|
Quotes & Info
|
| PCAP > SEC Filings for PCAP > Form 10-Q on 14-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
14-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
• Our ability to negotiate other financing and/or strategic alternatives, including possible debt or equity financing, acquisition or disposition of assets, and other strategic transactions;
• Our ability to maintain our status as a RIC under the Code;
• Our ability to continue as a going concern;
• Our future operating results;
• Our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies;
• The ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;
• Our expected financings and investments;
• Future changes in laws or regulations (including the interpretation of these laws and regulations by regulatory authorities) and conditions in our operating areas, particularly with respect to business development companies and RIC's;
• The adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; and
• The timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies.
In addition, words such as "anticipate," "believe," "expect" and "intend"
indicate a forward-looking statement, although not all forward-looking
statements include these words. The forward-looking statements contained in this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual
results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the
forward-looking statements for any reason, including the factors set forth in
"Risk Factors" in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and in our 2008 annual report on
Form 10-K.
We have based the forward-looking statements included in this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q on information available to us on the date of this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q, and we assume no obligation to update any such
forward-looking statements. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or
update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional
disclosures that we may make through reports that we may file in the future with
the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q
and current reports on Form 8-K.
the amount of our advances outstanding under the facility exceeding the maximum
availability under the facility for more than three consecutive business days.
The maximum availability under the facility is determined by, among other
things, the fair market value of all eligible loans serving as collateral under
the facility. Because the fair market value of certain eligible loans decreased
at December 31, 2008, our advances outstanding under the facility exceeded the
maximum availability under the facility. This determination was made in
connection with the delivery of a borrowing base report to the facility lenders
on March 31, 2009. As a result of the occurrence of the termination event under
the facility, we can no longer make additional advances under the facility.
Also, the interest rate payable under the Amended Securitization Facility
increased from the commercial paper rate plus 1.75% to the prime rate plus
3.75%. In addition, the terms of the facility require that from April 3, 2009
all principal, interest and fees collected from the debt investments secured by
the facility must be used to pay down amounts outstanding under the facility
within 24 months following the date of the termination event. Substantially all
of our debt investments are secured under our Amended Securitization Facility.
The facility also permits the lenders, upon notice to us, to accelerate amounts
outstanding under the facility and exercise other rights and remedies provided
by the facility, including the right to sell the collateral under the facility.
To date, we have not received any such notice from the lenders. At June 30,
2009, the interest rate under the Amended Securitization Facility was 7.0%.
Moreover, our independent registered public accounting firm issued an opinion
on our December 31, 2008 consolidated financial statements that states that the
consolidated financial statements were prepared assuming we will continue as a
going concern and further states that the uncertainty regarding the renewal of
our liquidity facility raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as
a going concern. At the time our independent registered public accounting firm
issued this opinion, we were negotiating the renewal of the liquidity facility,
which matured on April 11, 2009, that supported our Amended Securitization
Facility with certain liquidity banks. In the event that the liquidity banks did
not renew the liquidity facility, the terms of the Amended Securitization
Facility would require, among other things, that all principal and interest
collected from the debt investments secured by the facility be used to pay down
amounts outstanding under the facility by April 2011. Subsequent to the issuance
of this opinion by our independent registered public accounting firm, the
liquidity banks determined not to renew the liquidity facility supporting our
Amended Securitization Facility.
We are in discussions with the Amended Securitization Facility lenders to
seek relief from certain terms of the facility, including the requirement under
the facility that we use all principal, interest and fees collected from the
debt investments secured by the facility to pay down amounts outstanding under
the facility by April 3, 2011. However, based on discussions with the Lenders to
date, we are not optimistic that the lenders will agree to provide us any relief
from any terms of the facility. Moreover, even if we are successful in seeking
relief from the lenders of the facility, our ability to operate our business in
the manner in which we have historically operated will be constrained until our
ability to access the debt and equity capital markets improves. As a result, we
are also currently evaluating other financing and/or strategic alternatives,
including possible sale of our company, debt or equity financing, disposition of
assets, and other strategic transactions. For a discussion of a strategic
transaction we entered into with Prospect Capital Corporation on August 3, 2009,
see "Management's Discussion and Analysis and Results of Operations - Recent
Developments."
Portfolio Composition
Our primary business is lending to and investing in small- to mid-sized
businesses through investments in senior secured loans, junior secured loans,
subordinated debt investments and equity-based investments, including warrants.
The fair value of our portfolio was $283.9 million and $322.4 million at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Total portfolio investment activity as of and for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008 was as follows:
June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008
Beginning portfolio at fair value $ 322,370,748 $ 384,725,753
Investments in debt securities 10,273,276 79,096,786
Investments in equity securities 188 3,245,937
Investment repayments (21,116,671 ) (95,018,988 )
Increase in payment-in-kind interest/dividends 2,218,782 5,452,124
Sale of investments (1,377,011 ) (15,267,401 )
Change in unearned revenue 443,572 (129,458 )
Realized loss on investments (12,013,473 ) -
Change in fair value of investments (16,870,174 ) (39,992,921 )
Ending portfolio at fair value $ 283,929,237 $ 322,370,748
|
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the composition of our portfolio at fair value was as follows:
June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008
Investments at Percentage of Investments at Percentage of
Fair Value Total Portfolio Fair Value Total Portfolio
Senior secured revolving lines of credit $ 14,252,865 5.0 % $ 10,266,191 3.2 %
Senior secured term loans 123,459,342 43.5 146,372,476 45.4
Junior secured term loans 50,861,771 17.9 58,076,196 18.0
Senior subordinated debt 85,658,932 30.2 93,365,112 29.0
Investments in equity securities 9,696,327 3.4 14,290,773 4.4
Totals $ 283,929,237 100.0 % $ 322,370,748 100.0 %
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and year ended December 31, 2008, the
weighted average yield on all of our outstanding debt investments was
approximately 10.7% and 12.1%, respectively. The weighted average balance of our
debt investment portfolio during the six months ended June 30, 2009 was
$300.3 million, down from $333.2 million during the fourth quarter of 2008.
Yields are computed using actual interest income earned for the year (annualized
for the six months ended June 30, 2009), including amortization of loan fees and
original issue discount, divided by the weighted average fair value of debt
investments. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $109.8 million and
$123.5 million, respectively, of our portfolio investments at fair value were at
fixed interest rates, which represented approximately 39% and 38%, respectively,
of our total portfolio of investments at fair value. We generally structure our
subordinated debt investments at fixed rates while many of our senior secured
and junior secured loans are, and will be, at variable rates.
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, our equity investments consisted of
common and preferred stock, LLC membership interests and warrants to acquire
equity interests in certain of our portfolio companies. Warrants to acquire
equity interests allow us to participate in the potential appreciation in the
value of the portfolio company, while minimizing the amount of upfront cost to
us.
The composition of our investment portfolio by industry sector, using Moody's
Industry Classifications, excluding unearned income, as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 at cost and fair value was as follows:
June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008
Cost % (1) Fair Value % (1) Cost % (1) Fair Value % (1)
Machinery $ 51,631,722 15.0 % $ 36,171,707 12.7 % $ 51,384,711 14.0 % $ 39,527,874 12.3 %
Health Care, Education &
Childcare 39,025,805 11.3 37,864,405 13.3 39,749,005 10.9 39,501,102 12.2
Personal & Nondurable
Consumer Products 38,546,025 11.2 36,274,356 12.8 39,609,196 10.8 39,247,796 12.2
Automobile 30,715,635 8.9 23,050,225 8.1 33,276,374 9.1 26,487,272 8.2
Textiles & Leather 28,954,845 8.4 27,780,125 9.8 29,557,681 8.1 29,368,566 9.1
Electronics 27,233,211 7.9 27,389,835 9.6 31,033,364 8.5 30,033,495 9.3
Printing & Publishing 26,352,526 7.6 11,324,964 4.0 26,302,411 7.2 18,159,998 5.6
Metals & Minerals 23,089,697 6.7 22,746,197 8.0 23,049,480 6.3 22,453,909 7.0
Mining, Steel, Iron &
Nonprecious Metals 17,921,135 5.2 11,323,286 4.0 18,092,545 4.9 17,245,764 5.3
Retail Stores 11,579,947 3.4 11,484,713 4.1 10,978,984 3.0 10,872,284 3.4
Housewares & Durable
Consumer Products 11,106,570 3.2 7,292,672 2.6 11,005,810 3.0 9,333,052 2.9
Ecological 9,929,859 2.9 9,588,359 3.4 8,556,102 2.3 8,164,902 2.5
Grocery 8,393,329 2.4 8,541,001 3.0 8,156,189 2.2 8,278,569 2.6
Chemicals, Plastic &
Rubber 5,360,932 1.6 3,781,610 1.3 16,659,410 4.6 9,347,006 2.9
Insurance 5,012,842 1.5 4,699,639 1.6 5,000,000 1.4 4,048,200 1.3
Buildings & Real Estate 4,492,943 1.3 4,492,943 1.6 4,613,182 1.3 4,613,182 1.4
Personal, Food &
Miscellaneous Services 3,000,000 0.9 - - 3,000,000 0.8 1,050,000 0.3
Diversified/Conglomerate
Service 1,570,736 0.5 - - 1,570,736 0.4 623,500 0.2
Aerospace & Defense 463,168 0.1 123,200 0.1 463,168 0.1 173,600 0.1
Oil & Gas - - - - 3,840,677 1.1 3,840,677 1.2
Total $ 344,380,927 100.0 % $ 283,929,237 100.0 % $ 365,899,025 100.0 % $ 322,370,748 100.0 %
|
(1) Represents percentage of total portfolio.
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we did not have any investment in
excess of 10% of the total investment portfolio at fair value. Investment
income, consisting of interest, dividends and fees can fluctuate dramatically
upon repayment of an investment or sale of an equity interest. Revenue
recognition in any given period can be highly concentrated among several
portfolio companies. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, we did not record investment income from any portfolio company in excess
of 10% of total investment income.
June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008
Investments at Percentage of Investments at Percentage of
Investment Rating Fair Value Total Portfolio Fair Value Total Portfolio
1 $ 95,779,317 34.9 % $ 82,179,735 26.7 %
2 134,852,717 49.2 184,507,897 59.9
3 30,469,979 11.1 21,275,475 6.9
4 4,890,139 1.8 8,477,320 2.7
5 8,240,758 3.0 11,639,548 3.8
Totals $ 274,232,910 100.0 % $ 308,079,975 100.0 %
|
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had loans and equity investments
from six and three, respectively, of our portfolio companies on non-accrual
status. See "-Critical Accounting Policies - Interest and Dividend Income
Recognition" for a discussion of when we place debt investments on non-accrual
status.
In the event that the United States economy continues in a prolonged
recession, it is possible that the financial results of small- to mid-sized
companies, similar to those in which we invest, could experience further
deterioration, which could ultimately lead to difficulty in meeting debt service
requirements and an increase in defaults. We can provide no assurance that the
performance of certain of our portfolio companies will not be negatively
impacted by these economic or other conditions which could have a negative
impact on our future results.
Results of Operations
The principal measure of our financial performance is net income (loss) which
includes net investment income, net realized gain (loss) and net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation). Net investment income is the difference between our
income from interest, dividends, fees, and other investment income and our
operating expenses. Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference
between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and
their stated cost. Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on interest rate
swaps is the net change in the fair value of our outstanding swap agreements.
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments is the net change in
the fair value of our investment portfolio.
Comparison for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Total Investment Income
Total investment income includes interest and dividend income on our
investments, fee income and other investment income. Fee income consists
principally of loan and arrangement fees, annual administrative fees, unused
fees, prepayment fees, amendment fees, equity structuring fees and waiver fees.
Other investment income consists primarily of the accelerated recognition of
deferred
financing fees received from our portfolio companies on the repayment of the
outstanding investment, the sale of the investment or reduction of available
credit.
Total investment income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
was $8.1 million and $10.7 million, respectively. For the three months ended
June 30, 2009, this amount consisted of interest income of $12,000 from cash and
cash equivalents, $7.8 million of interest and dividend income from portfolio
investments (which included $1.1 million in payment-in-kind or PIK interest and
dividends) and $288,000 of fee income. For the three months ended June 30, 2008,
this amount consisted of interest income of $30,000 from cash and cash
equivalents, $10.1 million of interest and dividend income from portfolio
investments (which included $1.4 million in payment-in-kind or PIK interest and
dividends), $142,000 in fee income and $380,000 in other investment income.
The decrease in our total investment income for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily
attributable to a decrease in the weighted average fair value balance
outstanding of our interest-bearing investment portfolio during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009. The primary reason behind the decrease in total investment
income was a decrease in interest income due to the decrease in the weighted
average fair value balance of our investment portfolio, and a decrease in the
weighted average yield of our investments. During the three months ended
June 30, 2009, the weighted average fair value balance outstanding of our
interest-bearing investment portfolio was approximately $292.4 million as
compared to approximately $337.3 million during the three months ended June 30,
2008. The weighted average yield on our investments during the three months
ended June 30, 2009 decreased as a result of an increase in the number of loans
on non-accrual status and an overall decrease in market interest rates.
Expenses
Expenses include compensation expense, interest on our outstanding
indebtedness, professional fees, and general and administrative expenses.
Expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, were $5.6 million
and $4.2 million, respectively. Expenses increased for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008 by
approximately $1.4 million, primarily as a result of higher interest expense of
$852,000, higher professional fees of $610,000 and higher general and
administrative expenses of $126,000, partially offset by lower compensation
expense which decreased by $268,000. The lower compensation expense was
principally attributable to the elimination of bonus accruals given the impact
of the current market and economic environment on our financial performance,
reduction of employee headcount during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first
quarter of 2009, partially offset by an increase in base salary for three of our
executive officers during the first quarter of 2009. The increase in interest
expense was attributable to an increase in interest rates during the second
quarter of 2009 as a result of the April 3, 2009 termination event which
occurred under the Amended Securitization Facility. Our weighted average
borrowings outstanding were approximately $141.5 million during the three months
ended June 30, 2009, as compared to $139.6 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2008. Such borrowings were used primarily to fund investments. The
increase in professional fees expense is primarily due to additional legal fees
we incurred in 2009 relating to the termination event under the Amended
Securitization Facility and our evaluation of strategic alternatives for the
company. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily the
result of additional costs incurred in connection with the evaluation of
strategic alternatives, including additional fees paid to our directors in
connection with board meetings relating to the termination event under the
Amended Securitization Facility and the evaluation of strategic alternatives for
us.
Realized Gain (Loss) on Disposition of Investments
Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference between the
proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their stated
cost. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, we realized a loss of
$413,000 on investments principally from the sale of one syndicated loan
investment. During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we realized a loss of
$344,000 on investments principally from the cancellation of warrants in which
we had previously recorded unrealized depreciation on the entire warrant
balance.
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation on Investments
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments is the net change
in the fair value of our investment portfolio during the reporting period,
including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or
depreciation when gains or losses are realized. During the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of $12.7 million
and $3.4 million, respectively, on our investments. For the three months ended
June 30, 2009, our net unrealized depreciation consisted of the following:
approximately $12.9 million of unrealized depreciation resulted from a decline
in cash flows of our portfolio companies; approximately $1.5 million of
unrealized depreciation which resulted from changes in market multiples and
interest rates; offset by approximately $1.7 million of unrealized appreciation
resulted from quoted market prices on our syndicated loan portfolio. For the
three months ended June 30, 2008, our net unrealized depreciation consisted of
the following: approximately $217,000 of unrealized depreciation resulted from
the decrease in quoted market prices on our syndicated loan portfolio as a
result of the disruption in the credit markets for broadly
syndicated loans; approximately $3.6 million resulted from a decline in the
financial performance of our portfolio companies; offset by approximately
$452,000 of unrealized appreciation which resulted from changes in market
multiples and interest rates.
Net Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation on Interest Rate Swaps
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on interest rate swaps represents
the change in the value of the swap agreements. For the three months ended
. . .
|
|