|
Quotes & Info
|
| XOHO.OB > SEC Filings for XOHO.OB > Form 10-Q on 9-Nov-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
9-Nov-2009
Quarterly Report
• our ability to broaden our customer reach and expand our market share;
• pursuit of growth opportunities; and
• the potential need to obtain future financing to fund our business plan and repay our scheduled obligations.
Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions
and are subject to a number of both known and unknown risks and uncertainties.
Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should our
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results in future periods may
differ materially from the future results, performance, and/or achievements
expressed or implied in this document. These risks include any failure by us to:
• generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our cash requirements and
execute our business strategy;
• prevail in our legal proceedings;
• increase the volume of traffic on our network; and
• achieve and maintain market penetration and revenue levels given the highly competitive nature of the telecommunications industry.
For a detailed discussion of risk factors affecting our business and operations, see Item 1A, Risk Factors in our 2008 Annual Report. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. These forward-looking statements should not be relied on as representing our estimates or views as of any subsequent date.
Executive Summary
We are a leading nationwide facilities-based competitive telecommunications
services provider that delivers a comprehensive array of telecommunications
solutions to large enterprises, medium and small business, government customers,
telecommunications carriers and service providers, and Internet content
providers. We believe our nationwide high-capacity network, advanced IP and
converged communications services, broadband wireless capabilities, and a
responsive, customer-focused orientation, among other things, differentiate us
from our competitors. We offer customers a broad range of managed voice, data
and IP services in more than 75 metropolitan markets across the United States.
In 2008 we retired all of our long-term debt through the sale of preferred stock
to entities affiliated with our Chairman. During 2009, we have used and plan to
continue using the remaining proceeds from such sale to fund our business and
growth initiatives, provide ongoing working capital for our business and pursue
additional opportunities which create value for our shareholders. We continue to
see opportunities to invest our capital and invested $148.9 million in fixed
assets for long-term growth during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
During the first nine months of 2009, we continued to see the results from a
number of initiatives previously implemented including the lighting of our
long-haul fiber network, development of the carrier/wholesale channel, and
expansion of our portfolio of services to business and enterprise customers. Our
prior capital expenditure investments significantly contributed to $64.7 million
of revenue growth for our core services. While our total revenue increased 3.9%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the year-ago period, we
were able to limit the corresponding increase in cost of service to 2.3% due
primarily to planned network optimization projects. Additionally, improvements
to our internal cost structure have driven the reduction in our selling, general
and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue to 32.3% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 from 34.1% for the year-ago period.
As a result of discontinuing Nextlink as a separate operating segment and
integrating its operations into our existing product offerings, we performed an
impairment evaluation of our LMDS licenses as of June 30, 2009. We determined
that the carrying value of these assets exceeded their fair value and recorded
an impairment charge of $8.3 million during the second quarter of 2009.
In 2008, XOC commenced an enterprise-wide transformation initiative intended to
enhance shareholder value through focusing on improving service delivery,
accelerating revenue growth, and reducing operating costs. These initiatives are
partially being realized in 2009, with further realization expected in 2010 and
beyond. In conjunction with this transformation initiative, we intend to
continue to invest in new network infrastructure, develop new service offerings
and continue expanding our customer base in high-growth markets.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 we recognized net income
of $19.0 million and $8.6 million, respectively. These results were primarily
derived from investment gains from the sale of marketable securities of
$16.3 million and $34.3 million in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, respectively.
We continue to monitor the impact of macro-economic conditions on our business.
Potential negative aspects include a general slowdown in the demand for
telecommunications services, delayed IT and other projects that have
telecommunications needs, elongated sales cycles on the part of our customers,
higher involuntary churn, and delayed payments from customers.
On July 9, 2009, we received a letter from ACF Holding, an entity wholly owned
by the Chairman that owns the majority of the Company's common shares, pursuant
to which ACF Holding made a non-binding proposal to acquire all of the Company's
outstanding common shares which it does not own, for consideration in the form
of cash of $0.55 net per share.
As reported in our recent 8-K filing, on September 28, 2009 the special
committee of the Board of Directors of XO Holdings, Inc. announced that it has
"unanimously concluded that the proposal of ACF Industries Holding Corp., an
affiliate of Carl C. Icahn and holder of a majority of the shares of XO
Holdings' common stock, to purchase all of the shares of XO Holdings' common
stock not currently held by ACF at a price of $0.55 per share substantially
undervalues the company, and, therefore, the special committee does not support
the proposal." The special committee communicated to Mr. Icahn that it would
consider a proposal that recognizes the full value of the company and reflects
the significant benefits that would accrue to ACF as a result of full ownership.
On October 23, 2009, ACF sent a letter to the special committee pursuant to
which ACF made a non-binding proposal to increase its previously outstanding
offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares which it does not own, to an
aggregate of $0.80 net per share in cash. The offer made on October 23, 2009
expired on October 26, 2009 at 6:00 pm (EST). The Chairman and other related
parties filed Amendment no. 22 to Schedule 13D on November 9, 2009. Such
amendment stated: "In the period following October 26, 2009, the stated
termination date of ACF Holding's $0.80 per share offer, representatives of ACF
Holding continued to discuss the matter with members of the Special Committee
and its advisors...Representatives of ACF Holding pointed out that the CLEC
industry faced difficult times ahead and that ACF Holding believed that its
offer of $0.80 per share was fair, especially in light of the fact that it
required a majority of the minority stockholders to vote for it in order to
become effective. Representatives of ACF Holding also pointed out that ACF
Holding had raised its proposed merger price from $0.55 to $0.80 per share
without receiving a counteroffer. They also stated that the initial offer was
made when the market price for the Shares was under $0.30 per share. In light of
all of the above facts, ACF Holding is now terminating its offer."
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are based on the
selection of accounting policies and the application of significant accounting
estimates, some of which require management to make significant assumptions. We
believe that some of the more critical estimates and related assumptions that
affect our financial condition and results of operations are in the areas of
revenue recognition, cost of service, allowance for uncollectible accounts,
assessment of loss contingencies and property and equipment. For more
information on critical accounting policies and estimates, see Item 7,
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in our 2008 Annual Report. We have discussed the application of these
critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of our Board
of Directors.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we did not change or adopt any
new accounting policies that had a material effect on our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
Results of Operations
The following table contains certain data from our unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30,
% of % of Change
2009 Revenue 2008 Revenue Dollars Percent
Revenue $ 382,000 100.0 % $ 373,925 100.0 % $ 8,075 2.2 %
Costs and expenses:
Cost of service* 217,712 57.1 % 210,925 56.4 % 6,787 3.2 %
Selling, general and
administrative 120,331 31.5 % 119,964 32.1 % 367 0.3 %
Depreciation and
amortization 43,288 11.3 % 47,847 12.8 % (4,559 ) -9.5 %
Loss on disposal of
assets 912 0.2 % 796 0.2 % 116 14.6 %
Total costs and
expenses 382,243 100.1 % 379,532 101.5 % 2,711 0.7 %
|
Loss from operations $ (243 ) -0.1 % $ (5,607 ) -1.5 % $ (5,364 ) -95.7 %
Nine Months Ended September 30,
% of % of Change
2009 Revenue 2008 Revenue Dollars Percent
Revenue $ 1,145,448 100.0 % $ 1,102,444 100.0 % $ 43,004 3.9 %
Costs and expenses:
Cost of service* 667,281 58.3 % 652,540 59.2 % 14,741 2.3 %
Selling, general and
administrative 369,418 32.3 % 375,531 34.1 % (6,113 ) -1.6 %
Depreciation and
amortization 129,593 11.3 % 140,515 12.7 % (10,922 ) -7.8 %
Impairment of LMDS
licenses 8,282 0.7 % - - 8,282 nm
Loss (gain) on
disposal of assets 4,989 0.4 % (37 ) nm 5,026 nm
Total costs and
expenses 1,179,563 103.0 % 1,168,549 106.0 % 11,014 0.9 %
|
Loss from operations $ (34,115 ) -3.0 % $ (66,105 ) -6.0 % $ (31,990 ) -48.4 %
* - exclusive of depreciation and amortization
nm - not meaningful
Revenue
Total revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 increased
2.2% and 3.9%, respectively as compared to the same periods in 2008, due to
growth in our core service offerings relating to Broadband services, formerly
reported as Data and IP services, partially as a result of the investments in
next-generation Broadband services combined with sales and marketing efforts
targeting these high-growth strategic services. This growth was partially offset
by decreases in Integrated/Voice and our older Legacy/TDM services which are
predominately deployed using TDM, circuit-switched voice technologies. Based on
continued investments which leverage next-generation Broadband technologies, we
expect revenue from Legacy/TDM services, as a percentage of our total revenue,
will continue to decline during 2009 as our sales continue to be focused on
next-generation Broadband solutions. Results for 2009 have been and
likely will continue to be sensitive to influences in a challenging
macro-economic environment and changes in the regulatory climate.
Revenue was earned from services provided in the following categories (dollars
in thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30,
% of % of Change
2009 Revenue 2008 Revenue Dollars Percent
Core services
Broadband $ 199,949 52.3 % $ 173,398 46.4 % $ 26,551 15.3 %
Integrated/Voice 69,151 18.1 % 77,799 20.8 % (8,648 ) -11.1 %
Total core services 269,100 70.4 % 251,197 67.2 % 17,903 7.1 %
Legacy/TDM services 112,900 29.6 % 122,728 32.8 % (9,828 ) -8.0 %
Total revenue $ 382,000 100.0 % $ 373,925 100.0 % $ 8,075 2.2 %
|
Core Services. For the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2008, we experienced continued growth in market
demand for telecommunications services utilizing next generation Broadband
technologies and transport services as evidenced by the 15.3% increase in
revenue from our Broadband services. This increase principally resulted from
revenue growth in IP VPN, IP Flex, Dedicated Private Line, and DIA services. IP
VPN revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2009 increased $7.7 million
compared to the year-ago period primarily due to continued strong response to
marketing efforts in 2008 following the product launch in late 2007. IP VPN
offers value compared to traditional private line solutions for secure local
access and demand continues to grow as a result. IP Flex is our flagship
integrated data and voice solution. Revenue from our IP Flex service for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 increased $4.8 million, or 18.6%, compared
to the year-ago period primarily due to our continued focus to move customers
from TDM-based solutions.
Also contributing significantly to the growth in our Core Broadband services was
the $4.2 million, or 6.0%, increase in Dedicated Private Line revenues for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the year ago period as a
result of our investments in our long-haul network. Revenue from our Broadband
services also increased as a result of a $2.4 million, or 5.8%, increase in DIA
revenue and a $5.1 million, or 69.5%, increase in wholesale VoIP origination and
termination services during the three months ended September 30, 2009 over the
year-ago period. VoIP termination revenue benefitted significantly from efforts
to optimize pricing relative to network capacity.
The growth in the Broadband category of our Core Services was partially offset
by a net reduction in Integrated/Voice revenue. This category contains more
mature bundled data and voice offerings introduced in 2000 such as XOptions and
Integrated Access, as well as traditional carrier long distance termination
("CLDT"). Revenue from CLDT increased $1.8 million, or 9.0%, compared to the
year-ago period. Like VoIP termination, CLDT was also impacted by market
conditions and our ability to operate within these market conditions. The gain
for CLDT
however was more than offset by the decrease in traditional TDM-based integrated
solutions as part of the customer demand shift to Broadband-enabled solutions.
Legacy/TDM Services. Voice and data services we consider to be legacy are
primarily deployed using TDM, circuit switched voice technologies. Legacy voice
and other services include basic business lines, switched trunks, local usage,
commercial traditional switched long distance, carrier reciprocal access, IVR,
voice conferencing, calling card and revenue from transaction-based pass-through
taxes.
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, revenue from our Legacy/TDM
services category decreased compared to the three months ended September 30,
2008 due primarily to declines in our legacy voice products, including retail
long distance usage. Our Legacy/TDM services comprise approximately one-third of
our installed customer base and generate a considerable percentage of our
revenue. We believe certain Legacy/TDM services continue to be an important part
of our overall service mix; however, sales and marketing efforts are focused on
promoting our Core Broadband services.
Nine Months Ended September 30,
% of % of Change
2009 Revenue 2008 Revenue Dollars Percent
Core services
Broadband $ 584,677 51.0 % $ 490,629 44.5 % $ 94,048 19.2 %
Integrated/Voice 216,440 18.9 % 245,764 22.3 % (29,324 ) -11.9 %
Total core services 801,117 69.9 % 736,393 66.8 % 64,724 8.8 %
Legacy/TDM services 344,331 30.1 % 366,051 33.2 % (21,720 ) -5.9 %
Total revenue $ 1,145,448 100.0 % $ 1,102,444 100.0 % $ 43,004 3.9 %
|
Core Services. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, revenue from our
Broadband services increased 19.2% compared to the year-ago period primarily due
to increased revenue from our IP VPN, IP Flex, Dedicated Private Line, and DIA
services. IP VPN revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 increased
$22.2 million compared to the year-ago period primarily due to continued strong
response to marketing efforts. Revenue from our IP Flex service for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 increased $16.9 million, or 24.0%, compared to
the year-ago period primarily due to our continued focus to move customers from
TDM-based solutions. Also contributing significantly to the growth in our Core
Broadband services was the $14.4 million, or 6.9%, increase in Dedicated Private
Line revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the
year-ago period as a result of our investments in our long-haul network. Revenue
from our Core Broadband services also increased as a result of a $13.2 million,
or 11.2%, increase in DIA revenue and a $12.6 million, or 62.9%, increase in
wholesale VoIP origination and termination services during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the year-ago period.
The growth in the Broadband category of our Core Services was partially offset
by a net reduction in Integrated/Voice revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 compared
to the year-ago period. Integrated/Voice revenue decreased due principally to
the decrease in traditional TDM-based integrated solutions as part of the demand
shift from XOptions to Broadband-enabled solutions. This decline was partially
offset by a $7.9 million, or 12.5%, increase in CLDT revenue for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to the year-ago period due to strong demand.
During the remainder of 2009, we expect Core Services revenue as a percentage of
total revenue to increase compared to 2008 as we continue to orient our
marketing focus to respond to the ongoing demand for these products and
services.
Legacy/TDM Services. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, revenue from
our Legacy/TDM services category decreased compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 due primarily to the $28.8 million, or 12.2%, decline in our
legacy voice products.
During the remainder of 2009, we expect our Legacy/TDM services revenue to
decrease compared to 2008 as we continue to orient our marketing focus to our
Core Services.
Cost of Service
Our cost of service ("COS") includes telecommunications services costs, network
operations costs and pass-through taxes. Telecommunications services costs
include expenses directly associated with providing services to customers, such
as the cost of connecting customers to our network via leased facilities,
leasing components of network facilities and interconnect access and transport
services paid to third-party service providers. Network operations include costs
related to network repairs and maintenance, costs to maintain rights-of-way and
building access facilities, and certain functional costs related to engineering,
network, system delivery, field operations and service delivery. Pass-through
taxes are taxes we are assessed related to selling our services which we pass
through to our customers. COS excludes depreciation and amortization expense.
The following table summarizes our cost of service by component (dollars in
thousands):
Three Months Ended September 30,
% of % of Change
2009 Revenue 2008 Revenue Dollars Percent
Telecommunications
services $ 154,499 40.5 % $ 150,021 40.1 % $ 4,478 3.0 %
Network operations 50,035 13.1 % 47,617 12.7 % 2,418 5.1 %
Pass-through taxes 13,178 3.4 % 13,287 3.6 % (109 ) -0.8 %
Total cost of
services $ 217,712 57.0 % $ 210,925 56.4 % $ 6,787 3.2 %
|
The COS increase for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 was mainly due to the increase in telecommunications services costs and network operation costs. The primary telecommunications services costs that contributed to the period over period increase were $11.3 million related to growth in sales of our Broadband service lines and the $4.7 million incremental increase in wholesale long distance usage costs. These increases were partially offset by $10.5 million of incremental cost savings achieved through planned network optimization projects completed as of September 30, 2009.
Network optimization projects are initiatives and actions we take to reduce our
costs associated with providing telecommunications services to our customers.
Network optimization projects include re-homing circuits to the nearest network
POP, hubbing circuits onto the same transport facility, moving network
facilities to lower cost providers, disconnection of capacity from third party
providers which is no longer required and other similar actions which vary in
type, size and duration.
Network operations costs for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared
to the same period in 2008 increased by $2.4 million, primarily due to a $1.5
million increase in technical sites software and related costs and $0.8 million
due to increases in building access rights of way.
Nine Months Ended September 30,
% of % of Change
2009 Revenue 2008 Revenue Dollars Percent
Telecommunications
services $ 478,729 41.8 % $ 468,474 42.5 % $ 10,255 2.2 %
Network operations 149,838 13.1 % 143,045 13.0 % 6,793 4.7 %
Pass-through taxes 38,714 3.4 % 41,021 3.7 % (2,307 ) -5.6 %
Total cost of
services $ 667,281 58.3 % $ 652,540 59.2 % $ 14,741 2.3 %
|
The telecommunications services increase for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 compared to the same period in 2008 was due primarily to $36.4 million of
growth in sales of our Broadband service lines and the $20.8 million incremental
increase in wholesale long distance usage costs. These increases were partially
offset by a $12.3 million decline in the cost of terminating wholesale long
distance usage as a result of traffic terminating to lower cost locations and
$29.6 million of incremental cost savings achieved through planned network
optimization projects completed as of September 30, 2009. Additionally, we
realized $5.1 million cost reductions during 2009 due to net favorable vendor
dispute settlements.
The network operations costs increased by $6.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. The increase was
attributed to a $3.4 million increase in technical sites software and related
costs and $2.4 million increase in building access rights of way.
. . .
|
|