|
Quotes & Info
|
| ACFC > SEC Filings for ACFC > Form 10-Q on 14-May-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
14-May-2012
Quarterly Report
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements which are statements that are not historical or current facts. When used in this filing and in future filings by Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation's press releases or other public or shareholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases, "anticipate," "would be," "will allow," "intends to," "will likely result," "are expected to," will continue," "is anticipated," "estimated," "projected," or similar expressions are intended to identify, "forward looking statements." Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to changes in economic conditions in Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation's market area, changes in policies by regulatory agencies, fluctuations in interest rates, demand for loans in Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation's market area, the availability of liquidity from deposits or borrowings to execute on loan and investing opportunities, changes in the position of banking regulators on the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, and competition, all or some of which could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected.
Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made, and advise readers that various factors, including regional and national economic conditions, substantial changes in levels of market interest rates, credit and other risks of lending and investing activities, and competitive and regulatory factors, could affect Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation's financial performance and could cause Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation's actual results for future periods to differ materially from those anticipated or projected.
Atlantic Coast Financial Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.
Recent Developments
While the Company's capital levels continued to exceed the required minimums of 5%, 6%, and 10%, respectively, necessary to be deemed a well-capitalized institution, the Company remained under an Individual Minimum Capital Requirement agreement with regulators during the first quarter of 2012, which mandates that Atlantic Coast Bank must achieve a 7% Tier 1(core) capital ratio. With this in mind, and in light of the losses the Company has incurred over the past four years, the Company's Board of Directors began a review of strategic alternatives late in 2011, and engaged a financial advisor to assist in the exploration of alternatives to enhance stockholder value. The Company also received approval from the Federal Reserve Board to pursue these strategic alternatives, which include consideration of a potential business combination and a rights offering. This process continues, however, there can be no assurances as to the outcome of these efforts.
Critical Accounting Policies
Certain accounting policies are important to the portrayal of the Company's financial condition, since they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Estimates associated with these policies are susceptible to material changes as a result of changes in facts and circumstances, including, but without limitation, changes in interest rates, performance of the economy, financial condition of borrowers and laws and regulations. Management believes that its critical accounting policies include determining the allowance for loan losses, determining fair value of securities available for sale, other real estate owned and accounting for deferred income taxes. These accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Allowance for Loan Losses
An allowance for loan losses ("allowance") is maintained to reflect probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance is based on ongoing assessments of the estimated losses incurred in the loan portfolio and is established as these losses are recognized through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Generally, loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibity of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Due to declining real estate values in our markets and the weak United States economy in general, it is likely that impairment reserves on non-performing one-to-four family residential and home equity loans, will not be recoverable and represent a confirmed loss. As a consequence the Company recognizes the charge-off of impairment reserves on non-performing one-to-four family residential and home equity loans in the period the loan is classified as such. This process accelerates the recognition of charge-offs but has no impact on the impairment evaluation process.
The reasonableness of the allowance is reviewed and established by management, within the context of applicable accounting and regulatory guidelines, based upon its evaluation of then-existing economic and business conditions affecting the Bank's key lending areas. Senior credit officers monitor the conditions discussed above continuously and reviews are conducted quarterly with the Bank's senior management and Board of Directors.
Management's methodology for assessing the reasonableness of the allowance consists of several key elements, which include a general loss component by type of loan and specific allowances for identified problem loans. The allowance also incorporates the results of measuring impaired loans.
The general loss component is calculated by applying loss factors to outstanding loan balances based on the internal risk evaluation of the loans or pools of loans. Changes to the risk evaluations relative to both performing and non-performing loans affect the amount of this component. Loss factors are based on the Bank's recent loss experience, current market conditions that may impact real estate values within the Bank's primary lending areas, and on other significant factors that, in management's judgment, may affect the ability to collect loans in the portfolio as of the evaluation date. Other significant factors that exist as of the balance sheet date that may be considered in determining the adequacy of the allowance include credit quality trends (including trends in non-performing loans expected to result from existing conditions), collateral values, geographic foreclosure rates, new and existing home inventories, loan volumes and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio segments and recent charge-off experience in particular segments of the portfolio. The impact of the general loss component on the allowance began increasing during 2008 and has continued to increase during each year through the first quarter of 2012. The increase reflected the deterioration of market conditions, and the increase in the recent loan loss experience that has resulted from management's proactive approach to charging off losses on impaired one- to four-family and home equity loans in the period the impairment is identified.
Management also evaluates the allowance for loan losses based on a review of certain large balance individual loans. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows management expects to receive on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. For all specifically reviewed loans where it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the terms of the loan agreement, impairment is determined by computing a fair value based on either discounted cash flows using the loan's initial interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. No specific allowance is recorded unless fair value is less than carrying value. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as individual consumer and residential loans are collectively evaluated for impairment and are excluded from the specific impairment evaluation; for these loans, the allowance for loan losses is calculated in accordance with the general allowance for loan losses policy described above. Accordingly, individual consumer and residential loans are not separately identified for impairment disclosures, unless the loan has been modified as a troubled debt restructuring as discussed below.
Loans for which the terms have been modified as a result of the borrower's financial difficulties are considered troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs"). TDRs are measured for impairment based upon the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan's interest rate at inception of the loan or the appraised value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Impairment of homogenous loans, such as one-to four-residential loans, that have been modified as TDRs is calculated in the aggregate based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Loans modified as TDRs with market rates of interest are classified as impaired loans in the year of restructure and until the loan has performed for 12 months in accordance with the modified terms. The assessment of market rate of interest for homogenous TDR loans is done based on the weighted average rates of those loans compared to prevailing interest rates at the time of restructure.
Fair Value of Securities Available for Sale
Securities available for sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported separately in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax. The fair values for investment securities are determined by quoted market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3).
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. In determining OTTI, management considers many factors, including: (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions, and (4) whether the Company has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to management at a point in time.
When OTTI is determined to have occurred, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether we intend to sell the security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss. If we intend to sell the security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current-period credit loss, the OTTI recognized in earnings is equal to the entire difference between its amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If we do not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period loss, the OTTI is separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the total related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized as a charge to earnings. The amount of the OTTI related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment. The Company recorded no OTTI for the three months ended March 31, 2012.
Other Real Estate Owned
Assets acquired through or in lieu of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value, less estimated selling costs, at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. If fair value declines subsequent to foreclosure, a valuation allowance is recorded through expense. Costs relating to improvement of property are capitalized, whereas costs relating to the holding of property are expensed.
Deferred Income Taxes
After converting to a federally chartered savings association, Atlantic Coast Bank became a taxable organization. Income tax expense (benefit) is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary difference between carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates and operating loss carryforwards. The Company's principal deferred tax assets result from the allowance for loan losses and operating loss carryforwards. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations are subject to interpretation with respect to the determination of the tax basis of assets and liabilities for credit unions that convert charters and become a taxable organization. Since Atlantic Coast Bank's transition to a federally chartered thrift, the Company has recorded income tax expense based upon management's interpretation of the applicable tax regulations. Positions taken by the Company in preparing our federal and state tax returns are subject to the review of taxing authorities, and the review by taxing authorities of the positions taken by management could result in a material adjustment to the financial statements.
All available evidence, both positive and negative, is considered when determining whether or not a valuation allowance is necessary to reduce the carrying amount to a balance that is considered more likely than not to be realized. The determination of the realizability of deferred tax assets is highly subjective and dependent upon judgment concerning management's evaluation of such evidence. Positive evidence considered includes the probability of achieving forecasted taxable income and the ability to implement tax planning strategies to accelerate taxable income recognition. Negative evidence includes the Company's cumulative losses. Following the initial establishment of a valuation allowance, if the Company is unable to generate sufficient pre-tax income in future periods or otherwise fails to meet forecasted operating results, an additional valuation allowance may be required. Any valuation allowance is required to be recorded during the period identified. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had a valuation allowance of $26.3 million for the net deferred tax asset.
Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011
General. Total assets decreased $12.1 million, or 1.5%, to $776.8 million at March 31, 2012 as compared to $789.0 million at December 31, 2011. The primary reason for the decrease in assets was a decrease in loans of $22.3 million, partially offset by an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $6.1 million and an increase in securities available for sale of $5.1 million as the Company continued to manage its balance sheet consistent with its capital preservation strategy and to increase the Company's liquidity position. Total deposits decreased $10.4 million, or 2.0%, to $498.0 million at March 31, 2012 from $508.4 million at December 31, 2011. Non-maturing deposits consisting of non-interest bearing and interest bearing demand accounts and savings and money market accounts grew by $12.5 million, while time deposits decreased by $22.9 million during the first quarter of 2012.
Following is a summarized comparative balance sheet as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
March 31, December 31, Increase (decrease)
2012 2011 Dollars Percentage
(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 47,117 $ 41,017 $ 6,100 14.9 %
Securitites available for sale 131,910 126,821 5,089 4.0 %
Loans 498,921 521,233 (22,312 ) -4.3 %
Allowance for loan losses 13,516 15,526 (2,010 ) -12.9 %
Loans, net 485,405 505,707 (20,302 ) -4.0 %
Loans held for sale 59,399 61,619 (2,220 ) -3.6 %
Other assets 53,000 53,803 (803 ) -1.5 %
Total assets $ 776,831 $ 788,967 $ (12,136 ) -1.5 %
Liabilities and Stockholders' equity
Deposits
Non-interest bearing demand $ 40,012 $ 34,586 $ 5,426 15.7 %
Interest bearing demand 77,434 76,811 623 0.8 %
Savings and money market 205,829 199,334 6,495 3.3 %
Time 174,735 197,680 (22,945 ) -11.6 %
Total deposits 498,010 508,411 (10,401 ) -2.0 %
Federal Home Loan Bank advances 135,000 135,000 - 0.0 %
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase 92,800 92,800 - 0.0 %
Accrued expenses and other
liabilities 5,706 6,462 (756 ) -11.7 %
Total liabilities 731,516 742,673 (11,157 ) -1.5 %
Stockholders' equity 45,315 46,294 (979 ) -2.1 %
Total liabilities and stockholders'
equity $ 776,831 $ 788,967 $ (12,136 ) -1.5 %
|
Securities available for sale. Securities available for sale was comprised primarily of debt securities of U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises, and mortgage-backed securities. The investment portfolio increased approximately $5.1 million to $131.9 million at March 31, 2012, from $126.8 million at December 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2012, approximately $120.6 million of securities available for sale were pledged as collateral for the securities sold under agreements to repurchase. At March 31, 2012, approximately $130.8 million, or 99%, of the debt securities held by the Company were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae, institutions which the government has affirmed its commitment to support.
Loans held for sale. Loans held for sale were comprised entirely of loans secured by one- to four-family residential homes originated internally or purchased from third-party originators. Loans held for sale decreased $2.2 million, or approximately 3.6% to $59.4 million at March 31, 2012 as compared to $61.6 million at December 31, 2011 primarily due to a decrease in loan production from our warehouse lending operations. As of March 31, 2012, the weighted average number of days outstanding of loans held for sale was 27 days.
During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company originated a total of $186.5 million of loans held for sale, comprised of approximately $11.1 million of one- to four-family residential loans originated internally, and approximately $175.4 million of one- to four-family residential loans purchased from third parties under warehouse loan agreements. Approximately $189.3 million of the one- to four-family residential loans were sold, resulting in a gain of $610,000 and interest earned of $600,000 on outstanding balances which was recorded in interest income. The Company intends to continue to focus on opportunities to grow the warehouse line of business in the near future due to its favorable margins and efficient capital usage.
Loans. Below is a comparative composition of net loans as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, excluding loans held for sale:
% of total December 31, % of total
March 31, 2012 loans 2011 loans
(Dollars in Thousands)
Real estate loans:
One-to-four family $ 233,082 47.4 % $ 241,453 46.9 %
Commercial 67,562 13.7 % 72,683 14.1 %
Other ( land and multi-family) 27,981 5.7 % 29,134 5.7 %
Total real estate loans 328,625 66.8 % 343,270 66.8 %
Real estate construction loans:
One-to-four family 1,223 0.2 % 2,044 0.4 %
Commercial 4,260 0.9 % 4,083 0.8 %
Acquisition and development - 0.0 % - 0.0 %
Total real estate construction loans 5,483 1.1 % 6,127 1.2 %
Other loans:
Home equity 71,368 14.5 % 74,199 14.4 %
Consumer 65,525 13.3 % 67,850 13.2 %
Commercial 21,348 4.3 % 23,181 4.5 %
Total other loans 158,241 32.1 % 165,230 32.0 %
Total loans 492,349 100 % 514,627 100 %
Allowance for loan losses (13,516 ) (15,526 )
Net deferred loan costs 6,697 6,730
Premiums (discounts) on purchased loans (125 ) (124 )
Loans, net $ 485,405 $ 505,707
|
Total portfolio loans declined $22.3 million or approximately 4.0% to $492.3 million at March 31, 2012 as compared to $514.6 million at December 31, 2011 primarily due to payoffs of one- to four-family residential loans during the three months ended March 31, 2012. Portfolio loan originations increased $600,000 to $11.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012 from $10.5 million for the same period in 2011.
Small business loan originations, including SBA loans, were $2.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2012. The Company intends to sell the guaranteed portion of SBA loans upon completion of loan funding. The Company plans to continue to expand this business line going forward.
Consistent with its capital preservation and risk management policies, the Company does not intend to portfolio originated loans, but rather continue to emphasize the sale of mortgages it originates in the secondary market in the near term.
The composition of the Bank's loan portfolio is heavily weighted toward one- to four-family residential loans. As of March 31, 2012, first mortgages (including residential construction loans), second mortgages and home equity loans totaled $305.7 million, or 62.1% of total gross loans. Approximately $44.1 million, or 60.6% of loans recorded as home equity loans are in a first lien position. Accordingly, $278.4 million, or 91.1% of loans collateralized by one- to four-family residential loans were in a first lien position as of March 31, 2012.
Florida Georgia Other States Total
(Dollars in Thousands)
1-4 Family First Mortgages $ 149,100 $ 47,007 $ 36,975 $ 233,082
1-4 Family Second Mortgages 34,245 35,927 1,195 71,367
1-4 Family Construction Loans 1,082 - 141 1,223
$ 184,427 $ 82,934 $ 38,311 $ 305,672
|
Allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses was $13.5 million, or 2.71% of total loans compared to $15.5 million or 2.98% of total loans outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
The allowance for loan losses activity for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:
March 31, March 31,
2012 2011
(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period $ 15,526 $ 13,344
Charge-offs:
Real Estate Loans
One-to four-family 1,114 1,406
Commercial 2,138 -
Other (Land & Multi-family) 900 49
Real Estate Construction Loans
Construction One-to four family - -
Construction Commercial - -
Acquistion & Development - -
Other Loans
Home equity 1,131 1,106
Consumer 483 249
Commercial 71 -
Total charge-offs 5,837 2,810
Recoveries:
Real Estate Loans
One-to four-family 256 141
Commercial 2 -
Other (Land & Multi-family) - 33
Real Estate Construction Loans
Construction One-to four family - -
Construction Commercial - -
Acquistion & Develpoment - -
Other Loans
Home equity 13 4
Consumer 80 54
Commercial 2 -
Total recoveries 353 232
Net charge-offs 5,484 2,578
Provision for loan losses 3,474 2,797
Balance at end of period $ 13,516 $ 13,563
|
Net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2012 includes $1.6 million, of which $1.1 million was reserved for in 2011, for the expected loss on a non-performing income producing commercial real estate loan that the Bank has consented to a plan by the borrower to sell the collateral in order to repay the remaining loan balance. Net charge-offs for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, also increased approximately $900,000 for charge-off of collateral dependent loans, the impairment for which had been reserved for in 2011, and the Company has determined no other sources of repayment exist.
. . .
|
|