Search the web
Welcome, Guest
[Sign Out, My Account]
EDGAR_Online

Quotes & Info
Enter Symbol(s):
e.g. YHOO, ^DJI
Symbol Lookup | Financial Search
ALHC.OB > SEC Filings for ALHC.OB > Form 10-K/A on 21-Aug-2009All Recent SEC Filings

Show all filings for ALLIANCE HEALTHCARD INC | Request a Trial to NEW EDGAR Online Pro

Form 10-K/A for ALLIANCE HEALTHCARD INC


21-Aug-2009

Annual Report


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Overview
Since formation in 1998 we have been a provider of discount medical plans with a focus on creating, marketing, and distributing membership savings programs primarily to the underserved markets in the United States. Our original programs offered attractive savings in approximately 16 areas of healthcare, including physician visits, hospital stays, chiropractics, vision, dental, pharmacy, hearing, and patient advocacy, among others. In February 2007, we completed the merger-acquisition of BMS Holding Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries, Benefit Marketing Solutions, L.L.C. (BMS) and BMS Insurance Agency, L.L.C., (BMS Agency). BMS is the largest membership plan provider to dealers in the rental-purchase industry. For financial reporting purpose, BMS was considered the acquiring entity and historical financial statements prior to March of 2007 reflect the activities of BMS as adjusted for the effect of the recapitalization which occurred at the merger date. Activities of Alliance HealthCard, Inc. prior to the merger date are no longer reflected in the historical financial statements as it was considered to be the acquired entity. Additional intangible assets and goodwill totaling $4,791,945 were recorded on the financial statements as of the merger date reflecting the fair market value of Alliance HealthCard, Inc. in excess of its identifiable net tangible assets as of the date of the merger. While we continue to market our health oriented programs, the merger-acquisition has greatly expanded our business scope to include programs that offer discount savings on dining and entertainment, automotive, legal and financial, as well as insurance programs including leased property, involuntary unemployment, accidental death and dismemberment, and product service plans. We sell our membership savings programs to retailers, insurance companies, finance companies, banks, employer groups and association-based organizations through direct sales or independent marketing consultants, and are now a leading provider of value added membership plans sold in conjunction with point-of-sale transactions.
BMS was formed in February 2002 and designs, markets, and distributes membership programs for rental-purchase companies, financial organizations, employer groups, retailers and association-based organizations on a nation-wide basis. These membership programs are sold as part of a point-of-sale transaction or through direct marketing efforts. BMS is one of the largest membership plan providers to dealers in the rental-purchase industry market space. The point-of-sale membership plans are sold through more than 5,100 locations in the U.S. and Canada.
In connection with the merger-acquisition of BMS Holding Company, the merger was accounted for as a reverse merger-acquisition with Alliance HealthCard as the legal acquirer and BMS Holding Company as the accounting acquirer. Under the accounting treatment, the historical operations of BMS Holding Company and its subsidiaries, BMS and BMS Agency, became ours and our former operations and assets and liabilities were deemed purchased by BMS Holding Company. Therefore, the historical operations contained in this report are those of BMS Holding Company and its subsidiaries.
Critical Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements. Significant estimates include our claims liability (see Note 12) and the discounted future cash flows used to calculate our goodwill for impairment.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
We account for acquisitions of businesses in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141,"Business Combinations" ("SFAS 141"). Goodwill in such acquisitions represents the excess of the cost of a business acquired over the net of the amounts assigned to assets acquired, including identifiable intangible assets and liabilities assumed. SFAS 141 specifies criteria to be used in determining whether intangible assets acquired in a business combination must be recognized and reported separately from goodwill. Amounts assigned to goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets are based on independent appraisals or internal estimates.
Customer lists acquired in an acquisition are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the customer lists. Customer lists deemed acquired in connection with the Alliance Healthcard, Inc. merger were valued at $2,500,000 and are being amortized over 60 months, the estimated useful life of the list. Amortization of customer lists totaled $500,004 and $291,669, respectively for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007.
We account for recorded goodwill and other intangible assets in accordance with SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("SFAS 142"). In accordance with SFAS 142, we do not amortize goodwill. Management evaluates goodwill for impairment for each reporting period. If considered impaired goodwill will be written down to fair value and a corresponding impairment loss recognized. We evaluate the recoverability of identifiable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an intangible asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, (2) a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or
(3) an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition of an asset. We measure the carrying amount of the asset against the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with it. Should the sum of the expected future net cash flows be less than the carrying value of the asset being evaluated, an impairment loss would be recognized. The impairment loss would be calculated as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. The fair value is measured based on quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including the discounted value of estimated future cash flows. The evaluation of asset impairment requires us to make assumptions about future cash flows over the life of the asset being evaluated. These assumptions require significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts. As of September 30, 2008 and 2007 we recognized no impairment losses related to our intangible assets. Stock Based Compensation
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS 123R"), we measure stock based compensation expense using the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period. Income Taxes
We adopted SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes," that requires, among other things, a liability approach to calculating deferred income taxes. The objective is to measure a deferred income tax liability or asset using the tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred income tax liability or asset is expected to be settled or realized. Any resulting net deferred income tax assets should be reduced by a valuation allowance sufficient to reduce such assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
In 2006, FASB issued FIN 48, which clarifies the application of SFAS 109 by defining a criterion that an individual income tax position must meet for any part of the benefit of that position to be recognized in an enterprise's financial statements and provides guidance on measurement, de-recognition, classification, accounting for interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. In accordance with the transition provisions, we adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007.
We have recognized a liability for uncertain tax positions. See Note 9. Income Taxes. We further believe that there are no tax positions for which it is reasonably possible, based on current tax law and policy that the unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease over the next 12 months producing, individually or in the aggregate, a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, "Revenue Recognition, corrected copy," which requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the seller's price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and, (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ("SFAS 157"). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement does not require any new fair value measurements; rather, it applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The provisions of this statement are to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which this statement is initially applied, with any transition adjustment recognized as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The provisions of SFAS 157 are effective for the fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Therefore, we anticipate adopting this standard as of October 1, 2008. Management has not determined the effect, if any, the adoption of this statement will have on our financial condition or results of operations.
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans ("SFAS No. 158"), an amendment of FASB Nos. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). SFAS No. 158 requires (a) recognition of the funded status (measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation) of a benefit plan as an asset or liability in the employer's statement of financial position, (b) measurement of the funded status as of the employer's fiscal year-end with limited exceptions, and
(c) recognition of changes in the funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. The requirement to recognize the funded status of a benefit plan and the disclosure requirements are effective as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006. The requirement to measure the plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the employer's fiscal year-end statement of financial position is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. This SFAS 158 has no current applicability to our financial statements. In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159).This statement permits companies to choose to measure many financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS 159 on its consolidated financial statements. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations, which replaces SFAS No. 141. SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The Statement also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective as of the beginning of an entity's fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 (our Fiscal 2010). SFAS No. 141R will have an effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements for any business combinations the Company may enter into after the effective date. In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest, changes in a parent's ownership interest and the valuation of retained non-controlling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. The Statement also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the non-controlling owners. SFAS No.160 is effective as of the beginning of an entity's fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2008 (our Fiscal 2010). The Company does not believe SFAS No. 160 will have an effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 161) as an amendment to SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". SFAS 161 requires that objectives for using derivative instruments be disclosed in terms of underlying risk and accounting designation. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS 162 "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles" ("SFAS 162"). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. SFAS 162 is effective sixty days following the SEC's approval of PCAOB amendments to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of 'Present fairly in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles'". The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, "Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts, an interpretation of SFAS No. 60." The scope of SFAS 163 is limited to financial guarantee insurance (and reinsurance) contracts, as described in this Statement, issued by enterprises included within the scope of SFAS 60. Accordingly, SFAS 163 does not apply to financial guarantee contracts issued by enterprises excluded from the scope of SFAS 60 or to some insurance contracts that seem similar to financial guarantee insurance contracts issued by insurance enterprises (such as mortgage guaranty insurance or credit insurance on trade receivables). SFAS 163 also does not apply to financial guarantee insurance contracts that are derivative instruments included within the scope of SFAS Statement No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Results of Operations
Year Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 2007 Revenue increased $3.3 million, or 19%, to $20.9 million for the year ended September 30, 2008, compared to revenue of $17.6 million for the same prior year period. The $3.3 million increase consisted of an increase for BMS of $2.2 million attributable to the following: a) $.6 million from a major client due to an increase in membership sales and b) 1.6 million from new and existing client business. Alliance HealthCard was responsible for the remaining increase of $1.1 million attributable to new business.
Gross profit increased $3.7 million, or 62%, to $9.8 million for the year ended September 30, 2008 compared to $6.1 million for the prior year end. The increase was primarily attributable to the following: a) additional revenue; b) a decrease in discount benefits and fulfillment expenses; and partially offset by
c) an increase in claims expenses. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue was 47% and 34% for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Sales and marketing expenses increased $.3 million, or 37%, to $1.3 million for the year ending September 30, 2008, compared to $.9 million for the year ending September 30, 2007. Sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenue were 6.0% and 5.2% for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase consisted of $.2 million for BMS and $.1 million for Alliance HealthCard. The increase was primarily attributable to compensation and commission expense. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $.2 million to $.5 million for the year ended September 30, 2008 due primarily to the amortization of customer lists deemed acquired by us from Alliance HealthCard in connection with the 2007 merger.


Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses increased $.2 million, or 8%, to $3.1 million for the year ending September 30, 2008 compared to $2.9 million for the prior year. Expenses for 2007 consisted of one time merger expenses of $.3 million. Excluding one-time merger expenses from the year ended September 30, 2007, there was an increase of $.5 million for the year ended September 30, 2008. The $.5 million increase was primarily attributable to only seven months of operations for Alliance for the year ended September 30, 2007. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue were 15% and 17% for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
We recognized net income tax expense of $2.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 compared to $.5 million for the prior year. This was due primarily to the fact that only the last seven months of fiscal 2007 for both Alliance HealthCard and BMS were taxed at the corporate level. Prior to the merger, the BMS operations for the first five months of fiscal 2007 were taxed at the shareholder level and Alliance HealthCard utilized net operating loss carry forwards.
We reported net income prior to dividends and distributions of $2.7 million for the year ended September 30, 2008 compared to $1.4 million for the same prior year. Net income available for common shareholders was $2.7 million for fiscal 2008 as compared to $(6.8) million for fiscal 2007. Total dividends and distributions paid in connection with the promissory notes to former BMS shareholders were $0 and $8.2 million for the years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of September 30, 2008, we had unrestricted cash of $3.0 million and a working capital deficit of $.5 million. Our current liabilities include an estimated current portion of notes payable to related parties. These note obligations are only payable in the event that our consolidated earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for each of the fiscal years ending on September 30, 2007, 2008 and 2009 ("Actual EBITDA") exceeds $4,200,000 (the "Targeted EBITDA"). If the Targeted EBITDA level is not achieved then the principal amount of these notes will be reduced by an amount equal to the percentage by which the Actual EBITDA for each of those fiscal years falls short of the Targeted EBITDA and the adjusted principal balance of these notes will then be amortized over the remaining term of the notes in accordance with the foregoing payment terms.
Cash provided by operating activities was $3.3 million and $2.0 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase of $1 .3 million was primarily attributable to an increase in revenue and net income offset by a decrease in claims and other liabilities.
Cash used in investing activities was $0.2 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, while during the 2007 fiscal year cash provided by investing activities was $1.0 million. The decrease of $.9 million was attributable to the cash received from the merger for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 and the increase in restricted cash of $.2 million.
Cash used in financing activities was $2.3 million for the year ended September 30, 2008 compared to $2.7 million for the same prior year period. The increase of $.4 million was related to the following:
• A reduction of $1.6 million for distributions paid prior to the merger to former shareholders of BMS Holding Company, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007;

• Promissory note payments to related parties of $2.3 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 compared to $1.2 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007;

• Proceeds of $.1 million from exercise of stock options during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008; and

• Repayment of our line of credit for $.15 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.

We anticipate that our cash on hand, together with cash flow from operations, will be sufficient for the next 12 months to finance operations, make capital investments in the ordinary course of business, and pay indebtedness when due.
IMPACT OF INFLATION
Inflation has not had a material effect on the Company to date. However, the effects of inflation on future operating results will depend in part, on the Company's ability to increase prices or lower expenses, or both, in amounts that offset inflationary cost increases.


Table of Contents

  Add ALHC.OB to Portfolio     Set Alert         Email to a Friend  
Get SEC Filings for Another Symbol: Symbol Lookup
Quotes & Info for ALHC.OB - All Recent SEC Filings
Sign Up for a Free Trial to the NEW EDGAR Online Pro
Detailed SEC, Financial, Ownership and Offering Data on over 12,000 U.S. Public Companies.
Actionable and easy-to-use with searching, alerting, downloading and more.
Request a Trial      Sign Up Now


Copyright © 2010 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service
SEC Filing data and information provided by EDGAR Online, Inc. (1-800-416-6651). All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Neither Yahoo! nor any of independent providers is liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. By accessing the Yahoo! site, you agree not to redistribute the information found therein.