|
Quotes & Info
|
| PVTB > SEC Filings for PVTB > Form 10-Q on 9-Nov-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
9-Nov-2009
Quarterly Report
• further deterioration in asset quality, including transactions extended directly for commercial real estate property investment, and to investors in real estate projects,
• difficult commercial real estate market conditions; collateral values and absorption of projects available for lease remaining soft,
• the effect of continuing weak economic conditions on industry segments, in addition to commercial real estate, causing an increase in under-performing and non-performing loans,
• changes in legal or regulatory requirements or the results of regulatory examinations that could adversely impact our business and financial condition or restrict growth, including our ability to pursue FDIC-assisted transactions,
• additional adverse developments in our loan or investment portfolios,
• any need to continue to further increase our allowance for loan losses,
• unforeseen difficulties, higher than expected costs and the inability to manage operational risks associated with the continued execution of our Strategic Growth Plan,
• fluctuations in market rates of interest and loan and deposit pricing in our market areas,
• the effect of margin pressure on our earnings,
• the failure to obtain on terms acceptable to us, or at all, the capital necessary to fund our growth and maintain our regulatory capital ratios, or those of our subsidiary banks, above the "well-capitalized" threshold,
• any charges related to asset impairments, including the impact of future losses on our deferred tax asset in future periods,
• inability to effectively manage interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk and operational risk,
• insufficient liquidity or funding sources or our inability to obtain the cost-effective funding necessary to fund our loan growth on terms that are acceptable to us,
• failure to capitalize on growth opportunities and to realize cost savings in connection with acquisitions,
• slower than anticipated growth of our business or business declines, including as a result of continuing negative economic conditions,
• inability to retain top management personnel due to inadequate incentive compensation arrangements, or legislation or regulations that restrict executive compensation,
• unforeseen difficulties relating to the mergers and integrations of our subsidiary banks,
• inability to comply with any requirements imposed on us or our subsidiary banks by our regulators, and the potential negative consequences that may result,
• statutory and regulatory restrictions and/or limitations on our ability to pay dividends or on our subsidiary banks' ability to pay dividends to us,
• unforeseen difficulties relating to the acquisition and integration of businesses acquired in purchase and assumption transactions, including certain assets of the former Founders Bank,
• competition,
• failure to improve operating efficiencies through expense controls,
• the possible dilutive effect of potential acquisitions, expansion or future capital raises, and
• risks and other factors set forth in Item 1A, "Risk Factors," of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Item 1A in this Form 10-Q.
Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results, performance
or achievements, or industry results, may be materially different from the
results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, our past
results of operations do not necessarily indicate our future results.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which
speak only as of the dates on which they were made. We are not undertaking an
obligation to update these forward-looking statements, even though our situation
may change in the future, except as required under federal securities law. We
qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") and are consistent with
predominant practices in the financial services industry. Critical accounting
policies are those policies that management believes are the most important to
our financial position and results of operations. Application of critical
accounting policies requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and
judgments based on information available at the date of the financial statements
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying
notes. Future changes in information may affect these estimates, assumptions,
and judgments, which, in turn, may affect amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements.
We have numerous accounting policies, of which the most significant are
presented in Note 1, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," to the
Consolidated Financial Statements of our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These
policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other consolidated
financial statement notes and in this discussion, provide information on how
significant assets and liabilities are valued in the consolidated financial
statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation
techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the
methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has
determined that our accounting policies with respect to the allowance for loan
losses, goodwill and intangible assets, and income taxes are the accounting
areas requiring subjective or complex judgments that are most important to our
financial position and results of operations, and, as such, are considered to be
critical accounting policies, as discussed below.
Allowance for Loan Losses
We maintain an allowance for loan losses at a level management believes is
sufficient to absorb credit losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The allowance
for loan losses represents our estimate of probable losses in the portfolio at
each balance sheet date and is based on a review of available and relevant
information. The allowance contains provisions for probable losses that have
been identified relating to specific borrowing relationships as well as probable
losses inherent in our loan portfolio and credit undertakings that are not
specifically identified. Our allowance for loan losses is assessed monthly to
determine the appropriate level of the allowance. The amount of the allowance
for loan losses is determined based on a variety of factors, including, among
other factors, assessment of the credit risk of the loans in the portfolio,
delinquent loans, impaired loans, evaluation of current economic conditions in
the market area, actual charge-offs and recoveries during the period, industry
loss averages and historical loss experience.
Management adjusts the allowance for loan losses by recording a provision for
loan losses in an amount sufficient to maintain the allowance at the level
determined appropriate. Loans are charged-off when deemed to be uncollectible by
management.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net
assets acquired using the purchase method of accounting. Other intangible assets
represent purchased assets that also lack physical substance but can be
distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other legal rights or
because the asset is capable of being sold or exchanged either on its own or in
combination with a related contract, asset, or liability. We test goodwill at
least annually for impairment or more often if events or circumstances indicate
that there may be impairment. Impairment losses on recorded goodwill, if any,
will be recorded as operating expenses.
Goodwill is allocated to business segments at acquisition. Fair values of
reporting units are determined using either market-based valuation multiples for
comparable businesses if available, or discounted cash flow analyses based on
internal financial forecasts. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its
net book value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired.
Identified intangible assets that have a finite useful life are amortized over
that life in a manner that reflects the estimated decline in the economic value
of the identified intangible asset and are subject to impairment testing
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may
not be recoverable. All of the other intangible assets have finite lives which
are amortized over varying periods not exceeding 15 years and include core
deposit premiums that use an accelerated method of amortization and client
relationship intangibles and assembled workforce which are amortized on a
straight line basis.
Income Taxes
The determination of income tax expense or benefit, and the amounts of current
and deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on a complex analyses
of many factors, including interpretation of federal and state income tax laws,
current financial accounting standards, the difference between tax and financial
reporting bases of assets and liabilities (temporary differences), assessments
of the likelihood that the reversals of deferred deductible temporary
differences will yield tax benefits and estimates of reserves required for tax
uncertainties.
We are subject to the federal income tax laws of the United States and the tax
laws of the states and other jurisdictions where we conduct business. We
periodically undergo examination by various governmental taxing authorities.
Such agencies may require that changes in the amount of tax expense be
recognized when their interpretations of tax law differ from those of
management, based on their judgments about information available to them at the
time of their examinations. There can be no assurance that future events, such
as court decisions, new interpretations of existing law or positions by federal
or state taxing authorities, will not result in tax liability amounts that
differ from our current assessment of such amounts, the impact of which could be
significant to future results.
Temporary differences may give rise to deferred tax assets or liabilities, which
are recorded on our Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. We assess
the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized in future periods based
on weighing both positive and negative evidence and establish a valuation
allowance for those deferred tax assets for which recovery is unlikely, based on
a standard of "more likely" than not. In making this assessment, we must make
judgments and estimates regarding the ability to realize these assets through:
(a) the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, (b) future
taxable income, (c) the possible application of future tax planning strategies,
and (d) carryback to taxable income in prior years. We have not established a
valuation allowance relating to our deferred tax assets at September 30, 2009.
However, there is no guarantee that the tax benefits associated with these
deferred tax assets will be fully realized. We have concluded, as of
September 30, 2009, that it is more likely than not that such tax benefits will
be realized.
In the preparation of income tax returns, tax positions are taken based on
interpretation of federal and state income tax laws for which the outcome of
such positions may not be certain. We periodically review and evaluate the
status of uncertain tax positions and may establish tax reserves for estimates
of amounts that may ultimately be due or owed (including interest). These
estimates may change from time to time based on our evaluation of developments
subsequent to the filing of the income tax return, such as tax authority audits,
court decisions or other tax law interpretations. There can be no assurance that
any tax reserves will be sufficient to cover tax liabilities that may ultimately
be determined to be owed. At September 30, 2009, we had $667,000 of tax reserves
established relating to uncertain tax positions that would favorably affect the
Company's effective tax rate if recognized in future periods.
THIRD QUARTER PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW
Overview
The Company reported a net loss of $31.2 million, or $0.68 per diluted share,
for the third quarter ended September 30, 2009, compared with a net loss of
$7.8 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, for the third quarter 2008. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, the net loss was $23.9 million, or $0.62
per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $30.7 million, or $1.07 per diluted
share, for the prior year period. Earnings for the third quarter 2009 were
negatively impacted by ongoing weakness in the economy and in particular its
impact on our commercial real estate borrowers, which directly impacted the
performance of our loan portfolio and the amount of provision we recorded to
maintain our allowance for loan losses in an amount adequate for GAAP accounting
purposes. Despite the earnings setback this quarter, we believe we continue to
meet many of the goals of our Strategic Growth Plan (the "Plan") announced in
the fourth quarter 2007 and remain well-positioned to seize market opportunities
that drive long-term shareholder value. We continue to be selective in the
clients we choose to do business with, opting for people and businesses we know
and with which we have relationships. Based on our strategy, loans and deposits,
due in large part to the FDIC-assisted acquisition of Founders Bank, have
continued to grow. Notable items for the third quarter 2009 include:
• provision for loan losses was $90.0 million and net charge-offs were
$37.3 million, resulting in an increased allowance for loan losses of
$192.8 million or 2.14% of total loans;
• net revenue grew 6% over the second quarter 2009 to $101.2 million, including $11.5 million from the Founders Bank transaction, from $95.8 million and net interest margin grew 10 basis points to 3.09% with Founders contributing 16 basis points to third quarter net interest margin;
• client deposits grew 21% from the second quarter, including $793.9 million from the Founders Bank transaction and $759.6 million of organic growth, while loans grew 3%, reflecting selectivity and market conditions; and
• total risk-based capital ratio was 13.40%, Tier 1 capital ratio was 11.01% and tangible common equity ratio was 6.00%.
Recent Developments
On November 2, 2009, we closed an underwritten public offering of common stock,
which included the full exercise of the underwriters' overallotment option, and
issued a total of 22.2 million shares for net proceeds of $181.2 million to the
Company after deducting underwriting commissions. Of that amount, approximately
$35.3 million was purchased by certain funds managed by GTCR Golder Rauner II,
L.L.C (collectively, "GTCR").
In addition, certain funds affiliated with GTCR, purchased approximately
$12.8 million of non-voting common stock of the Company, equating to 1.6 million
shares through an exercise of its existing preemptive rights. The net proceeds
from the public offering, as well as from the sale of non-voting common stock,
will qualify as tangible common equity and Tier 1 capital and will be used to
further capitalize our subsidiary banks in order to support continued growth and
for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including possible
FDIC-assisted acquisition transactions subject to satisfying eligibility
requirements to participate in such transactions.
At September 30, 2009 our total risk-based capital ratio was 13.40%, Tier 1
capital ratio was 11.01% and tangible common equity ratio was 6.00%. Giving
effect to the public offering and issuance of the non-voting common stock under
the preemptive rights agreement and on a pro-forma basis, at September 30, 2009
our capital ratios would have been 15.24%, 12.84% and 7.62% for total risk-based
capital, Tier 1 capital and tangible common equity, respectively.
In addition, upon completion of the offering, we are eligible to request that
the U.S. Department of the Treasury reduce the number of shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrant held by the U.S. Treasury by 50 percent to
645,013 shares.
Update on Founders Bank Transaction
On July 2, 2009, The PrivateBank - Chicago acquired all the non-brokered
deposits and certain assets of the former Founders Bank, which are reflected in
our unaudited consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2009. In
conjunction with the FDIC loss sharing agreement on the Founders transaction,
the acquired loans and foreclosed loan collateral, including the fair value of
expected FDIC reimbursements, is presented in our consolidated statement of
financial condition as "covered assets." In accordance with business combination
accounting rules, these loans were recorded at fair value without a related
allowance for loan losses. The transaction is contributing to the overall
execution of the Strategic Growth Plan according to management's expectations.
The client retention has been strong since the transaction, with total deposits
growing 3% to $793.9 million as of September 30, 2009, and we believe the
transaction provides us with a strong platform for cross-selling, new business
development and core funding opportunities.
Balance Sheet Growth
Total assets increased to $12.1 billion at September 30, 2009, from
$10.0 billion at December 31, 2008. Assets attributable to Founders totaled
$836.5 million at September 30, 2009. Total loans increased to $9.0 billion at
September 30, 2009, from $8.0 billion at December 31, 2008. Commercial loans,
including commercial and industrial and owner-occupied commercial real estate
loans, increased to 51% of the Company's total loans at September 30, 2009 from
49% of total loans at December 31, 2008. Commercial real estate loans were 29%
of total loans at September 30, 2009, compared to 30% of the Company's total
loans at December 31, 2008.
Total deposits were $9.6 billion at September 30, 2009, compared to $8.0 billion
at December 31, 2008. Deposits attributable to Founders totaled $793.9 million
at September 30, 2009. Client deposits increased to $8.9 billion at
September 30, 2009, from $6.0 billion at December 31, 2008. Client deposits at
September 30, 2009, include $981.7 million in client CDARS® deposits. Brokered
deposits (excluding client CDARS®) were 7% of total deposits at September 30,
2009, a decrease from 25% of total deposits at December 31, 2008.
Net Revenue Growth
Net revenue grew to $101.2 million in the third quarter 2009, including
$11.5 million attributable to Founders, from $65.2 million in the third quarter
2008. Net interest income improved to $87.4 million in the third quarter 2009,
including $9.8 million attributable to Founders, up from $52.6 million for the
third quarter 2008. Net interest margin (on a tax equivalent basis) was 3.09%
for the third quarter 2009, compared to 2.70% for the third quarter 2008. The
improvement in net interest margin was primarily the result of our interest
bearing liabilities repricing downward more quickly than our interest earning
assets. An increased client deposit base and repositioning within funding types
further served to reduce our cost of funds by 166 basis points. The inclusion of
Founders net interest income during the third quarter 2009 also aided our net
interest margin improvement by 16 basis points over the second quarter 2009.
Non-interest income was $12.9 million in the third quarter 2009, compared to
$11.7 million in the third quarter 2008. Founders contributed $1.6 million to
non-interest income in the third quarter 2009. Treasury management income was
$3.1 million in the third quarter 2009 compared to $600,000 in the third quarter
2008. Mortgage banking income increased to $1.8 million in the third quarter
2009, compared to $776,000 for the third quarter 2008. Banking and other
services income was $4.1 million in the third quarter 2009, compared to
$1.7 million in the third quarter 2008. Capital markets activities resulted in a
negative revenue position of $322,000, compared with income of $3.9 million in
the third quarter 2008, primarily due to a trading credit valuation adjustment
of $2.4 million.
Credit Quality
The combination of the need for specific reserves, deteriorating credit quality
and increased charge-offs necessitated the provisioning of $90.0 during the
third quarter 2009, compared to $30.2 million in the third quarter 2008.
Charge-offs were $40.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, offset
by recoveries of $2.8 million, and $109.5 million for the quarter ended December
31, 2008, offset by recoveries of $658,000. The allowance for loan losses as a
percentage of total loans was increased to 2.14% at September 30, 2009, compared
with 1.40% at December 31, 2008.
We had $396.6 million in total non-performing assets at September 30, 2009,
compared to $212.8 million at June 30, 2009 and $155.7 million at December 31,
2008, reflecting a continuing weakening credit environment. Non-performing
assets to total assets were 3.28% at September 30, 2009 compared to 1.94% at
June 30, 2009 and 1.55% at December 31, 2008. The elevated levels of
nonperforming loans and the increase in provision expense reflect ongoing
deterioration primarily in our commercial real estate portfolio but also across
select industry sectors. The increased level of loan loss coverage reflects
growth in non-performing assets and recognition of lower underlying collateral
values. During the quarter, deterioration of the commercial real estate
portfolio followed trends in the sector, including elevated commercial vacancy
rates, limited sales and financing activity, sponsor bankruptcies and downward
pressure on real estate values. The weak state of the economy continues to put
pressure on other business sectors represented in our portfolio, but not to the
degree seen in commercial real estate.
While a substantial majority of the commercial real estate loans that became
non-performing during the quarter were originated prior to November 2007, we
began to see several newer commercial (including Shared National Credits "SNCs")
and commercial real estate loans migrate to non-performing during the third
quarter. SNCs are defined as loan commitments of at least $20.0 million that are
shared by three or more financial institutions.
Expenses
Non-interest expense was $56.8 million in the third quarter, of which
$8.7 million relates to ongoing and defined transaction integration costs from
Founders, compared to $47.1 million in the third quarter 2008. The increase over
the third quarter 2008 reflects the ongoing investment in the Plan throughout
the year, increased Federal Deposit Insurance Company ("FDIC") insurance
premiums due to significant growth in insured deposits over the past year, an
increase in foreclosed property expense related to credit deterioration, and an
increase in salaries and benefits as well as professional fees related primarily
to the Founders transaction. The efficiency ratio was 56.2% in the third quarter
2009 compared to 72.2% in the third quarter 2008 primarily due to the reduction
in salaries and benefits as a result of a $9.8 million reversal of incentive
. . .
|
|