|
Quotes & Info
|
| APAC > SEC Filings for APAC > Form 10-Q on 4-Nov-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
4-Nov-2009
Quarterly Report
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain of our accounting policies are considered critical, due to the level of subjectivity and judgment necessary in applying these policies and because the impact of these estimates and assumptions on our financial condition and operating performance may be material. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments in these areas based on historic experience and other relevant factors. The estimates as of the date of the financial statements reflect our best judgment giving consideration to all currently available facts and circumstances. We believe our estimates and judgments are reasonable, however, actual results and the timing of the recognition of such amounts could differ from those estimates. We have used methodologies that are consistent from year to year in all material respects. We have identified the following accounting policies and estimates that we believe are most critical in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements: accounting for derivatives, allowance for doubtful accounts, accounting for employee benefits, revenue recognition, intangible assets, restructuring charges, accounting for stock-based compensation and income taxes. For details concerning these critical accounting policies and estimates see Item 7 of Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008, under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" and Note 3 to our audited consolidated financial statements which appears in Item 8 of Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2008. Any deviation from these policies or estimates could have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth selected information about our results of
operations for the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 27, 2009 and
September 28, 2008, respectively. Certain additional components of cost of
services have been included as we believe they would enhance an understanding of
our results of operations. All amounts in the table below are presented in
thousands.
Thirteen Weeks Ended Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
September 27, September 28, Fav (Unfav) September 27, September 28, Fav (Unfav)
2009 2008 % Change 2009 2008 % Change
Net Revenue $ 68,360 $ 59,243 15.4 % $ 207,648 $ 183,470 13.2 %
Cost of Services:
Direct labor 37,648 34,239 (10.0 ) 110,168 106,218 (3.7 )
Other facility expenses 16,547 14,933 (10.8 ) 49,361 48,678 (1.4 )
Total cost of services 54,195 49,172 (10.2 ) 159,529 154,896 (3.0 )
Percentage of revenue 79.3 % 83.0 % - 76.8 % 84.4 % -
Gross profit 14,165 10,071 40.7 48,119 28,574 68.4
Gross profit margin 20.7 % 17.0 % - 23.2 % 15.6 % -
Operating Expenses:
Selling, general & administrative expenses 7,518 7,187 (4.6 ) 22,868 23,582 3.0
Restructuring and other charges (reversals) (9 ) 616 101.5 (58 ) 3,394 101.7
Total operating expenses 7,509 7,803 3.8 22,810 26,976 15.4
Operating income 6,656 2,268 193.5 25,309 1,598 *
Other income (15 ) (129 ) (88.4 ) (45 ) (303 ) (85.1 )
Interest (income) expense, net (60 ) 359 116.7 (18 ) 3,954 100.5
Income (loss) before income taxes 6,731 2,038 230.3 25,372 (2,053 ) *
Income tax expense 143 33 (333.3 ) 429 33 *
Net income (loss) $ 6,588 $ 2,005 228.6 % $ 24,943 $ (2,086 ) *
|
* Means that the percentage change is not meaningful
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
To supplement our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented in
accordance with GAAP, we present EBITDA, which is defined as a non-GAAP
financial measure. The presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure is not
intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial
information presented in accordance with GAAP. The items excluded from this
non-GAAP financial measure are significant components of our financial
statements and must be considered in performing a comprehensive analysis of our
overall financial results.
We believe this non-GAAP financial measure provides meaningful supplemental
information and is useful in understanding our results of operations and
analyzing trends because it excludes certain charges such as interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization expenses that are not part of our ordinary
business operations.
EBITDA is a measure used by our lenders, investors and analysts to evaluate our
financial performance and our ability to pay interest and repay debt. This
measure is also indicative of our ability to fund the capital investments
necessary for our continued growth. We use this measure, together with our GAAP
financial metrics, to assess our financial performance, allocate resources,
measure our performance against debt covenants and evaluate our overall progress
towards meeting our long-term financial objectives.
We believe that this non-GAAP financial measure is useful to investors and
analysts in allowing for greater transparency with respect to the supplemental
information used by us in our financial and operational decision making. In
addition, we believe investors, analysts and lenders benefit from referring to
EBITDA when assessing our performance and expectations of our future
performance. However, this information should not be used as a substitute for
our GAAP financial information; rather it should be used in conjunction with
financial statement information contained in our condensed consolidated
financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP.
We use a consistent method for computation of EBITDA. Our calculation of EBITDA
may not be consistent with calculations of similar measures used by other
companies. The accompanying notes have more details on the GAAP financial
measure that is most directly comparable to our non-GAAP financial measure and
the related reconciliation between these financial measures.
Thirteen Weeks Ended (1) Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
September 27, September 28, Fav (Unfav) September 27, September 28, Fav (Unfav)
2009 2008 % Change 2009 2008 % Change
(Dollars in thousands except statistical data and notes)
EBITDA (2) $ 9,600 $ 5,214 84.1 % $ 34,065 $ 11,140 205.8 %
Statistical information:
Number of customer care centers:
Domestic 9 9 9 9
Off-shore 4 3 4 3
Total 13 12 13 12
Number of workstations, end of period:
Domestic 5,174 4,486 5,174 4,486
Off-shore 3,647 3,275 3,647 3,275
Total 8,821 7,761 8,821 7,761
|
Notes to Non-GAAP Financial Measures
(1) We operate on a thirteen-week fiscal quarter that ends on the Sunday closest to September 30.
(2) We define
EBITDA as net
income
(loss) plus
income tax
expense
(benefit),
depreciation
and
amortization,
and interest
expense.
EBITDA is a measure used by our lenders, investors and analysts to evaluate our
financial performance and our ability to pay interest and repay debt. This
measure is also indicative of our ability to fund the capital investments
necessary for our continued growth. We use this measure, together with our GAAP
financial metrics, to assess our financial performance, allocate resources,
measure our performance against debt covenants and evaluate our overall progress
towards meeting our long-term financial objectives.
EBITDA is not intended to be considered in isolation or used as a substitute for
net income (loss) or cash flow from operations data presented in accordance with
GAAP or as a measure of liquidity. The items excluded from EBITDA are
significant components of our statements of operations and must be considered in
performing a comprehensive assessment of our overall financial results.
EBITDA can be reconciled to net income (loss), which we believe to be the most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, as follows:
Thirteen Weeks Ended Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended
September 27, September 28, September 27, September 28,
2009 2008 2009 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
Net income (loss) $ 6,588 $ 2,005 $ 24,943 $ (2,086 )
Interest (income) expense, net (60 ) 359 (18 ) 3,954
Income tax expense 143 33 429 33
Depreciation and amortization 2,929 2,817 8,711 9,239
EBITDA $ 9,600 $ 5,214 $ 34,065 $ 11,140
|
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Thirteen Weeks Ended September 27,
2009 and September 28, 2008
Net revenue increased 15.4% to $68.4 million for the thirteen weeks ended
September 27, 2009, as compared to $59.2 million for the thirteen weeks ended
September 28, 2008. The increase in revenue is primarily driven by growth with
existing and new clients of $11.6 million in the communications vertical,
$0.9 million in the healthcare vertical, excluding the seasonal Medicare Part D
program, $0.6 million in the media & publishing vertical and $0.4 million in the
financial services vertical. This was partially offset by the decline in revenue
of $1.8 million in the business services vertical, $1.1 million from the
seasonal Medicare Part D program, $0.8 million in the travel & entertainment
vertical, $0.4 million from the exit of a retail client in 2008 and $0.2 million
of other services.
Cost of services increased $5.0 million, or 10.2%, to $54.2 million for the
thirteen weeks ended September 27, 2009, from $49.2 million for the thirteen
weeks ended September 28, 2008. Direct labor increased $3.4 million, or 10.0%,
primarily driven by higher volume in the domestic communications vertical and
higher volume offshore, partly offset by lower wage rates and employee benefits,
both domestically and offshore, and lower volume in the business services
vertical. Facility and other costs increased $1.6 million, or 10.8%, primarily
due to $1.9 million of increased facility costs related to growth and expansion
domestically and from the build-out of our fourth facility in the Philippines,
partially offset by $0.3 million of other continued cost savings initiatives.
Cost of services as a percentage of revenue declined to 79.3% for the thirteen
weeks ended September 27, 2009 from 83.0% for the thirteen weeks ended
September 28, 2008, primarily driven by lower wage rates and employee benefits.
Gross profit increased $4.1 million, or 40.7%, to $14.2 million for the thirteen
weeks ended September 27, 2009, as compared to $10.1 million for the thirteen
weeks ended September 28, 2008, primarily due to an increase in domestic and
off-shore volume and lower wages and employee benefits, partially offset by
increased facility and other costs associated with growth and expansion
domestically and off-shore. Gross profit margin increased to 20.7% for the
thirteen weeks ended September 27, 2009 from 17.0% for the thirteen weeks ended
September 28, 2008 due to a decline in wage rates and employee benefits both
domestically and off-shore.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $7.5 million for the thirteen
weeks ended September 27, 2009 as compared to $7.2 million for the thirteen
weeks ended September 28, 2008. The $0.3 million increase is primarily due to
$0.7 million increase in compensation and benefits primarily related to
incentive compensation, a $0.3 million increase in professional fees and a
$0.2 million increase in employee recruiting and relocation costs, partially
offset by a $0.6 million reduction in bad debt expense driven by the collection
of previously provided reserves from a 2008 client bankruptcy, and a
$0.3 million reduction in rent and other facility charges resulting from the
relocation of our corporate office.
Restructuring and other charges reflected a recovery of less than $0.1 million
for the thirteen weeks ended September 27, 2009, as compared to a charge of
$0.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 28, 2008 and were primarily
related to adjustments in severance charges and retirement obligations recorded
in fiscal year 2008, offset by the reversal of the remaining reserve for
property taxes associated with the 2006 restructuring initiative. Restructuring
and other charges of $0.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 28,
2008 included $0.6 million of severance charges related to changes in our
executive team and further reductions in our operations and administrative
headcount and $0.1 million in additional restructuring charges associated with
our 2005 restructuring initiative, partially offset by the reversal of the
remaining $0.1 million reserve associated with the 2007 restructuring
initiative. For more information regarding restructuring and other charges, see
Note 9 of our condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Operating income was $6.7 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 27,
2009, as compared to $2.3 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 28,
2008. The $4.4 million improvement was the result of a $4.1 million increase in
gross profit and a $0.6 million decrease in restructuring and other charges,
partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in selling, general and
administrative expenses as noted above.
Net interest income was less than $0.1 million for the thirteen weeks ended
September 27, 2009 and was primarily related to $0.2 million from the
amortization of points on forward contracts, partially offset by $0.1 million of
fees and interest associated with borrowings under the Revolving Loan Facility
with PNC. Interest expense was $0.4 million for the thirteen weeks ended
September 28, 2008 and was primarily related to interest associated with
borrowings under the Revolving Loan Facility with PNC.
EBITDA was $9.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended September 27, 2009, an
increase of $4.4 million, as compared to $5.2 million for the thirteen weeks
ended September 28, 2008. The increase was primarily due to a $4.1 million
increase in gross profit, a $0.6 million decrease in restructuring and other
charges, partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in selling, general and
administrative expenses as noted above. More information concerning this
non-GAAP financial measure, including the definition of EBITDA and a
reconciliation of this measure to the most directly comparable financial measure
calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP, can be found under the heading
"Non-GAAP Financial Measures" and the accompanying notes thereto appearing
elsewhere in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
The income tax expense for the thirteen weeks ended September 27, 2009 was
$0.1 million. This is driven by a gross income and earned tax of 5% on a portion
of our Philippine financial results and domestic state income taxes. The U.S.
federal tax provision is fully offset by the utilization of net operating loss
carryforwards and work opportunity tax credits. This resulted in a 2.1%
effective income tax rate for the thirteen weeks ended September 27, 2009. The
tax provision associated with the income before taxes for the thirteen weeks
ended September 28, 2008 of less than $0.1 million resulted from the utilization
of net operating loss carryforwards. The effective income tax rate for the
thirteen weeks ended September 28, 2008 was 1.6% due to the provision for state
income taxes.
Net income increased $4.6 million to $6.6 million for the thirteen weeks ended
September 27, 2009, as compared to $2.0 million for the thirteen weeks ended
September 28, 2008.
Comparison of Results of Operations for the Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
September 27, 2009 and September 28, 2008
Net revenue increased 13.2% to $207.6 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended
September 27, 2009, as compared to $183.5 million for the thirty-nine weeks
ended September 28, 2008. The increase in revenue of $24.1 million is primarily
driven by growth with existing and new clients of $29.9 million in the
communications vertical, $10.3 million in the healthcare vertical, excluding the
seasonal Medicare Part D program, $1.5 million in the media & publishing
vertical and $0.4 million in the financial services vertical. This was partially
offset by the decline in revenue of $9.5 million from the seasonal Medicare
Part D program, $3.2 million in the business services vertical, $2.9 million due
to the exit of a retail client in 2008, $0.8 million in the travel &
entertainment vertical and $1.6 million of other services.
Cost of services increased $4.6 million, or 3.0%, to $159.5 million for the
thirty-nine weeks ended September 27, 2009, as compared to $154.9 million for
the thirty-nine weeks ended September 28, 2008. Direct labor increased
$3.9 million, or 3.7%, primarily driven by higher volume in the domestic
communications vertical and higher volume off-shore, partially offset by lower
wage rates and employee benefits and improved efficiencies both domestically and
off-shore. Total facility and other costs increased $0.7 million, or 1.4%,
primarily due to $3.2 million increase in facility costs associated with
domestic expansion and the build-out of our fourth facility in the Philippines
and a $0.6 million increase in telecommunication costs associated with increased
volumes off-shore, partially offset by a $2.5 million decrease in facility and
other costs associated with continued cost savings initiatives both domestically
and offshore and $0.6 million of reduced information technology costs resulting
from the 2008 workforce reduction. Cost of services as a percentage of revenue
declined to 76.8% for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 27, 2009 from 84.4%
for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 28, 2008, primarily driven by lower
wages and employee benefits, increased labor efficiencies and the leveraging of
fixed costs.
Gross profit increased $19.5 million, or 68.4%, to $48.1 million for the
thirty-nine weeks ended September 27, 2009, as compared to $28.6 million for the
thirty-nine weeks ended September 28, 2008, primarily due to higher volume
domestically and off-shore and lower wage rates and employee benefits and
improved efficiencies both domestically and off-shore. Gross profit margin
increased to 23.2% for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 27, 2009 from 15.6%
for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 28, 2008 due to efficiencies in cost
of services as noted above.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $22.9 million for the
thirty-nine weeks ended September 27, 2009, a decrease of $0.7 million from
$23.6 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 28, 2008. The decrease
is primarily due to a $0.8 million reduction in bad debt expense related to the
specific reserves recorded in 2008 in the publishing vertical and a recovery of
a portion of these reserves recognized in 2009, a $0.7 million decrease in rent
and other facility charges resulting from the relocation of our corporate
office, a $0.6 million reduction in salaries and wages and $0.1 million of other
cost savings obtained through continued efforts to control expenses, partially
offset by a $1.1 million increase in incentive compensation and a $0.4 million
increase in professional fees.
Restructuring and other charges decreased $3.5 million to a recovery of $0.1 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 27, 2009, as compared to a charge of $3.4 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended September 28, 2008 and were primarily related to adjustments in severance charges and retirement obligations recorded in fiscal year 2008 and the reversal of the remaining reserve for property taxes associated with the 2006 restructuring initiative. During the thirty-nine weeks ended September 28, 2008, we recorded charges of . . .
|
|