|
Quotes & Info
|
| WMT > SEC Filings for WMT > Form 10-Q on 9-Sep-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
9-Sep-2009
Quarterly Report
This discussion relates to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of July 31, 2009, and for the three- and six-month periods then ended and the accompanying notes included under Part I, Item 1, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as our Consolidated Financial Statements as of January 31, 2009, and for the year then ended and the accompanying notes, and the related Management's Discussion
We intend for this discussion to provide the reader with information that will assist in understanding our financial statements, the changes in certain key items in those financial statements from year to year, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting principles affect our financial statements. The discussion also provides information about the financial results of the various segments of our business to provide a better understanding of how those segments and their results affected the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as a whole.
Throughout this Management's Discussion and Analysis of our Financial Condition and Results of Operations, we discuss segment operating income and comparable store sales. Segment operating income is defined as operating income for each operating segment and excludes unallocated corporate overhead. From time to time, we revise the allocation of corporate overhead and the measurement of each segment's operating income as changes in business needs dictate. When we do, we restate all periods presented for comparative purposes.
Comparable store sales is a measure which indicates the performance of our existing stores by measuring the growth in sales for such stores for a particular period over the corresponding period in the prior year. Our comparable store sales are measured in this report on a calendar basis in relation with our fiscal calendar. Comparable store sales is also referred to as "same-store" sales by others within the retail industry. The method of calculating comparable store sales varies across the retail industry. As a result, our calculation of comparable store sales is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
In discussions of our consolidated results and the operating results of our International segment, we sometimes refer to the impact of changes in currency exchange rates. When we refer to changes in exchange rates, we are referring to the differences between the currency exchange rates we use to convert the International segment's operating results for a period in fiscal 2009 as stated in the local currencies in which that segment operates into U.S. dollars to report those results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and the currency exchange rates we use to convert the International segment's operating results for the comparable fiscal 2010 period into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. The impacts of those currency exchange rates we refer to typically reflect the effect of those differences in currency exchange rates on the period to period comparisons of our consolidated results or the operating results of the International segment.
In connection with the Company's finance transformation project, we adjusted the classification of certain revenue and expense items within our income statement for financial reporting purposes. The changes, which were effective February 1, 2009, did not impact operating income or consolidated net income attributable to Walmart and had a minimal impact on our comparable store sales.
Company Performance Metrics
Management uses a number of metrics to assess the Company's performance including:
• Total sales;
• Comparable store sales;
• Operating income;
• Diluted net income per common share from continuing operations attributable to Walmart;
• Return on investment; and
• Free cash flow.
Total Sales
Three Months Ended July 31, Six Months Ended July 31,
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
(Amounts in millions) 2009 of Total Change 2008 of Total Change 2009 of Total Change 2008 of Total Change
Net Sales:
Walmart U.S. $ 64,209 64.2 % 0.3 % $ 63,989 63.0 % 8.6 % $ 125,453 64.8 % 2.0 % $ 122,980 62.9 % 7.7 %
International 23,965 23.9 % -5.1 % 25,257 24.9 % 17.0 % 45,228 23.4 % -8.0 % 49,184 25.1 % 19.4 %
Sam's Club 11,908 11.9 % -3.2 % 12,300 12.1 % 8.2 % 22,872 11.8 % -2.4 % 23,424 12.0 % 8.1 %
Total Net Sales $ 100,082 100.0 % -1.4 % $ 101,546 100.0 % 10.6 % $ 193,553 100.0 % -1.0 % $ 195,588 100.0 % 10.5 %
|
Our total net sales decreased 1.4% and 1.0% for the three and six months ended July 31, 2009, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in the prior year. The decreases primarily resulted from the negative impact of the currency exchange rates, deflation in certain categories and lower fuel prices. For the three and six months ended July 31, 2009, changes in currency exchange
Comparable Store Sales
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 31, July 31,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Walmart U.S. -1.0 % 4.6 % 0.2 % 3.7 %
Sam's Club (1) -4.0 % 7.4 % -3.2 % 7.1 %
Total U.S. (2) -1.5 % 5.0 % -0.3 % 4.2 %
|
(1) Sam's Club comparable club sales include fuel. Fuel sales had a negative impact of 4.8 percentage points for the three and six months ended July 31, 2009. Fuel sales had a positive impact of 3.4 and 3.2 percentage points for the three and six months ended July 31, 2008, respectively.
(2) Fuel sales had a negative impact of 0.9 and 0.8 percentage points for the three and six months ended July 31, 2009, respectively. Fuel sales had a positive impact of 0.5 percentage points for the three and six months ended July 31, 2008.
Comparable store sales in the United States, including fuel sales, decreased 1.5% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to an increase of 5.0% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. For the six months ended July 31, 2009, comparable store sales in the United States, including fuel sales, decreased 0.3% compared to an increase of 4.2% for the corresponding period in the prior year. Comparable store sales in fiscal 2010 were lower than fiscal 2009 primarily due to a decrease in average transaction size per customer, resulting in part from deflation in certain categories, and lower fuel prices.
Operating Income
Three Months Ended July 31, Six Months Ended July 31,
Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent Percent
(Amounts in millions) 2009 of Total Change 2008 of Total Change 2009 of Total Change 2008 of Total Change
Operating Income:
Walmart U.S. $ 4,901 83.3 % 5.0 % $ 4,667 80.3 % 10.1 % $ 9,365 84.4 % 4.2 % $ 8,987 80.7 % 9.7 %
International 1,143 19.4 % -6.2 % 1,218 21.0 % 17.5 % 2,023 18.2 % -10.8 % 2,268 20.4 % 18.2 %
Sam's Club 419 7.1 % -5.0 % 441 7.6 % -2.6 % 812 7.3 % -2.6 % 834 7.5 % 0.7 %
Other (581 ) -9.8 % 13.3 % (513 ) -8.9 % 16.1 % (1,101 ) -9.9 % 14.8 % (959 ) -8.6 % 16.5 %
$ 5,882 100.0 % 1.2 % $ 5,813 100.0 % 9.9 % $ 11,099 100.0 % -0.3 % $ 11,130 100.0 % 10.0 %
|
Operating income growth compared to net sales growth is a meaningful metric to share with investors because it indicates how effectively we manage costs and leverage expenses. Our objective is to grow operating income faster than net sales. For the second quarter of fiscal 2010, our operating income increased 1.2% compared to the prior year, while our net sales decreased 1.4% for the same period. While the Walmart U.S. segment met this objective, the Sam's Club and International segments did not. The Sam's Club segment did not meet this objective due to higher health benefit and remodel costs. The International segment fell short of this objective primarily due to the negative impact of currency exchange rates.
For the six months ended July 31, 2009, our operating income decreased 0.3% compared to the prior year, while our net sales decreased 1.0% for the same period. While the Walmart U.S. segment met the objective of growing operating income faster than net sales, the Sam's Club and International segments did not. The Sam's segment did not meet this objective due to higher health benefit and remodel costs. The International segment fell short of this objective primarily due to the negative impact of currency exchange rates.
Diluted Net Income per Share from Continuing Operations Attributable to Walmart
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
` July 31, July 31,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Diluted net income per share from continuing
|
Return on Investment
Management believes return on investment ("ROI") is a meaningful metric to share with investors because it helps investors assess how effectively Walmart is employing its assets. Trends in ROI can fluctuate over time as management balances the long-term potential of strategic initiatives with any possible short-term impacts.
ROI was 18.4% and 19.4% for the trailing twelve months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in ROI resulted from the negative impact of currency exchange rates, the accrual for our settlement of 63 wage and hour class action lawsuits in January 2009 and our investment in Chile.
We define ROI as adjusted operating income (operating income plus interest income, depreciation and amortization and rent expense) for the fiscal year or trailing twelve months divided by average invested capital during that period. We consider average invested capital to be the average of our beginning and ending total assets of continuing operations plus accumulated depreciation and amortization less accounts payable and accrued liabilities for that period, plus a rent factor equal to the rent for the fiscal year or trailing twelve months multiplied by a factor of eight.
ROI is considered a non-GAAP financial measure under the SEC's rules. We consider return on assets ("ROA") to be the financial measure computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") that is the most directly comparable financial measure to ROI as we calculate that financial measure. ROI differs from ROA (which is income from continuing operations for the fiscal year or the trailing twelve months divided by average of total assets of continuing operations for the period) because ROI: adjusts operating income to exclude certain expense items and add interest income; adjusts total assets from continuing operations for the impact of accumulated depreciation and amortization, accounts payable and accrued liabilities; and incorporates a factor of rent to arrive at total invested capital.
Although ROI is a standard financial metric, numerous methods exist for calculating a company's ROI. As a result, the method used by management to calculate ROI may differ from the methods other companies use to calculate their ROI. We urge you to understand the methods used by another company to calculate its ROI before comparing our ROI to that of such other company.
For the Twelve Months Ended
July 31,
(Amounts in millions) 2009 2008
CALCULATION OF RETURN ON INVESTMENT
Numerator
Operating income (1) $ 22,767 $ 22,967
+ Interest income (1) 242 277
+ Depreciation and amortization (1) 6,830 6,636
+ Rent (1) 1,756 1,706
= Adjusted operating income $ 31,595 $ 31,586
Denominator
Average total assets of continuing operations (2) $ 167,358 $ 160,988
+ Average accumulated depreciation and
amortization (2) 36,223 31,493
- Average accounts payable (2) 29,355 28,824
- Average accrued liabilities (2) 16,157 14,816
+ Rent * 8 14,048 13,648
= Invested capital $ 172,117 $ 162,489
Return on investment (ROI) 18.4 % 19.4 %
CALCULATION OF RETURN ON ASSETS
Numerator
Income from continuing operations(1) $ 13,774 $ 13,839
Denominator
Average total assets of continuing operations (2) $ 167,358 $ 160,988
Return on assets (ROA) 8.2 % 8.6 %
As of July 31,
Certain Balance Sheet Data 2009 2008 2007
Total assets of continuing operations (1) $ 168,795 $ 165,921 $ 156,054
Accumulated depreciation and amortization 38,466 33,980 29,005
Accounts payable 28,797 29,912 27,736
Accrued liabilities 16,706 15,607 14,025
|
(1) Based on continuing operations only and therefore excludes the impact of Gazeley Limited, a former United Kingdom property development subsidiary, which was sold in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, and the closure of 23 stores and divesture of other properties of The Seiyu, Ltd. in Japan pursuant to restructuring program adopted during the third quarter of fiscal 2009. All of these activities have been disclosed as discontinued operations. Total assets as of July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 in the table above exclude assets of discontinued operations that are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of $147, $974 and $895, respectively.
(2) The average is based on the addition of the account balance at the end of the current period to the account balance at the end of the prior period and dividing by 2.
We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities in a period minus payments for property and equipment made in that period. We generated positive free cash flow of $4.2 billion and $5.1 billion for the six months ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decline in our free cash flow is primarily the result of increased capital spending.
Free cash flow is considered a non-GAAP financial measure under the SEC's rules. Management believes, however, that free cash flow is an important financial measure for use in evaluating the Company's financial performance, which measures our ability to generate additional cash from our business operations. Free cash flow should be considered in addition to, rather than as a substitute for, income from continuing operations as a measure of our performance and net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.
Additionally, our definition of free cash flow is limited, in that it does not represent residual cash flows available for discretionary expenditures due to the fact that the measure does not deduct the payments required for debt service and other contractual obligations or payments made for business acquisitions. Therefore, we believe it is important to view free cash flow as a measure that provides supplemental information to our entire statement of cash flows.
Although other companies report their free cash flow, numerous methods may exist for calculating a company's free cash flow. As a result, the method used by our management to calculate free cash flow may differ from the methods other companies use to calculate their free cash flow. We urge you to understand the methods used by another company to calculate its free cash flow before comparing our free cash flow to that of such other company.
The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities, a GAAP measure, to free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure.
Six Months Ended July 31,
(Amounts in millions) 2009 2008
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 9,895 $ 10,164
Payments for property and equipment (5,744 ) (5,074 )
Free cash flow $ 4,151 $ 5,090
Net cash used in investing activities $ (5,748 ) $ (4,527 )
Net cash used in financing activities $ (3,434 ) $ (4,380 )
|
Results of Operations
The following discussion of our Results of Operations is based on our continuing operations and excludes any results or discussion of our discontinued operations.
Consolidated
Three Months Ended July 31, 2009
Our total net sales decreased 1.4% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and increased 10.6% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The decrease in fiscal 2010 primarily resulted from the negative impact of currency exchange rates, deflation in certain categories and lower fuel prices. Currency exchange rates had a $4.2 billion unfavorable impact on the International segment's net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Currency exchange rates had a $1.1 billion favorable impact on the International segment's net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Our gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, ("gross profit margin") increased from 24.1% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 to 24.9% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. This increase is primarily due to more effective merchandising and strong inventory management in the Walmart U.S. and Sam's Club segments.
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses ("operating expenses"), as a percentage of net sales, increased 0.8 percentage points for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales increased in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 primarily due to lower net sales, higher health benefit costs and increased technology and system expenses which relate to our long-term transformation projects to enhance our information systems for finance, merchandising and human resources.
Interest, net, for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 increased 3.7% compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009 due to an increase in total debt. The increase in total debt was partially offset by lower interest rates.
Our effective income tax rate from continuing operations increased from 34.1% for the second quarter of fiscal 2009 to 34.3% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 due to the timing of certain discrete tax matters, as well as the mix of income between domestic and international operations.
Six Months Ended July 31, 2009
Our total net sales decreased 1.0% for the six months ended July 31, 2009 and increased 10.5% for the six months ended of July 31, 2008. The decrease in fiscal 2010 primarily resulted from the negative impact of currency exchange rates, deflation in certain categories and lower fuel prices. Currency exchange rates had a $9.0 billion unfavorable impact on the International segment's net sales for the six months ended July 31, 2009. Currency exchange rates had a $2.4 billion favorable impact on the International segment's net sales for the six months ended July 31, 2008.
Our gross profit margin increased from 24.1% for the first six months of fiscal 2009 to 24.8% for the first six months of fiscal 2010. This increase was primarily due to more effective merchandising and strong inventory management in the Walmart U.S. and Sam's Club segments.
Operating expenses, as a percentage of net sales, increased 0.6 percentage points for the first six months of fiscal 2010 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2009. Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales increased for the first six months of fiscal 2010 primarily due to lower net sales, currency exchange rates and higher health benefit costs.
Membership and other income, as a percentage of net sales, decreased 0.1 percentage points compared to the first six months of fiscal 2009 due to decline in several miscellaneous income categories.
Interest, net, for the first six months of fiscal 2010 decreased 1.3% compared to the first six months of fiscal 2009 due to lower interest rates on our borrowings.
Our effective income tax rate from continuing operations decreased from 34.3% for the first six months of fiscal 2009 to 34.0% for the first six months of fiscal 2010 due to the mix of income between domestic and international operations, as well as the impact of currency exchange rates.
Walmart U.S. Segment
Three Months Ended July 31, 2009
(Amounts in millions)
Segment net Segment operating Segment
sales increase income increase operating
from prior Segment from prior income as a percentage
Segment fiscal year operating fiscal year of segment
Three months ended July 31, net sales second quarter income second quarter net sales
2009 $ 64,209 0.3 % $ 4,901 5.0 % 7.6 %
2008 63,989 8.6 % 4,667 10.1 % 7.3 %
|
Net sales for the Walmart U.S. segment increased 0.3% for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009. The increase resulted from our continued expansion activities and strength in our grocery and health and wellness categories. Comparable store sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 decreased 1.0% resulting from a decrease in average transaction size per customer, despite an increase in customer traffic in our comparable stores. The decrease in average transaction size per customer was attributable in part to the change in mix of merchandise sold and deflation.
Gross profit margin increased 1.1 percentage points for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2009 due to higher initial margins, lower inventory shrinkage and consistent year-over-year markdowns as a percentage of sales resulting from better inventory management.
Other income as a percentage of segment net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was consistent with the second quarter of fiscal 2009.
Six Months Ended July 31, 2009
(Amounts in millions)
Segment net
. . .
|
|
|