|
Quotes & Info
|
| NRP > SEC Filings for NRP > Form 10-Q on 5-Nov-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
5-Nov-2009
Quarterly Report
The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and notes
thereto included elsewhere in this filing and the financial statements and
footnotes included in the Natural Resource Partners L.P. Form 10-K, as filed on
February 27, 2009.
Executive Overview
Our Business
We engage principally in the business of owning, managing and leasing coal
properties in the three major coal-producing regions of the United States:
Appalachia, the Illinois Basin and the Western United States. As of December 31,
2008, we owned or controlled approximately 2.1 billion tons of proven and
probable coal reserves, of which 59% are low sulfur coal. We lease coal reserves
to experienced mine operators under long-term leases that grant the operators
the right to mine and sell coal from our reserves in exchange for royalty
payments.
Our revenue and profitability are dependent on our lessees' ability to mine
and market our coal reserves. Most of our coal is produced by large companies,
many of which are publicly traded, with experienced and professional sales
departments. A significant portion of our coal is sold by our lessees under coal
supply contracts that have terms of one year or more. However, over the long
term, our coal royalty revenues are affected by changes in the market for and
the market price of coal.
In our coal royalty business, our lessees make payments to us based on the
greater of a percentage of the gross sales price or a fixed royalty per ton of
coal they sell, subject to minimum monthly, quarterly or annual payments. These
minimum royalties are generally recoupable over a specified period of time
(usually three to five years) if sufficient royalties are generated from coal
production in those future periods. We do not recognize these minimum coal
royalties as revenue until the applicable recoupment period has expired or they
are recouped through production. Until recognized as revenue, these minimum
royalties are recorded as deferred revenue, a liability on our balance sheet.
In addition to coal royalty revenues, we generated approximately 22% of our
year- to-date and third quarter revenues from other sources in both 2008 and
2009. These other sources include: aggregate royalties; coal processing and
transportation fees; rentals; royalties on oil and gas; timber; overriding
royalties; and wheelage payments.
Our Current Liquidity Position
As of September 30, 2009 we had $278 million in available capacity under our
existing credit facility, which does not mature until March 2012, as well as
approximately $61 million in cash. In connection with the Colt acquisition in
the third quarter, the holders of our incentive distribution rights agreed to
forego approximately $7.35 million in distributions with respect to each of the
third and fourth quarters of 2009, giving us approximately $14.7 million of
additional liquidity. In addition, because we amortize substantially all of our
long-term debt, we have no need to pay off or refinance any debt obligations
other than our regularly scheduled principal payments.
Pursuant to purchase and sale agreements in connection with the Blue Star and
Colt acquisitions, we anticipate funding an additional $257 million over the
next 27 months, of which approximately $175 million is anticipated to be funded
over the next 12 months, as the sellers achieve various development milestones.
We anticipate funding these acquisitions through the use of the available
capacity under our credit facility and through the issuance of debt and/or
equity in the capital markets. We believe that we have enough liquidity to meet
our current capital needs.
Current Results
As of September 30, 2009, our reserves were subject to 206 leases with 75
lessees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our lessees produced
35.5 million tons of coal generating $148.3 million in coal royalty revenues
from our properties, and our total revenues were $190.2 million.
As a result of declines in production in the first nine months, we recorded
lower than expected revenues for the periods ended September 30, 2009. The
difficult economic environment and very low prices for natural gas, a competing
fuel, impacted demand for coal, particularly within heavily industrialized
regions where coal is the dominant generating fuel. While we do not have much
visibility into the future of the coal markets, several public coal companies
have indicated that they are starting to see signs of a recovery. We expect that
during the remainder of 2009, we will experience gradual improvements similar to
the changes we have seen in the latter part of the first nine months, but do not
expect material improvement during the remainder of this year.
Even though coal royalty revenues from our Appalachian properties represented
67% of our total revenues in the first nine months of 2009, this percentage has
continued to decline as we are diligently working to diversify our holdings by
expanding our presence in the Illinois Basin. Through our relationship with the
Cline Group, we expect our Illinois Basin assets to contribute even more
significantly to our total revenues in the remainder of 2009 and 2010.
Because we have significant exposure to metallurgical coal, we are feeling
the effects of the global reduction in demand for steel. Several of the
metallurgical coal producers on our properties temporarily ceased production
during the second quarter, but gradually started calling miners back to work in
the third quarter although metallurgical coal prices, which have recently
increased off of their lows for the year, should remain steady for the remainder
of the year. Approximately 30% of our coal royalty revenues and 23% of the
related production during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were from
metallurgical coal.
Political, Legal and Regulatory Environment
The political, legal and regulatory environment is becoming increasingly
difficult for the coal industry. In June 2009, the White House Council on
Environmental Quality announced a Memorandum of Understanding among the
Environmental Protection Agency, or "EPA", Department of Interior, and the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers concerning the permitting and regulation of coal mines
in Appalachia. While the Council described this memorandum as an "unprecedented
step[s] to reduce environmental impacts of mountaintop coal mining," the
memorandum broadly applies to all forms of coal mining in Appalachia. The
memorandum contemplates both short-term and long-term changes to the process for
permitting and regulating coal mines in Appalachia.
These new processes impact only six Appalachian states. In connection with
this initiative, the EPA has used its authority to create significant delays in
the issuance of new permits and the modification of existing permits. The
all-encompassing nature of the changes suggests that implementation of the
memorandum will generate continued uncertainty regarding the permitting of coal
mines in Appalachia for some time and inevitably will lead, at a minimum, to
substantial delays and increased costs.
In addition to the increased oversight of the EPA, the Mine Safety and Health
Administration, or MSHA, has increased its involvement in the approval and
enforcement of safety issues in connection with mining. MSHA's involvement has
increased the cost of mining due to more frequent citations and much higher
fines imposed on our lessees as well as the overall cost of regulatory
compliance. Combined with the difficult economic environment and the higher
costs of mining in general, MSHA's recent increased participation in the mine
development process could significantly delay the opening of new mines.
In April 2009, the EPA issued a notice of its findings and determination that
emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and other "greenhouse gases," or "GHGs,"
presented an endangerment to human health and the environment because such gases
are, according to EPA, contributing to warming of the earth's atmosphere and
other climatic changes. Finalization of EPA's finding and determination will
allow it to begin regulating emissions of GHGs under existing provisions of the
federal Clean Air Act. In September 2009, EPA proposed two sets of regulations
in response to its finding and determination, one to reduce emissions of GHGs
from motor vehicles and the other to control emissions from large stationary
sources, including coal-fired electric power plants. Although the motor vehicle
rules are expected to be adopted in March 2010, it may take EPA several years to
adopt and impose regulations limiting emissions of GHGs from stationary sources.
Any limitation on emissions of GHGs from our operations and equipment could
require us to incur costs to reduce emissions of GHGs associated with our
operations. Similarly, any limitation on emissions of GHGs from the operations
of consumers of coal could cause them to incur additional costs and reduce the
demand for coal.
Finally, on June 26, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives approved
adoption of the "American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009," also known as
the "Waxman-Markey cap-and-trade legislation" or ACESA. The purpose of ACESA is
to control and reduce emissions of GHGs in the United States. GHGs are certain
gases, including carbon dioxide and methane, that may be contributing to warming
of the Earth's atmosphere and other climatic changes. The net effect of ACESA
will be to impose increasing costs on the combustion of carbon-based fuels such
as coal.
The U.S. Senate has begun work on its own legislation for controlling and
reducing emissions of GHGs in the United States. If the Senate adopts GHG
legislation that is different from ACESA, the Senate legislation would need to
be reconciled with ACESA and both chambers would be required to approve
identical legislation before it could become law. President Obama has indicated
that he is in support of the adoption of legislation to control and reduce
emissions of GHGs through an emission allowance permitting system that results
in fewer allowances being issued each year but that allows parties to buy, sell
and trade allowances as needed to fulfill their GHG emission obligations.
Although it is not possible at this time to predict whether or when the Senate
may act on climate change legislation or how any bill approved by the Senate
would be reconciled with ACESA, any laws or regulations that may be adopted to
restrict or reduce emissions of GHGs could have an adverse effect on demand for
our coal.
Distributable Cash Flow
Under our partnership agreement, we are required to distribute all of our
available cash each quarter. Because distributable cash flow is a significant
liquidity metric that is an indicator of our ability to generate cash flows at a
level that can sustain or support an increase in quarterly cash distributions
paid to our partners, we view it as the most important measure of our success as
a company. Distributable cash flow is also the quantitative standard used in the
investment community with respect to publicly traded partnerships.
Our distributable cash flow represents cash flow from operations less actual
principal payments and cash reserves set aside for scheduled principal payments
on our senior notes. Although distributable cash flow is a "non-GAAP financial
measure," we believe it is a useful adjunct to net cash provided by operating
activities under GAAP. Distributable cash flow is not a measure of financial
performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash
flows from operating, investing or financing activities. Distributable cash flow
may not be calculated the same for NRP as for other companies. A reconciliation
of distributable cash flow to net cash provided by operating activities is set
forth below.
Reconciliation of GAAP "Net cash provided by operating activities"
to Non-GAAP "Distributable cash flow"
For the Three Months Ended For the Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
(Unaudited)
2009 2009 2009 2008
Net cash provided by operating
activities $ 38,120 $ 58,273 $ 138,799 $ 159,143
Less scheduled principal payments (7,693 ) (7,691 ) (17,235 ) (17,234 )
Less reserves for future principal
payments (8,059 ) (4,308 ) (24,177 ) (12,924 )
Add reserves used for scheduled
principal payments 7,693 7,691 17,235 17,234
Distributable cash flow $ 30,061 $ 53,965 $ 114,622 $ 146,219
|
Acquisitions
We are a growth-oriented company and have closed a number of acquisitions
over the last several years. Our most recent acquisitions are briefly described
below.
Colt - In September 2009, we signed a definitive agreement to acquire
approximately 200 million tons of coal reserves related to the Deer Run Mine in
Illinois from Colt LLC, an affiliate of the Cline Group, through eight separate
transactions for a total purchase price of $255 million. Upon closing of the
first transaction, NRP paid $10.0 million, funded through its credit facility,
and acquired approximately 3.3 million tons of reserves associated with the
initial production from the mine. Future closings anticipated through 2012 will
be associated with completion of certain milestones relating to the new mine's
construction.
Blue Star - In July 2009, we acquired approximately 121 acres of limestone
reserves in Wise County, Texas from Blue Star Materials, LLC for a purchase
price of $24 million. As of September 30, 2009, we had funded $12.0 million of
the acquisition with borrowings under our credit facility. The remaining
payments are expected to be made over the next six months upon completion of
certain development milestones.
Gatling Ohio - In May 2009, we completed the purchase of the membership
interest in two companies from Adena Minerals, LLC, an affiliate of the Cline
Group. The companies own coal reserves and infrastructure assets, related to
Cline's Yellowbush Mine located on the Ohio River in Meigs County, Ohio. We
issued 4,560,000 common units to Adena Minerals in connection with this
acquisition. In addition, the general partner of Natural Resource Partners
granted Adena Minerals an additional nine percent interest in the general
partner.
Massey - Jewell Smokeless. In March 2009, we acquired from Lauren Land
Company, a subsidiary of Massey Energy, the remaining four-fifths interest in
coal reserves located in Buchanan County, Virginia in which we previously held a
one-fifth interest. Total consideration for this purchase was $12.5 million.
Macoupin. In January 2009, we acquired coal reserves and infrastructure
assets related to the Shay No. 1 mine in Macoupin County, Illinois for
$143.7 million from Macoupin Energy, LLC, an affiliate of the Cline Group.
Coal Properties. In October 2008, we acquired an overriding royalty for
$5.5 million from Coal Properties Inc. This overriding royalty agreement is for
coal reserves located in the states of Illinois and Kentucky.
Mid-Vol Coal Preparation Plant. In April 2008, we completed construction of a
coal preparation plant and coal handling infrastructure under our memorandum of
understanding with Taggart Global USA, LLC. The total cost to build the
facilities was $12.7 million.
Licking River Preparation Plant. In March 2008, we signed an agreement for
the construction of a coal preparation plant facility under our memorandum of
understanding with Taggart Global USA, LLC. The total cost for the facility,
located in Eastern Kentucky, was $8.9 million.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended Increase Percentage
September 30, (Decrease) Change
2009 2008
(In thousands, except percent and per ton data)
(Unaudited)
Coal:
Coal royalty revenues
Appalachia
Northern $ 3,998 $ 3,433 $ 565 16 %
Central 33,688 40,371 (6,683 ) (17 %)
Southern 4,849 5,397 (548 ) (10 %)
Total Appalachia 42,535 49,201 (6,666 ) (14 %)
Illinois Basin 5,413 6,438 (1,025 ) (16 %)
Northern Powder River Basin 1,359 2,684 (1,325 ) (49 %)
Total $ 49,307 $ 58,323 $ (9,016 ) (15 %)
Production (tons)
Appalachia
Northern 1,238 1,172 66 6 %
Central 6,984 8,859 (1,875 ) (21 %)
Southern 799 1,015 (216 ) (21 %)
Total Appalachia 9,021 11,046 (2,025 ) (18 %)
Illinois Basin 1,723 2,441 (718 ) (29 %)
Northern Powder River Basin 539 1,448 (909 ) (63 %)
Total 11,283 14,935 (3,652 ) (24 %)
Average gross royalty per ton
Appalachia
Northern $ 3.23 $ 2.93 $ 0.30 10 %
Central 4.82 4.56 0.27 6 %
Southern 6.07 5.32 0.75 14 %
Total Appalachia 4.72 4.45 0.26 6 %
Illinois Basin 3.14 2.64 0.50 19 %
Northern Powder River Basin 2.52 1.85 0.67 36 %
Combined average gross royalty per ton 4.37 3.91 0.46 12 %
Aggregates:
Royalty revenue $ 1,400 $ 1,980 $ (580 ) (29 %)
Aggregate royalty bonus $ 300 $ 300 $ - -
Production 1,148 1,484 (336 ) (23 %)
Average base royalty per ton $ 1.22 $ 1.33 $ (0.11 ) (8 %)
|
Coal Royalty Revenues and Production. Coal royalty revenues comprised
approximately 77% of our total revenue for each of the three month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008. The following is a discussion of the coal royalty
revenues and production derived from our major coal producing regions:
Appalachia. Primarily due to lower production by our lessees in the Northern
and Central Appalachian regions, coal royalty revenues decreased in the three
month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period of 2008. The
lower production was due to a number of factors, including mine closures and
temporary idling due to increasing costs, a difficult regulatory environment,
increasingly difficult geologic conditions and some mines moving to adjacent
properties. This decline in production was in part offset by a higher royalty
per ton in all regions. We expect that our lessees in Appalachia will continue
to experience these difficulties, which may cause future production levels to
continue to decline.
Illinois Basin. Production and coal royalty revenues decreased primarily due
to a mine moving off our property and lower shipments from our Williamson
property.
Northern Powder River Basin. Coal royalty revenues and production decreased
on our Western Energy property due to the normal variations that occur due to
the checkerboard nature of ownership and an unplanned outage at one of the power
plants that this mine supplies.
Aggregates Royalty Revenues and Production. Aggregate production decreased
during the second quarter resulting in lower royalty revenue. The lower
production is mainly attributed to lower demand in the region.
Nine Months Ended Increase Percentage
September 30, (Decrease) Change
2009 2008
(In thousands, except percent and per ton data)
(Unaudited)
Coal:
Coal royalty revenues
Appalachia
Northern $ 9,931 $ 11,838 $ (1,907 ) (16 %)
Central 101,874 117,642 (15,768 ) (13 %)
Southern 14,755 14,697 58 <1 %
Total Appalachia 126,560 144,177 (17,617 ) (12 %)
Illinois Basin 16,234 14,995 1,239 8 %
Northern Powder River Basin 5,500 8,329 (2,829 ) (34 %)
Total $ 148,294 $ 167,501 $ (19,207 ) (11 %)
Production (tons)
Appalachia
Northern 3,304 4,436 (1,132 ) (26 %)
Central 21,962 27,430 (5,468 ) (20 %)
Southern 2,438 3,239 (801 ) (25 %)
Total Appalachia 27,704 35,105 (7,401 ) (21 %)
Illinois Basin 5,005 5,899 (894 ) (15 %)
Northern Powder River Basin 2,840 4,493 (1,653 ) (37 %)
Total 35,549 45,497 (9,948 ) (22 %)
Average gross royalty per ton
Appalachia
Northern $ 3.01 $ 2.67 $ 0.34 13 %
Central 4.64 4.29 0.35 8 %
Southern 6.05 4.54 1.51 33 %
Total Appalachia 4.57 4.11 0.46 11 %
Illinois Basin 3.24 2.54 0.70 28 %
Northern Powder River Basin 1.94 1.85 0.08 4 %
Combined average gross royalty per ton 4.17 3.68 0.49 13 %
Aggregates:
Royalty revenue $ 3,377 $ 5,028 $ (1,651 ) (33 %)
Aggregate royalty bonus $ 1,320 $ 2,544 $ (1,224 ) (48 %)
Production 2,629 3,876 (1,247 ) (32 %)
Average base royalty per ton $ 1.28 $ 1.30 $ (0.01 ) (1 %)
|
Coal Royalty Revenues and Production. Coal royalty revenues comprised
approximately 78% of our total revenue for each of the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008. The following is a discussion of the coal royalty
revenues and production derived from our major coal producing regions:
Appalachia. Primarily due to lower production by our lessees, coal royalty
revenues decreased in the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to
the same period of 2008. Production was lower across all three Appalachian
regions. Although production was lower, our royalty per ton increased across all
regions, partially offsetting the production decline. The lower production was
due to a number of factors, including mine closures and temporary idling due to
increasing costs, a difficult regulatory environment, increasingly difficult
geologic conditions and some mines moving to adjacent properties. We expect that
our lessees in Appalachia will continue to experience these difficulties, which
may cause current production levels and potentially the prices being realized by
our lessees to decline.
Illinois Basin. Both production and coal royalty revenues decreased for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period for 2008.
These decreases were primarily due to a mine moving to adjacent property and
slightly lower shipments from our Williamson property partially offset by the
production at Williamson being a higher royalty per ton.
Northern Powder River Basin. Coal royalty revenues and production decreased
on our Western Energy property due to the normal variations that occur due to
the checkerboard nature of ownership and an unplanned outage at one of the power
plants that this mine supplies. Near the end of the first quarter, the mine on
this property experienced a brief work stoppage during the negotiation of a new
labor contract.
Aggregates Royalty Revenues and Production. Aggregate production decreased
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 resulting in lower royalty
revenue. The lower production is mainly attributed to lower demand in the
region.
Other Operating Results
Coal Processing and Transportation Revenues. We generated $1.5 million and
. . .
|
|