|
Quotes & Info
|
| IDCC > SEC Filings for IDCC > Form 10-Q on 2-Nov-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
2-Nov-2009
Quarterly Report
quarter 2009. Although third quarter 2009 per unit royalties declined 6% on a
year-over-year basis, these royalties increased 17% sequentially.
Technology solutions revenue increased to $2.5 million in third quarter 2009
from $2.2 million in third quarter 2008, attributable to increased royalties
earned on the company's SlimChip modem IP in third quarter 2009. In third
quarter 2009, 64% of total revenue of $75.5 million was attributable to
companies that individually accounted for 10% or more of this amount, Samsung
(34%), LG (19%), and Sharp (11%).
Litigation and Arbitration
Please see Note 6, "Litigation and Legal Proceedings," in the Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a full discussion of the following matter and
other matters:
Nokia USITC
In August 2007, InterDigital filed a USITC Complaint against Nokia
Corporation and Nokia, Inc. (collectively, "Nokia") alleging that Nokia engaged
in an unfair trade practice by selling for importation into the United States,
importing into the United States, and selling after importation into the United
States, certain 3G mobile handsets and components that infringe two of
InterDigital's patents. In November and December 2007, a third patent and fourth
patent, respectively, were added to our Complaint against Nokia. The Complaint
seeks an exclusion order barring from entry into the United States infringing 3G
mobile handsets and components that are imported by or on behalf of Nokia. Our
Complaint also seeks a cease-and-desist order to bar further sales of infringing
Nokia products that have already been imported into the United States.
Nokia then unsuccessfully sought to terminate or stay the USITC investigation
against it on the ground that Nokia and we must first arbitrate an alleged
dispute as to whether Nokia is licensed under the patents asserted by
InterDigital against Nokia in the USITC investigation. After that effort failed,
Nokia sought and obtained a preliminary injunction in the U.S. District Court
for the Southern District of New York preventing us from proceeding in the USITC
against Nokia. Shortly after the issuance of the preliminary injunction, the
Nokia USITC investigation was stayed, and the Nokia and Samsung USITC
investigations were de-consolidated, which permitted the Samsung USITC
investigation to move forward.
In July 2008, the Second Circuit reversed the preliminary injunction obtained
by Nokia. In September 2008, the Administrative Law Judge lifted the stay in the
Nokia USITC investigation. In March 2009, the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York dismissed Nokia's claims relating to its alleged
license dispute.
The evidentiary hearing in the Nokia USITC investigation was held from
May 26, 2009 through June 2, 2009. On August 14, 2009, the Administrative Law
Judge issued an Initial Determination finding no violation of Section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930. The Initial Determination found that our patents were valid
and enforceable, but that Nokia did not infringe these patents. In the event
that a Section 337 violation were to be found by the Commission, the
Administrative Law Judge recommended the issuance of a limited exclusion order
barring entry into the United States of infringing Nokia 3G WCDMA handsets and
components as well as the issuance of appropriate cease and desist orders. On
August 31, 2009, we filed a petition for review of certain issues raised in the
August 14, 2009 Initial Determination. On that same date, Nokia also filed a
contingent petition for review of certain issues in the Initial Determination.
Responses to both petitions were filed on September 8, 2009.
On October 16, 2009, the Commission issued a notice that it had determined to
review in part the Initial Determination, and that it affirmed the
Administrative Law Judge's determination of no violation and terminated the
investigation.
If we choose to do so, we have 60 days from the Commission's October 16, 2009
decision to file an appeal of the Commission's decision to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In such an appeal, we can raise any of
the issues raised in our August 31, 2009 petition, except for the construction
of the term "synchronize" on which the Commission took no position. The issue of
validity, on which the Commission also took no position, likewise cannot be
raised in such an appeal.
We are considering whether to file an appeal of the Commission's decision to
the United State Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Comparability of Financial Results
When comparing third quarter 2009 financial results against other periods, the
following item should be taken into consideration:
• Our third quarter 2009 operating expenses were reduced by $4.0 million based
on revised expectations for the anticipated payout associated with a
long-term performance-based incentive program, this adjustment reduced third
quarter development expense, selling, general and administrative expense, and
patent licensing and arbitration costs by $2.4 million, $1.1 million, and
$0.5 million, respectively.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2008 Form 10-K. A discussion
of our critical accounting policies, and the estimates related to them, are
included in Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2008 Form 10-K.
There have been no material changes in our existing critical accounting policies
from the disclosures included in our 2008 Form 10-K. Refer to Note 1, "Basis of
Presentation," in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for updates
related to new accounting pronouncements.
FINANCIAL POSITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments, as well as cash generated from operations. We have the ability to
obtain additional liquidity through debt and equity financings, but have not had
a significant debt or equity financing in over 10 years and do not anticipate a
need for such financings in the next twelve months. Based on our past
performance and current expectations, we believe our available sources of funds,
including cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and cash generated
from our operations, will be sufficient to finance our operations, capital
requirements, and any stock repurchase programs that we may initiate in the next
twelve months. Although our existing revenue streams have been affected by the
recent global economic downturn, our near-term revenues are partially insulated
from market swings since approximately 63% of our recurring patent license
revenues were based on fixed payments in first nine months 2009.
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had the following amounts of
cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments (in thousands):
September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 Increase/(Decrease)
Cash and cash equivalents $ 265,771 $ 100,144 $ 165,627
Short-term investments 163,952 41,516 122,436
Total cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments $ 429,723 $ 141,660 $ 288,063
|
Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments increased $288.1 million
in first nine months 2009. The increase was primarily due to our receipt of the
first two of four $100.0 million installments from Samsung under our patent
license agreement signed in January 2009 and new prepayments from two existing
licensees totaling $182.4 million. After using those and other receipts to fund
our operations, working capital requirements and share repurchases in first nine
months 2009, we invested the excess in short-term investments.
Cash flows from operations
We generated the following cash flows from our operating activities in first
nine months 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 2008 Increase/(Decrease) Cash flows from operating activities $ 332,502 $ 105,795 $ 226,707
The positive operating cash flow in first nine months 2009 arose principally
from receipts of approximately $492.0 million related to patent licensing and
technology solutions agreements. These receipts included the first two of four
installments of $100.0 million from Samsung under our January 2009 license
agreement. We also received prepayments of $182.4 million from two existing
licensees, per-unit royalty payments of $61.6 million from other existing
licensees, other fixed-fee payments of $37.1 million, and cash receipts from our
technology solutions agreements totaling $10.9 million, primarily related to
royalties associated with our SlimChip modem IP. These receipts were partially
offset by cash operating expenses (operating expenses less depreciation of fixed
assets, amortization of intangible assets, non-cash repositioning charges and
non-cash compensation) of $92.0 million, cash payments for foreign source
withholding taxes of $40.7 million related to Samsung and Pantech cash receipts,
an estimated federal tax payment of $4.0 million, and changes in working capital
during first nine months 2009.
The positive operating cash flow in first nine months 2008 arose principally
from receipts of approximately $257.7 million related to 2G and 3G patent
licensing agreements. These receipts included the third of three $95.0 million
payments from LG, a new prepayment of $29.6 million from an existing licensee,
$51.4 million of prepayments and $81.7 million of current royalty payments from
existing licensees, and cash receipts from our technology solutions agreements
totaling $3.1 million, primarily related to royalties associated with our
SlimChip modem IP. These receipts were partially offset by cash operating
expenses (operating expenses less depreciation of fixed assets, amortization of
intangible assets and non-cash compensation) of $112.6 million, an estimated
federal tax payment of $3.0 million, foreign source withholding taxes of
$15.9 million, payment of $23.0 million to post a bond for the Federal Insurance
Company arbitration award and changes in working capital during first nine
months 2008.
Working capital
We believe that working capital, adjusted to exclude cash, cash equivalents,
short-term investments, current maturities of debt, and current deferred revenue
provides additional information about assets and liabilities that might affect
our near-term liquidity. Our adjusted working capital, a non-GAAP financial
measure, reconciles to working capital, the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure, at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands) as
follows:
September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 Increase/(Decrease)
Current assets $ 718,249 $ 241,021 $ 477,228
Current liabilities (244,091 ) (126,537 ) (117,554 )
Working capital 474,158 114,484 359,674
(Subtract) Add
Cash and cash equivalents (265,771 ) (100,144 ) (165,627 )
Short-term investments (163,952 ) (41,516 ) (122,436 )
Current portion of long-term debt 586 1,608 (1,022 )
Current deferred revenue 193,527 78,646 114,881
Adjusted working capital $ 238,548 $ 53,078 $ 185,470
|
The $185.5 million increase in adjusted working capital is primarily due to
our January 2009 patent license agreement with Samsung. Our recognition of the
last two installment payments under this agreement, which are due from Samsung
within the next twelve months, increased accounts receivable by $200.0 million
and our deferred tax assets by $33.0 million for foreign withholding taxes
associated with those payments. The decrease in accrued compensation related to
our first quarter 2009 payments against our long-term cash incentive and annual
bonus obligations further contributed to the increase in adjusted working
capital. These items were partially offset by an increase of $33.0 million in
foreign taxes payable associated with the Samsung license agreement and the
increase of $2.8 million in other accrued expenses primarily attributable to
accrued repositioning charges and accrued legal fees.
We used net cash from investing activities of $147.8 million in first nine
months 2009 and used net cash from investing activities of $6.4 million in first
nine months 2008. We purchased $122.3 million of short-term marketable
securities, net of sales, in first nine months 2009 and sold $22.9 million of
short-term marketable securities, net of purchases, in first nine months 2008.
This increase in purchases was driven by higher cash receipts and lower cash
requirements during first nine months 2009. Purchases of property and equipment
decreased to $2.4 million in first nine months 2009 from $4.4 million in first
nine months 2008 due to the lower levels of development tools and engineering
needed in first nine months 2009 as a result of our cessation of further
SlimChip product development. Investment costs associated with patents increased
from $20.7 million in first nine months 2008 to $21.9 million in first nine
months 2009.
Net cash used in financing activities decreased $47.0 million primarily due
to our higher levels of stock repurchase activity in first nine months 2008. We
also received $3.5 million and $1.6 million more in respective contributions
from stock option exercises and tax benefits from share-based compensation as
compared to the prior year.
Other
Our combined short-term and long-term deferred revenue balance at
September 30, 2009 was approximately $721.9 million, an increase of
$462.2 million from December 31, 2008. We have no material obligations
associated with such deferred revenue. In first nine months 2009, we recorded
gross increases in deferred revenue of $627.1 million primarily related to the
$400.0 million received or due from Samsung under the license agreement signed
in January 2009, $182.4 million in prepayments from two existing licensees,
$21.7 million of stock and $15.0 million of cash from Pantech and $9.4 million
in prepayments from new and existing licensees. The gross increases in deferred
revenue were partially offset by first nine months 2009 deferred revenue
recognition of $133.7 million related to the amortization of fixed-fee royalty
payments and $31.3 million related to per-unit exhaustion of prepaid royalties
(based upon royalty reports provided by our licensees).
Based on current license agreements, we expect the amortization of fixed-fee
royalty payments to reduce the September 30, 2009 deferred revenue balance of
$721.9 million by $193.5 million over the next twelve months. Additional
reductions to deferred revenue will be dependent upon the level of per-unit
royalties our licensees report against prepaid balances.
At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had approximately 2.1 million
and 2.9 million options outstanding, respectively, that had exercise prices less
than the fair market value of our stock at each balance sheet date. These
options would generate $25.9 million and $38.9 million of cash proceeds to the
Company if they are fully exercised.
Credit Facility
In light of our current financial position and in connection with the
reduction of recurring operating expenses expected to result from our
repositioning plan, we elected to terminate our $60.0 million unsecured
revolving credit facility on April 2, 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by
Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Third Quarter 2009 Compared to Third Quarter 2008
Revenues
The following table compares third quarter 2009 revenues to revenues in the
comparable period from the prior year (in millions):
Third Third
Quarter Quarter
2009 2008 Increase/(Decrease)
Per-unit royalty revenue $ 27.7 $ 29.6 $ (1.9 ) (6 %)
Fixed-fee amortized royalty revenue 44.8 22.0 22.8 104 %
Recurring patent licensing royalties 72.5 51.6 20.9 41 %
Past infringement and other non-recurring royalties 0.5 1.3 (0.8 ) (62 %)
Total patent licensing royalties 73.0 52.9 20.1 38 %
Technology solutions revenue 2.5 2.2 0.3 14 %
Total revenue $ 75.5 $ 55.1 $ 20.4 37 %
|
Revenues were $75.5 million in third quarter 2009, compared to $55.1 million
in third quarter 2008. Patent licensing royalties of $73.0 million in third
quarter 2009 posted a 38% increase over $52.9 million in third quarter 2008, due
to the addition of $25.7 million in fixed-fee amortized royalty revenue from
patent license agreements with Samsung signed in first quarter 2009, and a
partial quarter of fixed-fee revenue related to the Pantech license agreement
signed late in the third quarter. This increase was partially offset by a
decrease in per-unit royalty revenue related to industry-wide declines in
handset sales for comparable second quarter sales. Despite this overall decline
in per-unit royalties, certain licensees with concentrations in the smartphone
market reported increased sales for the reporting period.
Technology solutions revenue increased in third quarter 2009 to $2.5 million
from $2.2 million in third quarter 2008. The increase is primarily attributable
to increased royalties earned on our SlimChip modem IP in third quarter 2009.
In third quarter 2009, 64% of our total revenue of $75.5 million was
attributable to companies that individually accounted for 10% or more of our
total revenue, Samsung (34%), LG (19%), and Sharp (11%). In third quarter 2008,
55% of our total revenue of $55.1 million was attributable to companies that
individually accounted for 10% or more of our total revenue, LG (26%), Sharp
(16%) and NEC (13%).
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses decreased 31% to $28.9 million in third quarter 2009 from
$42.0 million in third quarter 2008. The $13.1 million decrease was primarily
due to the following net changes in expenses (in millions):
(Decrease)/
Increase
Long-term cash incentives $ (4.8 )
Personnel-related costs (3.5 )
Consulting services (3.5 )
Depreciation and amortization (2.6 )
Patent litigation and arbitration (2.5 )
Share-based compensation 1.1
Arbitration and contingency adjustment 2.7
Total decrease in operating expenses $ (13.1 )
|
The decrease in long-term cash incentives resulted from a $4.0 million
reduction to the related accrual for the incentive period from January 1, 2008
through December 31, 2010. This reduction was based on our revised expectations
for the payout that will become due under this performance-based compensation
program. This $4.0 million adjustment reduced our third quarter development
expense, selling, general and administrative expense and patent administration
and licensing expense by $2.4 million, $1.1 million and $0.5 million,
respectively. The balance of the decrease in long-term cash incentives and the
increase in sharebased compensation was due to the structure of our Long-term
Compensation Program ("LTCP"), which includes overlapping long-term cash
incentives cycles in 2008 and restricted stock unit ("RSU") cycles in 2009. The
decrease in personnel-related costs, consulting services, and depreciation and
amortization were primarily due to the repositioning announced on March 30,
2009. Patent litigation and arbitration decreased primarily due to the
resolution of our various disputes with Samsung. In 2008, we recognized a credit
of $2.7 million associated with the reduction of a previously established
accrual associated with our contingent obligation to reimburse Nokia for a
portion of its attorney's fees associated with the recently resolved U.K.
matters.
The following table summarizes the change in operating expenses by category
(in millions):
Third Third
Quarter Quarter
2009 2008 Increase/(Decrease)
Selling, general and administrative $ 4.9 $ 6.9 $ (2.0 ) (29 %)
Patent administration and licensing 13.3 14.3 (1.0 ) (7 %)
Development 10.7 23.5 (12.8 ) (54 %)
Arbitration and litigation contingencies - (2.7 ) 2.7 (100 %)
Total operating expenses $ 28.9 $ 42.0 $ (13.1 ) (31 %)
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expense: The decrease in selling, general
and administrative expense in third quarter 2009 was primarily due to a decrease
in personnel-related costs due to the repositioning announced on March 30, 2009,
as well as the adjustment recorded to the long-term cash incentive accrual
discussed above.
Patent Administration and Licensing Expense: The decrease in patent
administration and licensing expenses primarily resulted from a decrease in
patent litigation and arbitration ($2.5 million) and a decrease in long-term
cash incentive accrual expense ($0.5 million), which were partially offset by
increases in patent maintenance and amortization ($1.3 million) and other
personnel-related costs ($0.5 million).
Development Expense: The decrease in development expense was primarily due to
the repositioning announced March 30, 2009, as well as the adjustment recorded
to the long-term cash incentive accrual discussed above.
Arbitration and Litigation Contingencies: In third quarter 2008, we recognized a
credit of $2.7 million associated with the reduction of a previously established
accrual associated with our contingent obligation to reimburse Nokia for a
portion of its attorney's fees associated with the recently resolved U.K.
matters.
Interest and Investment Income, Net
Net interest and investment income for third quarter 2009 totaled
$0.5 million, a decrease of $0.6 million from third quarter 2008. The decrease
was primarily due to lower rates of return in third quarter 2009 as compared to
third quarter 2008.
First Nine Months 2009 Compared to First Nine Months 2008
Revenues
The following table compares first nine months 2009 revenues to revenues in
the comparable period from the prior year (in millions):
First Nine First Nine
Months Months
. . .
|
|
|