In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we refer to Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries as "we," "us," "Company," or "our," unless we specifically state otherwise or the context indicates otherwise.

When used in this discussion and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the words "believes," "anticipates," "projects," "should," "estimates," "expects," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and in Section 21F of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Actual results may differ materially due to uncertainties including:

· our ability to identify and acquire retail real estate and real estate-related debt investments that meet our investment standards in our target markets;

· the level of rental revenue and net interest income we achieve from our target assets;

· the market value of our assets and the supply of, and demand for, retail real estate and real estate-related debt investments in which we invest;

· the length of the current economic downturn;

· the conditions in the local markets in which we operate and our concentration in those markets, as well as changes in national economic and market conditions;

· consumer spending and confidence trends;

· our ability to enter into new leases or to renew leases with existing tenants at the properties we own or acquire at favorable rates;

· our ability to anticipate changes in consumer buying practices and the space needs of tenants;

· the competitive landscape impacting the properties we own or acquire and their tenants;

· our relationships with our tenants and their financial condition and liquidity;

· our ability to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust (a "REIT") for U.S. federal income tax;

· our use of debt as part of our financing strategy and our ability to make payments or to comply with any covenants under any borrowings or other debt facilities we currently have or subsequently obtain;

· the level of our operating expenses, including amounts we are required to pay to our management team and to engage third party property managers;

· the estimated costs of the planned relocation of the Company's corporate operations to California;

· changes in interest rates that could impact the market price of our common stock and the cost of our borrowings; and

· legislative and regulatory changes (including changes to laws governing the taxation of REITs).

Forward-looking statements are based on estimates as of the date of this report. We disclaim any obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements reflecting new estimates, events or circumstances after the date of this report.

The risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

Retail Opportunity Investments Corp. commenced operations in October 2009 as a fully integrated and self-managed REIT. The Company specializes in the acquisition, ownership and management of necessity-based community and neighborhood shopping centers in the western and eastern regions of the United States, anchored by national and regional supermarkets and drugstores. The Company refers to the properties it targets for investment as its target assets.

From the commencement of its operations through June 30, 2012, the Company completed approximately $720.2 million of shopping center investments. As of June 30, 2012, the Company's portfolio consisted of 36 wholly-owned retail properties totaling approximately 3.6 million square feet of gross leasable area ("GLA"). The Company also owns two retail properties through joint ventures, encompassing approximately 500,000 square feet of GLA. The joint ventures are comprised of a 49% ownership interest in the Crossroads Shopping Center, a 464,822 square foot shopping center situated on approximately 40 acres of land, which are currently 96% leased and a 95% interest in a shopping center located in Wilsonville, Oregon. In addition, the Company owns a 50% interest in a B-note of an existing first mortgage note secured by a 407,952 square foot shopping center.

As of June 30, 2012, the Company's portfolio was approximately 92.8% leased. At June 30, 2012, the Company considered 31 of its wholly-owned properties to be stabilized properties with a weighted average leased area of 94.8%. The remaining five properties were considered by the Company to be re-development properties that were 75.6 % leased at June 30, 2012. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company leased or renewed a total of 284,314 and 456,776 square feet, respectively in its portfolio. The Company has committed approximately $3.8 million and $483,560 in tenant improvements and leasing commissions respectively, for the new leases and renewals that occurred during the year ended June 30, 2012. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company experienced a 3.4% decrease in rental rates across its portfolio with respect to lease renewals that expired during such period. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company experienced a 1.5% decrease in rental rates across its portfolio with respect to lease renewals that expired during such period.

The Company reincorporated as a Maryland corporation on June 2, 2011. The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, commencing with the year ended December 31, 2010.

Subsequent Events

On July 24, 2012, the Company acquired the property known as The Village at Novato located in Novato, California for a purchase price of $10.5 million. The Village at Novato is approximately 20,000 square feet and is anchored by Traders Joe's. The property was acquired with cash.

On July 31, 2012, the Company's board of directors declared a cash dividend on its common stock of $0.14 per share, payable on August 31, 2012 to holders of record on August 14, 2012.

On August 1, 2012, the Company acquired the property known as Glendora Shopping Center located in Glendora, California for a purchase price of $14.9 million. Glendora Shopping Center is approximately 107,000 square feet and is anchored by Albertsons. The property was acquired with cash.

On August 1, 2012, the Company acquired the remaining interest in Wilsonville Old Town Square from its joint venture partner for approximately $1.6 million and paid off an existing $13.3 million construction loan securing the property. The property and the loan repayment were funded with cash.

On August 2, 2012, the Company announced that it plans to move its corporate operations from White Plains, New York to San Diego, California by year end 2012. Additionally, on August 2, 2012, the Company announced that John Roche, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, has elected not to remain with the Company once the transition to the West Coast has been completed. The Company has commenced a search for Mr. Roche's replacement. The Company expects to incur costs estimated to be between $3.0 million and $3.3 million associated with the relocation

Report on Operating Results

Funds from operations ("FFO"), is a widely-recognized non-GAAP financial measure for REITs that the Company believes when considered with financial statements determined in accordance with GAAP, provides additional and useful means to assess its financial performance. FFO is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate the performance of REITs, most of which present FFO along with net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP.

The Company computes FFO in accordance with the "White Paper" on FFO published by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT"), which defines FFO as net income attributable to common stockholders (determined in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains or losses from debt restructuring, sales of depreciable property, and impairments, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for partnerships and unconsolidated joint ventures.

In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") guidance relating to business combinations, which, among other things, requires any acquirer of a business (investment property) to expense all acquisition costs related to the acquisition, the amount of which will vary based on each specific acquisition and the volume of acquisitions. Accordingly, the costs of completed acquisitions will reduce our FFO. Acquisition costs for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were approximately $630,000 and $254,000, respectively. Acquisition costs for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were approximately $753,000 and $429,000, respectively.

However, FFO:

· does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP (which, unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of net income); and

· should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance.

FFO as defined by us may not be comparable to similarly titled items reported by other REITs due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs. The table below provides a reconciliation of net income applicable to stockholders in accordance with GAAP to FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.

                                                         For the Three Months Ended             For the Six Months Ended
                                                     June 30, 2012       June 30, 2011      June 30, 2012      June 30, 2011

Net income (Loss) for period                         $    4,424,752     $       697,771     $    5,552,156     $    6,877,860
Plus: Real property depreciation                          3,576,680           1,986,141          6,783,268          3,789,605
Amortization of tenant improvements and allowances        1,065,949             624,648          2,154,749          1,190,511
Amortization of deferred leasing costs                    2,980,885           2,368,151          5,941,580          4,689,974
Funds from operations                                $   12,048,266     $     5,676,711     $   20,431,753     $   16,547,950

Net Cash Provided by (Used in):
Operating Activities                                 $    5,766,330     $     2,517,103     $    9,880,437     $    6,553,134
Investing Activities                                 $  (52,144,069 )   $    (6,995,507 )   $  (90,947,198 )   $  (93,470,221 )
Financing Activities                                 $   45,792,752     $     8,042,819     $   56,903,173     $   17,509,185

Results of Operations

At June 30, 2012, the Company had equity interests in 38 properties, of which 36 are consolidated ("consolidated properties") in the accompanying financial statements and two are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The Company believes, because of the location of the properties in densely populated areas, the nature of its investment provides for relatively stable revenue flows even during difficult economic times. The Company has a strong capital structure with manageable debt. The Company expects to continue to explore acquisition opportunities that might present themselves during this economic downturn consistent with its business strategy.

Results of Operations for the Three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the Three months ended June 30, 2011.

The following comparison for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011, makes reference to the effect of the same-store properties. Same-store properties represent all consolidated operating properties owned by the Company in the same manner during both periods which totaled 22 of the Company's 36 consolidated properties. Operating income is defined as operating income generated from the Company's consolidated operating properties (net of depreciation and amortization).

During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company generated net income of approximately $4.4 million compared to net income of $698,000 generated during the three months ended June 30, 2011. The substantial cause of the differences during the two periods resulted from a bargain purchase gain recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2012. The Company recognized a $3.9 million bargain purchase gain in 2012, when recording the fair values of two properties that were acquired during the period through Conveyance in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreements. In addition, operating income increased by $2.2 million as a result of an increase in the number of properties owned by the Company in 2012 compared to 2011 and an increase in same-store properties operating income. As of June 30, 2012, the Company owned 36 consolidated properties as compared to 23 properties at June 30, 2011. The newly acquired properties increased operating income in 2012 by approximately $1.3 million. Operating income from the 22 same-store properties increased operating income by approximately $882,000 primarily due to an increase in the weight average leased area which increased to 90.8% in 2012 as compared to 89.6% in 2011 for these properties. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company incurred approximately $2.8 million of interest expense compared to approximately $1.1 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011, due to borrowings on the term loan. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company had $110.0 million outstanding on its term loan. There were no borrowings outstanding on the term loan at June 30, 2011, as the Company obtained the loan after June 30, 2011. In addition, interest expense was higher in 2012 as compared to 2011 due to higher borrowings on the Company's credit facility. The company had $64.0 million outstanding on its credit facility at June 30, 2012 as compared to $25.0 million outstanding at June 30, 2011.

Results of Operations for the Six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the Six months ended June 30, 2011.

The following comparison for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011, makes reference to the effect of the same-store properties. Same-store properties represent all consolidated operating properties owned by the Company in the same manner during both periods which totaled 17 of the Company's 36 consolidated properties. Operating income is defined as operating income generated from the Company's consolidated operating properties (net of depreciation and amortization).

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company generated net income of approximately $5.6 million compared to net income of $6.9 million generated during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The substantial cause of the differences during the two periods resulted from a decrease in the bargain purchase gains recorded during 2012 as compared to 2011. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 the Company recognized $3.9 million in bargain purchase gains, when recording the fair values of two properties that were acquired during the period through a Conveyance in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreements. In 2011, the Company recorded $5.8 million in bargain purchase gains relating to three properties that were acquired during the period through a Conveyance in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreement. In addition during the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company incurred approximately $5.1 million of interest expense compared to approximately $2.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011, due to borrowings on the term loan. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company had $110.0 million outstanding on its term loan. There were no borrowings outstanding on the term loan at June 30, 2011, as the Company obtained the loan after June 30, 2011. The Company had $64.0 million outstanding on its credit facility at June 30, 2012 as compared to $25.0 million outstanding at June 30, 2011. Operating income increased by $4.7 million as a result of an increase in the number of properties owned by the Company in 2012 compared to 2011 and an increase in same- store properties operating income. As of June 30, 2012, the Company owned 36 properties as compared to 23 properties at June 30, 2011. The newly acquired properties increased operating income in 2012 by approximately $3.4 million. Operating income from the 17 same-store properties increased operating income by approximately $1.3 million primarily due to an increase in the weight average leased area which increased to 90.8% in 2012 as compared to 89.6% in 2011 for these properties.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, interest income generated from mortgages notes receivables decreased by approximately $562,000 as a result of the Company obtaining ownership interest in three properties that were previously secured by a mortgage note. The Company obtained the properties through a Conveyance in Lieu of Foreclosure agreement during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the presentation of the Company's financial condition and results of operations and require management's most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. Set forth below is a summary of the accounting policies that management believes are critical to the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. This summary should be read in conjunction with the more complete discussion of the Company's accounting policies included in Note 1 to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

The Company records base rents on a straight-line basis over the term of each lease. The excess of rents recognized over amounts contractually due pursuant to the underlying leases is included in tenant and other receivables on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Most leases contain provisions that require tenants to reimburse a pro-rata share of real estate taxes and certain common area expenses. Adjustments are also made throughout the year to tenant and other receivables and the related cost recovery income based upon the Company's best estimate of the final amounts to be billed and collected. In addition, the Company also provides an allowance for future credit losses in connection with the deferred straight-line rent receivable.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts is established based on a quarterly analysis of the risk of loss on specific accounts. The analysis places particular emphasis on past-due accounts and considers information such as the nature and age of the receivables, the payment history of the tenants or other debtors, the financial condition of the tenants and any guarantors and management's assessment of their ability to meet their lease obligations, the basis for any disputes and the status of related negotiations, among other things. Management's estimates of the required allowance is subject to revision as these factors change and is sensitive to the effects of economic and market conditions on tenants, particularly those at retail properties. Estimates are used to establish reimbursements from tenants for common area maintenance, real estate tax and insurance costs. The Company analyzes the balance of its estimated accounts receivable for real estate taxes, common area maintenance and insurance for each of its properties by comparing actual recoveries versus actual expenses and any actual write-offs. Based on its analysis, the Company may record an additional amount in its allowance for doubtful accounts related to these items. In addition, the Company also provides an allowance for future credit losses in connection with the deferred straight-line rent receivable.

Real Estate

Land, buildings, property improvements, furniture/fixtures and tenant improvements are recorded at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Renovations and/or replacements, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.

Upon the acquisition of real estate properties, the fair value of the real estate purchased is allocated to the acquired tangible assets (consisting of land, buildings and improvements), and acquired intangible assets and liabilities (consisting of above-market and below-market leases and acquired in-place leases). The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, which value is then allocated to land, buildings and improvements based on management's determination of the relative fair values of these assets. In valuing an acquired property's intangibles, factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on its evaluation of current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, tenant improvements, legal and other related costs.

The value of in-place leases is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental rates, over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as if vacant. Above-market and below-market lease values are recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be received and management's estimate of market lease rates, measured over the terms of the respective leases that management deemed appropriate at the time of acquisition. Such valuations include a consideration of the non-cancellable terms of the respective leases as well as any applicable renewal periods. The fair values associated with below-market rental renewal options are determined based on the Company's experience and the relevant facts and circumstances that existed at the time of the acquisitions. The value of the above-market and below-market leases associated with the original lease term is amortized to rental income, over the terms of the respective leases. The value of below-market rental lease renewal options is deferred until such time as the renewal option is exercised and subsequently amortized over the corresponding renewal period. The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense, and the above-market and below-market lease values are amortized to rental income, over the remaining non-cancellable terms of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be recognized in operations at that time. The Company will record a bargain purchase gain if it determines that the purchase price for the acquired assets was less than the fair value. The Company will record a liability in situations where any part of the cash consideration is deferred. The amounts payable in the future are discounted to their present value. The liability is subsequently re-measured to fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. If, up to one year from the acquisition date, information regarding fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is received and estimates are refined, appropriate property adjustments are made to the purchase price allocation on a retrospective basis.

The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful life of its properties for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation. These assessments have a direct impact on its net income.

Properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:

Buildings 39-40 years
Property Improvements 10-20 years
Furniture/Fixtures 3-10 years
Tenant Improvements Shorter of lease term or their useful life

Asset Impairment

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to aggregate future net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceed the fair value. Management does not believe that the value of any of the Company's real estate investments was impaired at June 30, 2012.

The Company reviews its investments in its unconsolidated joint ventures for impairment periodically and the Company would record an impairment charge when events or circumstances change indicating that a decline in the fair values below the carrying values has occurred and such decline is other-than temporary. The ultimate realization of the Company's investment in its unconsolidated joint ventures is dependent on a number of factors, including the performance of each investment and market conditions. Management does not believe that the value of its unconsolidated joint ventures was impaired at June 30, 2012.

REIT Qualification Requirements

The Company has elected and qualified to be taxed as a REIT under the Code, and believes that it has been organized and has operated in a manner that will allow it to continue to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code.

The Company is subject to a number of operational and organizational requirements to qualify and then maintain qualification as a REIT. If the Company does not qualify as a REIT, its income would become subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes at regular corporate rates that would be substantial and the Company cannot re-elect to qualify as a REIT for four taxable years following the year that it failed to qualify as a REIT. The resulting adverse effects on the Company's results of operations, liquidity and amounts distributable to stockholders would be material.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is a measure of the Company's ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain its assets and operations make distributions to its stockholders and meet other general business needs. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, . . .