|
Quotes & Info
|
| QELP > SEC Filings for QELP > Form 10-Q on 5-Nov-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
5-Nov-2009
Quarterly Report
Forward-looking statements
This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements that do not
directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. You can typically identify
forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words, such as "may,"
"will," "could," "project," "believe," "intend," "anticipate," "expect,"
"estimate," "continue," "potential," "plan," "forecast" and other words of
similar import. Forward-looking statements include information concerning
possible or assumed future results of our operations, including statements about
the Recombination, projected financial information, valuation information,
possible outcomes from strategic alternatives other than the Recombination, the
expected amounts, timing and availability of financing, availability under
credit facilities, levels of capital expenditures, sources of funds, and funding
requirements, among others.
These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans,
expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to
risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our
control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results
expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. Those factors include,
among others, the risk factors described in Part II, Item IA. "Risk Factors," as
well as the risk factors described in Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our 2008 Form
10-K/A.
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described
in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different
extent or at a different time than as described. You should consider the areas
of risk and uncertainty described above and discussed in Part II, Item IA. "Risk
Factors," as well as the risk factors described in Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in
our 2008 Form 10-K/A in connection with any written or oral forward-looking
statements that may be made after the date of this report by us. Except as may
be required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
Overview of QELP
We are a publicly traded master limited partnership formed in 2007 by Quest
Resource Corporation ("QRCP") to acquire, exploit and develop oil and natural
gas properties. Our principal oil and gas production operations are located in
the Cherokee Basin of southeastern Kansas and northeastern Oklahoma; Seminole
County, Oklahoma; and West Virginia and New York in the Appalachian Basin.
Operating Highlights
Our significant operational highlights include:
• We reduced production costs in the current quarter by $0.13 per Mcfe from
the prior year quarter.
• We sustained natural gas production levels similar to the prior year despite minimal current period capital expenditures on acquisition and development.
Financial Highlights
Our significant financial highlights include:
• We reduced total debt by $41.1 million since December 31, 2008.
• We increased cash and cash equivalents by $14.3 million since December 31, 2008.
• We repriced our derivatives during the second quarter of 2009 and received $26 million as a result.
Recent Developments
Global Financial Crisis and Impact on Capital Markets and Commodity Prices
Currently, there is unprecedented uncertainty in the financial markets. This
uncertainty presents additional potential risks to us and our subsidiaries and
affiliates. These risks include the availability and costs associated with our
borrowing capabilities and raising additional debt and equity capital.
Additionally, the current global economic outlook coupled with exceptional
unconventional resource development success in the U.S. has resulted in a
significant decline in natural gas prices across the United States. Gas price
declines impact us in two different ways. First, the basis differential from
NYMEX pricing to sales point pricing for our Cherokee Basin gas production has
narrowed significantly. Our Cherokee Basin basis differential averaged $0.49 per
Mmbtu in the third quarter of 2009 and was $0.23 per Mmbtu in October 2009 which
is down from an average of $1.79 per Mmbtu in the third quarter of 2008 and
$3.38 per Mmbtu in October 2008. The second impact has been the absolute value
erosion of natural gas prices. Our operations and financial condition are
significantly impacted by absolute natural gas prices. On September 30, 2009,
the spot market price for natural gas at Henry Hub was $3.30 per Mmbtu, a 53.7%
decrease from September 30, 2008.
For oil, worldwide demand has decreased by over 5% from 2007 levels creating
an oversupply environment similar to natural gas. The recent recovery of oil
prices into the $70 per barrel range has had a small positive impact on revenues
during the second half of 2009. Our management believes that managing price
volatility will continue to be a challenge. The spot market price for oil at
Cushing, Oklahoma at September 30, 2009 was $70.46 per barrel, a 30.0% decrease
from the price at September 30, 2008. It is impossible to predict the duration
or outcome of these price declines or the long-term impact on drilling and
operating costs and the impacts, whether favorable or unfavorable, to our
results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. Due to our relatively
low level of oil production relative to gas and our existing commodity hedge
positions, the volatility of oil prices had less of an effect on our operations.
Suspension of Distributions
We suspended distributions on our subordinated units starting with the third
quarter of 2008 and on all units starting with the fourth quarter of 2008.
Distributions on all of our units continue to be suspended. We do not expect to
have any available cash to pay distributions in 2009 and we are unable to
estimate at this time when such distributions may, if ever, be resumed. The
terms of our credit agreements restrict our ability to pay distributions, among
other things. Even if the restrictions on the payment of distributions under our
credit agreements are removed, we may continue to not pay distributions in order
to conserve cash for the repayment of indebtedness or other business purposes.
Even if we do not pay distributions, our unitholders may be liable for taxes
on their share of our taxable income.
Settlement Agreements
As discussed in our 2008 Form 10-K/A, we and QRCP filed lawsuits, related to
certain unauthorized transfers, repayments and re-transfers of funds (the
"Transfers") to entities controlled by Jerry D. Cash, our former chief executive
office, seeking, among other things, to recover the funds that were transferred.
On May 19, 2009, we, QRCP, and Quest Midstream Partners, L.P. ("Quest
Midstream") entered into settlement agreements with Mr. Cash, the
controlled-entity and the other owners to settle this litigation. Under the
terms of the settlement, and based on a settlement allocation agreed to by our
board of directors and the board of directors of QRCP, QRCP received
(1) approximately $2.4 million in cash and (2) 60% of the controlled-entity's
interest in a gas well located in Louisiana and a landfill gas development
project located in Texas and we received Mr. Cash's interest in STP Newco, Inc
("STP") which consisted of 100% of the common stock of the company.
While QRCP estimated the value of these assets to be less than the amount of
the unauthorized transfers and cost of the internal investigation, Mr. Cash
represented that they comprised substantially all of Mr. Cash's net worth and
the majority of the value of the controlled-entity. We and QRCP did not take
Mr. Cash's stock in QRCP, which he represented had been pledged to secure
personal loans with a principal balance far in excess of the current market
value of the stock.
STP owns interests in certain oil producing properties in Oklahoma, and other
assets and liabilities. STP's accounting and operation records provided to us,
at the date of the settlement, were in poor condition and we are in the process
of reconstructing the financial records in order to determine the estimated fair
value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the
settlement. Based on documents QRCP received prior to the settlement, the
estimated fair value of the net assets to be assumed was expected to provide us
reimbursement for all of the costs of the internal investigation and the costs
of the litigation against Mr. Cash that have been paid by us; however, the
financial information we received prior to closing contained errors related to
Mr. Cash's ownership interests in the properties as well as amounts due vendors
and royalty owners. Based on work performed to date, we and QRCP, believe that
the actual estimated fair value of net assets of STP that we received is less
than previously expected. We and QRCP expect to complete our analysis of STP's
financial information and our final valuation of the oil producing properties
obtained from STP by December 31, 2009. We and QRCP also are in the process of
determining what further actions can be taken with regards to this matter and
intend to pursue all remedies available under the law.
Based on the information available at this time, we have valued the known
assets and liabilities. As additional information becomes available other assets
and/or liabilities may be identified and recorded. The fair value of the assets
and liabilities we received is as follows (in thousands):
Oil & gas properties $ 1,076
Current liabilities (326 )
Long-term debt (719 )
Net assets received $ 31
|
Recombination
On July 2, 2009, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger
Agreement") with QRCP, Quest Midstream, and other parties thereto pursuant to
which, following a series of mergers and an entity conversion, QRCP, QELP and
the successor to Quest Midstream will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of
PostRock Energy Corporation ("PostRock"), a new, publicly-traded corporation
(the "Recombination"). On October 2, 2009, the Merger Agreement was amended to,
among other things, reflect certain technical changes as a result of an internal
restructuring. On October 6, 2009, PostRock filed with the SEC a registration
statement on Form S-4, which included a joint proxy statement/prospectus,
relating to the Recombination.
While we are working toward the completion of the Recombination before the
end of 2009; it remains subject to the satisfaction of a number of conditions,
including, among others, the arrangement of one or more satisfactory credit
facilities for PostRock and its subsidiaries, the approval of the transaction by
our unitholders, the unitholders of Quest Midstream and the stockholders of
QRCP, and consents from each entity's existing lenders. There can be no
assurance that these conditions will be met or that the Recombination will
occur.
Upon completion of the Recombination, the equity of PostRock would be owned
approximately 44% by current Quest Midstream common unitholders, approximately
33% by our current common unitholders (other than QRCP), and approximately 23%
by current QRCP stockholders.
Additionally, in connection with the Merger Agreement, on July 2, 2009, we
entered into a Support Agreement with QRCP, Quest Midstream and certain Quest
Midstream unitholders (the "Support Agreement"), which was amended on October 2,
2009 to, among other things, add an additional Quest Midstream common unitholder
as a party. Pursuant to the Support Agreement, as amended, QRCP has, subject to
certain conditions, agreed to vote the common and subordinated units of us and
Quest Midstream that it owns in favor of the Recombination and the holders of
approximately 73% of the common units of Quest Midstream have, subject to
certain conditions, agreed to vote their common units in favor of the
Recombination.
Results of Operations
The following discussion of financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the related notes, which are included elsewhere in this report.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2008
Overview. Operating data for the periods indicated are as follows (in
thousands):
Three Months Ended
September 30, Increase/
2009 2008 (Decrease)
Oil and gas sales $ 18,151 $ 49,454 $ (31,303 ) (63.3 )%
Oil and gas production costs $ 8,458 $ 9,821 $ (1,363 ) (13.9 )%
Transportation expense $ 10,879 $ 8,583 $ 2,296 26.8 %
Depreciation, depletion and amortization $ 9,076 $ 13,196 $ (4,120 ) (31.2 )%
General and administrative expenses $ 5,570 $ 734 $ 4,836 658.9 %
Gain from derivative financial instruments $ 8,752 $ 145,132 $ (136,380 ) (94.0 )%
Interest expense, net $ 3,370 $ 4,354 $ (984 ) (22.6 )%
|
Production. Oil and gas production data for the periods indicated are as follows:
Three Months Ended
September 30, Increase/
2009 2008 (Decrease)
Production Data:
Natural gas production (Mmcf) 5,317 5,694 (377 ) (6.6 )%
Oil production (Mbbl) 20 19 1 5.3 %
Total production (Mmcfe) 5,437 5,808 (371 ) (6.4 )%
Average daily production (Mmcfe/d) 59.1 63.1 (4.0 ) (6.3 )%
Average Sales Price per Unit:
Natural gas (Mcf) $ 3.18 $ 8.30 $ (5.12 ) (61.7 )%
Oil (Bbl) $ 64.21 $ 116.89 $ (52.68 ) (45.1 )%
Natural gas equivalent (Mcfe) $ 3.34 $ 8.51 $ (5.17 ) (60.8 )%
Average Unit Costs per Mcfe:
Production costs $ 1.56 $ 1.69 $ (0.13 ) (7.7 )%
Transportation expense $ 2.00 $ 1.48 $ 0.52 35.1 %
Depreciation, depletion and amortization $ 1.67 $ 2.27 $ (0.60 ) (26.4 )%
|
Oil and Gas Sales. Oil and gas sales decreased $31.3 million, or 63.3%, to
$18.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, from $49.5 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was the result of a
decrease in average realized prices and a small decrease in volumes. The
decrease in the average realized price accounted for $30.1 million of the
decrease. Our average product prices, which exclude hedge settlements, on an
equivalent basis (Mcfe) decreased to $3.34 per Mcfe for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 from $8.51 per Mcfe for the three months ended September 30,
2008. A decline in volumes of 371 Mmcfe for the quarter further reduced oil and
gas sales by $1.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Oil and Gas Operating Expenses. Oil and gas operating expenses consist of oil
and gas production costs, which include lease operating expenses, severance
taxes and ad valorem taxes, and transportation expense. Oil and gas operating
expenses increased $0.9 million, or 5.1%, to $19.3 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, from $18.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
Oil and gas production costs decreased $1.4 million, or 13.9%, to
$8.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, from $9.8 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due
to cost-cutting measures that began in the third quarter of 2008 continuing into
the current year, including a reduction in field headcount by approximately half
while simultaneously reducing overtime hours for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2008. In addition, well service improvement measures resulted in
fewer wells going offline, reduced loss of production due to offline wells, and
fewer well repairs in the current period. Production costs including gross
production taxes and ad valorem taxes were $1.56 per Mcfe for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $1.69 per Mcfe for the three months
ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in per unit cost was due to the
cost-cutting and well service improvement measures discussed above.
Transportation expense increased $2.3 million, or 26.8%, to $10.9 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009, from $8.6 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008. The increase was primarily due to an increase
in the contracted transportation rate. Transportation expense was $2.00 per Mcfe
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $1.48 per Mcfe for
the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization. We are subject to variances in our
depletion rates from period to period due to changes in our proved oil and gas
reserve quantities, production levels, product prices and changes in the
depletable cost basis of our oil and gas properties. Our depreciation, depletion
and amortization decreased approximately $4.1 million, or 31.2% , for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 to $9.1 million from $13.2 million in 2008. On a
per unit basis, we had a decrease of $0.60 per Mcfe to $1.67 per Mcfe for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 from $2.27 per Mcfe for the three months
ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to the impairment of
our oil and gas properties in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter
of 2009, which decreased our rate per unit, as well as the resulting decrease in
the depletable pool.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses
increased $4.8 million, or 658.9%, to $5.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, from $0.7 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008. The increase is primarily due to increased accounting and audit fees
related to our reaudits and restatements as well as increased legal,
professional and investment banker fees related to our Recombination activities.
Gain from Derivative Financial Instruments. Gain from derivative financial
instruments decreased $136.4 million to $8.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, from $145.1 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008. We recorded a $19.6 million realized gain and $10.9 million unrealized
loss on our derivative contracts for the three months ended September 30, 2009
compared to a $7.5 million realized loss and $152.7 million unrealized gain for
the three months ended September 30, 2008. Unrealized gains and losses are
attributable to changes in oil and natural gas prices and volumes hedged from
one period end to another.
Interest Expense, net. Interest expense, net, decreased $1.0 million, or
22.6% , to $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, from
$4.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in
interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2008, is due both to lower average outstanding
debt levels and to lower interest rates.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2008
Overview. Operating data for the periods indicated are as follows (in
thousands):
Nine Months Ended
September 30, Increase/
2009 2008 (Decrease)
Oil and gas sales $ 56,260 $ 136,908 $ (80,648 ) (58.9 )%
Oil and gas production costs $ 23,216 $ 34,104 $ (10,888 ) (31.9 )%
Transportation expense $ 31,272 $ 25,921 $ 5,351 20.6 %
Depreciation, depletion and amortization $ 24,766 $ 34,750 $ (9,984 ) (28.7 )%
General and administrative expenses $ 13,249 $ 5,501 $ 7,748 140.8 %
Impairment of oil and gas properties $ 95,169 $ - $ 95,169 *
Gain (loss) from derivative financial
instruments $ 31,078 $ (4,482 ) $ 35,560 793.4 %
Interest expense, net $ 11,274 $ 8,747 $ 2,527 28.9 %
|
* Not meaningful
Production. Oil and gas production data for the periods indicated are as follows:
Nine Months Ended
September 30, Increase/
2009 2008 (Decrease)
Production Data:
Natural gas production (Mmcf) 16,107 15,755 352 2.2 %
Oil production (Mbbl) 60 47 13 27.7 %
Total production (Mmcfe) 16,467 16,037 430 2.7 %
Average daily production (Mmcfe/d) 60.3 58.5 1.8 3.1 %
Average Sales Price per Unit:
Natural gas (Mcf) $ 3.30 $ 8.36 $ (5.06 ) (60.5 )%
Oil (Bbl) $ 52.27 $ 110.40 $ (58.13 ) (52.7 )%
Natural gas equivalent (Mcfe) $ 3.42 $ 8.54 $ (5.12 ) (60.0 )%
Average Unit Costs per Mcfe:
Production costs $ 1.41 $ 2.13 $ (0.72 ) (33.8 )%
Transportation expense $ 1.90 $ 1.62 $ 0.28 17.3 %
Depreciation, depletion and amortization $ 1.50 $ 2.17 $ (0.67 ) (30.9 )%
|
Oil and Gas Sales. Oil and gas sales decreased $80.6 million, or 58.9%, to
$56.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, from $136.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was the result of a
decrease in average realized prices, partially offset by higher volumes. The
decrease in the average realized price accounted for $82.1 million of the
decrease. Our average product prices, which exclude hedge settlements, on an
equivalent basis (Mcfe) decreased to $3.42 per Mcfe for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 from $8.54 per Mcfe for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. This decrease was offset by slightly higher volumes of 430 Mmcfe,
resulting in increased oil and gas sales of $1.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The increased volumes resulted from the PetroEdge acquisition.
Oil and Gas Operating Expenses. Oil and gas operating expenses consist of oil
and gas production costs, which include lease operating expenses, severance
taxes and ad valorem taxes, and transportation expense. Oil and gas operating
expenses decreased $5.5 million, or 9.2%, to $54.5 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, from $60.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Oil and gas production costs decreased $10.9 million, or 31.9% to
$23.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, from $34.1 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to
cost-cutting and well service improvement measures such as a reduction in field
headcount by approximately one-third while overtime hours were simultaneously
reduced for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. The reductions came at the same time we absorbed the
operations of PetroEdge, which increased our total production, further reducing
our cost per Mcfe. In addition, well service improvement measures resulted in
fewer wells going offline, reduced loss of production due to offline wells, and
fewer well repairs in the current period compared to the prior period.
Production costs including gross production taxes and ad valorem taxes were
$1.41 per Mcfe for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $2.13
per Mcfe for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in per unit
cost was due to the cost-cutting and well service improvement measures discussed
above, as well as higher volumes over which to spread fixed costs.
Transportation expense increased $5.4 million, or 20.6%, to $31.3 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, from $25.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. The increase was due to an increase in the contracted
transportation rate and increased volumes. Transportation expense was $1.90 per
Mcfe for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared to $1.62 per Mcfe
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization. We are subject to variances in our
depletion rates from period to period due to changes in our oil and gas reserve
quantities, production levels, product prices and changes in the depletable cost
basis of our oil and gas properties. Our depreciation, depletion and
amortization decreased approximately $10.0 million, or 28.7%, for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 to $24.8 million from $34.8 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. On a per unit basis, we had a decrease of $0.67
per Mcfe to $1.50 per Mcfe for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from
$2.17 per Mcfe for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was
primarily due to the impairments of our oil and gas properties in the fourth
quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, offset by decreases in proved
reserves due to the effect of lower prices.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses
increased $7.7 million, or 140.8%, to $13.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, from $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. The increase is primarily due increased legal, audit and other
professional fees in connection with the restatement and reaudits of our
financial statements as well as increased legal, professional and investment
banker fees related to our Recombination activities.
. . .
|
|