|
Quotes & Info
|
| OCN > SEC Filings for OCN > Form 10-Q on 6-Aug-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
6-Aug-2012
Quarterly Report
INTRODUCTION
The following discussion of our results of operations, change in financial condition and liquidity should be read in conjunction with our Interim Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes, all included elsewhere in this report on Form 10-Q and with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
OVERVIEW
Strategic Priorities
The long-term success for Ocwen is driven primarily by several factors:
1. Access to new servicing business;
2. Cost of servicing;
3. Quality of customer service;
4. Ability to manage delinquencies and advances;
5. Capacity to take on new business while meeting all regulatory and
customer requirements; and
6. Cost of funds and amount of capital required.
Ocwen is an established industry leader in cost of servicing and ability to manage delinquencies and advances. Nevertheless, Ocwen has initiatives aimed at improving capabilities across all factors.
For accessing new servicing business, we continue to follow a four-pronged strategy:
1. Acquisition of existing servicing platforms or mortgage servicing rights;
2. Subservicing and special servicing opportunities;
3. Flow servicing and co-issue; and
4. New servicing segments.
As a result of the Litton Acquisition, which closed on September 1, 2011, Ocwen's servicing UPB grew by approximately $38.6 billion making it the 12thlargest mortgage loan servicer in the U. S. Together with other acquisitions, we added a total of 259,788 loans with a UPB of $41.3 billion to our residential servicing portfolio in 2011. Through the first six months of 2012, we have added an additional 176,256 loans with a UPB of $34.2 billion as follows:
· On April 2nd, we deployed $464,215 of capital to complete the Saxon MSR
Transaction for the rights to service approximately 132,000 securitized
agency and non-agency residential loans with a UPB of $22.2 billion, of
which approximately 58,100 loans with a UPB of approximately $9.9
billion we had previously subserviced. We borrowed $825,961 under two
new two-year servicing advance facilities to finance the approximately
$1.2 billion of associated servicing advances.
· Also on April 2nd, we deployed $151,154 of capital to complete the JPMCB
MSR Transaction which included servicing rights for certain third party
private securitizations in which neither JPMCB nor any of its affiliated
entities were issuers or loan sellers. The acquisition relates to
approximately 41,200 non-prime residential loans with a UPB of $8.1
billion. We borrowed $418,764 under an existing advance facility to
finance the $557,184 of acquired servicing advances.
· On May 31st, we completed the acquisition of MSRs from Aurora on a
portfolio of approximately 3,300 small-balance commercial mortgage loans
with a total UPB of $1.8 billion for $53,095, including $52,911 of
servicing advances.
· On May 31st, we completed the boarding of approximately 6,300
non-performing loans with a UPB of $1.9 billion under a subservicing
contract with a large bank. We boarded approximately 4,400 additional
non-performing loans with a UPB of $1.1 billion in July with further
boardings expected through year-end.
· On June 11th, we completed the purchase of residential MSRs from BANA on
a portfolio of approximately 51,000 residential mortgage loans with a
UPB of approximately $10.1 billion owned by Freddie Mac. We entered into
a new two-year advance facility to finance a portion of the $34,486 of
acquired advances. In addition, we issued a new promissory note to
finance the acquired MSRs.
In July 2012, we purchased $300 million UPB of Fannie Mae MSRs and expect to acquire an additional $2.4 billion UPB of Fannie Mae MSRs on September 1, 2012. We expect that other non-prime and prime servicing platforms and servicing portfolios will come to market in the next several months. We are currently tracking potential deals with UPB totaling several hundred billion dollars. To the extent that we find these opportunities to be attractive, we believe that we can compete given our low cost, high quality servicing platform. Our technology also provides us a unique ability to quickly scale our servicing operations to handle acquired loan portfolios.
We also expect to continue to pursue subservicing and special servicing transactions. We have recently completed two subservicing transfers with one large bank, and we expect that we will continue regular transfers for at least the next several months. We have also been working closely with two other large banks on subservicing arrangements. The recently announced Federal-State servicing agreement with the five largest mortgage servicers and potential additional settlements may result in additional business opportunities for Ocwen as large servicers seek to meet their principal reduction modification commitments.
Regarding flow servicing, Correspondent One purchased approximately $17 million of conventional loans from members of Lenders One in the first six months of 2012. Correspondent One will soon be acquiring Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans, as well. Over time, we expect that this joint venture with Altisource (each holds 49% equity interest in the entity) will be able to use its relationship with Lenders One (which generated approximately 8% of new loans originated in the United States in 2011) to substantially grow its volume. Correspondent One has seen significant, positive environmental changes in the correspondent lending market. There has been a contraction in correspondent lending, and the price paid for agency mortgage servicing rights has significantly declined. At the reduced prices, we believe that it is attractive to retain servicing on loans closed by Correspondent One.
In July 2012, Ocwen launched its co-issue business. Under these arrangements, Ocwen sets up forward agreements to purchase servicing on newly originated loans. The originator sells the loans to a GSE or issues a GNMA security and simultaneously transfers servicing to Ocwen. At the end of July, Ocwen's funding pipeline for Correspondent One and co-issue purchases was approximately $195 million.
We also plan on evaluating new segments of the servicing industry such as reverse mortgages and home equity lines of credit and developing capabilities to service these segments. In addition, we deployed a full on-shore servicing alternative for entities that have that requirement.
In 2012, we continue to roll out new initiatives designed to reduce our cost of servicing, to improve customer service and our ability to manage delinquencies and advances and to increase our capacity while meeting evolving servicing practices and regulatory requirements. For example, we have technology initiatives that will further strengthen our industry-leading position by enhancing our ability to optimize offers to borrowers while reducing our cost to service. We also continue to develop new programs, such as our highly-regarded "Shared Appreciation Modification" (SAM) which incorporates principal reductions and lower payments for borrowers while providing a net present value positive loss mitigation outcome for investors, including the ability to recoup losses if property values increase over time. This unique program has been expanded in the first half of 2012 to include all but a few states, and we hope to offer it nationally by year-end.
Inquiries into servicer foreclosure practices by state or federal government bodies, regulators or courts are continuing and bring the possibility of adverse regulatory actions, including extending foreclosure timelines. Foreclosure delays slow the recovery of deferred servicing fees and advances. In 2011, foreclosure timelines increased by 133 days in judicial foreclosure states and 32 days in traditional non-judicial foreclosure states as compared to 2010 averages. In the first six months of 2012, foreclosure timelines have increased by an additional 102 days in judicial foreclosure states and 34 days in traditional non-judicial foreclosure states as compared to the 2011 averages. Despite this timeline extension, the 90+ non-performing delinquency rate on the Ocwen portfolio as a percentage of UPB has declined from 27.9% at December 31, 2011 to 24.5% at June 30, 2012. This improvement occurred as modifications, especially on the Litton portfolio, have driven down delinquency rates and obviated foreclosure. Also, fewer loans have entered delinquency, as early intervention loss mitigation has improved. Excluding the new MSR portfolios acquired during the second quarter which were on average more delinquent than our existing portfolio, the delinquency rate on the total portfolio as a percentage of UPB would have declined to 23.8% at June 30, 2012.
We also implemented a strategic initiative through our relationship with HLSS that we believe will, over time, significantly reduce the amount of capital that we require. HLSS acquires and holds MSRs and related servicing advances in a more efficient manner than is currently feasible for Ocwen.
As disclosed in Note 4 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements, on March 5, 2012, Ocwen completed the sale to HLSS Holdings of the Rights to MSRs related to serviced loans with a UPB of approximately $15.2 billion. HLSS Holdings also assumed the related match funded liabilities. These assets were acquired in the HomEq Acquisition. OLS also entered into a subservicing agreement with HLSS Holdings on February 10, 2012 under which it will subservice the MSRs after legal ownership of the MSRs has been transferred to HLSS Holdings. As also disclosed in Note 4, on May 1, 2012, Ocwen completed a second sale to HLSS Holdings of Rights to MSRs for approximately $2.9 billion of UPB and related servicing advances. Unlike the initial sale, HLSS did not acquire the financing SPE that held the advances or assume any of the related match funded liabilities. Together, these transactions are referred to as the HLSS Transactions.
In the future, HLSS may acquire additional MSRs or rights similar to the Rights to MSRs from Ocwen and enter into related subservicing arrangements with Ocwen. HLSS may also acquire MSRs from third parties. If HLSS chooses to engage Ocwen as a subservicer on these acquisitions, the effect could be to increase the benefit of this strategy to Ocwen by increasing the size of its subservicing portfolio with little or no capital requirement on the part of Ocwen. Any Rights to MSRs to be sold by Ocwen to HLSS in any subsequent transactions will be subject to customary closing conditions.
The effects on Ocwen of the HLSS Transactions include the following:
· Ocwen's liquidity and cash flows improved as the sale resulted in cash
proceeds to Ocwen of $242,618, of which $64,395 was used to repay match
funded liabilities and $44,555 was used to reduce the balance on the
senior secured term loan that Ocwen entered into on September 1, 2011 as
required under the terms of the related loan agreement.
· Ocwen's match funded liabilities decreased, as HLSS Holdings assumed the
HomEq Servicing advance facility from Ocwen in the initial sale and
Ocwen used a portion of the proceeds from the second sale to repay the
match funded debt related to the sold advances. As disclosed in 0 and 0,
upon assumption of the advance facility debt by HLSS Holdings in the
initial sale, Ocwen terminated the interest rate swap hedging
relationship for accounting purposes and recognized in earnings $5,958
of hedge losses that had been included in Accumulated other
comprehensive loss.
· As described above, Ocwen has initially sold Rights to MSRs to HLSS
Holdings. While the sale of the Rights to MSRs to HLSS Holdings will
achieve an economic result for Ocwen substantially identical to a sale
of the MSRs, Ocwen is accounting for the transaction as a financing
until the required third party consents are obtained and legal ownership
of the MSRs transfers to HLSS Holdings. As a result, the MSRs remain on
our balance sheet and continue to be amortized, and we have recognized a
financing liability. The amount of servicing revenues recognized is
unchanged as a result of the HLSS Transactions. HLSS purchased the
Rights to MSRs for $11,020 more than Ocwen's carrying value at the date
of sale. This amount will be realized over time as the Rights to MSRs
amortize.
· Interest expense increased as the interest on the portion of the sales
proceeds accounted for as a financing is greater than the interest on
the HomEq Servicing advance facility transferred to HLSS in the initial
sale and the match funded liabilities repaid with proceeds from the
second sale principally because Ocwen is also compensating HLSS for the
cost of capital used to fund the transactions.
· Ocwen has lower capital requirements since HLSS Holdings is acquiring
not only the Rights to MSRs but also the servicer advances related to
the Rights to MSRs and assuming responsibility for funding servicer
advances in the future.
· Over time, Ocwen expects that the reduction in the equity required to
run its Servicing business will be greater than the reduction in net
income, thus improving the return on equity of its Servicing business.
See Note 20 for information regarding an agreement between Ocwen and HLSS Management to provide each other with certain professional services for a fee.
As noted in Note 1 to the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements, on February 27, 2012, we formed Ocwen Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (OMS) under the laws of the United States Virgin Islands (USVI). OMS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of OCN and has its principal place of business in St. Croix, USVI. OMS was created as part of an initiative to consolidate the ownership and management of all of our global servicing assets and operations under a single entity and cost-effectively expand our United States-based servicing activities. OMS is located in a federally-recognized economic development zone where qualified entities are eligible for certain benefits. On August 1, 2012, we were officially advised that OMS was approved as a "Category IIA service business" and is therefore entitled to receive such benefits. Among other benefits, this will have a favorable impact on our effective tax rate.
Operations Summary
Our consolidated operating results for the first six months of 2012 have been significantly impacted by the Litton Acquisition which closed on September 1, 2011 and the four MSR acquisitions that closed during the second quarter of 2012. The operating results of the Litton Loan Servicing business are included in the Servicing segment since the acquisition date.
The following table summarizes our consolidated operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. We have provided a more complete discussion of operating results by line of business in the Segment Results and Financial Condition section.
|
|