Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
And Results of Operations
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to Horizon Bancorp
("Horizon" or "Company") and Horizon Bank, N.A. (Bank). Horizon intends such
forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of
1995, and is including this statement for the purposes of these safe harbor
provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions
and describe future plans, strategies and expectations of Horizon, are generally
identifiable by use of the words "believe," "expect," "intend," "anticipate,"
"estimate," "project" or similar expressions. Horizon's ability to predict
results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently
uncertain. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on Horizon's future
activities and operating results include, but are not limited to:
• Credit risk: the risk that loan customers or other parties will be unable to
perform their contractual obligations;
• Market risk: the risk that changes in market rates and prices will adversely
affect the Company's financial condition or results of operation;
• Liquidity risk: the risk that Horizon or the Bank will have insufficient
cash or access to cash to meet its operating needs;
• Operational risk: the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed
internal processes, people and systems, or external events;
• Economic risk: the risk that the economy in the Company's markets could
decline further resulting in increased unemployment, decreased real estate
values and increased loan charge-offs; and
• Compliance risk: the risk of additional action by Horizon's regulators or
additional regulation could hinder the Company's ability to do business
profitably.
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking
statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.
Overview
Horizon Bancorp ("Horizon" or the "Company") is a registered bank holding
company incorporated in Indiana and headquartered in Michigan City, Indiana.
Horizon provides a broad range of banking services in Northwestern Indiana and
Southwestern Michigan through its bank subsidiary, Horizon Bank, N.A. (the
"Bank") and other affiliated entities. Horizon operates as a single segment,
which is commercial banking. Horizon's Common Stock is traded on the Nasdaq
Global Market under the symbol HBNC. The Bank was chartered as a national
banking association in 1873 and has operated continuously since that time. The
Bank is a full-service commercial bank offering commercial and retail banking
services, corporate and individual trust and agency services, and other services
incident to banking.
Horizon continues to operate in a challenging and uncertain economic
environment. Within the Company's primary market areas of Northwest Indiana and
Southwest Michigan unemployment rates have increased over the last year. This
rise in unemployment has been driven by factors including slowdowns in the steel
and recreational vehicle industries as well as a continued slowdown in the
housing industry. Like numerous other parts of the country, Northwest Indiana
and Southwest Michigan are experiencing a rise in mortgage delinquencies and
bankruptcy filings as a result of increased unemployment rates. Despite these
economic factors, Horizon continues to post positive results through the first
half of 2009.
Table of Contents
HORIZON BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
And Results of Operations
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Following are some of the major factors that impacted Horizons financial
performance for the second quarter:
• The net interest margin contracted during the second quarter as Horizon
elected to keep higher money market deposits on its balance sheet as a
precaution against future cash needs. The cash balances returned to more
historic levels during the month of June.
• Horizon continued to experience high residential mortgage refinance volumes
through the second quarter generating additional interest and fee income.
• Horizon's quarterly provision for loan losses reserve increased by
approximately $100,000 from the first quarter of 2009.
• Horizon's non-performing loans increased to approximately $13.5 million as
of June 30, 2009 from $10.5 million at the end of the first quarter.
• Horizon's special FDIC assessment of $663,000 that was recorded in the
second quarter of 2009
• Horizon's capital ratios continue to be maintained above the regulatory
standards for well-capitalized banks.
• Horizon opened its 19th branch on June 8, 2009 in Munster, Indiana.
Critical Accounting Policies
The notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2008 contain a summary of the Company's
significant accounting policies. Certain of these policies are important to the
portrayal of the Company's financial condition, since they require management to
make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, some of which may relate to
matters that are inherently uncertain. Management has identified the allowance
for loan losses, intangible assets and hedge accounting as critical accounting
policies.
Allowance for Loan Losses
An allowance for loan losses is maintained to absorb probable incurred loan
losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The determination of the allowance for
loan losses is a critical accounting policy that involves management's ongoing
quarterly assessments of the probable incurred losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. The identification of loans that have probable incurred losses is
subjective, therefore, a general reserve is maintained to cover all probable
losses within the entire loan portfolio. Horizon utilizes a loan grading system
that helps identify, monitor and address asset quality problems in an adequate
and timely manner. Each quarter, various factors affecting the quality of the
loan portfolio are reviewed. Large credits are reviewed on an individual basis
for loss potential. Other loans are reviewed as a group based upon previous
trends of loss experience. Horizon also reviews the current and anticipated
economic conditions of its lending market as well as transaction risk to
determine the effect they may have on the loss experience of the loan portfolio.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Management believes that the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets
also involves a higher degree of judgment than most other significant accounting
policies. Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 142,
"Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" establishes standards for
the amortization of acquired intangible assets and impairment assessment of
goodwill. At June 30, 2009, Horizon had core deposit intangibles of $1.6 million
subject to amortization and $5.8 million of goodwill, which is not subject to
amortization. Goodwill arising from business combinations represents the value
attributable to unidentifiable intangible assets in the business acquired.
Horizon's goodwill relates to the value inherent in the banking industry and
that value is dependent upon the ability of Horizon to provide quality, cost
effective banking services in a competitive marketplace. The goodwill value is
supported by revenue that is in part driven
Table of Contents
HORIZON BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
And Results of Operations
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
by the volume of business transacted. A decrease in earnings resulting from a
decline in the customer base or the inability to deliver cost effective services
over sustained periods can lead to impairment of goodwill that could adversely
affect earnings in future periods. SFAS No. 142 requires an annual evaluation of
goodwill for impairment. The evaluation of goodwill for impairment requires the
use of estimates and assumptions. For the first time in Horizon's history, the
market value for Horizon's stock dropped below the book value during the fourth
quarter of 2008. Market price at the close of business on June 30, 2009 was
$16.25 per share compared to a book value of $25.62 per common share. Horizon
reported record earnings for the ninth consecutive year in 2008 and has
continued to report strong earnings through the first half of 2009 and believes
the decline in market price relates to an overall decline in the financial
industry sector and is not specific to Horizon. Horizon engaged a third party to
perform an impairment test of its goodwill in 2008. The evaluation included
three approaches: 1) income approach using a discounted cash flow based on
earnings capacity, 2) price to earnings multiples and 3) price to book value
ratios. Approaches two and three use median results from 17 bank sale
transactions that occurred during 2007 and 2008. The selling banks ranged in
size from $763.0 million to $2.1 billion. The impairment test was performed as
of November 30, 2008 and provided support that no impairment to the Company's
goodwill was required based on its results.
Due to the evaluation being done as of November 30, 2008, the financial results
for December 2008 were anticipated and included as part of this analysis. An
additional $20 million of capital was injected into Horizon Bank by the holding
company but the calculated fair value of Horizon Bank was still well above its
book value. There were no significant changes in the Company's stock price, book
value, or earnings as of June 30, 2009 that would change the results of the
evaluation completed at the end of 2008. Horizon has concluded that, based on
its own internal evaluation and the independent impairment test conducted by a
third party, the recorded value of goodwill is not impaired.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired
through purchase or through the sale of financial assets on a servicing-retained
basis. Capitalized servicing rights are amortized into non-interest income in
proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income
of the underlying financial assets. Servicing assets are evaluated regularly for
impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized
cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying servicing rights by predominant
characteristics, such as interest rates, original loan terms and whether the
loans are fixed or adjustable rate mortgages. Fair value is determined using
prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based
upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions. When the book value
of an individual stratum exceeds its fair value, an impairment reserve is
recognized so that each individual stratum is carried at the lower of its
amortized book value or fair value. In periods of falling market interest rates,
accelerated loan prepayment speeds can adversely affect the fair value of these
mortgage-servicing rights relative to their book value. In the event that the
fair value of these assets was to increase in the future, Horizon can recognize
the increased fair value to the extent of the impairment allowance but cannot
recognize an asset in excess of its amortized book value. Future changes in
management's assessment of the impairment of these servicing assets, as a result
of changes in observable market data relating to market interest rates, loan
prepayment speeds, and other factors, could impact Horizon's financial condition
and results of operations either positively or adversely.
Generally, when market interest rates decline and other factors favorable to
prepayments occur, there is a corresponding increase in prepayments as customers
refinance existing mortgages under more favorable interest rate terms. When a
mortgage loan is prepaid, the anticipated cash flows associated with servicing
that loan are terminated, resulting in a reduction of the fair value of the
capitalized mortgage servicing rights. To the extent that actual borrower
prepayments do not react as anticipated by the prepayment model (i.e., the
historical data observed in the model does not correspond to actual market
activity), it is possible that the prepayment model could fail to accurately
predict mortgage prepayments and could result in significant earnings
volatility. To estimate prepayment speeds, Horizon utilizes a third-party
prepayment model, which is based upon statistically
Table of Contents
HORIZON BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
And Results of Operations
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
derived data linked to certain key principal indicators involving historical
borrower prepayment activity associated with mortgage loans in the secondary
market, current market interest rates and other factors, including Horizon's own
historical prepayment experience. For purposes of model valuation, estimates are
made for each product type within the mortgage servicing rights portfolio on a
monthly basis.
Derivative Instruments
As part of the Company's asset/liability management program, Horizon utilizes,
from time-to-time, interest rate floors, caps or swaps to reduce the Company's
sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations. These are derivative instruments,
which are recorded as assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets
at fair value. Changes in the fair values of derivatives are reported in the
consolidated income statements or other comprehensive income ("OCI") depending
on the use of the derivative and whether the instrument qualifies for hedge
accounting. The key criterion for the hedge accounting is that the hedged
relationship must be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in those
cash flows that are attributable to the hedged risk, both at inception of the
hedge and on an ongoing basis.
Horizon's accounting policies related to derivatives reflect the guidance in
SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," as
revised and further interpreted by SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," ("SFAS 133") and other related
accounting guidance. Derivatives that qualify for the hedge accounting treatment
are designated as either: a hedge of the fair value of the recognized asset or
liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment (a fair value hedge) or a hedge
of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or
paid related to a recognized asset or liability (a cash flow hedge). For fair
value hedges, the cumulative change in fair value of both the hedge instruments
and the underlying loans is recorded in non-interest income. For cash flow
hedges, changes in the fair values of the derivative instruments are reported in
OCI to the extent the hedge is effective. The gains and losses on derivative
instruments that are reported in OCI are reflected in the consolidated income
statement in the periods in which the results of operations are impacted by the
variability of the cash flows of the hedged item. Generally, net interest income
is increased or decreased by amounts receivable or payable with respect to the
derivatives, which qualify for hedge accounting. At inception of the hedge,
Horizon establishes the method it uses for assessing the effectiveness of the
hedging derivative and the measurement approach for determining the ineffective
aspect of the hedge. The ineffective portion of the hedge, if any, is recognized
currently in the consolidated statements of income. Horizon excludes the time
value expiration of the hedge when measuring ineffectiveness.
Valuation Measurements
Valuation methodologies often involve a significant degree of judgment,
particularly when there are no observable active markets for the items being
valued. Investment securities, residential mortgage loans held for sale and
derivatives are carried at fair value, as defined in SFAS No. 157 "Fair Value
Measurement" ("SFAS 157"), which requires key judgments affecting how fair value
for such assets and liabilities is determined. In addition, the outcomes of
valuations have a direct bearing on the carrying amounts of goodwill, mortgage
servicing rights, and pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations. To
determine the values of these assets and liabilities, as well as the extent, to
which related assets may be impaired, management makes assumptions and estimates
related to discount rates, asset returns, prepayment rates and other factors.
The use of different discount rates or other valuation assumptions could produce
significantly different results, which could affect Horizon's results of
operations.
Table of Contents
HORIZON BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
And Results of Operations
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Financial Condition
On June 30, 2009, Horizon's total assets were $1.3 billion, an increase of
$36.4 million from December 31, 2008 but a decrease of $100.0 million from
March 31, 2009. Due to the economic environment the financial institution
industry was experiencing at the beginning of 2009, management determined it
would be prudent to maintain higher liquidity levels. During that same time the
Company's mortgage warehouse business line was experiencing significant growth
due to the increase in mortgage loan refinancing activity, and this also created
a need for additional liquidity. Management put into place several successful
strategies during the first quarter of 2009 to generate the additional
liquidity. As a result, the Company maintained excess cash and cash equivalents
at the end of the first quarter and throughout most of the second quarter of
2009. A significant portion of that additional liquidity was generated from
municipal money market deposits. This funding was designed to match the growth
of assets in the mortgage warehouse business line and provide additional
liquidity without utilizing asset based collateral borrowings or federal fund
lines. At June 30, 2009, most of the additional funding from the municipal money
market accounts was moved out of the Bank and cash and cash equivalents and the
municipal money market accounts were back to more historic levels. The Bank does
not anticipate a near term need to maintain the level of excess liquidity during
the third quarter as it did in the second quarter.
Investment securities increased by approximately $28.7 million compared to the
end of 2008. This growth was continued from the fourth quarter as additional
investment securities were purchased to leverage the capital raised through the
U.S. Department of Treasury's Capital Purchase Program which is part of the
Economic Emergency Stabilization Act approved by Congress during the fourth
quarter of 2008. The increase in investment securities held to maturity was
primarily from local municipal tax anticipation warrants that will mature on
December 31, 2009.
Investment securities were comprised of the following as of:
June 30, 2009 December 31, 2008
Amortized Fair Amortized Fair
Investment securities Cost Value Cost Value
Available for sale
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies $ 19,880 $ 20,145 $ 23,661 $ 24,914
State and municipal 95,174 94,372 88,282 86,985
Federal agency collateralized mtg. obligations 17,521 17,282 13,063 12,951
Federal agency mortgage-backed pools 183,236 186,886 174,227 176,389
Corporate notes 587 381 587 399
Total available for sale 316,398 319,066 299,820 301,638
Total held to maturity, state and municipal 12,875 12,978 1,630 1,634
Total investment securities $ 329,273 $ 332,044 $ 301,450 $ 303,272
|
Net loans increased $12.2 million since December 31, 2008. This increase was
almost entirely related to the growth in the Company's mortgage warehouse
business line as its customers utilized their warehouse lines to fund
residential mortgage refinancing activity.
Total deposits increased $7.0 million during the first half of 2009 and as
indicated above, decreased $129.3 million since March 31, 2009. The decrease in
deposits during the second quarter was primarily the result of the additional
funding that was generated during the first quarter of 2009 from the municipal
money market accounts moving out of the Bank.
Table of Contents
HORIZON BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
And Results of Operations
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
The Company's borrowings have increased $25.1 million since December 31, 2008.
The Company implemented three major funding initiatives during the first half of
2009. The first initiative was to generate liquidity as described above from
municipal money market accounts. The second initiative was to reduce the
outstanding balances in the Company's short-term borrowing lines, to make those
lines available and provide more daily liquidity. The third initiative was to
continue to take steps to extend the duration of liabilities in a low interest
rate environment and lock in long-term funding costs. The short-term borrowings
of $52.2 million at December 31, 2008 were replaced with a $50.0 million fixed
rate long-term corporate repurchase agreement therefore extending the duration
of liabilities and increasing the available daily liquidity. The Company also
added $33.6 million of long-term brokered certificates of deposit during the
first quarter to also help in extending the duration of deposits. The Company
will continue to look for opportunities to extend the duration of liabilities
while long-term rates remain low.
Stockholders' equity totaled $107.2 million at June 30, 2009 compared to
$103.4 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in stockholders' equity during
the period was the result of net income and an increase in the market value of
investment securities available for sale, reduced by dividends declared. At
June 30, 2009, the ratio of average stockholders' equity to average assets was
7.80% compared to 6.65% at December 31, 2008. Book value per common share at
June 30, 2009 increased to $25.85 compared to $24.68 at December 31, 2008.
Results of Operations
Overview
Consolidated net income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009 was
$2.1 million, a decrease of 31.0% compared to $3.0 million for the same period
in 2008. Earnings per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2009
decreased to $0.53 basic and $0.52 diluted, compared to $0.93 basic and $0.92
diluted for the same three-month period in 2008. Diluted earnings per share were
reduced by $0.11 per share due to the preferred stock dividends and the
accretion of the discount on preferred stock, which is not available to common
stockholders. The preferred stock was issued in the fourth quarter of 2008 and
therefore did not affect the first quarter of 2008. The results from the second
quarter of 2009 were also impacted by the special FDIC assessment of $663,000,
which reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.13 per share. In addition, the
second quarter of 2008 included a death benefit from officer life insurance of
$538,000, which was tax-free income, and increased diluted earnings per share
for the quarter by $0.17 per share.
Consolidated net income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2009 was
$4.7 million, a decrease of 14.8% compared to $5.5 million for the same period
in 2008. Earnings per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2009
decreased to $1.25 basic and $1.22 diluted, compared to $1.72 basic and $1.70
diluted for the same six-month period in 2008. Diluted earnings per share were
reduced by $0.21 per share due to the preferred stock dividends and the
accretion of the discount on preferred stock, which is not available to common
stockholders. The special FDIC assessment expense during the second quarter of
2009 and the income from the death benefit on officer life insurance during the
second quarter of 2008 also affected the six-month results.
Net Interest Income
The largest component of net income is net interest income. Net interest income
is the difference between interest income, principally from loans and investment
securities, and interest expense, principally on deposits and borrowings.
Changes in the net interest income are the result of changes in volume, net
interest spread, and net interest margin. Volume refers to the average dollar
levels of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest
spread refers to the difference between the average yield on interest-earning
assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest margin
refers to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets and is
influenced by the level and relative mix of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities.
Table of Contents
HORIZON BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
And Results of Operations
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
The reduction in short-term interest rates over the last six months has
influenced the cost of the Company's interest bearing liabilities more
significantly then the reduction in yields received on the Company's interest
earning assets, resulting in an increase of the net interest margin for both the
three and six month periods ending June 30, 2009. Management believes that the
current level of interest rates is driven by external factors and therefore
impacts the results of the Company's net interest margin. Management does not
expect a rise in interest rates in the short term, but an increase in rates is
expected at some time in the future due to the current historically low interest
rate environment.
Net interest income during the three months ended June 30, 2009 was
$11.3 million, an increase of $2.0 million or 20.6% over the $9.3 million earned
during the same period in 2008. Yields on the Company's interest-earning assets
decreased by 52 basis points to 5.70% for the three months ended June 30, 2009,
from 6.22% for the same period in 2008. Interest income increased $1.5 million
from $17.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 to $18.8 million for
the same period in 2009. This increase was due to the increased volume of
. . .