|
Quotes & Info
|
| COKE > SEC Filings for COKE > Form 10-Q on 6-Nov-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
6-Nov-2009
Quarterly Report
• Areas of Emphasis - a summary of the Company's key priorities.
• Overview of Operations and Financial Condition - a summary of key information and trends concerning the financial results for the third quarter of 2009 ("Q3 2009") and the first nine months of 2009 ("YTD 2009") and changes from the third quarter of 2008 ("Q3 2008") and the first nine months of 2008 ("YTD 2008").
• Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting Pronouncements - a discussion of accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of the Company's financial condition and results of operations and that require critical judgments and estimates and the expected impact of new accounting pronouncements.
• Results of Operations - an analysis of the Company's results of operations for Q3 2009 and YTD 2009 compared to Q3 2008 and YTD 2008.
• Financial Condition - an analysis of the Company's financial condition as of the end of Q3 2009 compared to year-end 2008 and the end of Q3 2008 as presented in the consolidated financial statements.
• Liquidity and Capital Resources - an analysis of capital resources, cash sources and uses, investing activities, financing activities, off-balance sheet arrangements, aggregate contractual obligations and hedging activities.
• Cautionary Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
The consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of the
Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries including Piedmont Coca-Cola
Bottling Partnership ("Piedmont"). The noncontrolling interest consists of The
Coca-Cola Company's interest in Piedmont, which was 22.7% for all periods
presented.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued new
guidance on accounting for the noncontrolling interest in the consolidated
financial statements. The Company implemented the new guidance effective
December 29, 2008, the beginning of the first quarter of 2009 ("Q1 2009"). The
new guidance changes the accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary (commonly referred to previously as
minority interest). Piedmont is the Company's only subsidiary that has a
noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest income of $1.0 million in Q3
2009, $2.0 million in YTD 2009, $.7 million in Q3 2008 and $1.7 million in YTD
2008 have been reclassified to be included in net income on the Company's
consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the amount of consolidated
net income attributable to both the Company and the noncontrolling interest are
shown on the Company's consolidated statements of operations. Noncontrolling
interest related to Piedmont totaled $52.4 million, $50.4 million and
$49.7 million at September 27, 2009, December 28, 2008 and September 28, 2008,
respectively. These amounts have been reclassified as noncontrolling interest in
the equity section of the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
Our Business and the Nonalcoholic Beverage Industry
The Company produces, markets and distributes nonalcoholic beverages, primarily
products of The Coca-Cola Company, which include some of the most recognized and
popular beverage brands in the world. The Company is the second largest bottler
of products of The Coca-Cola Company in the United States, distributing these
products in eleven states primarily in the Southeast. The Company also
distributes several other beverage brands. These product offerings include both
sparkling and still beverages. Sparkling beverages are carbonated beverages
including energy products. Still beverages are noncarbonated beverages such as
bottled water, tea, ready to drink coffee, enhanced water, juices and sports
drinks. The Company had net sales of approximately $1.5 billion in 2008.
The nonalcoholic beverage market is highly competitive. The Company's
competitors include bottlers and distributors of nationally and regionally
advertised and marketed products and private label products. In each region in
which the Company operates, between 85% and 95% of sparkling beverage sales in
bottles, cans and other containers are accounted for by the Company and its
principal competitors, which in each region includes the local bottler of
Pepsi-Cola and, in some regions, the local bottler of Dr Pepper, Royal Crown
and/or 7-Up products. During the last several years, industry sales of sugar
sparkling beverages, other than energy products, have declined. The decline in
sugar sparkling beverages has generally been offset by sales growth in other
nonalcoholic product categories. The sparkling beverage category (including
energy products) represents 82% of the Company's YTD 2009 bottle/can net sales.
The principal methods of competition in the nonalcoholic beverage industry are
point-of-sale merchandising, new product introductions, new vending and
dispensing equipment, packaging changes, pricing, price promotions, product
quality, retail space management, customer service, frequency of distribution
and merchandising, and advertising. The Company believes it is competitive in
its territories with respect to each of these methods.
Historically, operating results for the third quarter and the first nine months
of the fiscal year have not been representative of results for the entire fiscal
year. Business seasonality results primarily from higher unit sales of the
Company's products in the second and third quarters versus the first and fourth
quarters of the fiscal year. Fixed costs, such as depreciation expense, are not
significantly impacted by business seasonality.
The Company performs its annual impairment test of franchise rights and goodwill
as of the first day of the fourth quarter. During YTD 2009, the Company believes
it has not experienced any events or changes in circumstances that indicate the
carrying amounts of the Company's franchise rights or goodwill exceeded fair
values. As such, the Company has not performed an interim impairment test during
YTD 2009 and has not recognized any impairments of franchise rights or goodwill.
Net sales by product category were as follows:
Third Quarter First Nine Months
In Thousands 2009 2008 2009 2008
Bottle/can sales:
Sparkling beverages (including energy
products) $ 257,289 $ 258,200 $ 749,488 $ 762,741
Still beverages 59,694 66,160 166,629 186,020
Total bottle/can sales 316,983 324,360 916,117 948,761
Other sales:
Sales to other Coca-Cola bottlers 31,822 31,231 98,433 94,356
Post-mix and other 25,751 25,972 74,016 72,123
Total other sales 57,573 57,203 172,449 166,479
Total net sales $ 374,556 $ 381,563 $ 1,088,566 $ 1,115,240
|
Areas of Emphasis
Key priorities for the Company include revenue management, product innovation
and beverage portfolio expansion, distribution cost management and productivity.
Revenue Management
Revenue management requires a strategy which reflects consideration for pricing
of brands and packages within product categories and channels, highly effective
working relationships with customers and disciplined fact-based decision-making.
Revenue management has been and continues to be a key performance driver which
has a significant impact on the Company's results of operations.
Product Innovation and Beverage Portfolio Expansion
Sparkling beverages volume, other than energy products, has declined over the
past several years. Innovation of both new brands and packages has been and will
continue to be critical to the Company's overall revenue. The Company began
distributing Monster Energy® drinks in certain of the Company's territories
beginning in November 2008. The Company introduced the following new products
during 2007: smartwater®, vitaminwater®, vitaminenergy™, Gold Peak™ and Country
Breeze tea products, juice products from FUZE® (a subsidiary of The Coca-Cola
Company) and V8® juice products from the Campbell Soup Company. The Company also
modified its energy product portfolio in 2007 with the addition of NOS® products
from FUZE®.
In October 2008, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Hansen
Beverage Company ("Hansen"), the developer, marketer, seller and distributor of
Monster Energy® drinks, the leading volume brand in the United States energy
category. Under this agreement, the Company has the right to distribute Monster
Energy® drinks in certain of the Company's territories. The agreement has a term
of 20 years and can be terminated by either party under certain circumstances,
subject to a termination penalty in certain cases. In conjunction with the
execution of this agreement, the Company was required to pay Hansen
$2.3 million. This amount equals the amount that Hansen was required to pay to
the distributors of Monster Energy®drinks to terminate the prior distribution
agreements. The Company has recorded the payment to Hansen as distribution
rights and will amortize the amount on a straight-line basis to selling,
delivery and administrative ("S,D&A") expenses over the 20-year term of the
agreement.
In August 2007, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Energy
Brands Inc. ("Energy Brands"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Coca-Cola
Company. Energy Brands, also known as glacéau, is a producer and distributor of
branded enhanced beverages including vitaminwater®, smartwater® and
vitaminenergy™. The distribution agreement was effective November 1, 2007 for a
period of ten years and, unless earlier terminated, will be automatically
renewed for succeeding ten-year terms, subject to a one year non-renewal
notification by the Company. In conjunction with the execution of the
distribution agreement, the Company entered into an agreement with The Coca-Cola
Company whereby the Company agreed not to introduce new third party brands or
certain third party brand extensions in the United States through August 31,
2010 unless mutually agreed to by the Company and The Coca-Cola Company.
The Company has invested in its own brand portfolio with products such as Tum-E
Yummies™, a vitamin C enhanced flavored drink, Country Breeze tea and diet
Country Breeze tea and is the exclusive licensee of Cinnabon Premium Coffee
Lattes. These brands enable the Company to participate in strong growth
categories and capitalize on distribution channels that may include the
Company's traditional Coca-Cola franchise territory as well as third party
distributors outside the Company's traditional Coca-Cola franchise territory.
While the growth prospects of Company-owned or exclusive licensed brands appear
promising, the cost of developing, marketing and distributing these brands is
anticipated to be significant as well.
Distribution Cost Management
Distribution costs represent the costs of transporting finished goods from
Company locations to customer outlets. Total distribution costs amounted to
$138.7 million and $152.5 million in YTD 2009 and YTD 2008, respectively. Over
the past several years, the Company has focused on converting its distribution
system from a conventional routing system to a predictive system. This
conversion to a predictive system has allowed the Company to more efficiently
handle increasing numbers of products. In addition, the Company has closed a
number of smaller sales distribution centers over the past several years
reducing its fixed warehouse-related costs.
The Company has three primary delivery systems for its current business:
• bulk delivery for large supermarkets, mass merchandisers and club stores;
• advanced sales delivery for convenience stores, drug stores, small supermarkets and certain on-premise accounts; and
• full service delivery for full service vending customers.
Distribution cost management will continue to be a key area of emphasis for the
Company.
Productivity
A key driver in the Company's S,D&A expense management relates to ongoing
improvements in labor productivity and asset productivity. The Company continues
to focus on its supply chain and distribution functions for ongoing
opportunities to improve productivity.
Overview of Operations and Financial Condition
The following items affect the comparability of the financial results presented
below:
Q3 2009 and YTD 2009
• a $1.4 million and $5.3 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment to cost of sales related to the Company's 2010 and 2011 aluminum hedging programs in Q3 2009 and YTD 2009, respectively;
• a $1.7 million credit to income tax expense related to the agreement with a state tax authority to settle certain prior tax positions in Q1 2009;
• a $5.4 million credit to income tax expense related to the reduction of the liability for uncertain tax positions in Q3 2009 due mainly to the lapse of applicable statutes of limitations;
• a $.9 million and $2.9 million pre-tax favorable impact to S,D&A expenses in Q3 2009 and YTD 2009, respectively, due to a change in the estimate of the useful lives of certain cold drink dispensing equipment in Q1 2009;
• a $.1 million pre-tax unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment and $.9 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the Company's 2009 fuel hedging program in Q3 2009 and YTD 2009, respectively;
• a $.6 million pre-tax favorable adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the gain on the termination of a capital lease related to an operating facility in Q1 2009; and
• a $.5 million pre-tax unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment and $1.1 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the Company's 2010 fuel hedging program in Q3 2009 and YTD 2009, respectively.
Q3 2008 and YTD 2008
• a $13.8 million pre-tax charge to freeze the Company's liability to the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund ("Central States"), a multi-employer pension fund effective in Q3 2008, while preserving the pension benefits previously earned by Company employees covered by the plan;
• a $4.0 million pre-tax charge for restructuring expense related to the Company's plan initiated in Q3 2008 to reorganize the structure of its operating units and support services, which resulted in the elimination of approximately 350 positions;
• a $2.6 million adjustment to increase equity investment in a plastic bottle cooperative in YTD 2008; and
• a $.6 million pre-tax unfavorable mark-to-market adjustment and $1.2 million pre-tax favorable mark-to-market adjustment to S,D&A expenses related to the Company's 2008 fuel hedging program in Q3 2008 and YTD 2008, respectively.
The following overview provides a summary of key information concerning the Company's financial results for Q3 2009 and YTD 2009 compared to Q3 2008 and YTD 2008.
Third Quarter %
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) 2009 2008 Change Change
Net sales $ 374,556 $ 381,563 $ (7,007 ) (1.8 )
Gross margin 157,320 155,827 1,493 1.0
S,D&A expenses 131,024 149,384 (18,360 ) (12.3 )
Income from operations 26,296 6,443 19,853 NM*
Interest expense 8,866 9,406 (540 ) (5.7 )
Income (loss) before income taxes 17,430 (2,963 ) 20,393 NM*
Income tax provision (benefit) 1,043 (523 ) 1,566 NM*
Net income (loss) 16,387 (2,440 ) 18,827 NM*
Net income (loss) attributable to the Company 15,428 (3,145 ) 18,573 NM*
Basic net income (loss) per share:
Common Stock $ 1.68 $ (.34 ) $ 2.02 NM*
Class B Common Stock $ 1.68 $ (.34 ) $ 2.02 NM*
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
Common Stock $ 1.68 $ (.34 ) $ 2.02 NM*
Class B Common Stock $ 1.67 $ (.34 ) $ 2.01 NM*
|
* Not Meaningful
First Nine Months %
In Thousands (Except Per Share Data) 2009 2008 Change Change
Net sales $ 1,088,566 $ 1,115,240 $ (26,674 ) (2.4 )
Gross margin 464,576 467,625 (3,049 ) (0.7 )
S,D&A expenses 386,461 421,300 (34,839 ) (8.3 )
Income from operations 78,115 46,325 31,790 68.6
Interest expense 28,059 29,789 (1,730 ) (5.8 )
Income before income taxes 50,056 16,536 33,520 NM*
Income tax provision 11,928 7,135 4,793 67.2
Net income 38,128 9,401 28,727 NM*
Net income attributable to the Company 36,146 7,675 28,471 NM*
Basic net income per share:
Common Stock $ 3.94 $ 0.84 $ 3.10 NM*
Class B Common Stock $ 3.94 $ 0.84 $ 3.10 NM*
Diluted net income per share:
Common Stock $ 3.93 $ 0.84 $ 3.09 NM*
Class B Common Stock $ 3.92 $ 0.83 $ 3.09 NM*
|
* Not Meaningful
The Company's net sales decreased 1.8% in Q3 2009 compared to Q3 2008. The decrease in net sales was primarily due to a 1.2% decrease in bottle/can volume and a 1.8% decrease in average sales price per bottle/can unit. The decrease in bottle/can volume was primarily due to a volume decrease in bottled water. The decrease in average sales price per bottle/can unit was primarily due to lower per unit prices in sparkling products except energy products partially offset by higher per unit prices in energy products. The Company's net sales decreased 2.4% in YTD 2009 compared to YTD 2008. The decrease in net sales was primarily due to a 6.0% decrease in
bottle/can volume partially offset by a 2.3% increase in average sales price per
bottle/can unit. The decrease in bottle/can volume was primarily due to a
decrease in volume in all product categories except energy products. The
increase in average sales price per bottle/can unit was primarily due to
increased sales prices in all product categories except enhanced water products.
Gross margin dollars increased 1.0% in Q3 2009 compared to Q3 2008. The
Company's gross margin percentage increased to 42.0% for Q3 2009 from 40.8% for
Q3 2008. The increase in gross margin dollars and gross margin percentage was
primarily due to an increase in marketing funding support received primarily
from The Coca-Cola Company partially offset by lower bottle/can sales price per
unit. Gross margin dollars decreased .7% in YTD 2009 compared to YTD 2008. The
Company's gross margin percentage increased to 42.7% for YTD 2009 from 41.9% for
YTD 2008. The decrease in gross margin dollars was primarily due to lower
bottle/can volume and increases in raw material costs partially offset by higher
average sales price per bottle/can unit. The increase in gross margin percentage
in YTD 2009 compared to YTD 2008 was primarily due to higher sales prices per
unit and a decrease in cost of sales due to the Company's aluminum hedging
program partially offset by higher raw material costs.
S,D&A expenses decreased 12.3% in Q3 2009 from Q3 2008 and 8.3% in YTD 2009 from
YTD 2008. The decreases in S,D&A expenses in Q3 2009 from Q3 2008 and YTD 2009
from YTD 2008 were primarily attributable to decreases in salaries and wages,
decreases in fuel costs and decreased depreciation expense offset by increased
employee benefit costs and increased bonus expense. During Q3 2008, the Company
recorded a charge that resulted from a new collective bargaining agreement that
allowed the Company to freeze its liability for the union pension plan. During
Q3 2008, the Company also recorded restructuring expense related to the
Company's plan to reorganize the structure of its operating units and support
services.
Net interest expense decreased 5.7% in Q3 2009 compared to Q3 2008 and decreased
5.8% in YTD 2009 compared to YTD 2008. The decrease in YTD 2009 compared to YTD
2008 was primarily due to lower debt. The Company's overall weighted average
interest rate was 5.7% during both YTD 2009 and YTD 2008.
Net debt and capital lease obligations were summarized as follows:
Sept. 27, December 28, Sept. 28,
In Thousands 2009 2008 2008
Debt $ 552,882 $ 591,450 $ 591,450
Capital lease obligations 64,006 77,614 78,280
Total debt and capital lease obligations 616,888 669,064 669,730
Less: Cash and cash equivalents 25,062 45,407 20,583
Total net debt and capital lease obligations (1) $ 591,826 $ 623,657 $ 649,147
|
(1) The non-GAAP measure "Total net debt and capital lease obligations" is used to provide investors with additional information which management believes is helpful in the evaluation of the Company's capital structure and financial leverage.
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies, Estimates and New Accounting
Pronouncements
Critical Accounting Policies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has made a number of estimates
and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial
position in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under
different assumptions and conditions. The Company included in its Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2008 a discussion of the Company's
most critical accounting policies, which are those most important to the
portrayal of the Company's financial condition and results of operations and
require management's most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, often as
a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain.
The Company did not make changes in any critical accounting policies during YTD
2009. Any changes in critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed
with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company during the
quarter in which a change is made.
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued new guidance which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The new guidance does not require any new fair value measurements
but could change the Company's current practices in measuring fair value. The
new guidance was effective at the beginning of the first quarter of 2008 for all
financial assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities
recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. In February 2008,
the FASB issued additional guidance which deferred the application date of the
provisions of new guidance for all nonfinancial assets and liabilities until Q1
2009 except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis. The adoption of this new guidance did
not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements as
of YTD 2009, but could have a material effect in the future. See Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements for additional information.
In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance which established principles and
requirements for recognizing and measuring identifiable assets and goodwill
acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in an acquisition,
at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The new guidance was effective
for Q1 2009. The impact on the Company of adopting this new guidance will depend
on the nature, terms and size of business combinations completed after the
effective date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued new guidance to establish new accounting and
new reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary
(commonly referred to previously as minority interest) and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This new guidance was effective for the Company
as of the beginning of Q1 2009 and is being applied prospectively, except for
the presentation and disclosure requirements, which have been applied
retrospectively. The adoption of this new guidance did not have a significant
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued new guidance which amends and expands the
disclosure requirements relative to derivative instruments to provide an
enhanced understanding of why an entity uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and how they
. . .
|
|