|
Quotes & Info
|
| SHBI > SEC Filings for SHBI > Form 10-Q on 9-Aug-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
9-Aug-2012
Quarterly Report
Unless the context clearly suggests otherwise, references to "the Company", "we", "our", and "us" in the remainder of this report are to Shore Bancshares, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Information
Portions of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not historical in nature, including statements that include the words "anticipate", "estimate", "should", "expect", "believe", "intend", and similar expressions, are expressions about our confidence, policies, and strategies, the adequacy of capital levels, and liquidity and are not guarantees of future performance. Such forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties, including economic conditions, competition in the geographic and business areas in which we operate, inflation, fluctuations in interest rates, legislation, and governmental regulation. These risks and uncertainties are described in detail in the section of the periodic reports that Shore Bancshares, Inc. files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") entitled "Risk Factors" (see Item 1A of Part II of this report). Actual results may differ materially from such forward-looking statements, and we assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements at any time except as required by law.
Introduction
The following discussion and analysis is intended as a review of significant factors affecting the Company's financial condition and results of operations for the periods indicated. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes presented in this report, as well as the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Annual Report of Shore Bancshares, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Shore Bancshares, Inc. is the largest independent financial holding company located on the Eastern Shore of Maryland. It is the parent company of The Talbot Bank of Easton, Maryland located in Easton, Maryland ("Talbot Bank") and CNB located in Centreville, Maryland (together with Talbot Bank, the "Banks"). Until January 1, 2011, the Company also served as the parent company to The Felton Bank located in Felton, Delaware. On January 1, 2011, The Felton Bank merged into CNB, with CNB as the surviving bank. The Banks operate 18 full service branches in Kent County, Queen Anne's County, Talbot County, Caroline County and Dorchester County in Maryland and Kent County, Delaware. The Company engages in the insurance business through three insurance producer firms, The Avon-Dixon Agency, LLC, Elliott Wilson Insurance, LLC and Jack Martin Associates, Inc.; a wholesale insurance company, TSGIA, Inc.; and two insurance premium finance companies, Mubell Finance, LLC and ESFS, Inc. (all of the foregoing are collectively referred to as the "Insurance Subsidiary"). Each of these entities is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Shore Bancshares, Inc. The Company engages in the mortgage brokerage business under the name "Wye Mortgage Group" through a minority series investment in an unrelated Delaware limited liability company.
The shares of common stock of Shore Bancshares, Inc. are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "SHBI".
Shore Bancshares, Inc. maintains an Internet site at www.shbi.com on which it makes available free of charge its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to the foregoing as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The financial information contained within the financial statements is, to a significant extent, financial information contained that is based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting: (i) Topic 450, "Contingencies", of the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"), which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable; and (ii) ASC Topic 310, "Receivables", which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the loan balance and the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market. Management uses many factors to estimate the inherent loss that may be present in our loan portfolio, including economic conditions and trends, the value and adequacy of collateral, the volume and mix of the loan portfolio, and our internal loan processes. Actual losses could differ significantly from management's estimates. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another. Although the economics of transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact the transactions could change.
Three basic components comprise our allowance for credit losses: (i) a specific allowance; (ii) a formula allowance; and (iii) a nonspecific allowance. Each component is determined based on estimates that can and do change when the actual events occur. The specific allowance is established against impaired loans (i.e., nonaccrual loans and troubled debt restructurings) based on our assessment of the losses that may be associated with the individual loans. The specific allowance remains until charge-offs are made. An impaired loan may show deficiencies in the borrower's overall financial condition, payment history, support available from financial guarantors and/or the fair market value of collateral. The formula allowance is used to estimate the loss on internally risk-rated loans, exclusive of those identified as impaired. Loans are grouped by type (construction, commercial real estate, residential real estate, commercial or consumer). Each loan type is assigned an allowance factor based on management's estimate of the risk, complexity and size of individual loans within a particular category. Loans identified as special mention, substandard, and doubtful are adversely rated. These loans are assigned higher allowance factors than favorably rated loans due to management's concerns regarding collectability or management's knowledge of particular elements regarding the borrower. The nonspecific allowance captures losses that have impacted the portfolio but have yet to be recognized in either the specific or formula allowance.
Management has significant discretion in making the adjustments inherent in the determination of the provision and allowance for credit losses, including in connection with the valuation of collateral, the estimation of a borrower's prospects of repayment, and the establishment of the allowance factors on the formula allowance and unallocated allowance components of the allowance. The establishment of allowance factors is a continuing exercise, based on management's ongoing assessment of the totality of all factors, including, but not limited to, delinquencies, loss history, trends in volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in lending policy, the experience and depth of management, national and local economic trends, concentrations of credit, the quality of the loan review system and the effect of external factors such as competition and regulatory requirements, and their impact on the portfolio. Allowance factors may change from period to period, resulting in an increase or decrease in the amount of the provision or allowance, based on the same volume and classification of loans. Changes in allowance factors will have a direct impact on the amount of the provision, and a corresponding effect on net income. Errors in management's perception and assessment of these factors and their impact on the portfolio could result in the allowance not being adequate to cover losses in the portfolio, and may result in additional provisions or charge-offs.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Other intangible assets represent purchased assets that also lack physical substance but can be distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other legal rights or because the asset is capable of being sold or exchanged either on its own or in combination with a related contract, asset or liability. Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested at least annually for impairment, usually during the third quarter, or on an interim basis if circumstances dictate. Intangible assets that have finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and also are subject to impairment testing.
Impairment testing requires that the fair value of each of the Company's reporting units be compared to the carrying amount of its net assets, including goodwill. The Company's reporting units were identified based on an analysis of each of its individual operating segments. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than book value, an expense may be required to write down the related goodwill or purchased intangibles to record an impairment loss.
Fair Value
The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Significant financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are investment securities and interest rate caps. Impaired loans and other real estate owned are significant financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. See Note 8, "Fair Value Measurements", in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion of fair value.
OVERVIEW
The Company reported net income of $293 thousand for the second quarter of 2012, or diluted income per common share of $0.03, compared to a net loss of $233 thousand, or diluted loss per common share of $(0.03), for the second quarter of 2011. For the first quarter of 2012, the Company reported a net loss of $3.0 million, or diluted loss per common share of $(0.36). The provision for credit losses for the second quarter of 2012 was $3.5 million, which was $1.9 million and $4.8 million lower than the provision for the second quarter of 2011 and the first quarter of 2012, respectively. Annualized return on average assets was 0.10% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to (0.08)% for the same period in 2011. Annualized return on average stockholders' equity was 0.99% for the second quarter of 2012, compared to (0.77)% for the second quarter of 2011. For the first quarter of 2012, annualized return on average assets was (1.05)% and return on average equity was (10.04)%.
For the first six months of 2012, the Company reported a net loss of $2.7 million, or diluted loss per common share of $(0.32), compared to a net loss of $1.3 million, or diluted loss per common share of $(0.16), for the first six months of 2011. Annualized return on average assets was (0.47)% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to (0.24)% for the same period in 2011. Annualized return on average stockholders' equity was (4.59)% for the first six months of 2012, compared to (2.18)% for the first six months of 2011.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net interest income for the second quarter of 2012 was $9.0 million, compared to $9.9 million for the second quarter of 2011 and $9.2 million for the first quarter of 2012. The decrease in net interest income when compared to the second quarter of 2011 and the first quarter of 2012 was primarily due to lower yields earned on average earning assets and a decline in higher-yielding average loan balances. The net interest margin was 3.36% for the second quarter of 2012, 3.80% for the second quarter of 2011 and 3.42% for the first quarter of 2012, a decrease of 44 basis points and 6 basis points, respectively. Loan charge-offs continued to negatively impact our net interest income and net interest margin.
Interest income was $11.7 million for the second quarter of 2012, a decrease of 8.2% from the second quarter of 2011. Average earning assets (loans, investment securities, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with other banks) increased 2.8% during the second quarter of 2012 when compared to the same period in 2011, while yields earned decreased 51 basis points to 4.35%, mainly due to loan activity. Average loans decreased 7.4% and the yield earned on loans decreased 5 basis points from 5.43% to 5.38%. Loans comprised 75.2% of total average earning assets for the second quarter of 2012, compared to 83.5% for the second quarter of 2011. Taxable investment securities grew $23.9 million, or 22.4%, although yields declined 76 basis points because the reinvestment rates on investment securities purchased during 2012 were lower than the yields on the investment securities that matured during the period. Excess cash shifted from federal funds sold (decreasing $13.1 million) to interest-bearing deposits (increasing $85.0 million) to take advantage of higher yields on interest-bearing deposits. Interest income decreased 1.4% when compared to the first quarter of 2012. Average earning assets remained relatively unchanged during the second quarter of 2012 when compared to the first quarter of 2012, and yields earned declined 5 basis points.
Interest expense was $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of 4.8% when compared to the same period last year. Average interest-bearing liabilities (deposits and borrowings) increased 2.8% while rates paid decreased 9 basis points to 1.20%, primarily due to changes in time deposits (certificates of deposit $100,000 or more and other time deposits). For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the average balance of certificates of deposit $100,000 or more and other time deposits each decreased approximately 1.0% when compared to the same period last year, and the average rate paid on these time deposits decreased 21 and 29 basis points, respectively, reflecting current market conditions. The decrease in average time deposits was more than offset by an increase in interest-bearing demand deposits (10.8%) and money market and savings deposits (5.6%), reflecting a shift in customer investment needs. Interest on money market and savings deposits included an adjustment to expense related to interest rate caps and the hedged deposits associated with them. This adjustment increased interest expense $502 thousand for the second quarter of 2012 and $299 thousand for the second quarter of 2011. See Note 9, "Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities", in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. When comparing the second quarter of 2012 to the first quarter of 2012, interest expense remained relatively unchanged with average balances of total interest-bearing liabilities decreasing less than 1.0% and the interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities staying at 1.20%.
Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $18.2 million, a decrease of 8.0% when compared to the same period last year. As with the quarterly results, the decrease was mainly due to lower yields earned on average earning assets and a decline in higher-yielding average loan balances. The net interest margin was 3.39% for the first six months of 2012 and 3.79% for the first six months of 2011.
Interest income was $23.5 million for the first six months of 2012, a decrease of 7.5% when compared to the first six months of 2011. Average earning assets increased 2.6% during the six months ended June 30, 2012 when compared to the same period in 2011, while yields earned decreased 50 basis points to 4.37% primarily due to the impact of loan activity. When comparing the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 to the same period of last year, average loans decreased 6.8% and the yield earned on loans decreased 11 basis points. Loans comprised 75.9% and 83.5% of total average earning assets for the first six months of 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Interest expense was $5.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of 5.8% when compared to the same period last year. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased 2.4%, while rates paid decreased 11 basis points to 1.20% primarily due to time deposit activity. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the average balance of certificates of deposit $100,000 or more and other time deposits decreased 4.1% and 1.9%, respectively, when compared to the same period last year, and the average rate paid on these deposits decreased 23 and 28 basis points, respectively.
Analysis of Interest Rates and Interest Differentials
The following table presents the distribution of the average consolidated
balance sheets, interest income/expense, and annualized yields earned and rates
paid for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
For the Three Months Ended For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2012 June 30, 2011
Average Income(1)/ Yield/ Average Income(1)/ Yield/
(Dollars in thousands) Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate
Earning assets
Loans (2), (3) $ 816,553 $ 10,917 5.38 % $ 881,976 $ 11,935 5.43 %
Investment securities
Taxable 130,528 707 2.18 106,609 782 2.94
Tax-exempt 3,771 49 5.32 4,581 60 5.27
Federal funds sold 11,200 2 0.10 24,310 5 0.09
Interest-bearing deposits 124,171 61 0.20 39,182 12 0.12
Total earning assets 1,086,223 11,736 4.35 % 1,056,658 12,794 4.86 %
Cash and due from banks 21,424 18,327
Other assets 70,458 68,190
Allowance for credit losses (14,507 ) (17,962 )
Total assets $ 1,163,598 $ 1,125,213
Interest-bearing liabilities
Demand deposits $ 152,685 68 0.18 % $ 137,775 76 0.22 %
Money market and savings
deposits (4) 276,527 813 1.18 261,869 633 0.97
Certificates of deposit
$100,000 or more 242,662 880 1.46 244,805 1,022 1.67
Other time deposits 205,046 882 1.73 206,310 1,038 2.02
Interest-bearing deposits 876,920 2,643 1.21 850,759 2,769 1.31
Short-term borrowings 13,818 11 0.31 15,020 13 0.36
Long-term debt 455 5 4.63 932 11 4.51
Total interest-bearing
liabilities 891,193 2,659 1.20 % 866,711 2,793 1.29 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits 144,210 126,081
Other liabilities 9,421 11,234
Stockholders' equity 118,774 121,187
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity $ 1,163,598 $ 1,125,213
Net interest spread $ 9,077 3.15 % $ 10,001 3.57 %
Net interest margin 3.36 % 3.80 %
Tax-equivalent adjustment
Loans $ 27 $ 39
Investment securities 17 20
Total $ 44 $ 59
|
(1) All amounts are reported on a tax equivalent basis computed using the
statutory federal income tax rate of 34.0% for 2012 and 2011 exclusive of the
alternative minimum tax rate and nondeductible interest expense.
(2) Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans.
(3) Interest income on loans includes amortized loan fees, net of costs, and all
are included in the yield calculations.
(4) Interest on money market and savings deposits includes an adjustment to
expense related to interest rate caps and the hedged deposits associated with
them. This adjustment increased interest expense $502 thousand for the
second quarter of 2012 and $299 thousand for the second quarter of 2011.
The following table presents the distribution of the average consolidated balance sheets, interest income/expense, and annualized yields earned and rates paid for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
For the Three Months Ended For the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2012 June 30, 2011
Average Income(1)/ Yield/ Average Income(1)/ Yield/
(Dollars in thousands) Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate
Earning assets
Loans (2), (3) $ 824,569 $ 21,957 5.35 % $ 884,738 $ 23,975 5.46 %
Investment securities
Taxable 130,148 1,464 2.26 104,131 1,439 2.79
Tax-exempt 4,020 106 5.34 4,596 118 5.18
Federal funds sold 10,497 4 0.08 35,499 21 0.12
Interest-bearing
deposits 117,931 109 0.19 30,432 18 0.12
Total earning assets 1,087,165 23,640 4.37 % 1,059,396 25,571 4.87 %
Cash and due from banks 19,799 18,819
Other assets 69,310 66,711
Allowance for credit
losses (14,692 ) (16,811 )
Total assets $ 1,161,582 $ 1,128,115
Interest-bearing
liabilities
Demand deposits $ 152,988 142 0.19 % $ 134,719 149 0.22 %
Money market and savings
deposits (4) 277,941 1,591 1.15 261,358 1,228 0.95
Certificates of deposit
$100,000 or more 241,591 1,751 1.46 251,953 2,108 1.69
Other time deposits 203,394 1,800 1.78 207,300 2,117 2.06
Interest-bearing
deposits 875,914 5,284 1.21 855,330 5,602 1.32
Short-term borrowings 15,720 26 0.33 14,595 26 0.36
Long-term debt 455 10 4.63 932 21 4.53
Total interest-bearing
liabilities 892,089 5,320 1.20 % 870,857 5,649 1.31 %
Noninterest-bearing
deposits 140,235 124,201
Other liabilities 9,042 11,234
Stockholders' equity 120,216 121,823
Total liabilities and
stockholders' equity $ 1,161,582 $ 1,128,115
Net interest spread $ 18,320 3.17 % $ 19,922 3.56 %
Net interest margin 3.39 % 3.79 %
Tax-equivalent
adjustment
Loans $ 56 $ 78
Investment securities 36 40
Total $ 92 $ 118
|
(1) All amounts are reported on a tax equivalent basis computed using the
statutory federal income tax rate of 34.0% for 2012 and 2011 exclusive of the
alternative minimum tax rate and nondeductible interest expense.
(2) Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans.
(3) Interest income on loans includes amortized loan fees, net of costs, and all
are included in the yield calculations.
(4) Interest on money market and savings deposits includes an adjustment to
expense related to interest rate caps and the hedged deposits associated with
them. This adjustment increased interest expense $962 thousand for the first
six months of 2012 and $559 thousand for the first six months of 2011.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income for the second quarter of 2012 increased $196 thousand, or 4.5%, when compared to the second quarter of 2011. The higher amount was primarily the result of an increase in other noninterest income which included a $217 thousand gain on the sale of a bank branch building. This increase was partially offset by a decline in insurance agency commissions and service charges on deposit accounts which were impacted by a decrease in customer use of overdraft protection programs. Total noninterest income for the second quarter of 2012 remained relatively unchanged when compared to the first quarter of 2012. The slightly higher amount when compared to the first quarter of 2012 was primarily the result of the $217 thousand gain on the sale of a bank branch building which was mainly offset by a decrease in insurance agency commissions due to the fact that contingency payments are typically received in the first quarter of the year.
Total noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased $375 thousand, or 4.3%, when compared to the same period in 2011, primarily due to higher insurance agency commissions ($110 thousand) and other noninterest income ($449 thousand). Other noninterest income included the $217 thousand gain on the sale of a bank branch building and a $96 thousand increase in rental income from other real estate owned properties. Partially offsetting the increase in noninterest income was a decline in service charges on deposit accounts.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2012 increased $469 thousand, or 5.1%, when compared to the second quarter of 2011, mostly due to higher salaries and wages and other noninterest expenses. Salaries and wages increased $272 thousand, mainly due to the hiring of a new executive vice president at The Talbot Bank of Easton, Maryland during the second quarter of last year as part of that bank's succession plan, and a new lender at CNB for the Delaware region during the third quarter of last year. Other noninterest expenses increased $212 thousand, primarily due to higher expenses related to other real estate owned activities. Total noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2012 decreased . . .
|
|