|
Quotes & Info
|
| EXTR > SEC Filings for EXTR > Form 10-Q on 7-Feb-2012 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-Feb-2012
Quarterly Report
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including the following sections, contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including in particularly, our expectations
regarding market demands, customer requirements and the general economic
environment, and future results of operations, and other statements that include
words such as "may" "expect" or "believe" . These forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties. We caution investors that actual results may
differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a
result of certain risk factors identified in the section entitled "Risk Factors"
in this Report, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of
fiscal 2012, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 3,
2011, and other filings we have made with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These risk factors, include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in
demand for our products and services; a highly competitive business environment
for network switching equipment; our effectiveness in controlling expenses; the
possibility that we might experience delays in the development or introduction
of new technology and products; customer response to our new technology and
products; the timing of any recovery in the global economy; risks related to
pending or future litigation; and a dependency on third parties for certain
components and for the manufacturing of our products.
Business Overview
We are a leading provider of network infrastructure equipment and services for
enterprises, data centers, and service providers. We were incorporated in
California in May 1996 and reincorporated in Delaware in March 1999. Our
corporate headquarters are located in Santa Clara, California. We develop and
sell network infrastructure equipment to our enterprise, data center and
telecommunications service provider customers.
We conduct our sales and marketing activities on a worldwide basis through a
distribution channel utilizing distributors, resellers and our field sales
organization. We primarily sell our products through an ecosystem of channel
partners who combine our Ethernet products with their offerings to create
compelling information technology solutions for end user customers. We utilize
our field sales organization to support our channel partners and to sell direct
to end-user customers, including some large global accounts. Our customers
include businesses, hospitals, schools, hotels, telecommunications companies and
government agencies around the world.
We outsource the majority of our manufacturing and supply chain management
operations as part of our strategy to maintain global manufacturing capabilities
and to reduce our costs. We conduct quality assurance, manufacturing
engineering, document control and test development at our main campus in Santa
Clara, California. This approach enables us to reduce fixed costs and to
flexibly respond to changes in market demand
The market for network infrastructure equipment is highly competitive and
dominated by a few large companies. The current economic climate has further
driven consolidation of vendors within the Ethernet networking market and with
vendors from adjacent markets, including storage, security, wireless and voice
applications. We believe that the underpinning technology for all of these
adjacent markets is Ethernet. As a result, independent Ethernet switch vendors
are being acquired or merged with larger, adjacent market vendors to enable them
to deliver complete and broad solutions. As a result, we believe that, as an
independent Ethernet switch vendor, we must provide products that, when combined
with the products of our large strategic partners, create compelling solutions
for end user customers. Our approach is to focus on the intelligence and
automation layer that spans our hardware products and that facilitates
end-to-end solutions, as opposed to positioning Extreme Networks as a
low-cost-vendor with point products.
We believe that continued success in our marketplace is dependent upon a variety
of factors that includes, but is not limited to, our ability to design, develop
and distribute new and enhanced products employing leading-edge technology.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we began shipping our new Summit X670,
our next-generation data center top-of-rack switch. During the second quarter of
fiscal 2012, we delivered our BlackDiamond BD-X data center core switch as well
as the E4G Cell Site router to initial beta customers; delivered the latest
version of our ExtremeXOS operating system, version 12.7, and the latest version
of the Ridgeline network and service management platform.
Results of Operations
During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we achieved the following results:
• Net revenues of $82.8 million compared to net revenues of $85.1
million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
• Total gross margin of 56% of net revenues compared to 56% in the
second quarter of fiscal 2011.
• Operating income of $4.1 million compared to operating income of
$9.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
|
• Net income of $4.1 million compared to net income of $8.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011.
During the six months ended January 1, 2012, we experienced the following
results:
• Net revenues of $161.7 million compared to net revenues of $169.0
million in the first six months of fiscal 2011.
• Total gross margin of 56% of net revenues compared to 56% in the
first six months of fiscal 2011.
• Operating income of $5.8 million compared to operating income of
$11.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2011.
• Net income of $5.7 million compared to net income of $11.6 million
in the first six months of fiscal 2011.
• Cash provided by operating activities of $4.0 million for the six
months ending January 1, 2012 compared to cash provided by operating
activities of $9.6 million for the six months ending December 26,
2010.
• Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and marketable
securities decreased by $0.6 million in the six months ended
January 1, 2012 to $146.4 million from $147.0 million as of July 3,
2011, primarily as a result of cash used in operating activities.
|
We operate in three regions: Americas, which includes the United States, Canada, Mexico, Central America and South America; EMEA, which includes Europe, Middle East, and Africa; and APAC which includes Asia Pacific, South Asia and Japan. Prior to the first quarter of fiscal 2012, South America was included as part of EMEA. Revenue by geographical area (as presented in the table below) for the three and six months ended December 26, 2010 has been adjusted to reflect this change. The following table presents the total net revenue geographically for the three and six months ended January 1, 2012 and December 26, 2010 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
January 1, December 26, $ % January 1, December 26, $ %
2012 2010 Change Change 2012 2010 Change Change
Net Revenues:
Americas $ 36,801 $ 30,842 $ 5,959 19.3 % $ 70,246 $ 62,908 $ 7,338 11.7 %
Percentage of net
revenue 44.4 % 36.2 % 43.4 % 37.2 %
EMEA 32,428 37,191 (4,763 ) (12.8 )% 63,314 71,079 (7,765 ) (10.9 )%
Percentage of net
revenue 39.2 % 43.7 % 39.2 % 42.1 %
APAC 13,583 17,098 (3,515 ) (20.6 )% 28,146 34,981 (6,835 ) (19.5 )%
Percentage of net
revenue 16.4 % 20.1 % 17.4 % 20.7 %
Total net revenues $ 82,812 $ 85,131 $ (2,319 ) (2.7 )% $ 161,706 $ 168,968 $ (7,262 ) (4.3 )%
|
Net Revenues
The following table presents net product and service revenues for the three and
six months ended January 1, 2012 and December 26, 2010, respectively (dollars in
thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
January 1, December 26, $ % January 1, December 26, $ %
2012 2010 Change Change 2012 2010 Change Change
Net Revenue:
Product $ 68,094 $ 70,334 $ (2,240 ) (3.2 )% $ 131,307 $ 139,547 $ (8,240 ) (5.9 )%
Percentage of net
revenue 82.2 % 82.6 % 81.2 % 82.6 %
Service 14,718 14,797 (79 ) (0.5 )% 30,399 29,421 978 3.3 %
Percentage of net
revenue 17.8 % 17.4 % 18.8 % 17.4 %
Total net revenue $ 82,812 $ 85,131 $ (2,319 ) (2.7 )% $ 161,706 $ 168,968 $ (7,262 ) (4.3 )%
|
Product revenue decreased by $2.2 million, or 3% in the three months ended January 1, 2012, and decreased by $8.2 million or 6% in the six months ended January 1, 2012, compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2011. The decrease in product revenue was primarily caused by lower volume, particularly in the EMEA and APAC regions. In the first half of fiscal 2011, product revenue in these geographic regions included significant sales to certain large enterprise customers. We did not experience the same level of sales to this EMEA and APAC customer base in the first two quarters of fiscal 2012, partly due to the inherent long sales cycle and the sporadic timing of sales to these customers, as well as the impact of the challenging
macroeconomic environment in Europe. The decline in product sales volume in EMEA
and APAC was partially offset by continuing product sales growth in the Americas
region.
Service revenue was flat in the three months ended January 1, 2012, and
increased by $1.0 million or 3% in the six months ended January 1, 2012,
compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2011. The increase in service
revenue in the first half of fiscal 2012 was primarily due to our continuing
stable levels of service contract renewals on our increasing installed base,
resulting in higher service revenue from the amortization of contracts initiated
in the first six months of fiscal 2012 and in the prior fiscal year.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit
The following table presents the gross profit on product and service revenues
and the gross profit percentage of product and service revenues for the three
and six months ended January 1, 2012 and December 26, 2010 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
January 1, December 26, $ % January 1, December 26, $ %
2012 2010 Change Change 2012 2010 Change Change
Gross profit:
Product $ 37,273 $ 39,441 $ (2,168 ) (5.5 )% $ 71,008 $ 77,824 $ (6,816 ) (8.8 )%
Percentage of
product revenue 54.7 % 56.1 % 54.1 % 55.8 %
Service 8,995 8,540 455 5.3 % 18,796 16,993 1,803 10.6 %
Percentage of
service revenue 61.1 % 57.7 % 61.8 % 57.8 %
Total gross
profit $ 46,268 $ 47,981 $ (1,713 ) (3.6 )% $ 89,804 $ 94,817 $ (5,013 ) (5.3 )%
% of Total
Revenue 55.9 % 56.4 % 55.2 % 56.1 %
|
Cost of product revenue includes costs of raw materials, amounts paid to
third-party contract manufacturers, costs related to warranty obligations,
charges for excess and obsolete inventory, royalties under technology license
agreements, and internal costs associated with manufacturing overhead, including
management, manufacturing engineering, quality assurance, development of test
plans, and document control. We outsource substantially all of our manufacturing
and supply chain management operations, and we conduct quality assurance,
manufacturing engineering, document control and distribution. Accordingly, a
significant portion of our cost of product revenue consists of payments to our
primary contract manufacturer, Alpha Networks, located in Hsinchu, Taiwan and
Dongguan, China. In addition, we source our wireless product line from Motorola
and resell most of the products under the Extreme Networks, Inc. brand.
Product gross profit decreased by $2.2 million and product gross margin
decreased to 55% from 56% in the three months ended January 1, 2012 compared to
the corresponding period of fiscal 2011. In the six months ended January 1,
2012, product gross profit decreased by $6.8 million and product gross margin
decreased to 54% from 56%, compared to the corresponding period of fiscal 2011.
The decreases in product gross profit and gross margin were primarily due to the
decrease in product revenue in the three and six months ended January 1, 2012
compared to the same periods in fiscal 2011, unfavorable profit impact from
product mix shifts, and to a lesser degree, increased sales discounts.
Cost of service revenue consists primarily of labor, overhead, repair and
freight costs and the cost of spares used in providing support under customer
service contracts. Service gross profit increased by $0.5 million and $1.8
million in the three and six months ended January 1, 2012, respectively. The
increase in gross profit in the second quarter of fiscal 2012 was primarily due
to favorable impact from lower labor and service product costs. The increase in
gross profit in the six months ended January 1, 2012 was primarily attributable
to the increase in service revenue, combined with lower labor and service
inventory costs.
Service gross margin improved to 61% from 58% in the three months ended January
1, 2012, and improved to 62% from 58% in the six months ended January 1, 2012,
compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal 2011. The improvement in service
gross margin was primarily due to a reduction in labor costs resulting from
headcount reduction and other cost-reduction measures, as well as lower costs of
service inventory resulting from product mix shifts.
Operating Expenses
The following table presents operating expenses and operating income (in
thousands, except percentages):
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
$ % $ %
January 1, 2012 December 26, 2010 Change Change January 1, 2012 December 26, 2010 Change Change
Sales and
marketing $ 22,734 $ 25,087 $ (2,353 ) (9.4 )% $ 44,855 $ 49,993 $ (5,138 ) (10.3 )%
Research and
development 11,082 12,028 (946 ) (7.9 )% 23,490 24,889 (1,399 ) (5.6 )%
General and
administrative 7,954 5,963 1,991 33.4 % 14,224 12,548 1,676 13.4 %
Restructuring,
net 437 - 437 100.0 % 1,392 - 1,392 100.0 %
Litigation
settlement - (4,200 ) 4,200 (100.0 )% - (4,200 ) 4,200 (100.0 )%
Total operating
expenses $ 42,207 $ 38,878 $ 3,329 8.6 % $ 83,961 $ 83,230 $ 731 0.9 %
Operating income $ 4,061 $ 9,103 $ (5,042 ) (55.4 )% $ 5,843 $ 11,587 $ (5,744 ) (49.6 )%
|
The following table highlights our operating expenses and operating income as a
percentage of net revenues:
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
January 1, 2012 December 26, 2010 January 1, 2012 December 26, 2010
Sales and marketing 27.5 % 29.5 % 27.7 % 29.6 %
Research and development 13.4 % 14.1 % 14.5 % 14.7 %
General and administrative 9.6 % 7.0 % 8.8 % 7.4 %
Restructuring, net 0.5 % - % 0.9 % - %
Litigation settlement - % (4.9 )% - % (2.5 )%
Total operating expenses 51.0 % 45.7 % 51.9 % 49.3 %
Operating income 4.9 % 10.7 % 3.6 % 6.9 %
|
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses consist of salaries, commissions and related
expenses for personnel engaged in marketing and sales functions, as well as
trade shows and promotional expenses. Sales and marketing expenses in the three
months ended January 1, 2012 decreased by $2.4 million, or 9%, compared to the
corresponding period of fiscal 2011. The decrease in sales and marketing
expenses was primarily due to a decrease of $1.3 million in employee-related
expenses. Other significant decreases in sales and marketing expenses in the
second quarter of fiscal 2012 included a decrease of $0.4 million in both
commission expense and professional fees, and a decrease of $0.3 million in both
travel and IT expenses.
Sales and marketing expenses for the six months ended January 1, 2012 decreased
by $5.1 million, or 10%, compared to the corresponding period of fiscal 2011.
The decrease in sales and marketing expenses was primarily due to a decrease of
$2.4 million in employee-related expenses resulting from headcount reduction and
a decrease of $0.9 million in commission expense due to the combined impact of
headcount reduction and lower revenue in the first six months of fiscal 2012
compared to the same period in fiscal 2011. Other decreases in sales and
marketing expenses in the six months ended January 1, 2012, primarily reflected
the effects of cost-cutting measures, including a decrease of $0.7 million in
both professional services and supplies expenses, and a decrease of $0.6 million
in travel expenses.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related
personnel expenses, consultant fees and prototype expenses related to the
design, development, and testing of our products. Research and development
expenses for the three months ended January 1, 2012 decreased by $0.9 million,
or 8%, compared to the corresponding period of fiscal 2011. The decrease in
research and development expenses was primarily due to a decrease of $1.7
million in employee-related costs, partially offset by an increase of $0.7
million in engineering project expenses.
Research and development expenses for the six months ended January 1,
2012 decreased by $1.4 million, or 6%, compared to the corresponding period of
fiscal 2011. The decrease in research and development expenses was primarily due
to a decrease of $2.6 million in employee-related and contract labor costs
resulting from headcount reduction, and a decrease of $0.6 million in supplies
and equipment costs, partially offset by an increase of $1.5 million in
engineering project expenses.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended January 1,
2012 increased by $2.0 million, or 33%, compared to the corresponding period of
fiscal 2011. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily
due to an increase of $1.8 million in legal expenses, largely attributable to
expenses incurred in connection with the trial of a lawsuit during the second
quarter and costs associated with a new lawsuit.
General and administrative expenses for the six months ended January 1,
2012 increased by $1.7 million, or 13%, compared to the corresponding period of
fiscal 2011. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily
due to increases of $1.9 million in legal expenses and $0.7 million in
accounting-related services, partially offset by a net decrease of $1.3 million
in employee-related expenses resulting from headcount reduction.
Restructuring, Net
In fiscal 2011, we implemented restructuring plans, involving among other
things, a reduction of our worldwide workforce. The associated restructuring
costs primarily consisted of cash severance, termination benefits and asset
impairments. During the three and six months ended January 1, 2012, we
recognized additional restructuring charges of approximately $0.6 million and
$1.6 million, respectively, primarily consisting of cash severance. As of
January 1, 2012, we had $0.7 million of restructuring liabilities remaining,
which we anticipate paying by the end of fiscal 2012.
Interest Income
The change in interest income in the three and six months ended January 1, 2012,
compared to the corresponding period of fiscal 2011 was insignificant.
Interest Expense
The decrease in interest expense in both the three and six months ended January
1, 2012, compared to the corresponding period of fiscal 2011 was insignificant.
Other Income / (Expense), Net
Other expense, net increased by approximately $0.2 million in the second quarter
of fiscal 2012, and other income, net increased by $0.2 million in the six
months ended January 1, 2012 compared to the corresponding periods of fiscal
2011. The changes in other income and expense primarily resulted from net
realized and unrealized gains from the settlement of accounts receivable and
accounts payable transactions and from the translation of certain assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies into U.S. dollars.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
We recorded an income tax provision of $0.2 million and $0.6 million for the
three months ended January 1, 2012 and December 26, 2010, respectively. We
recorded an income tax provision of $0.7 million and $0.4 million for the six
months ended January 1, 2012 and December 26, 2010, respectively. The income tax
provision for the three months ended January 1, 2012 consisted primarily of
taxes on foreign income and U.S. state income taxes, partially offset by a
benefit for the release of an unrecognized tax benefit due to the expiration of
statute of limitations. The income tax benefit for the three months ended
December 26, 2010 consisted primarily of taxes on foreign income and U.S. state
income taxes. The income tax provision for the six months ended January 1, 2012
consisted primarily of taxes on foreign income and U.S. state income taxes,
partially offset by a benefit for the release of an unrecognized tax benefit due
to the expiration of the statute of limitations. The income tax provision for
the six months ended December 26, 2010 consisted primarily of taxes on foreign
income and U.S. state income taxes, partially offset by a reversal of previously
recorded deferred tax liabilities. The income tax provisions for both fiscal
years were calculated based on the results of operations for the three and six
month periods ended January 1, 2012 and December 26, 2010, and may not reflect
the annual effective rate.
We have provided a full valuation allowance for our U.S. net deferred tax assets
after assessing both negative and positive evidence when measuring the need for
a valuation allowance. For the current quarter, evidence such as operating
losses during the most recent three-year period was given more weight than our
expectations of future profitability which are inherently uncertain.
Accordingly, we believe that there is sufficient negative evidence to maintain a
full valuation allowance against our U.S. federal and state net deferred tax
assets. This valuation allowance will be evaluated periodically and can be
reversed partially or totally if business results have sufficiently improved to
support realization of our U.S. deferred tax assets.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included elsewhere in this report are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these
unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue,
costs and expenses, and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances. In many instances, we could have reasonably used
different accounting estimates, and in other instances changes in the accounting
estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly,
actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by our
management. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. To
the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and
actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows will be affected.
As discussed in Part II, Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended July 3, 2011, we consider the following accounting policies
to be the most critical in understanding the judgments that are involved in
preparing our consolidated financial statements:
• Share-Based Compensation
• Revenue Recognition
• Inventory Valuation
• Long Lived Assets
• Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
• Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance
• Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
• Legal Contingencies
There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies since the filing of our last Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Recently Issues Accounting Pronouncements . . .
|
|