x-ray and lab services, all from convenient neighborhood locations with no appointments. Design and construction planning for several new locations is currently underway, and IC is also seeking opportunities to acquire existing urgent care operations across the United States. IC opened its first two operations during the third quarter of fiscal 2012. Dr. John Shufeldt resigned as Chief Executive Officer of IC effective September 12, 2012. In addition, on October 4, 2012, we committed to invest an additional $6.0 million to IC in exchange for senior preferred stock which will result in our holding approximately 96% of the outstanding interests in the joint venture on a fully-diluted basis. The proceeds of such investment will be used to continue the development of additional clinics in the Northwest.
On February 15, 2012, IC purchased an equity investment in an urgent care
software service provider for $1.4 million. In addition, on March 1, 2012, DRX
Urgent Care LLC (DRX), a newly formed subsidiary of IC, purchased substantially
all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Doctors Express Franchising
LLC, a national urgent care franchise system for $2.0 million, adjusted for
certain items at the time of close and redeemable noncontrolling interest of
$11.6 million. We recognized intangible assets of $7.9 million in trade name,
$3.0 million in franchise relationships and $2.7 million in goodwill as part of
this transaction.
Key Performance Indicators
We manage our skilled nursing business by monitoring key performance indicators
that affect our financial performance. These indicators and their definitions
include the following:
• Routine revenue: Routine revenue is generated by the contracted daily rate
charged for all contractually inclusive skilled nursing services. The
inclusion of therapy and other ancillary treatments varies by payor source
and by contract. Services provided outside of the routine contractual
agreement are recorded separately as ancillary revenue, including Medicare
Part B therapy services, and are not included in the routine revenue
definition.
• Skilled revenue: The amount of routine revenue generated from patients in our skilled nursing facilities who are receiving higher levels of care under Medicare, managed care, Medicaid, or other skilled reimbursement programs. The other skilled residents that are included in this population represent very high acuity residents who are receiving high levels of nursing and ancillary services which are reimbursed by payors other than Medicare or managed care. Skilled revenue excludes any revenue generated from our assisted living services.
• Skilled mix: The amount of our skilled revenue as a percentage of our total routine revenue. Skilled mix (in days) represents the number of days our Medicare, managed care, or other skilled patients are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities divided by the total number of days patients (less days from assisted living services) from all payor sources are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities for any given period (less days from assisted living services).
• Quality mix: The amount of routine non-Medicaid revenue as a percentage of our total routine revenue. Quality mix (in days) represents the number of days our non-Medicaid patients are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities divided by the total number of days patients from all payor sources are receiving services at our skilled nursing facilities for any given period (less days from assisted living services).
• Average daily rates: The routine revenue by payor source for a period at our skilled nursing facilities divided by actual patient days for that revenue source for that given period.
• Occupancy percentage (operational beds): The total number of residents occupying a bed in a skilled nursing, assisted living or independent living facility as a percentage of the beds in a facility which are available for occupancy during the measurement period.
• Number of facilities and operational beds: The total number of skilled nursing, assisted living and independent living facilities that we own or operate and the total number of operational beds associated with these facilities.
Skilled and Quality Mix. Like most skilled nursing providers, we measure both patient days and revenue by payor. Medicare, managed care and other skilled patients, whom we refer to as high acuity patients, typically require a higher level of skilled nursing and rehabilitative care. Accordingly, Medicare and managed care reimbursement rates are typically higher than from other payors. In most states, Medicaid reimbursement rates are generally the lowest of all payor types. Changes in the payor mix can significantly affect our revenue and profitability.
The following table summarizes our overall skilled mix and quality mix for the
periods indicated as a percentage of our total routine revenue (less revenue
from assisted living services) and as a percentage of total patient days (less
days from assisted living services):
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
2012 2011 2012 2011
Skilled Mix:
Days 25.2 % 24.9 % 25.8 % 25.8 %
Revenue 49.3 % 51.3 % 50.1 % 52.2 %
Quality Mix:
Days 38.4 % 38.2 % 39.0 % 38.2 %
Revenue 58.8 % 60.5 % 59.6 % 60.8 %
|
Occupancy. We define occupancy as the ratio of actual patient days (one patient
day equals one resident occupying one bed for one day) during any measurement
period to the number of beds in facilities which are available for occupancy
during the measurement period. The number of licensed and independent living
beds in a skilled nursing, assisted living or independent living facility that
are actually operational and available for occupancy may be less than the total
official licensed bed capacity. This sometimes occurs due to the permanent
dedication of bed space to alternative purposes, such as enhanced therapy
treatment space or other desirable uses calculated to improve service offerings
and/or operational efficiencies in a facility. In some cases, three- and
four-bed wards have been reduced to two-bed rooms for resident comfort, and
larger wards have been reduced to conform to changes in Medicare requirements.
These beds are seldom expected to be placed back into service. We define
occupancy in operational beds as the ratio of actual patient days during any
measurement period to the number of available patient days for that period. We
believe that reporting occupancy based on operational beds is consistent with
industry practices and provides a more useful measure of actual occupancy
performance from period to period.
The following table summarizes our overall occupancy statistics for the periods
indicated:
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
2012 2011 2012 2011
Occupancy:
Operational beds at end of period 12,090 11,461 12,090 11,461
Available patient days 1,108,622 1,032,478 3,256,086 2,882,973
Actual patient days 872,701 812,627 2,580,026 2,291,107
Occupancy percentage (based on operational beds) 78.7 % 78.7 % 79.2 % 79.5 %
|
Revenue Sources
Our total revenue represents revenue derived primarily from providing services
to patients and residents of skilled nursing facilities, and to a lesser extent
from assisted living facilities and ancillary services. We receive service
revenue from Medicaid, Medicare, private payors and other third-party payors,
and managed care sources. The sources and amounts of our revenue are determined
by a number of factors, including bed capacity and occupancy rates of our
healthcare facilities, the mix of patients at our facilities and the rates of
reimbursement among payors. Payment for ancillary services varies based upon the
service provided and the type of payor. The following table sets forth our total
revenue by payor source and as a percentage of total revenue for the periods
indicated:
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
2012 2011 2012 2011
$ % $ % $ % $ %
(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue:
Medicaid $ 76,709 37.0 % $ 70,967 36.1 % $ 223,934 36.5 % $ 204,273 36.1 %
Medicare 69,526 33.6 71,293 36.3 209,715 34.2 207,897 36.8
Medicaid-skilled 6,316 3.0 5,024 2.6 18,590 3.0 13,730 2.4
Total 152,551 73.6 147,284 75.0 452,239 73.7 425,900 75.3
Managed Care 26,316 12.7 23,621 12.0 77,738 12.7 71,938 12.7
Private and Other(1) 28,283 13.7 25,441 13.0 83,641 13.6 67,777 12.0
Total revenue $ 207,150 100.0 % $ 196,346 100.0 % $ 613,618 100.0 % $ 565,615 100.0 %
______________________
|
Critical Accounting Policies Update
There have been no significant changes during the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2012 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting
policies and estimates in our discussion and analysis of financial condition and
results of operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC,
except for the following:
Noncontrolling Interest
The noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is initially recognized at estimated
fair value on the acquisition date and is presented within total equity in our
condensed consolidated balance sheets. We present the noncontrolling interest
and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc.
in our condensed consolidated statements of income and net income per share is
calculated based on net income attributable to The Ensign Group, Inc.'s
stockholders. The carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest is adjusted
based on an allocation of subsidiary earnings based on ownership interest.
Noncontrolling interest that has redemption features outside our control is
accounted for as redeemable noncontrolling interest and is recorded as temporary
equity. Owners of noncontrolling interest in certain of our subsidiaries have
the right in certain circumstances to require it to purchase additional
ownership interests at an amount as defined in the applicable agreement. The
intent of the parties is to approximate fair value at the time of redemption by
using a multiple of earnings that is consistent with generally accepted
valuation practices. These contingent redemption rights are embedded in the
equity security at issuance, are not free-standing instruments, do not represent
a de facto financing and are not under our control.
Equity Investment
Our majority-owned subsidiary has a non-marketable equity investment which is
accounted for under the equity method. The investment is initially recorded at
cost and we will adjust the carrying amount for its share of the earnings or
losses of the investee after the date of investment. The investment is evaluated
periodically for impairment. If it is determined that a decline of the
investment is other than temporary, then the investment basis would be written
down to fair value and the write-down would be included in earnings as a loss.
Industry Trends
The skilled nursing industry has evolved to meet the growing demand for
post-acute and custodial healthcare services generated by an aging population,
increasing life expectancies and the trend toward shifting of patient care to
lower cost settings. The skilled nursing industry has evolved in recent years,
which we believe has led to a number of favorable improvements in the industry,
as described below:
• Shift of Patient Care to Lower Cost Alternatives. The growth of the senior
population in the United States continues to increase healthcare costs,
often faster than the available funding from government-sponsored
healthcare programs. In response, federal and state governments have
adopted cost-containment measures that encourage the treatment of patients
in more cost-effective settings such as skilled nursing facilities, for
which the staffing requirements and associated costs are often
significantly lower than acute care hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation
facilities and other post-acute care settings. As a result, skilled
nursing facilities are generally serving a larger population of
higher-acuity patients than in the past.
• Significant Acquisition and Consolidation Opportunities. The skilled nursing industry is large and highly fragmented, characterized predominantly by numerous local and regional providers. We believe this fragmentation provides significant acquisition and consolidation opportunities for us.
• Improving Supply and Demand Balance. The number of skilled nursing facilities has declined modestly over the past several years. We expect that the supply and demand balance in the skilled nursing industry will continue to improve due to the shift of patient care to lower cost settings, an aging population and increasing life expectancies.
• Increased Demand Driven by Aging Populations and Increased Life Expectancy. As life expectancy continues to increase in the United States and seniors account for a higher percentage of the total U.S. population, we believe the overall demand for skilled nursing services will increase. At present, the primary market demographic for skilled nursing services is primarily individuals age 75 and older. According to the 2010 U.S. Census, there were over 40 million people in the United States in 2010 that are over 65 years old. The 2010 U.S. Census estimates this group is one of the fastest growing segments of the United States population and is expected to more than double between 2000 and 2030.
We believe the skilled nursing industry has been and will continue to be impacted by several other trends. The use of long-term care insurance is increasing among seniors as a means of planning for the costs of skilled nursing services. In addition, as a result of increased mobility in society, reduction of average family size, and the increased number of two-wage earner couples, more seniors are looking for alternatives outside the family for their care. Effects of Changing Prices - Medicare reimbursement rates and procedures are subject to change from time to time, which could materially impact our revenue. Medicare reimburses our skilled nursing facilities under a prospective payment system (PPS) for certain inpatient covered services. Under the PPS, facilities are paid a predetermined amount per patient, per day, based on the anticipated costs of treating patients. The amount to be paid is determined by classifying each patient into a resource utilization group (RUG) category that is based upon each patient's acuity level. As of October 1, 2010, the RUG categories were expanded from 53 to 66 with the introduction of minimum data set (MDS) 3.0. . . .
|
|