Summary of HIGHLIGHT NETWORKS, INC.

Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant.

(a) Resignation of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

On July 27, 2012, the board of directors of Highlight Networks, Inc. (the "Company") dismissed Michael Cronin, CPA ("Cronin"), as the Company's independent registered public accountant. Cronin' on our financial statements for each of the past two fiscal years contained no adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that, the report expressed substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

During our two most recent fiscal years and through the date of dismissal, the Company had no disagreements with Cronin on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Cronin, would have caused him to make reference to the subject matter of such disagreements in its report on our financial statements for such periods.

During the Company's two most recent fiscal years and through the date of the dismissal, there were no reportable events as defined under Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K adopted by the SEC.

The Company has requested that Cronin furnish it with a letter addressed to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, stating whether or not it agrees with the above statements. A copy of the letter provided by Cronin is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K.

(b) New Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

On July 27, 2012, the Company engaged Patrick Rogers, CPA, P.A. ("Rogers"), as its new independent registered public accountant. Prior to the engagement of Rogers, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf has ever consulted Rogers regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company nor oral advice was provided that Rogers concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to this item) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of Item 304 of Regulation S-K).