|
Quotes & Info
|
| MTDR > SEC Filings for MTDR > Form 10-Q on 14-Aug-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
14-Aug-2012
Quarterly Report
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained herein and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC, along with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in such Form 10-K. The Annual Report is accessible on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov and on our website at www.matadorresources.com. Our discussion and analysis includes forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties and should be read in conjunction with "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" below for information about the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to be materially different than our forward-looking statements.
In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, references to "we," "our" or "the Company" refer to Matador Resources Company and its subsidiaries before the completion of our corporate reorganization on August 9, 2011 and Matador Holdco, Inc. and its subsidiaries after the completion of our corporate reorganization on August 9, 2011. Prior to August 9, 2011, Matador Holdco, Inc. was a wholly owned subsidiary of Matador Resources Company, now known as MRC Energy Company. Pursuant to the terms of our corporate reorganization, former Matador Resources Company became a wholly owned subsidiary of Matador Holdco, Inc. and changed its corporate name to MRC Energy Company, and Matador Holdco, Inc. changed its corporate name to Matador Resources Company.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the term "common stock" refers to shares of our common stock after the conversion of our Class B common stock into Class A common stock upon the consummation of our Initial Public Offering on February 7, 2012, as the Class A common stock became the only class of common stock authorized, and the term "Class A common stock" refers to shares of our Class A common stock prior to the automatic conversion of our Class B common stock into Class A common stock upon the consummation of our Initial Public Offering.
For certain oil and natural gas terms used in this report, please see the "Glossary of Oil and Natural Gas Terms" included with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable U.S. securities legislation. Additionally, forward-looking statements may be made orally or in press releases, conferences, reports, on our website or otherwise, in the future, by us or on our behalf. Such statements are generally identifiable by the terminology used such as "anticipate," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "might," "potential," "predict," "project," "should" or other similar words.
By their very nature, forward-looking statements require us to make assumptions that may not materialize or that may not be accurate. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, levels of activity and achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. Such factors include, among others: changes in oil or natural gas prices, the timing of planned capital expenditures, availability of acquisitions, uncertainties in estimating proved reserves and forecasting production results, operational factors affecting the commencement or maintenance of producing wells, the condition of the capital markets generally, as well as our ability to access them, the proximity to and capacity of transportation facilities, uncertainties regarding environmental regulations or litigation and other legal or regulatory developments affecting our business, and the other factors discussed below and elsewhere in this report and in other documents that we file with or furnish to the SEC, all of which are difficult to predict. Forward-looking statements may include statements about:
• our business strategy;
• our reserves and the present value thereof;
• our technology;
• our cash flows and liquidity;
• our financial strategy, budget, projections and operating results;
• our oil and natural gas realized prices;
• the timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas;
• the availability of drilling and production equipment;
• the availability of oil field labor;
• the amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures, including future exploration and development costs;
• the availability and terms of capital;
• government regulation and taxation of the oil and natural gas industry;
• our marketing of oil and natural gas;
• our exploitation projects or property acquisitions;
• our costs of exploiting and developing our properties and conducting other operations;
• general economic conditions;
• competition in the oil and natural gas industry;
• the effectiveness of our risk management and hedging activities;
• environmental liabilities;
• counterparty credit risk;
• developments in oil-producing and natural gas-producing countries;
• our future operating results;
• our estimated future reserves and the present value thereof;
• our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions contained in this report that are not historical; and
• other factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC.
Although we believe that the expectations conveyed by the forward-looking statements are reasonable based on information available to us on the date such forward-looking statements were made, no assurances can be given as to future results, levels of activity, achievements or financial condition.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should recognize that the statements are predictions of future results, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward- looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described above, as well as others not now anticipated. The impact of any one factor on a particular forward-looking statement is not determinable with certainty as such factors are interdependent upon other factors. The foregoing statements are not exclusive and further information concerning us, including factors that potentially could materially affect our financial results, may emerge from time to time. We do not intend to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements except as required by law.
Overview
We are an independent energy company engaged in the exploration, development, production and acquisition of oil and natural gas resources in the United States, with a particular emphasis on oil and natural gas shale plays and other unconventional resource plays. Our current operations are located primarily in the Eagle Ford shale play in South Texas and the Haynesville shale play in Northwest Louisiana and East Texas. We expect the majority of our near-term capital expenditures will focus on increasing our production and reserves from the Eagle Ford shale play. We believe our interests in the Eagle Ford shale play will enable us to create a more balanced commodity portfolio through the drilling of locations that are prospective for oil and liquids. In addition to these primary operating areas, we have acreage positions in Southeast New Mexico and West Texas and in Southwest Wyoming and adjacent areas of Utah and Idaho where we continue to identify new oil and gas prospects.
During the first six months of 2012, our operations were primarily focused on the exploration and development of our Eagle Ford shale properties in South Texas, as we continued executing our plan to significantly increase our oil production and oil reserves during 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we completed and began producing oil and natural gas from 12 gross/11.8 net operated and 1 gross/0.2 net non-operated Eagle Ford shale wells. We also completed and began producing natural gas from 14 gross/0.6 net non-operated Haynesville shale wells. We had two contracted drilling rigs operating in South Texas throughout the first six months of 2012 (except for a brief period near the end of the second quarter where we added a third rig to execute a two-well contract), and all of our operated drilling and completion activities were focused on the Eagle Ford shale. At August 14, 2012, we have two contracted drilling rigs operating in South Texas: one in LaSalle County and one in Karnes County.
In the second quarter of 2012 specifically, our activities were almost entirely focused on our Eagle Ford shale properties. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we completed and began producing oil and/or natural gas from 6 gross/5.9 net operated and 1 gross/0.2 net non-operated Eagle Ford shale wells. We completed one well on our Northcut lease in LaSalle County, four wells on our Danysh/Pawelek lease in Karnes County and one well on our Glasscock Ranch lease in Zavala County, all in the Eagle Ford shale. Three of the wells on the Danysh/Pawelek lease began producing at various times during the month of June 2012, and the Glasscock Ranch #1H well began producing at the very end of June. As a result, these four wells did not contribute fully to our second quarter production volumes.
Our average daily production for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was approximately 8,740 BOE per day, including approximately 3,130 Bbl of oil per day and 33.6 MMcf of natural gas per day, as compared to approximately 8,000 BOE per day, including 560 Bbl of oil per day and 44.6 MMcf of natural gas per day for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Both the average total daily production and the average daily oil production for the second quarter of 2012 were the best quarterly figures in our history. Our average daily oil production of 3,130 Bbl of oil per day during the second quarter of 2012 was an increase of about 42% from an average daily production of approximately 2,200 Bbl of oil per day during the first quarter of 2012 and an increase of almost six-fold from an average daily production of approximately 560 Bbl of oil per day in the second quarter of 2011. Our average daily production for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was approximately 8,380 BOE per day, including approximately 2,670 Bbl of oil per day and 34.3 MMcf of natural gas per day, as compared to approximately 7,160 BOE per day, including approximately 390 Bbl of oil per day and 40.8 MMcf of natural gas per day for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our total oil production increased almost seven-fold to approximately 485 MBbl of oil during the first six months of 2012 from approximately 70 MBbl of oil during the first six months of 2011. This increased oil production is a direct result of our ongoing drilling operations in the Eagle Ford shale. Oil production comprised approximately 36% and 32% of our total production (using a conversion ratio of one Bbl of oil per six Mcf of natural gas) for the three and six months ending June 30, 2012, respectively, as compared to approximately 7% and 5% of our total production for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
Our oil and natural gas revenues were approximately $65.2 million, or an increase of about 89%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $34.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our oil revenues increased almost eight-fold to $51.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $6.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our oil and natural gas revenues of $65.2 million for the first six months of 2012 were 97% of our total oil and natural gas revenues of $67.0 million reported for all of 2011. Our Adjusted EBITDA increased by approximately $23.8 million to approximately $49.3 million, or an increase of approximately 93%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. This increase in our Adjusted EBITDA is primarily attributable to the increase in our oil production and the associated increase in our oil and natural gas revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our Adjusted EBITDA of $49.3 million for the first six months of 2012 was 99% of our Adjusted EBITDA of $49.9 million reported for all of 2011.
Our estimated proved oil reserves increased almost eight-fold to approximately 6.7 million Bbl of oil at June 30, 2012 from approximately 0.9 million Bbl of oil at June 30, 2011, based on the reserves audit by our independent reservoir engineers, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. At June 30, 2012, we had approximately 19.1 million BOE of estimated total proved reserves, including approximately 6.7 million Bbl of oil and 73.9 Bcf of natural gas, with a PV-10 of $303.4 million and a Standardized Measure of $281.5 million. At June 30, 2012, 64% of our estimated proved reserves were proved developed reserves, 35% of our estimated proved reserves were oil and 65% of our estimated proved reserves were natural gas. At June 30, 2011, based on the reserves audit by our independent reservoir engineers, we had approximately 26.3 million BOE of estimated total proved reserves, including 0.9 million barrels of oil and 152.5 Bcf of natural gas, with a PV-10 of $144.4 million and a Standardized Measure of $134.2 million. At June 30, 2011, 34% of our estimated proved reserves were proved developed reserves, 3% of our estimated proved reserves were oil and 97% of our estimated proved reserves were natural gas.
The unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month natural gas prices was $3.146 per MMBtu for the period from July 2011 to June 2012 and $4.209 per MMBtu for the period from July 2010 to June 2011. These average prices were the natural gas prices used to estimate our natural gas reserves at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As a result of this decline in natural gas prices, at June 30, 2012, we removed 97.8 Bcf of previously classified proved undeveloped natural gas reserves in the Haynesville shale in Northwest Louisiana from our estimated total proved reserves, most of which were attributable to non-operated properties. As the leasehold acreage associated with these previously classified proved undeveloped natural gas reserves is held by production from existing Haynesville wells, however, these natural gas volumes remain available to be developed by us or the operator at a future time when natural gas prices improve, so long as the producing wells holding this acreage continue to produce as necessary to maintain held-by-production status.
During 2012, we intend to allocate 84% of our 2012 capital expenditure budget of $313.0 million to the exploration, development and acquisition of additional interests in the Eagle Ford shale play. Including these anticipated capital expenditures in the Eagle Ford shale, we plan to dedicate about 94% of our 2012 anticipated capital expenditure budget to opportunities prospective for oil and liquids production. At June 30, 2012, we have incurred approximately $146.7 million or about 47% of our 2012 estimated capital expenditures of $313.0 million. This includes approximately $12.3 million incurred to acquire additional leasehold acreage primarily in the Eagle Ford shale near our existing properties. During the first half of 2012, our drilling and completion costs for new wells have been less than we budgeted, although our costs for production facilities, pipelines and other infrastructure have exceeded our initial estimates. Overall, at June 30, 2012, we are executing our 2012 capital expenditure program largely as planned and remain within our anticipated capital expenditure budget for 2012. While we have budgeted $313.0 million for 2012, the aggregate amount of capital we will expend may fluctuate materially based on market conditions and our drilling results, as well as other opportunities we may encounter during the remainder of 2012.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, natural gas prices have declined to their lowest levels in many years, with the NYMEX Henry Hub natural gas futures contract for the earliest delivery date ranging between a high of $3.10 per MMBtu in early January and a low of $1.91 per MMBtu in mid-April. We would not expect to drill any operated natural gas wells, except for natural gas wells in specific exploratory projects like the Meade Peak shale in Southwest Wyoming, until natural gas prices improved significantly from their recent levels. In addition, as a result of these low natural gas prices, several of our non-operated Haynesville shale wells were shut in for brief periods or produced less natural gas than we anticipated during the first six months of 2012 as the operators voluntarily curtailed a portion of the natural gas production from these wells.
As we continue to transition our operations to the Eagle Ford shale play in South Texas, we may face challenges associated with establishing operations in new areas and securing the necessary services to drill and complete wells and with securing the necessary pipeline and natural gas processing capabilities to transport, process and market the oil and natural gas that we produce. We may also incur higher than anticipated costs associated with establishing new operating infrastructure and facilities on our leases throughout the area. We believe we have successfully secured the necessary drilling and completion services for our current Eagle Ford operations. We did not experience difficulties in securing completion, and particularly hydraulic fracturing services, for any wells drilled during the first six months of 2012, although we experienced these problems at various times during 2011 in South Texas and may have such difficulties again in the future. We believe that maintaining reliable drilling and completion services and reducing drilling and completion costs will be essential to the successful development of the Eagle Ford shale play.
We did experience temporary pipeline interruptions from time to time during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 associated with natural gas production from our Eagle Ford shale wells and have elected to either shut in wells for brief periods or to flare some of the natural gas we produced. We believe that these pipeline interruptions and capacity constraints are temporary and that additional oil and natural gas pipeline infrastructure currently being built throughout South Texas will help to alleviate these problems within 60 to 90 days. At August 14, 2012, we are negotiating a natural gas gathering, transportation and processing agreement, including firm transportation and processing, for most of our operated natural gas production in South Texas. We expect to complete this agreement during the third quarter of 2012. If we were required to shut in our production for long periods of time due to these pipeline interruptions, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
On February 2, 2012, our common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbol "MTDR." Our general and administrative expenses have increased as a result of us operating as a public company. These increased expenses include costs associated with, among other items, legal and accounting support services, filing annual and quarterly reports with the SEC, investor relations activities, directors' fees, incremental directors' and officers' liability insurance costs, transfer and registrar agent fees and expenses associated with compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other regulations. In addition, we have increased our staff size and compensation and incurred other ongoing general and administrative expenses necessary to maintain and grow a publicly traded exploration and production company. As a result, we believe that our general and administrative expenses for future periods may continue to increase. Our consolidated financial statements for future periods will reflect these increased expenses and affect the comparability of our financial statements with periods before the completion of our Initial Public Offering.
Initial Public Offering
We closed the Initial Public Offering of our common stock on February 7, 2012 and closed the over-allotment option on March 7, 2012. We issued 12,209,167 shares of common stock and 2,674,167 shares of common stock were sold by the selling shareholders. The shares were sold at a price to the public of $12.00 per share and we received cash proceeds of approximately $136.6 million from this transaction, net of underwriting discounts and commissions. We did not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling shareholders. The underwriters received underwriting discounts and commissions totaling approximately $9.9 million, and we incurred additional costs of approximately $3.5 million in connection with the offering, which amounted to total fees and costs of approximately $13.4 million. We used $123.0 million of the net proceeds to repay the then outstanding borrowings under our Credit Agreement. We used the remaining net proceeds to fund a portion of our 2012 capital expenditure requirements.
Estimated Proved Reserves
The following table sets forth our estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves at June 30, 2012 and 2011. These reserves estimates were based on evaluations prepared by our engineering staff and have been audited for their reasonableness by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent reservoir engineers. These reserves estimates were prepared in accordance with the SEC's rules for oil and natural gas reserves reporting. The estimated reserves shown are for proved reserves only and do not include any unproved reserves classified as probable or possible reserves that might exist for our properties, nor do they include any consideration that could be attributable to interests in unproved and unevaluated acreage beyond those tracts for which proved reserves have been estimated. Proved oil and natural gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions. Our total estimated proved reserves are estimated using a conversion ratio of one Bbl per six Mcf.
At June 30,(1)
2012 2011
Estimated Proved Reserves Data: (2)
Estimated proved reserves:
Oil (MBbl) 6,728 878
Natural Gas (Bcf) 73.9 152.5
Total (MBOE) (3) 19,052 26,294
Estimated proved developed reserves:
Oil (MBbl) 3,133 401
Natural Gas (Bcf) 54.0 51.1
Total (MBOE) 12,130 8,915
Percent developed 63.7 % 33.9 %
Estimated proved undeveloped reserves:
Oil (MBbl) 3,595 478
Natural Gas (Bcf) 20.0 101.4
Total (MBOE) 6,922 17,380
PV-10(4) (in millions) $ 303.4 $ 144.4
Standardized Measure(5) (in millions) $ 281.5 $ 134.2
|
(1) Numbers in table may not total due to rounding.
(2) Our estimated proved reserves, PV-10 and Standardized Measure were determined using index prices for oil and natural gas, without giving effect to derivative transactions, and were held constant throughout the life of the properties. The unweighted arithmetic averages of the first-day-of-the-month prices for the period from July 2011 to June 2012 were $92.17 per Bbl for oil and $3.146 per MMBtu for natural gas and for the period from July 2010 to June 2011 were $86.60 per Bbl for oil and $4.209 per MMBtu for natural gas. These prices were adjusted by property for quality, energy content, regional price differentials, transportation fees, marketing deductions and other factors affecting the price received at the wellhead.
(3) Thousands of barrels of oil equivalent, estimated using a conversion ratio of one Bbl per six Mcf.
(4) PV-10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from Standardized Measure, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues. PV-10 is not an estimate of the fair market value of our properties. We and others in the industry use PV-10 as a measure to compare the relative size and value of proved reserves held by companies and of the potential return on investment related to the companies' properties without regard to the specific tax characteristics of such entities. Our PV-10 at June 30, 2012 and 2011 may be reconciled to our Standardized Measure of discounted future net cash flows at such dates by reducing our PV-10 by the discounted future income taxes associated with such reserves. The discounted future income taxes at June 30, 2012 and 2011 were, in millions, $21.9 and $10.2, respectively.
(5) Standardized Measure represents the present value of estimated future net cash flows from proved reserves, less estimated future development, production, plugging and abandonment costs and income tax expenses, discounted at 10% per annum to reflect the timing of future cash flows. Standardized Measure is not an estimate of the fair market value of our properties.
Our estimated proved oil and natural gas reserves decreased from approximately 26.3 million BOE at June 30, 2011 to approximately 19.1 million BOE at June 30, 2012, reflecting primarily the decrease in our proved undeveloped natural gas reserves from 101.4 Bcf at June 30, 2011 to 20.0 Bcf at June 30, 2012. The unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month natural gas prices was $3.146 per MMBtu for the period from July 2011 to June 2012 and $4.209 per MMBtu for the period from July 2010 to June 2011. These average prices were the natural gas prices used to estimate our natural gas reserves at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As a result of this decline in natural gas prices, at June 30, 2012, we removed 97.8 Bcf of previously classified proved undeveloped natural gas reserves in the Haynesville shale in Northwest Louisiana from our estimated total proved reserves, most of which were attributable to non-operated properties. As the leasehold acreage associated with these previously classified proved undeveloped natural gas reserves is held by production from existing Haynesville wells, however, these natural gas volumes remain available to be developed by us or the operator at a future time when natural gas prices improve, so long as the producing wells holding this acreage continue to produce as necessary to maintain held-by-production status.
Our estimated proved oil reserves increased almost eight-fold to approximately 6.7 million Bbl at June 30, 2012 from approximately 0.9 million Bbl at June 30, 2011. This increase is attributable to proved oil reserves added as a result of . . .
|
|