|
Quotes & Info
|
| DCBF > SEC Filings for DCBF > Form 10-Q on 14-Aug-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
14-Aug-2012
Quarterly Report
INTRODUCTION
In the following pages, management presents an analysis of the Corporation's consolidated financial at June 30, 2012, compared to December 31, 2011, and the consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same periods in 2011. This discussion is designed to provide shareholders with a more comprehensive review of the operating results and financial position than could be obtained from reading the consolidated financial statements alone. This analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes and the selected financial data included elsewhere in this report.
The Corporation, through the Bank, provides customary retail banking services to its customers, including checking and savings accounts, time deposits, IRAs, safe deposit facilities, personal loans, real estate mortgage loans and installment loans. The Bank also provides trust and wealth management products and services through its own trust department and its Raymond James affiliation. It also offers a variety of commercial and commercial real estate loans along with treasury management services to various commercial businesses.
The Corporation, through the Bank, grants residential real estate, commercial real estate, consumer and commercial loans to customers located primarily in Delaware, Franklin, Licking, Morrow, Marion and Union Counties, Ohio. The economic conditions in the Corporation's market are one of the strongest within the State of Ohio, however, these conditions continue to present challenges to the banking industry. While economic activity is slowly starting to recover, there are still increases in unemployment levels, increased loan foreclosure volume and a decline in real estate values. The Corporation's business has been under pressure due primarily to decreased market activity, which has resulted in declining loan portfolios. Real estate values, especially in the Bank's core geographic area, have declined during the past several years and have not shown signs of increased prices or activity during 2012.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this report constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, such as statements relating to the financial condition and prospects, lending risks, plans for future business development and marketing activities, capital spending and financing sources, capital structure, the effects of regulation and competition, and the prospective business of both the Corporation and the Bank. Where used in this report, the words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "intend," and similar words and expressions, related to the Corporation or the Bank or their respective management, identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements reflect the current views of the Corporation and are based on information currently available to the management of the Corporation and the Bank and upon current expectations, estimates, and projections about the Corporation and its industry, management's belief with respect thereto, and certain assumptions made by management. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
(i) significant increases in competitive pressure in the banking and financial
services industries; (ii) changes in the interest rate environment which could
reduce anticipated or actual margins; (iii) changes in political conditions or
the legislative or regulatory environment; (iv)
general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally (especially in
central Ohio), becoming less favorable than expected resulting in, among other
things, a deterioration in credit quality of assets; (v) changes occurring in
business conditions and inflation; (vi) changes in technology; (vii) changes in
monetary and tax policies; (viii) changes in the securities markets; and
(ix) other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the filings of
the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Overview of the second quarter of 2012
The following is a summary of financial highlights from the three and six months ended June 30, 2012:
• The Corporation's total assets remained relatively consistent with December 31, 2011, decreasing 2.3% to $510,708. The decrease was mainly attributed to the decline in the loan portfolio, partially offset by an increase in total cash and cash equivalents and investment securities.
• As previously reported, in October 2010, the Bank entered into a Consent Agreement with the FDIC, and a written agreement with the Ohio Division of Financial Institutions ("Ohio Division"), both of which require that Tier 1 and Total Risk Based Capital percentages reach 9.0% and 13.0%, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, the Bank's capital ratios, as previously noted, were not at these levels. The Tier-1 capital ratio was 6.89%, while the Total Risk Based Capital was 10.41% at June 30, 2012.
• Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $442, an improvement over a net loss of $1,823 for the same period in 2011. This mainly attributed to the decline in the provision for loan losses from $3,211 to $730.
• Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 totaled $7,874, a decrease from $9,100 in the same period in the prior year, the decrease is primarily due to a smaller interest-earning asset base in the current year.
• Overall loan balances continue to decline due to lower market activity. Loans stood at $322,777 at June 30, 2012 compared to $359,767 at December 31, 2011, a decline of $36,990.
• Total borrowings decreased to $17,568 at June 30, 2012 from $40,036 at December 31, 2011. This is a result of paying off long-term debt with excess cash generated from the overall decrease in loans and the improved ability to raise deposits from its core customer base.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
The Corporation's assets totaled $510,708 at June 30, 2012, compared to $522,881 at December 31, 2011, a decrease of $12,173, or 2.3%. Cash and cash equivalents increased by $17,839 from year end, totaling $57,153 at June 30, 2012 as a result of increased deposits and payoffs and paydowns in the loan portfolios. Total securities increased $7,008 to $96,131 from December 31, 2011. This increase is also attributable to the payoffs and paydowns in the loan portfolio. Management utilizes investment securities to provide the Corporation with the flexibility to move funds into loans as demand warrants, and as collateral for various borrowing opportunities.
Total loans decreased $36,990, or 10.3%, during the first six months of 2012. The decline in outstanding loan balances is mainly due to the lower volume of new originations due to the current economy and payoffs amd paydowns within the current portfolio. The Corporation's loan originations have remained lower, as the availability of quality lending opportunities within the Bank's marketplace remain low.
Total deposits remained stable, increasing 0.9% from $445,428 at December 31, 2011 to $449,644 at June 30, 2012. Noninterest-bearing deposits grew by 8.7%, or $7,193, from year-end. The focus on core-deposit growth over the past 15 months has contributed to this growth.
Total borrowings decreased $22,468 during the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decline in long-term borrowings was mainly attributed to the Bank reducing its FHLB debt through the early pay-off of existing balances. In previous years, the Corporation utilized a matched funding methodology for its borrowing and deposit activities. However, with its current deposit base and adequate cash balances, there has been less need for the utilization of borrowed funds.
COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND
JUNE 30, 2011
Net Income (Loss). The Corporation reported net income of $283 for the three month period ended June 30, 2012, compared to a net loss of $1,856 for the same period in 2011. The improvement was mainly attributed to reduced provision expense of $2,281, reduced noninterest expense of $1,039, offset by a decline in net interest income of $620 and a reduction in noninterest income of $511.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on interest-earning assets exceeds interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is the largest component of the Corporation's income, and is affected by the interest rate environment and the volume and the composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Net interest income was $3,868 for the three month period ended June 30, 2012, and $4,488 for the same period in 2011. This decline is attributed to lower interest earning assets, primarily from the previously mentioned decline in loan balances. As noted, the current economic activity in the Corporation's market area is slowly recovering; however, there are still lower loan originations. Additionally, management has focused on reducing risk in its portfolios by tightening credit standards, further reducing the universe of quality loan originations available. Management has also focused on reducing low yielding cash balances by increasing its investment securities portfolio.
As noted, the Corporation continues to reduce its overall borrowings, mainly through the FHLB, by either replacing them with customer deposits or by reducing the overall size of the balance sheet through deposit run-off. Deposits normally are less expensive than borrowings and contribute to the stable net interest margin the Bank has experienced. Net interest margin for the second quarter was 3.29%, compared to 3.36% for the first quarter 2012 and 3.38% for the second quarter 2011. The decrease is a result of decreased yields on loans, offset by a decrease in deposit costs.
The Asset/Liability Management Committee, which is responsible for determining deposit rates, continues to closely monitor the Bank's cost of funds to take advantage of pricing and cash flow opportunities. Additionally, because of the increased competition in the Bank's primary marketplace, management has continued to recognize the importance of offering special rates on certain deposit products. These special deposit rates tend to negatively affect the Corporation's net interest margin. This strategy has yet to have a significant impact on the Bank's cost of funds, as any increase in customer deposit rates is more than offset by a reduction in the need and amount of higher costing FHLB borrowings.
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents the charge to income necessary to adjust the allowance for loan losses to an amount that represents management's assessment of the losses known and inherent in the Bank's loan portfolio. All lending activity contains associated risks of loan losses and the Bank recognizes these credit risks as a necessary element of its business activity.
The provision for loan losses totaled $255 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $2,536 for the same period in 2011. This decline from the prior year quarter is mainly attributed to the overall improvement in credit quality within the Bank's loan portfolios. Other contributing factors include improvement in delinquencies, improved workout results and stabilized real estate values, after periods of decline, within the Bank's market area. Management maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level to absorb management's estimate of probable inherent credit losses in its portfolio.
Nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2012 were $7,100, a decrease of $2,476 from the December 31, 2011 balance of $9,576. The portfolio of problem loans has continued to decrease in response to workout activities, and fewer new problem loans have surfaced. The majority of nonaccrual balances are attributed to loans in the investment real estate sector that were not generating sufficient cash flow to service the debt.
The allowance for loan losses was $9,148, or 2.83% of total loans at June 30, 2012, compared to $9,584, or 2.66% of total loans at December 31, 2011. Net charge-offs for the second quarter were $450, compared to $1,481 in the prior year quarter. The decrease in charge-offs is due to the previously mentioned continued stabilization of the problem loan portfolio. Management will continue to monitor the credit quality of the loan portfolio and may recognize additional provisions in the future if needed to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level.
Noninterest Income. Total noninterest income was $1,234 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decline from the $1,745 recognized in the second quarter 2011. The decline is attributed to reduced data processing revenue as a result of the sale of all outstanding contracts that were owned by Datatasx LLC in the prior year and reduced appreciation of Bank-owned life insurance when compared to the same quarter in the prior year.
Noninterest Expense. Total noninterest expense was $4,782 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a 17.8% decrease compared to noninterest expense of $5,821 for the same period in 2011. The decrease is primarily the result of restructuring that included reducing staff levels and branch closures in 2011, driving a $409 decrease in salaries and benefits and a $225 decrease in occupancy and equipment. The Corporation has also seen a reduction in FDIC insurance premiums of $198 as in the prior year the FDIC changed the methodology for the calculation of the premium which had a positive impact on the Bank's assessed amount.
Income Taxes. The Corporation recorded an income tax credit of $218 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to an income tax credit of $268 in the same period in 2011. In 2010, management recognized a full allowance on the net deferred tax asset. Management is maintaining its full allowance tax position each quarter.
COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND
JUNE 30, 2011
Net Income (Loss). The Corporation reported net income of $442 for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, compared to a loss of $1,823 for the same period in 2011. The improvement in profitability was mainly attributed to reduced provision expense and reduced operating expenses resulting from a reduction in staff and branch closures in 2011.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income was $7,874 for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, and $9,100 for the same period in 2011. The decline in net interest income is mainly attributed to lower interest earning assets when compared to the same period in 2011. The Corporation has been reducing its balance sheet in order to increase capital ratios, but has also experienced a decline in loan originations as the economy is slowly recovering. In lieu of increasing loan balances, management has allocated excess cash balances into its securities portfolio in order to increase yield on earning assets while providing collateral to fund future borrowing ability.
As noted earlier, the Corporation has been able to reduce its overall borrowings, by paying down debt with cash generated from the declining loan portfolio, and from an increase in retail deposits. Deposits normally are less expensive than borrowing which contributes to the stable net interest margin the Bank has experienced
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses totaled $730 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to $3,211 for the same period in 2011. This decline in provision expense from the previous year's quarter is mainly attributed to the overall improvement in credit quality within the Bank's loan portfolios. Overall, problem loans have declined since year-end 2010, and delinquencies are down. Management maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level to absorb management's estimate of probable inherent credit losses in its portfolio.
Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $1,166, compared to net charge-offs of $4,103 for the same period in the prior year. The significant decrease in charge-offs is due to further stabilization in the loan portfolio. Management will continue to monitor the credit quality of the loan portfolio and may recognize additional provisions in the future if needed to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level.
Noninterest Income. Total noninterest income decreased $325 to $2,922 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily attributable to the decline in data processing revenue resulting from the sale of contracts that were owned by Datatasx in 2011.
Noninterest Expense. Total noninterest expense decreased $1,598 to $9,653 for the first six months of the year compared to 2011. The decrease is a result of restructuring that reduced staff and closed branches. The Corporation experience higher expenses in the prior year associated with legal and consulting as a result of the credit issues within its loan portfolios. As workout results improved in the current year, these expenses have decreased accordingly.
Income Taxes. The Corporation recorded an income tax credit of $29 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to a credit of $292 in the same period in 2011. In 2010, management recognized a full allowance on the net deferred tax asset, and continues to record a full valuation allowance.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity is the ability of the Corporation to fund customers' needs for
borrowing and deposit withdrawals. The purpose of liquidity management is to
assure sufficient cash flow to meet all of the financial commitments and to
capitalize on opportunities for business expansion. This ability depends on the
financial strength, asset quality and types of deposit and investment
instruments offered by the Corporation to its customers. The Corporation's
principal sources of funds are deposits, loan and security repayments,
maturities of securities, sales of securities available for sale and other funds
provided by operations. The Bank also has the ability to borrow from the FHLB.
While scheduled loan repayments and maturing investments are relatively
predictable, deposit flows and early loan and mortgage-backed security
prepayments are more influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions,
and competition. The Corporation maintains investments in liquid assets based
upon management's assessment of (1) need for funds, (2) expected deposit flows,
(3) yields available on short-term liquid assets and (4) objectives of the
asset/liability management program.
Cash and cash equivalents increased $17,839 to $57,153 at June 30, 2012 as compared to December 31, 2011. The Bank continues to offer a number of retail deposit programs to increase core deposits while reducing reliance on large depositors and CDARS deposits. Cash and equivalents represented 11.2% of total assets at June 30, 2012 and 7.5% of total assets at December 31, 2011. The Corporation has the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB and the Federal Reserve should the Corporation need to supplement its future liquidity needs. Management believes the Corporation's liquidity position is adequate based on its current level of cash, cash equivalents, core deposits, the stability of its other funding sources, and the support provided by its capital base.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Total shareholders' equity increased $498 between December 31, 2011 and June 30, 2012. The increase is primarily due to net income of $442 and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Tier 1 capital is shareholders' equity excluding the unrealized gain or loss on securities and intangible assets. Total capital includes Tier 1 capital plus the allowance for loan losses, not to exceed 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Risk-weighted assets are the Corporation's total assets after such assets are assessed for risk and assigned a weighting factor defined by regulation based on their inherent risk.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries meet all published regulatory capital requirements. For the Bank, the total risk-based capital ratio was 10.41% at June 30, 2012, while the Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 9.20%. Regulatory minimums call for Tier 1 capital and total risk-based capital ratios of 4.0% and 8.0% at June 30, 2012, respectively. The Bank's Tier 1 leverage ratio, defined as Tier 1 capital divided by average assets, was 6.89% at June 30, 2012. As previously reported, in October 2010, the Bank entered into a Consent Agreement with the FDIC and a written agreement with the Ohio Division which requires that Tier-1 and Total Risk Based Capital percentages be 9.0% and 13.0% respectively. As a result, the Bank is currently not in compliance with these orders. The Corporation has been exploring alternatives for raising Capital. On July 18, 2012, the Corporation filed a Forms S-1 that announced a rights offering to standby purchasers for a total of approximately $13.2 million. The Corporation expects that it will be able to meet the Bank's Capital requirements if the rights offering is completed.
The following table sets forth the Corporation's obligations and commitments to make future payments under contract as of June 30, 2012.
Payment Due by Year
Less than More than
Contractual Obligations Total 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years 5 years
FHLB advances $ 17,568 $ 8,500 $ 3,794 $ 2,798 $ 2,476
Operating lease obligations 5,275 598 1,062 852 2,763
Loan and line of credit commitments 69,899 43,561 - - 26,338
Total Contractual Obligations $ 92,742 $ 52,659 $ 4,856 $ 3,650 $ 31,577
|
|
|