|
Quotes & Info
|
| BKSC > SEC Filings for BKSC > Form 10-Q on 13-Aug-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
13-Aug-2012
Quarterly Report
Management's discussion and analysis is included to assist shareholders in understanding the Company's financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow. This discussion should be reviewed in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements (unaudited) and notes included in this report and the supplemental financial data appearing throughout this report. Since the primary asset of the Company is its wholly-owned subsidiary, most of the discussion and analysis relates to the Bank.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other portions of this quarterly report contain certain "forward-looking statements" concerning the future operations of the Bank of South Carolina Corporation. Management desires to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1996 and is including this statement for the express purpose of availing the Company of protections of such safe harbor with respect to all "forward-looking statements" contained in this Form 10-Q. The Company has used "forward-looking statements" to describe future plans and strategies including its expectations of the Company's future financial results. The following are cautionary statements. Management's ability to predict results or the effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. A variety of factors may affect the operations, performance, business strategy and results of the Company including, but not limited to the following:
· Risk from changes in economic, monetary policy, and industry conditions
· Changes in interest rates, shape of the yield curve, deposit rates, the net interest margin and funding sources
· Market risk (including net income at risk analysis and economic value of equity risk analysis) and inflation
· Risk inherent in making loans including repayment risks and changes in the value of collateral
· Loan growth, the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, provisions for loan losses, and the assessment of problem loans
· Level, composition, and re-pricing characteristics of the securities portfolio
· Deposit growth, change in the mix or type of deposit products and services
· Continued availability of senior management
· Technological changes
· Ability to control expenses
· Changes in compensation
· Risks associated with income taxes including potential for adverse adjustments
· Changes in accounting policies and practices
· Changes in regulatory actions, including the potential for adverse adjustments
· Recently enacted or proposed legislation
· Current weakness in the financial service industry.
All forward-looking statements in this report are based on information available to the Company as of the date of this report. Although Management believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, Management cannot guarantee that these expectations will be achieved. The Company will undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In addition, certain statements in future filings by the Company with the SEC, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with the approval of the Company, which are not statements of historical fact, constitute forward looking statements.
Overview
Bank of South Carolina Corporation (the Company) is a financial institution
holding company headquartered in Charleston, South Carolina, with $311.3 million
in assets as of June 30, 2012 and net income of $890,267 and $1,780,993 for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2012. The Company offers a broad range of
financial services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Bank of South
Carolina (the Bank). The Bank is a state-chartered commercial bank which
operates primarily in the Charleston, Dorchester and Berkeley counties of South
Carolina. The Bank's original and current concept is to be a full service
financial institution specializing in personal service, responsiveness, and
attention to detail to foster long standing relationships.
The following is a discussion of the Company's financial condition as of June 30, 2012 as compared to December 31, 2011 and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The discussion and analysis identifies significant factors that have affected the Company's financial position and operating results and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes included in this report.
The Company derives most of its income from interest on loans and investments (interest bearing assets). The primary source of funding for making these loans and investments is the Company's interest and non-interest bearing deposits. One of the key measures of the Company's success is the amount of net interest income, or the difference between the income on its interest earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the expense on its interest bearing liabilities, such as deposits. Another key measure is the spread between the yield the Company earns on these interest bearing assets and the rate the Company pays on its interest bearing liabilities.
There are risks inherent in all loans; therefore, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb estimated losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. The Company established and maintains this allowance based on a methodology representing the environment it operates within. For a detailed discussion on the allowance for loan losses see "Provision for Loan Losses".
The Company's results of operations depend not only on the level of its net interest income from loans and investments, but also on its non-interest income and its operating expenses. Net interest income depends upon the volumes, rates and mix associated with interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities which result in the net interest spread. The Company's net interest spread for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were 3.83% and 3.75%, respectively, compared to 3.78% and 3.79% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in the net interest spread for the six months ended June 30, 2012, was primarily due to high yielding investment securities maturing and subsequently re-invested at significantly lower rates.
Non-interest income includes fees and other expenses charged to customers. A more detailed discussion of interest income, non-interest income and operating expenses follows.
For six months ended June 30, 2012, the Bank has paid $1,040,000 to the Company for dividend payments.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company has adopted various accounting policies that govern the application
of principles generally accepted in the United States and with general practices
within the banking industry in the preparation of its financial statements. The
Company's significant accounting policies are described in the footnotes to its
unaudited consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2012 and its notes
included in the consolidated financial statements in its 2011 Annual Report on
Form 10-K as filed with the SEC.
Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by the Company that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. The Company considers these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgment and assumptions the Company uses are based on historical experience and other factors, which the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the number of the judgments and assumptions the Company makes, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates that could have a material impact on the carrying values of its assets and liabilities and its results of operations.
The Company considers its policies regarding the allowance for loan losses to be its most subjective accounting policy due to the significant degree of management judgment. The Company has developed what it believes to be appropriate policies and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to its loan portfolio. The Company's assessments may be impacted in future periods by changes in economic conditions, the impact of regulatory examinations and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers which were not known by management at the time of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. For additional discussion concerning the Company's allowance for loan losses and related matters, see "Allowance for Loan Losses."
BALANCE SHEET
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents include working cash funds, due from banks, interest
bearing deposits in other banks, items in process of collection and federal
funds sold. In order to improve the Company's yield on daily liquidity, the
Company terminated all of its Federal Funds positions and moved the money to the
Federal Reserve as the Company was able to earn .25% - approximately ten basis
points more than the Company was making on Federal Funds. Therefore there were
no Federal Funds sold at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011. Total Cash and cash
equivalents decreased 16.35% or $18,243,093 to $93,372,543 at June 30, 2012,
from $111,615,636 at December 31, 2011. This decrease is the result of a
decrease in core deposits. (See further discussion under "Deposits").
Regulations set by the Federal Reserve require the Company to maintain certain average cash reserve balances. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the daily average reserve requirement was approximately $700,000.
LOANS
The Company focuses its lending activities on small and middle market
businesses, professionals and individuals in its geographic markets. At June 30,
2012, outstanding loans (plus deferred loan fees of $65,135) totaled
$210,750,195 which equaled 75.97% of total deposits and 67.70% of total
assets. Substantially all loans were to borrowers located in the Company's
market areas in the counties of Charleston, Dorchester and Berkeley in South
Carolina.
Because lending activities comprise such a significant source of revenue, the Company's main objective is to adhere to sound lending practices. The Loan Committee of the Board of Directors meets monthly to evaluate the adequacy of the Allowance for Loan Losses and to review all loans resulting in credit exposure of $10,000 or more.
The breakdown of total loans by type and the respective percentage of total loans are as follows:
June 30, December 31,
2012 2011 2011
Commercial loans $ 53,021,600 $ 52,809,459 $ 55,565,525
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate construction 3,685,093 4,802,531 3,564,327
Commercial real estate other 105,840,164 107,294,285 106,408,621
Consumer
Consumer real estate 43,427,930 42,499,017 43,185,861
Consumer other 4,775,408 4,929,801 4,984,778
210,750,195 212,335,093 213,709,112
Allowance for loan losses (3,341,579 ) (2,854,059 ) (3,106,884 )
Loans, net $ 207,408,616 $ 209,481,034 $ 210,602,228
Percentage of Loans June 30, December 31,
2012 2011 2011
Commercial loans 25.16% 24.87% 26.00%
Commercial real estate constructions 1.75% 2.26% 1.67%
Commercial real estate other 50.22% 50.53% 49.79%
Consumer real estate 20.61% 20.02% 20.21%
Consumer other 2.26% 2.32% 2.33%
Total 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
|
Although the Company's customers indicate that business conditions are improving, loan demand did not increase during the six months ended June 30, 2012 from year end 2011.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
The Company uses the investment securities portfolio for several purposes. It
serves as a vehicle to manage interest rate and prepayment risk, to generate
interest and dividend income from investment of funds, to provide liquidity to
meet funding requirements, and to provide collateral for pledges on public
funds. Investments are classified into three categories (1) Held to Maturity (2)
Trading and (3) Available for Sale. Management believes that maintaining its
securities in the Available for Sale category provides greater flexibility in
the management of the overall investment portfolio. The average yield on
investments at June 30, 2012 was 2.54% compared to 2.45% at December 31,
2011. The estimated fair value of the investments available for sale at June 30,
2012 and December 31, 2011 and percentage of each category to total investments
are as follows:
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
June 30,
2012 December 31, 2011
US Treasury Notes $ 6,260,625 $ 6,310,782
Government-Sponsored Enterprises 18,440,831 18,434,117
Municipal Securities 31,483,188 34,807,261
$ 56,184,644 $ 59,552,160
US Treasury Note 11.14 % 10.60 %
Government-Sponsored Enterprises 32.82 % 30.95 %
Municipal Securities 56.04 % 58.45 %
100.00 % 100.00 %
|
All investment securities were classified as Available for Sale (debt and equity securities that may be sold under certain conditions), at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The securities were reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of shareholders' equity, net of income taxes. Unrealized losses on securities due to fluctuations in fair value are recognized when it is determined that an other than temporary decline in value has occurred. Gains or losses on the sale of securities are recognized on a specific identification, trade date basis.
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale are summarized as follows as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
JUNE 30, 2012
GROSS GROSS ESTIMATED
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
U.S. Treasury Note $ 6,125,676 $ 134,949 $ - $ 6,260,625
Government-Sponsored Enterprises 17,961,794 479,037 - 18,440,831
Municipal Securities 28,489,314 2,993,874 - 31,483,188
Total $ 52,576,784 $ 3,607,860 $ - $ 56,184,644
DECEMBER 31, 2011
GROSS GROSS ESTIMATED
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED FAIR
COST GAINS LOSSES VALUE
U.S. Treasury Notes $ 6,153,299 $ 157,483 $ - $ 6,310,782
Government-Sponsored Enterprises 18,100,730 333,387 - 18,434,117
Municipal Securities 32,101,781 2,706,597 1,117 34,807,261
Total $ 56,355,810 $ 3,197,467 $ 1,117 $ 59,552,160
|
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale at June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, by contractual maturity are as follows:
ESTIMATED
AMORTIZED FAIR
COST VALUE
Due in one year or less $ 1,636,791 $ 1,651,258
Due in one year to five years 30,009,635 31,117,847
Due in five years to ten years 11,528,828 12,871,783
Due in ten years and over 9,401,530 10,543,756
Total $ 52,576,784 $ 56,184,644
|
ESTIMATED
AMORTIZED FAIR
COST VALUE
Due in one year or less $ 3,745,464 $ 3,752,060
Due in one year to five years 30,306,215 31,159,444
Due in five years to ten years 11,110,227 12,350,591
Due in ten years and over 11,193,904 12,290,065
Total $ 56,355,810 $ 59,552,160
|
At June 30, 2012, there were no Securities with an unrealized loss as compared to three Municipal Securities with an unrealized loss of $1,117, at December 31, 2011. The fair values of investment securities available for sale with unrealized losses at December 31, 2011, are as follows:
Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total
Description of Fair Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized
Securities Value Losses Fair Value Losses Fair Value Losses
U.S. Treasury Notes $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Government-Sponsored
Enterprises - - - - - -
Municipal Securities 243,884 1,117 - - 243,884 1,117
$ 243,884 $ 1,117 $ - $ - $ 243,884 $ 1,117
|
The unrealized losses on investments at December 31, 2011, were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Because the Company has the ability to hold these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
DEPOSITS
Deposits remain the Company's primary source of funding for loans and
investments. Average interest bearing deposits provided funding for 67.32% of
average earning assets for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and 71.80% for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2011. The Company encounters strong
competition from other financial institutions as well as consumer and commercial
finance companies, insurance companies and brokerage firms located in the
primary service area of the Bank. However, the percentage of funding provided by
deposits has remained stable. The breakdown of total deposits by type and the
respective percentage of total deposits are as follows:
June 30, December 31,
2012 2011 2011
Non-interest bearing demand 79,672,270 63,941,545 70,217,614
Interest bearing demand 63,505,499 54,277,473 64,350,891
Money market accounts 57,934,606 74,989,657 96,292,414
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over 39,784,530 42,200,691 38,638,528
Other time deposits 16,369,208 17,816,022 17,416,840
Other savings deposits 20,163,983 14,136,458 14,211,228
Total Deposits 277,430,096 267,361,846 301,127,515
Percentage of Deposits June 30, December 31,
2012 2011 2011
Non-interest bearing demand 28.72 % 23.92 % 23.32 %
Interest bearing demand 22.89 % 20.30 % 21.37 %
Money Market accounts 20.88 % 28.05 % 31.98 %
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over 14.34 % 15.78 % 12.83 %
Other time deposits 5.90 % 6.66 % 5.78 %
Other savings deposits 7.27 % 5.29 % 4.72 %
Total Deposits 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 %
|
Deposits have increased 3.77% from June 30, 2011 to June 30, 2012 and decreased 7.87% from December 31, 2011 to June 30, 2012.
On February 7, 2012, the Company was notified by a large depositor, that its funds would be withdrawn by the end of that month. This company was started in Charleston, SC and was purchased by an out-of-state company in 2007. The deposits remained with The Bank of South Carolina with the understanding these deposits would eventually be moved. At the end of the first quarter, these deposits had not been withdrawn; however, the majority, $40.8 million were withdrawn in April 2012, with additional funds withdrawn during May and June 2012. The balances of the deposits were $21,652,621 at June 30, 2011, $32,462,427 at December 31, 2011, and $3,111,504 at June 30, 2012.
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
The Bank had a demand note through the US Treasury, Tax and Loan system with the
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. The Bank had the ability to borrow up to
$1,000,000 at June 30, 2011 under the arrangement at an interest rate set by the
Federal Reserve. The note was secured by Government Sponsored Enterprise
Securities with a market value of $1,000,469 at June 30, 2011. The amount
outstanding under the note totaled $404,286 at June 30, 2011. The Federal
Reserve discontinued this program on December 30, 2011. Electronic tax deposits
will no longer be deposited into the Company's TT&L main account balance. At
June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had no outstanding federal
funds purchased with the option to borrow up to $21,000,000 on short term lines
of credit. In March 2012, the Company established a $6 million REPO Line with
Morgan Keegan. There have been no borrowings under this agreement. The Company
has also established a Borrower-In-Custody arrangement with the Federal
Reserve. This arrangement permits the Company to retain possession of loans
pledged as collateral to secure advances from the Federal Reserve Discount
Window. The Company established this arrangement as an additional source of
liquidity. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the Company could borrow up
to $63,404,746 and $61,527,194, respectively. There have been no borrowings
under this arrangement.
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 to Three Months Ended June 30,
2011
Net income increased $122,242 or 15.92% to $890,267, or basic and diluted
earnings per share of $.20 and $.20, respectively, for the three months ended
June 30, 2012, from $768,025, or basic and diluted earnings per share of $.17
and $.17, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase
in net income between periods is primarily due to an increase in mortgage
banking income and a decrease in the cost of funds. Mortgage banking income
increased $168,046 or 117.2%. (See "other income" for further
discussion) Average earning assets increased $14.13 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011. Average earning
assets were $305.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012 as
compared to $291.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Average
interest bearing deposits in other banks increased $4.2 million or 15.42% to
$32.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $27.8
million for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, the major component of the Company's net income, increased
$140,733 or 4.98% to $2,969,364 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from
$2,828,631 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. This increase is primarily
due to an increase of $24,641 or .91% in interest and fees on loans as well as a
decrease in the cost of funds. Interest expense decreased $101,483 or 47.45% to
$112,400 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, from $213,883 for the three
months ended June 30, 2011. Interest rates remain at historically low levels
resulting in lower rates paid on deposits as well as lower rates paid on short
term borrowings. The cost of average deposits decreased from .41% for the three
months ended June 30, 2011, to .23% for the three months ended June 30,
2012. Average interest bearing deposits decreased $9,137,796 or 4.39% during the
same time period. As reported in previous filings, the Company was notified by a
large depositor, on February 7, 2012, that its funds would be withdrawn. The
Company expected to withdraw its funds by the end of that month. This company
was started in Charleston, SC, and was purchased by an out-of-state company in
2007. The deposits remained with The Bank of South Carolina with the
understanding these deposits would eventually be moved. The deposits were not
withdrawn at the end of the first quarter; however the $40.8 million was
withdrawn in April 2012 with additional funds withdrawn during May and June,
2012. The balances of the deposits were $21,652,621 at June 30, 2011,
$32,462,427 at December 31, 2011, and $3,111,504 at June 30, 2012.
The Company's non-interest bearing demand accounts increased $15,730,725 or . . .
|
|