|
Quotes & Info
|
| PFPT > SEC Filings for PFPT > Form 10-Q on 8-Aug-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
8-Aug-2012
Quarterly Report
• In 2004, we launched our Regulatory Compliance and Digital Asset
Security solutions, designed to prevent the loss of critical data.
These Data Loss Prevention, or DLP, solutions apply our proprietary
machine learning and deep content inspection technologies to screen
outbound email to prevent the theft or inadvertent loss of sensitive or
confidential information.
• In 2005, we launched Proofpoint Secure Messaging, our first email
encryption solution.
• In 2006, we combined our email encryption and DLP technologies to
develop a new solution for policy?based encryption, enabling each
outgoing message to be inspected for confidential content and
automatically encrypted accordingly.
• In 2007, we began selling our software?based virtual appliance,
enabling our customers to deploy our solutions in a private cloud
configuration. We also invested in international expansion by
establishing a team in the United Kingdom as a precursor to the build
out of our data center infrastructure, and launching operations in
Germany and the Netherlands to support our customers outside of the
United States..
• In 2008, we introduced Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, a cloud?based
email archiving solution that enables businesses to securely archive
both their email and instant message conversations while enabling
real-time access to the entire repository for quick and easy electronic
discovery, or eDiscovery.
• In 2009, we launched Proofpoint Encryption, a proprietary email
encryption solution that improved the level of integration across our
data protection suite and allowed us to phase out technology licensed
from a third party. We also introduced a cloud?based email messaging
service.
|
• In 2010, we evolved our solutions to address new forms of messaging and
information sharing in the enterprise such as social media and
Internet?based collaboration and file sharing applications.
• In 2011, we achieved FISMA certification for our cloud?based archiving
and governance solution, enabling us to serve the rigorous security
requirements of U.S. Federal agencies. We also introduced an integrated
security offering in conjunction with VMware for its Zimbra
Collaboration Server.
• In 2012, we introduced Proofpoint Enterprise Governance, an information
governance solution that provides organizations the ability to monitor
and apply governance policies to unstructured information across the
enterprise. We also introduced Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection, a
solution that stops targeted attacks by combining previously disparate
email security, Web security and malware analysis technologies into a
single comprehensive cloud-based defense.
|
Our business is based on a recurring revenue model. Our customers pay a
subscription fee to license the various components of our security-as-a-service
platform for a contract term that is typically one to three years. At the end of
the license term, customers may renew their subscription and in each year since
the launch of our first solution in 2003, we have retained over 90% of our
customers. We derive this retention rate by calculating the total annually
recurring subscription revenue from customers currently using our
security-as-a-service platform and dividing it by the total annually recurring
subscription revenue from both these current customers as well as all business
lost through non-renewal. A growing number of our customers increase their
annual subscription fees after their initial purchase by broadening their use of
our platform or by adding more users, as evidenced by the fact that these sales
consistently represent 15% or more of our billings each year since 2008. As our
business has grown, our subscription revenue has increased as a percentage of
our total revenue, from 87% of total revenue in 2009, to 95% for the first half
of fiscal 2012.
We market and sell our solutions to large and mid-sized customers both directly
through our field and inside sales teams and indirectly through a hybrid model
where our sales organization actively assists our network of distributors and
resellers. We also derive a lesser portion of our revenue from the license of
our solutions to strategic partners who offer our solutions in conjunction with
one or more of their own products or services.
Our sales and marketing operation consists of sales people and associated
marketing resources, each of whom are assigned to a specific geographic
territory. Their mission is to grow additional revenue within their respective
territory in whatever manner is most efficient, either by obtaining new
customers or by working with existing customers to expand their use of our
solutions. Our sales teams are compensated equally for sales to new customers or
sales of additional solutions to existing customers, and we do not allocate
sales and marketing resources between activities related to the acquisition of
new customers and activities associated with the sale of additional solutions to
existing customers.
We invoice our customers for the entire contract amount at the start of the
term. The majority of these invoiced amounts are treated as deferred revenue on
our consolidated balance sheet and are recognized ratably over the term of the
contract. We invoice our strategic partners on a monthly basis, and the
associated fees vary based upon the level of usage during the month by their
customers. These amounts are recognized as revenue at the time of invoice.
Our solutions are designed to be implemented, configured and operated without
the need for any training or professional services. For those customers that
seek to develop deeper expertise in the use of our solutions or would like
assistance with complex configurations or the importing of data, we offer
various training and professional services. In some cases, we provide a hardware
appliance to those customers that elect to host elements of our solution behind
their firewall. Increasing adoption of virtualization in the data center has led
to a decline in the sales of our hardware appliances and a shift towards our
software?based virtual appliances, which are delivered as a download via the
Internet. Our hardware and services offerings carry lower margins and are
provided as a courtesy to our customers. The revenue derived from these
offerings has declined from 11.2% and 12.7% of total revenue in the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011 to 4.6% and 5.0% of total revenue in the three
and six months ended June 30, 2012. We view this trend as favorable to our
business and expect the overall proportion of total revenue derived from these
offerings to continue to gradually decline.
The substantial majority of our revenue is derived from our customers in the
United States. We believe the markets outside of the United States offer an
opportunity for growth and we intend to make additional investments in sales and
marketing to expand in these markets. Customers from outside of the United
States represented 18.1% and 18.3% for the three and six months ended June 30,
2012 and 20.8% and 21.2% of total revenue for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011,
respectively. As of June 30, 2012, we had in excess of 2,400 customers around
the world, including 28 of the Fortune 100. There was one partner that accounted
for more than 10% of our total revenue in the three and six months ended June
30, 2012, although the partner sold to a number of end user customers. There
were no single partners or customers that accounted for more than 10% of our
total revenue in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
We have not been profitable to date and will need to grow revenue at a rate
faster than our investments in cost of revenue and operating expenses in order
to achieve profitability, as discussed in more detail below.
Key Opportunities and Challenges
The majority of costs associated with generating customer agreements are
incurred up front. These upfront costs include direct incremental sales
commissions, which are recognized upon the billing of the contract. The costs
associated with the teams tasked with closing business with new customers and
additional business with our existing customers have represented more than 90%
of our total sales and marketing costs since 2008. Although we expect customers
to be profitable over the duration of the customer relationship, these upfront
costs typically exceed related revenue during the earlier periods of a contract.
As a result, while our practice of invoicing our customers for the entire amount
of the contract at the start of the term provides us with a relatively immediate
contribution to cash flow, the revenue is recognized ratably over the term of
the contract, and hence contributions toward operating income are limited in the
period where these sales and marketing costs are incurred. Accordingly, an
increase in the mix of new customers as a percentage of total customers would
likely negatively impact our near?term operating results. On the other hand, we
expect that an increase in the mix of existing customers as a percentage of
total customers would positively impact our operating results over time. As we
accumulate customers that continue to renew their contracts, we anticipate that
our mix of existing customers will increase, contributing to a decrease in our
sales and marketing costs as a percentage of total revenue and a commensurate
improvement in our operating income.
As part of maintaining our security-as-a-service platform, we provide ongoing
updates and enhancements to the platform services both in terms of the software
as well as the underlying hardware and data center infrastructure. These updates
and enhancements are provided to our customers at no additional charge as part
of the subscription fees paid for the use of our platform. While more
traditional products eventually become obsolete and require replacement, we are
constantly updating and maintaining our cloud?based services and as such they
operate with a continuous product life cycle. Much of this work is designed to
both maintain and enhance the customers' experience over time while also
lowering our costs to deliver the service, as evidenced by our improvements in
gross profit over the past three years. Our security-as-a-service platform is a
shared infrastructure that is used by all of our greater than 2,400 customers.
Accordingly, the costs of the platform are spread in a relatively uniform manner
across the entire customer base and no specific infrastructure elements are
directly attached to any particular customer. As such, in the event that a
customer chooses to not renew its subscription, the underlying resources are
reallocated either to new customers or to accommodate the expanding needs of our
existing customers and, as a result, we do not believe that the loss of any
particular customer has a meaningful impact on our gross profit as long as we
continue to grow our customer base.
To date, our customers have primarily used our solutions in conjunction with
email messaging content. We have developed solutions to address the new and
evolving messaging solutions such as social media and file sharing applications,
but these solutions are relatively nascent. If customers increase their use of
these new messaging solutions in the future, we anticipate that our growth in
revenue associated with email messaging solutions may slow over time. Although
revenue associated with our social media and file sharing applications has not
been material to date, we believe that our ability to provide security,
archiving, governance and discovery for these new solutions will be viewed as
valuable by our existing customers, enabling us to derive revenue from these new
forms of messaging and communication.
While the majority of our current and prospective customers run their email
systems on premise, we believe that there is a trend for large and mid?sized
enterprises to migrate these systems to the cloud. While our current revenue
derived from customers using cloud?based email systems continues to grow as a
percentage of our total revenue, many of these cloud?based email solutions offer
some form of threat protection and governance services, potentially mitigating
the need for customers to buy these capabilities from third parties such as
ourselves. We believe that we can continue to provide security, archiving,
governance, and discovery solutions that are differentiated from the services
offered by cloud?based email providers, and as such our platform will continue
to be viewed as valuable to enterprises once they have migrated their email
services to the cloud, enabling us to continue to derive revenue from this new
trend toward cloud?based email deployment models.
We are currently in the midst of a significant investment cycle in which we have
taken steps designed to drive future
revenue growth and profitability. For example, we plan to build out our
infrastructure, develop our technology, offer additional security-as-a-service
solutions, and expand our sales and marketing personnel both in the United
States and internationally. Accordingly, we expect that our total cost of
revenue and operating expenses will continue to increase in absolute dollars,
limiting our ability to achieve and maintain positive operating cash flow and
profitability in the near term.
With the majority of our business, we invoice our customers for the entire
contract amount at the start of the term and these amounts are recorded as
deferred revenue on our balance sheet, with the dollar weighted average duration
of these contracts for any given period over the past three years typically
ranging from 20 to 25 months. As a result, while our practice of invoicing
customers for the entire amount of the contract at the start of the term
provides us with a relatively immediate contribution to cash flow, the revenue
is recognized ratably over the term of the contract, and hence contributions
toward operating income are realized over an extended period. Accordingly, when
comparing the six months ended June 30, 2012 with the same period in 2011, our
cash flow related to operating activities improved by $0.5 million, respectively
while our operating loss improved by only $0.3 million. As such, our efforts to
improve our profitability require us to invest far less in operating expenses
than the cash flow generated by our business might otherwise allow. As we strive
to invest in an effort to continue to increase the size and scale of our
business, we expect that the level of investment afforded by our growth in
revenue should be sufficient to fund the investments needed to drive revenue
growth and broaden our product line.
Considering all of these factors, we do not expect to be profitable on a GAAP
basis in the near term and in order to achieve profitability we will need to
grow revenue at a rate faster than our investments in operating expenses and
cost of revenue.
We intend to grow our revenue through acquiring new customers by investing in
our sales and marketing activities. We believe that an increase in new customers
in the near term will result in a larger base of renewal customers, which, over
time we expect to be more profitable for us.
Sales and marketing is our greatest expense and hence a significant contributing
factor to our operating losses. Given that our costs to acquire new revenue
sources, either in the form of new customers or the sale of additional solutions
to existing customers, often exceed the actual revenue recognized in the initial
periods, we believe that our opportunity to improve our return on investment on
sales and marketing costs relies primarily on our ongoing ability to cost
effectively renew our business with existing customers, thereby lowering our
overall sales and marketing costs as a percentage of revenue as the mix of
revenue derived from this more profitable renewal activity increases over time.
Therefore, we anticipate that our initial significant investments in sales and
marketing activities will over time generate a larger base of more profitable
customers. Cost of subscription revenue is also a significant expense for us,
and we expect to continue to build on the improvements over the past three
years, such as in replacing third-party technology with our proprietary
technology and improving the utilization of our fixed investments in equipment
and infrastructure, in order to provide the opportunity for improved
subscription gross margins over time. Although we plan to continue enhancing our
solutions, we intend to lower our rate of investment in research and development
as a percentage of revenue over time by deriving additional revenue from our
existing platform of solutions rather than by adding entirely new categories of
solutions. In addition, as personnel costs are one of the primary drivers of the
increases in our operating expenses, we plan to reduce our historical rate of
headcount growth over time.
Key Metrics
We regularly review a number of metrics, including the following key metrics
presented in the unaudited table below, to evaluate our business, measure our
performance, identify trends in our business, prepare financial projections and
make strategic decisions. Many of these key metrics, such as adjusted
subscription gross profit, billings and adjusted EBITDA, are non-GAAP measures.
This non-GAAP information is not necessarily comparable to non-GAAP information
of other companies. Non-GAAP information should not be viewed as a substitute
for, or superior to, net loss prepared in accordance with GAAP as a measure of
our profitability or liquidity. Users of this financial information should
consider the types of events and transactions for which adjustments have been
made.
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2012 2011 2012 2011
(in thousands) (in thousands)
Total revenue $ 25,943 $ 19,880 $ 50,562 $ 38,661
Growth 30 % 29 % 31 % 28 %
Subscription revenue $ 24,750 $ 17,663 $ 48,019 $ 33,740
Growth 40 % 30 % 42 % 27 %
Adjusted subscription gross profit $ 18,642 $ 12,904 $ 35,982 $ 24,188
% of subscription revenue 75 % 73 % 75 % 72 %
Billings $ 26,346 $ 21,578 $ 50,228 $ 40,730
Growth 22 % 20 % 23 % 17 %
Adjusted EBITDA $ (926 ) $ (1,296 ) $ (1,710 ) $ (3,336 )
|
Subscription revenue. Subscription revenue represents the recurring subscription
fees paid by our customers and recognized as revenue during the period for the
use of our security-as-a-service platform, typically licensed for one to three
years at a time. We consider subscription revenue to be a key business metric
because it reflects the recurring aspect of our business model and is the
primary driver of growth for our business over time. The consistent growth in
subscription revenue over the past several years has resulted from our ongoing
investment in sales and marketing personnel, our efforts to expand our customer
base, and our efforts to broaden the use of our platform with existing
customers.
Adjusted subscription gross profit
We have included adjusted subscription gross profit, a non?GAAP financial
measure, in this report because it is a key measure used by our management and
board of directors to understand and evaluate our operating results, core
operating performance, and trends to prepare and approve our annual budget and
to develop short? and long-term operational plans. We have provided a
reconciliation between subscription gross profit, the most directly comparable
GAAP financial measure, and adjusted subscription gross profit. We believe that
adjusted subscription gross profit provides useful information to investors and
others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner
as our management and board of directors.
Our use of adjusted subscription gross profit has limitations as an analytical
tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for
analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because of these limitations,
you should consider adjusted subscription gross profit alongside other financial
performance measures, including subscription gross profit and our other GAAP
results.
The following unaudited table presents the reconciliation of subscription gross
profit to adjusted subscription gross profit for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2012 2011 2012 2011
(in thousands) (in thousands)
Subscription revenue $ 24,750 $ 17,663 $ 48,019 $ 33,740
Cost of subscription revenue 7,236 5,801 14,447 11,617
Subscription gross profit 17,514 11,862 33,572 22,123
Add back:
Stock?based compensation 109 107 238 205
Amortization of intangible assets 1,019 935 2,119 1,860
Adjusted subscription gross profit $ 18,642 $ 12,904 $ 35,929 $ 24,188
|
Billings
We have included billings, a non?GAAP financial measure, in this report because
it is a key measure used by our management and board of directors to manage our
business and monitor our near term cash flows. We have provided a reconciliation
between total revenue, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and
billings. Accordingly, we believe that billings provides useful information to
investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in
the same manner as our management and board of directors.
Our use of billings as a non-GAAP measure has limitations as an analytical tool,
and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for revenue or an
analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
• Billings is not a substitute for revenue, as trends in billings are not
directly correlated to trends in revenue except when measured over
longer periods of time;
• Billings is affected by a combination of factors including the timing
of renewals, the sales of our solutions to both new and existing
customers, the relative duration of contracts sold, and the relative
amount of business derived from strategic partners. As each of these
elements has unique characteristics in the relationship between
billings and revenue, our billings activity is not closely correlated
to revenue except over longer periods of time; and
• Other companies, including companies in our industry, may not use
billings, may calculate billings differently, or may use other
financial measures to evaluate their performance ? all of which reduce
the usefulness of billings as a comparative measure.
|
The following unaudited table presents the reconciliation of total revenue to billings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2012 2011 2012 2011
(in thousands) (in thousands)
Total revenue $ 25,943 $ 19,880 $ 50,562 $ 38,661
. . .
|
|
|