|
Quotes & Info
|
| BFIN > SEC Filings for BFIN > Form 10-Q on 7-May-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-May-2012
Quarterly Report
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains, and other periodic and current reports, press releases and other public stockholder communications of BankFinancial Corporation may contain, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve significant risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements may include statements relating to our future plans, strategies and expectations, as well as our future revenues, earnings, losses, financial performance, financial condition, asset quality metrics and future prospects. Forward looking statements are generally identifiable by use of the words "believe," "may," "will," "should," "could," "expect," "estimate," "intend," "anticipate," "project," "plan," or similar expressions. Forward looking statements speak only as of the date made. They are frequently based on assumptions that may or may not materialize, and are subject to numerous uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward looking statements. We intend all forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for the purpose of invoking these safe harbor provisions.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or projected and which could materially and adversely affect our operating results, financial condition or future prospects include, but are not limited to: (i) the failure of the real estate market to recover or further declines in real estate values that adversely impact the value of our loan collateral and OREO, asset dispositions and borrower equity in their investments; (ii) the persistence or worsening of adverse economic conditions in general and in the Chicago metropolitan area in particular, including high or increasing unemployment levels, that could result in increased delinquencies in our loan portfolio or a decline in the value of our investment securities and the collateral for our loans; (iii) results of supervisory monitoring or examinations by regulatory authorities, including the possibility that a regulatory authority could, among other things, require us to increase our loan classifications or allowance for loan losses, write-down assets, reduce credit concentrations or maintain specific capital levels; (iv) interest rate movements and their impact on customer behavior and our net interest margin; (v) less than anticipated loan growth due to a lack of demand for specific loan products, competitive pressures or a dearth of borrowers who meet our underwriting standards; (vi) changes, disruptions or illiquidity in national or global financial markets; (vii) the credit risks of lending activities, including risks that could cause changes in the level and direction of loan delinquencies and charge-offs or changes in estimates relating to the computation of our allowance for loan losses; (viii) monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve Board; (ix) factors affecting our ability to access deposits or cost-effective funding, and the impact of competitors' pricing initiatives on our deposit products; (x) the impact of new legislation or regulatory changes, including the Dodd-Frank Act, on our products, services, operations and operating expenses; (xi) higher federal deposit insurance premiums; (xii) higher than expected overhead, infrastructure and compliance costs; (xiii) changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines; and (xiv) and our failure to achieve expected synergies and cost savings from acquisitions.
These risks and uncertainties, as well as the Risk Factors set forth in Item 1A below, should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement in the future, or to reflect circumstances and events that occur after the date on which the forward-looking statement was made.
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that the most critical accounting policies upon which our financial condition and results of operation depend, and which involve the most complex subjective decisions or assessments, are included in the discussion entitled "Critical Accounting Policies" in Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and all amendments thereto, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. There are no material changes to the critical accounting policies disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
During the first quarter of 2012, the national and local economies showed limited signs of recovery. The principal challenges in the local economy continue to be persistent unemployment and uneven economic growth. Pricing and underwriting competition for multi-family and commercial real estate loans increased during the quarter. Competition for commercial and industrial loans remained intense in terms of both pricing and underwriting.
Loan portfolio balances declined in all categories except consumer loans. Residential loan balances continued to decline due to scheduled loan amortizations and loan prepayments. Multifamily loan balances and commercial real estate loan balances declined due to slightly lower loan origination volumes and certain targeted portfolio reductions; however, we believe that these portfolios are at or near a stabilized level. Commercial and industrial balances declined primarily because our largest healthcare borrower refinanced its loan at another institution. The refinancing occurred because the borrower's credit needs exceeded our regulatory loan-to-one-borrower limits and the borrower was unwilling to proceed with a loan participation arrangement. We expect modest growth in our commercial and industrial loan portfolio going forward. Although commercial lease origination volumes remained consistent in the first quarter of 2012, commercial lease balances declined due to unusually high volumes of scheduled lease repayments, which are expected to abate in future periods. Our focus for the remainder of 2012 will be to maintain current overall loan portfolio levels and to increase certain selected loan categories such as residential loans, commercial loans and commercial leases consistent with market opportunities.
Loan portfolio quality was stable to trending positive as the first quarter, 2012 ended. We negotiated several final consensual non-performing loan resolutions during the first quarter, 2012 that we expect will result in further improvements in our asset quality metrics in the second and third quarters, 2012. We believe that unemployment, consumer spending, borrower and investor perceptions of residential and commercial real estate valuations and the pace of judicial proceedings will continue to be the primary factors affecting our asset quality metrics and the pace of classified asset resolutions in 2012.
We continued to experience increasing purchaser interest in our classified asset collateral and OREO inventory, and the quantity of OREO under contract for sale on an orderly liquidation basis increased in the first quarter, 2012. We expect to continue accelerating the resolution of non-performing assets throughout the remainder of 2012.
Our general loan loss reserve requirement remained stable in the first quarter of 2012 due principally to a reduction of loan portfolio balances. Specific loan loss reserves were stable. Our underwriting standards remain consistent with historical standards, although our credit analyses continue to incorporate somewhat more conservative assumptions with respect to effective rents, expenses and occupancy levels given the current economic environment.
Given our excess liquidity position, we reduced our competitive posture with respect to pricing on single-service certificate of deposit accounts, which was successful in producing a decline in these account balances. Pricing conditions for local deposits, whether low-balance core deposits, certificates of deposit or high-balance, high-yield transaction accounts, remained generally favorable due to very low market yields and continued weak industry-wide loan demand. In addition, many competitors are still evaluating their deposit product configurations in the context of the Dodd-Frank Act and its related regulations; we expect we will adjust our deposit product offerings to explore such competitive advantages as may emerge in this new regulatory and competitive environment.
The Company's net interest spread and net interest margin were stable but we anticipate that current market conditions for new loans and lower effective yields resulting from scheduled loan repayments and loan renewals will likely cause some compression of our net interest margin and net interest spread. Given the quantity and volatility of the variables affecting our net interest margin and net interest spread, we are unable to confidently predict what the Company's net interest margin and net interest spread will be for the remainder of 2012.
Non-interest income was lower in the first quarter of 2012 primarily due to lower deposit related fees. We continue to evaluate the expansion of non-interest income sources, particularly related to insurance and trust services, to offset any potential future adverse impact associated with the Dodd-Frank Act.
Non-interest expense was lower due to lower non-performing asset expenses, offset by slightly higher compensation expenses related to seasonal factors. We will continue our review of certain departments and operations for net operating contributions and further operating efficiencies throughout the remainder of 2012.
Selected Financial Data
The following tables summarize the major components of the changes in our
balance sheet at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and in our statement of
operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011.
March 31, December 31,
2012 2011 Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Selected Financial Condition Data:
Total assets $ 1,549,137 $ 1,563,575 $ (14,438 )
Cash and cash equivalents 178,080 120,704 57,376
Securities 81,241 92,832 (11,591 )
Loans receivable, net 1,177,719 1,227,391 (49,672 )
Deposits 1,320,580 1,332,552 (11,972 )
Borrowings 9,995 9,322 673
Stockholders' equity 202,111 199,857 2,254
Three months ended March 31,
2012 2011 Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Selected Operating Data:
Interest income $ 16,634 $ 15,348 $ 1,286
Interest expense 1,240 1,996 (756 )
Net interest income 15,394 13,352 2,042
Provision for loan losses 996 2,424 (1,428 )
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses 14,398 10,928 3,470
Noninterest income 1,832 1,571 261
Noninterest expense 13,436 14,255 (819 )
Income (loss) before income taxes 2,794 (1,756 ) 4,550
Income tax expense (benefit) 457 (979 ) 1,436
Net income (loss) $ 2,337 $ (777 ) $ 3,114
|
Selected Financial Data
Three Months Ended March 31,
2012 2011
Performance Ratios:
Return on assets (ratio of net income (loss) to
average total assets) (1) 0.61 % (0.20 )%
Return on equity (ratio of net income (loss) to
average equity) (1) 4.61 (1.23 )
Net interest rate spread (1) (2) 4.18 3.68
Net interest margin (1) (3) 4.26 3.81
Average equity to average assets 13.16 16.48
Efficiency ratio (4) 78.00 95.52
Noninterest expense to average total assets (1) 3.49 3.71
Average interest-earning assets to average
interest-bearing liabilities 122.46 122.64
|
(1) Ratios are annualized.
(2) The net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities for the period.
(3) The net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets for the period.
(4) The efficiency ratio represents noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income.
At March 31, At December 31,
2012 2011
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:
Asset Quality Ratios:
Nonperforming assets to total assets 6.38 % 6.36 %
Nonaccrual loans to total loans 6.51 6.11
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming
loans 40.20 41.25
Allowance for loan losses to total loans 2.62 2.52
Capital Ratios:
Equity to total assets at end of period 13.05 12.78
Tier 1 leverage ratio (Bank only) 10.98 10.50
Other Data:
Number of full service offices 20 20
Employees (full-time equivalent basis) 353 357
|
|
|