|
Quotes & Info
|
| SWI > SEC Filings for SWI > Form 10-Q on 27-Oct-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
27-Oct-2009
Quarterly Report
Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that are
based on our management's beliefs and assumptions and on information currently
available to our management. The statements contained in this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements
may be signified by terms such as "anticipates," "believes," "could," "seeks,"
"estimates," "expects," "intends," "may," "plans," "potential," "predicts,"
"projects," "should," "will," "would" or similar expressions and the negatives
of those terms. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance
or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance
or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors
that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited
to, those identified below, and those discussed in other documents we file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Given these risks and uncertainties, you
should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also,
forward-looking statements represent our management's beliefs and assumptions
only as of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Except as required by
law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements
publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information
becomes available in the future.
Overview
We are a leading provider of powerful yet easy-to-use enterprise-class network management software designed by network professionals for network professionals. Our offerings range from individual software tools to more comprehensive software products, solve problems faced every day by network professionals and help to enable efficient and effective network management. We design our software to meet the requirements of networks and implementations of varying sizes and levels of complexity. We currently have customers that use our software to manage networks ranging from a single device to over 100,000 installed devices. Our products are easy to find, evaluate, use and maintain.
In 1999, we were formed and introduced the first version of one of our core products, Engineer's Toolset. Until December 2005, we were owned by our original stockholders and employed a simple business model designed to minimize expenses and maximize cash flow. We focused our marketing efforts almost exclusively on optimizing our placement in search engine listings, which we attempted to influence through changing the content on our website, and on direct email lead generation programs to the registered end-users of our software products. We did not engage in any proactive advertising, branding or lead generation programs, and thus had minimal marketing expense. By employing a "self service" model in which our software was downloaded by engineers who came to our website, we kept sales expense low as well. Our relatively small historical investment in sales and marketing and research and development allowed us to be profitable in every year since inception and to generate income before income taxes in excess of 80% of revenue from 2003 through 2005. Despite our low levels of expenditures, by 2005 we had grown our revenue to $27.9 million and had introduced a suite of software products, including our current flagship product, Orion Network Performance Monitor, and Orion Network Configuration Manager, formerly known as Cirrus Configuration Manager.
In 2005, our founder decided to explore alternatives in order to grow our business more rapidly than had been possible under our historical model. In December 2005, investors led by Bain Capital Ventures and Insight Venture Partners acquired an aggregate of 67.8% of our outstanding capital stock from our original stockholders and we recapitalized our company. As a result, we incurred $110.0 million of long-term debt. In the second half of 2006, we hired most of our current management team. This new management team began to implement changes to our business model that were designed to accelerate the growth of our revenue. These changes included expanding our suite of products, refining our product development process, creating sales and marketing organizations, and building administrative infrastructure to manage our business.
Since 2007, we have continued to build and refine our business model, making significant investments in people, systems and infrastructure. We continue to embrace certain elements of our founder's model, including providing downloadable enterprise-class software designed for network professionals, focusing on our customer base and end-user community, and offering compelling pricing. In addition, we now employ a highly efficient product development process, a scalable marketing model and a high volume, transaction-oriented inside sales model that have allowed us to drive and support rapid growth in our business at high operating margins while offering our products at prices that are typically significantly lower than those of our competitors. Our revenue grew from $38.2 million in 2006 to $61.7 million in 2007, $93.1 million in 2008 and $83.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and our operating income grew from $25.4 million in 2006 to $30.9 million in 2007, $42.0 million in 2008 and $36.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Our average transaction size for new license sales in each of 2007, 2008 and the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was less than $7,000 compared to hundreds of thousands of dollars for many competing products. We manage our business with a culture and systems that are focused on metrics and helping us to achieve a high level of visibility and consistency in our execution.
We have also sought to expand our product offerings through three acquisitions. In April 2007, we acquired ipMonitor, our entry-level network monitoring product, by purchasing substantially all of the assets and liabilities of IPMonitor Corporation, or IPMonitor. In May 2007, we acquired our LANsurveyor product and various underlying technologies by purchasing all of the outstanding stock of Neon Software, Inc., or Neon. In December 2008, we acquired our Kiwi Syslog Server and Kiwi CatTools products by purchasing substantially all of the assets and liabilities of Trilenium Investments Limited, or Trilenium. We paid $5.9 million, $3.8 million and $7.2 million, respectively, in connection with these acquisitions, resulting in the recording of purchased intangible assets and goodwill on our balance sheet, and amortization of certain of these assets in our statements of income. We made additional payments during 2008 of $0.8 million and $0.5 million upon achievement of the two development milestones related to the Neon acquisition. We anticipate making selective additional acquisitions of companies with products that complement our business model.
To increase our international sales, we have expanded international operations by building a direct sales force and contracting with resellers overseas. We established operations in Cork, Ireland in 2007 to serve as our international headquarters, opened a sales and support operation in Singapore in 2008 and established a research and development facility in the Czech Republic in 2008.
In May 2009, we completed our initial public offering, or IPO, in which we and certain of our stockholders sold 13,933,720 shares of our common stock at a price per share of $12.50 per share. We received net proceeds of $100.5 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $7.9 million and other offering costs of $4.1 million. We used a portion of the net proceeds to repay $49.8 million of the outstanding principal amount of our long-term debt under our December 2005 credit facilities, reducing our outstanding principal amount under such facilities to $44.1 million at September 30, 2009.
Key Business Metrics
We designed our business model to sell high volumes of low-priced, downloadable, enterprise-class software to our customers and to be low cost, scalable and efficient. We review a number of key business metrics to help us monitor the performance of our business model and to identify trends affecting our business. The measures that we believe are the primary indicators of our quarterly and annual performance are as follows:
Average Transaction Size for New License Sales. We focus our sales, marketing and research and development efforts on network professionals and other IT professionals in organizations of all sizes, with the goal of driving purchases of our software by these network and other IT professionals in very short sales cycles with minimal levels of approval. In addition, many of our customers make small initial purchases of our software to manage specific components of their networks and then make additional purchases over time to expand the use of the product that they purchased or to buy additional software products from us. We measure the average transaction size for new license sales on a frequent basis as an indicator of the success of these efforts and to ensure the effectiveness of our marketing and sales model.
Adjusted EBITDA. Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA to measure our performance. Because Adjusted EBITDA excludes certain non-cash expenses such as depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation, we believe that this measure provides us with additional useful information to measure and understand our performance on a consistent basis, particularly with respect to changes in performance from period to period. We use Adjusted EBITDA in the preparation of our budgets and to measure and monitor our performance. Adjusted EBITDA is not determined in accordance with GAAP and is not a substitute for or superior to financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP. See below for further discussion regarding Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income.
Revenue Growth. Beginning in the middle of 2006 with the hiring of our current executive management team, we have employed a differentiated business model for marketing and selling high volumes of enterprise- class software, which is focused on rapid revenue growth at high Adjusted EBITDA margins. We regularly review our revenue growth to measure our success.
Opportunities and Trends
Businesses, governments and other organizations are increasingly relying on data networks to execute their operations, facilitate their internal and external communications and transact business with their customers and partners, and these networks are generally growing in size and complexity. We believe that the increasing challenges of network management and the limitations of existing offerings present a market opportunity for our products. We expect our revenue to continue to grow as we capitalize on this market opportunity.
We believe that the recent economic conditions have caused some customers, particularly small businesses, to be more cautious about their technology purchases of technology and other related items. However, we also believe that these conditions offer us an opportunity to market and sell our products to mid-size businesses and enterprise customers at compelling prices compared to the prices of many competing products.
We have rapidly evolved and expanded our business since the middle of 2006. This expansion has included hiring most of our senior management team, moving our corporate headquarters to Austin, Texas and building infrastructure to support our business. This evolution has resulted in our significantly expanding our direct inside sales presence in the United States, entering into an outsourced development relationship in Eastern Europe in late 2006, creating a direct sales and support presence in Europe through establishment of our international headquarters in Cork, Ireland in the third quarter of 2007, establishing a research and development facility in the Czech Republic in 2008, entering into a second outsourced development relationship in Eastern Europe in 2008 and opening an international sales and support operation in Singapore in 2008. We have also expanded through three acquisitions in April and May 2007 and December 2008, two of which were international. These investments in and changes to our business have allowed us to accelerate our revenue growth significantly while maintaining high operating margins.
We expect to continue to invest for the foreseeable future in expanding our business as we increase our direct sales presence in the United States, Europe and Asia, enhance and expand our product offerings and pursue strategic acquisitions. We expect to continue to experience significant annual growth in our business while striving to maintain and increase Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue; however, there is a risk that the returns that we achieve on future investments in the growth of our business will not be as rapid or as high as what we have achieved in the past.
Key Components of Our Results of Operations
Sources of Revenue
Our revenue is primarily comprised of license and maintenance revenue. We license our software under perpetual licenses, which typically include one year of maintenance as part of the initial purchase price of the product. License revenue reflects the revenue recognized from sales of new licenses and upgrades to our software. We have experienced annual and quarterly growth in license revenue. Customers can renew and generally have renewed their maintenance agreements for annual periods at our standard list maintenance renewal pricing for their software products. Current customers with maintenance agreements are entitled to receive unspecified upgrades or enhancements when and if they become available. Maintenance revenue is an important source of our future revenue. We have experienced strong and consistent annual and quarterly growth in maintenance and other revenue. Because our maintenance base grew during 2007, 2008 and the first three quarters of 2009 due to new license sales and high customer retention, we expect maintenance revenue to continue to increase in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue primarily consists of personnel costs related to providing technical support services and amortization of acquired developed product technologies. Personnel costs include salaries, bonuses and stock- based compensation for technical support personnel, as well as an allocation of our facilities, information technology and other overhead costs and our employee benefit costs. We allocate stock-based compensation expense to personnel costs based on the expense category in which the optionholder works. We allocate overhead, such as rent, computer and other technology costs, and employee benefit costs to personnel costs in each expense category based on worldwide headcount in that category.
Operating Expenses
We classify our operating expenses into three categories: sales and marketing, research and development and general and administrative.
Our operating expenses primarily consist of personnel costs, contract research and development costs, marketing program costs and legal, accounting, consulting and other professional service fees. Personnel costs for each category of operating expenses include salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation for personnel in that category, as well as an allocation of our facilities, information technology and other overhead costs and our employee benefit costs. We allocate stock-based compensation expense resulting from the amortization of the fair value of options granted based on how we categorize the department in which the optionholder works. We allocate overhead, such as rent, computer and other technology costs and employee benefit costs, to each expense category based on worldwide headcount in that category.
Our operating expenses increased in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue in each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 as we have built infrastructure and added employees across all categories in order to accelerate and support our growth and to expand into international markets. Operating expenses as a percentage of revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately the same.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses primarily consist of personnel costs for our sales, marketing and business development employees and executives, commissions earned by our sales personnel, the cost of marketing programs such as on-line lead generation, promotional events and webinars and the cost of business development programs. We expect to continue to hire sales personnel in the United States and in both our international offices in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses primarily consist of personnel costs for our product development employees and executives and fees to our contract development vendors in Eastern Europe. We have devoted our development efforts primarily to expanding our product line and increasing the functionality and enhancing the ease-of-use of our software offerings. Since establishing a research and development center in the Czech Republic in 2008, we have significantly increased our research and development employee headcount and relied less on our Eastern European contract development vendors for research and development personnel.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses primarily consist of personnel costs for our executive, finance, legal, human resources and administrative personnel, as well as legal, accounting and other professional service fees and other corporate expenses. We have incurred additional costs in 2009 and expect to continue to incur higher costs associated with being a public company, including higher legal, corporate insurance and financial reporting expenses and the additional costs of achieving and maintaining compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) primarily consists of interest income, interest expense, foreign exchange gains (losses). Interest income represents interest received on our cash and cash equivalents. Interest expense is associated with our outstanding long-term debt, which was $44.1 million as of September 30, 2009 and $101.1 million as of December 31, 2008. We prepaid $7.2 million of principal in March 2009 and we repaid an additional $49.8 million of principal with the net proceeds from our IPO in May 2009, reducing our outstanding principal balance on the Notes to $44.1 million as of September 30, 2009. Foreign exchange gains (losses) relate to expenses and transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the associated company.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense primarily consists of corporate income taxes related to profits resulting from the sale of our software offerings by our United States and Ireland entities. We expect our income tax expense to increase in absolute dollars as our profits continue to increase; however, we expect our effective tax rate to continue to decline slowly, due to the lower corporate tax rate in Ireland, as our international revenue increases as a percentage of total revenue.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. In many instances, we could reasonably use different accounting estimates, and in some instances changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by our management. To the extent that there are differences between our estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will be affected.
In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require management's judgment in its application, while in other cases, management's judgment is required in selecting among available alternative accounting standards that allow different accounting treatment for similar transactions. We believe that these accounting policies requiring significant management judgment are critical to understanding our historical and future performance, as these policies relate to the more significant areas involving management's judgments and estimates. These critical accounting policies are:
• Impairment of long-lived assets;
• Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives;
• Revenue recognition;
• Stock-based compensation; and
• Income taxes
A description of our critical accounting policies that involve significant management judgments appears in our prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 20, 2009 under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates."
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2009, the FASB ratified two consensuses which will significantly affect the revenue recognition accounting policies for transactions that involve multiple deliverables and sales of software-enabled devices. The first consensus requires companies to allocate revenue in arrangements involving multiple deliverables based on the estimated selling price of each deliverable, even though those deliverables are not sold separately either by the company itself or other vendors. This consensus eliminates the requirement that all undelivered elements have objective and reliable evidence of fair value before a company can recognize the portion of the overall arrangement fee that is attributable to items that already have been delivered. In the absence of vendor-specific objective evidence and third-party evidence for one or more elements in a multiple-element arrangement, companies will estimate the selling prices of those elements. The overall arrangement fee will be allocated to each element whether delivered or undelivered, based on their relative selling prices, regardless of whether those estimated selling prices are evidenced by vendor-specific objective evidence, third-party evidence of fair value or are based on the company's judgment.
Under the second consensus, sales of tangible products that contain "essential" software will no longer be subject to the stringent revenue recognition requirements that applied to software licensing arrangements under the existing guidance. The second consensus excludes tangible products from the scope of software revenue accounting requirements if they contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver their essential functionality. For those tangible products, the new guidance under the first consensus will be applied and a greater proportion of the revenue from multiple-element arrangements involving tangible products that contain software will be recognized immediately in many circumstances.
Both consensuses will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. However, early adoption is permitted. If a company elects early adoption and the period of adoption is not the beginning of its fiscal year, the requirements must be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the fiscal year. Retrospective application to prior years is permitted, but not required. In the initial year of application, companies are required to make qualitative and quantitative disclosures about the impact of the changes. In many circumstances, the new guidance under these consensuses will require significant changes to a company's revenue recognition policies and procedures, including system modifications. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of these consensuses on our financial position and results of operations, but do not expect a material impact to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our condensed consolidated statements of income
data for the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Revenue:
License $ 17,638 $ 16,070 $ 44,777 $ 41,545
Maintenance and other 14,712 10,095 38,690 26,693
Total revenue 32,350 26,165 83,467 68,238
Cost of license revenue 153 61 458 191
Cost of maintenance and other revenue 1,110 879 3,127 2,415
Gross profit 31,087 25,225 79,882 65,632
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing 7,765 6,522 21,690 16,198
Research and development 2,986 2,339 8,167 6,249
General and administrative 5,150 4,527 13,127 12,486
Total operating expenses 15,901 13,388 42,984 34,933
Operating income 15,186 11,837 36,898 30,699
Other income (expense):
Interest income 93 140 225 400
Interest expense (668 ) (1,896 ) (3,659 ) (6,435 )
Other income (expense) (82 ) 84 (88 ) (43 )
Total other expense (657 ) (1,672 ) (3,522 ) (6,078 )
Income before income taxes 14,529 10,165 33,376 24,621
Income tax expense 4,374 2,878 10,415 7,956
Net income $ 10,155 $ 7,287 $ 22,961 $ 16,665
|
Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenue
Three Months Ended September 30,
2009 2008
Percentage Percentage
Revenue Amount of Revenue Amount of Revenue Change
. . .
|
|
|