|
Quotes & Info
|
| CBBO > SEC Filings for CBBO > Form 10-Q on 10-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
10-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
Our methodology for estimating inherent losses in the portfolio takes into
consideration all loans in our portfolio, segmented by industry type and risk
rating, and utilizes a number of subjective factors in addition to historical
loss rates. Subjective factors include: the economic outlook on both a national
and regional level; the volume and severity of non-performing loans; the nature,
value and estimated liquidity of collateral securing the loans; trends in loan
growth; concentrations with individual and interrelated borrowers, industries
and geographic regions; and competitive issues that impact loan underwriting.
Increases to the allowance occur when we expense amounts to the provision for
loan losses or when we recover previously charged-off loans or overdrafts. We
reduce the allowance when we charge-off loans or overdrafts that are deemed
uncollectible, although we do not necessarily cease collection activities when a
loan is charged-off. We determine the appropriateness and amount of these
charges by assessing the risk potential in our portfolio on an ongoing basis.
Loan charge-offs do not result in the recognition of additional expense, unless
the amount of a loan charge-off exceeds the loss amount previously provided for
in the allowance for loan losses.
On loans of either a larger size or troubled industry classification, we also
may perform an individual risk analysis on specific performing loans. This
individual analysis may include factors such as an updated review of the value
of the collateral securing the loan, the geographic location of the loan, the
expected or potential cash flows from the borrowers operations, the relative
strength and liquidity of the guarantors and the past payment performance on the
loan. If existing collateral appraisals or evaluations are, in our opinion,
dated or stale, we will typically obtain new appraisals or evaluations and these
new values will be used to evaluate the risk of the loan and resulting provision
for loan losses. Furthermore, in cases where the cash flow or liquidity of the
borrower has been eliminated or there is an absence of guarantor strength, we
may deem the loan to be totally collateral dependent. In such cases, if the
analysis of the net realizable value of the loan collateral is determined to be
deficient, that deficiency is charged-off.
The liability for off-balance-sheet financial instruments represents our best
estimate of probable losses associated with off-balance-sheet financial
instruments, which consist of commitments to extend credit, commitments under
credit card arrangements, and commercial and standby letters of credit. The
liability is included as a component of "Accrued interest payable and other
liabilities" on our balance sheet.
We evaluate the adequacy of the liability for credit losses from
off-balance-sheet financial instruments based upon reviews of individual credit
facilities, current economic conditions, the risk characteristics of the various
categories of commitments and other relevant factors. The liability is based on
estimates, which are evaluated on a regular basis, and, as adjustments become
necessary, they are reported in earnings in the periods in which they become
known.
Approximately 75%, or $585.71 million, of our loan portfolio is secured by real
estate collateral. Within the total balance of loans secured by real estate,
certain loans are designated as construction credits. Of these, $66.76 million
is secured by commercial property under construction (office buildings,
warehouse, commercial lot pads, etc.) and $151.99 million is secured by
residential property under construction (residential subdivisions, 1-4 family
dwellings, homes under construction by developers, etc.). We are actively
monitoring residential and commercial real estate values in all of our market
regions. The residential markets have declined significantly in our Central
Oregon and Portland-Vancouver metropolitan markets. Some of our more rural
eastern Oregon and Washington markets have remained stable or experienced only
minor declines. Although commercial real estate markets are also softening, only
Central Oregon has demonstrated significant distress at this time. In addition,
due to the downturn in national and regional real estate sales, a number of our
residential real estate construction and acquisition and development customers
have been unable to sell existing inventories in the normal course of business
and the repayment of these loans is now solely dependent on the liquidation of
the collateral. Many of the loans of this nature were written down to their
estimated fair market value less estimated costs to sell, resulting in
significant charge-offs during the year ended December 31, 2008 and continuing
into the first half of 2009.
Income Taxes
We estimate tax expense based on the amount we expect to owe various taxing
authorities in the current and future periods for transactions arising during
the current period. Accrued and/or refundable income tax represent the net
estimated amount due or to be received from taxing authorities. In estimating
accrued taxes and refundable taxes, we assess the relative merits and risks of
the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account statutory,
judicial and regulatory guidance in the context of our tax position.
The determination of our ability to fully utilize our deferred tax assets
requires significant judgment, the use of estimates and the interpretation of
complex tax laws. During the three month period ended June 30, 2009, we
determined that it is not "more likely than not" that we would be able to fully
recognize our net deferred tax assets. Therefore, we established a valuation
allowance to reduce our net deferred tax assets to zero.
OVERVIEW
Columbia Bancorp ("Columbia") is a bank holding company organized in 1996 under
Oregon Law. Columbia's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market
under the symbol "CBBO." Columbia's wholly-owned subsidiary, Columbia River Bank
("CRB" or the "Bank"), is an Oregon state-chartered bank, headquartered in The
Dalles, Oregon, through which substantially all business is conducted. CRB
offers a broad range of services to its customers, primarily small and medium
sized businesses and individuals.
We have a network of 21 full-service branches throughout Oregon and Washington.
In Oregon, we operate 14 branches. These branches serve the northern and eastern
Oregon communities of The Dalles, Hood River, Pendleton and Hermiston, the
central Oregon communities of Madras, Redmond, and Bend, and the Willamette
Valley communities of McMinnville, Canby and Newberg. In Washington, we operate
seven branches. These branches serve the communities of Goldendale, White
Salmon, Pasco, Yakima, Sunnyside, Richland and Vancouver.
Strategic Initiatives:
During the second quarter of 2009, we completed the previously announced plan to
relocate our operations center from Vancouver, Washington to The Dalles, Oregon
and additional staff reductions, including two executive officer positions.
Combined with other restructuring and staff reductions late in 2008, these
reductions are expected to yield annual salary savings of approximately $3.00
million.
A primary business strategy has been a continuing focus on improving credit
quality and resolving non-performing assets. During the second quarter we added
two additional experienced problem credit officers to our Special Assets Team
and realigned the Special Asset and Real Estate Risk Management teams to better
facilitate the sale of foreclosed bank owned properties. One benefit of this
realignment is to provide assistance to borrowers who want to sell troubled real
estate collateral prior to the bank taking possession of such property. This
strategy provides one more method to work out of troubled situations instead of
foreclosure. At the end of the second quarter we made a strategic decision to
engage a dedicated real estate broker responsible for coordinating the marketing
efforts of our other real estate owned. The agreement with the broker was
finalized in July 2009.
Financial Overview:
The following table presents an overview of our key financial performance
indicators:
Key Financial Performance Indicators:
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
As of and for the As of and for the
Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
% %
2009 2008 Change 2009 2008 Change
Return on average
assets -8.81 % -0.08 % -5.69 % 0.19 %
Return on average
equity -148.91 % -0.80 % -90.06 % 1.98 %
Average equity to
average assets 5.92 % 9.65 % 6.32 % 9.83 %
Net interest margin,
tax equivalent basis 2.74 % 4.57 % 2.71 % 4.86 %
Efficiency ratio 118.82 % 65.84 % 120.10 % 66.70 %
Net income (loss) $ (23,281 ) $ (205 ) 11257 % $ (30,183 ) $ 1,013 -3080 %
Earnings (loss) per
diluted common share $ (2.31 ) $ (0.02 ) 11450 % $ (3.00 ) $ 0.10 -3100 %
Total gross loans (1) $ 799,563 $ 942,610 -15 %
Total assets $ 1,067,934 $ 1,109,324 -4 %
Deposits $ 992,696 $ 939,410 6 %
Book value per common
share $ 4.48 $ 10.14 -56 %
Tangible book value
per common share $ 4.48 $ 9.41 -52 %
|
(1) Includes loan portfolio and loans held-for-sale and excludes allowance for loan losses and unearned loan fees.
The decrease noted in earnings per share was primarily due to an increase in the
provision for loan losses, the valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax
assets, the effect of net interest margin compression and increases in
non-interest expenses related to the increase in FDIC premiums.
Significant items as of and for the three months ended June 30, 2009 were as
follows:
• Rebalanced assets and liabilities. In part as a result of our strategic plan
to re-balance our assets and liabilities and focus closely upon our asset
quality, gross loans decreased by $64.44 million from December 31, 2008, as
we exited certain market sectors and customer relationships, and either
reclassified troubled loans to other real estate owned ("OREO") or
charged-off loans against our allowance for loan losses. Gross loans
decreased $36.75 million or 4% from March 31, 2009 for the same reasons.
• Non-performing assets ("NPAs") of $122.65 million, or 11% of total assets. Non-accrual loans comprised $111.31 million, or 91%, of NPAs. The remaining balance of $11.30 million, or 9%, was comprised of properties held as OREO. Of the non-accrual loans, $65.61 million, or 59% of the total are loans secured by residential real estate construction properties, $7.77 million or 7% are loans secured by residential home loans, $17.45 million or 16% are loans secured by commercial real estate, $11.85 million, or 11% are loans secured by agricultural farmland, and the remaining $8.63 million, or 7% are loans secured by other miscellaneous asset types.
• Loan loss provision of $14.40 million. Our provision for loan losses increased $4.70 million, or 48%, compared to $9.70 million recognized during the first quarter of 2009, as we continue to experience declining asset quality concentrated in our Central Oregon and Willamette Valley markets. Our second quarter loan loss provision increased by $8.75 million, or 155%, compared to the second quarter of 2008. Continuing declines in asset quality are primarily attributable to the general deterioration of credit quality indicators in our residential construction portfolio.
• Repaid $28.57 million of brokered deposits and borrowings. We paid off higher-cost wholesale borrowings and deposits using available liquid assets and retail deposits gathered over the last several months, and have concentrated heavily on maintaining retail deposits. During the quarter, deposits increased $55.49 million primarily due to non-branch deposits obtained from online rate listing services.
• Higher FDIC premiums. FDIC premiums and state assessments totaled $1.41 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009, an increase of $1.25 million, in comparison to the same period in 2008. The increase is a result of increases in premium assessments imposed by the FDIC, which is based on our voluntary participation in the Treasury Liability Guarantee Program ("TLGP") and the FDIC's rates applicable to banks in our regulatory classification as of March 31, 2009. In addition, premiums increased due to a special assessment assessed on all financial institutions during the quarter totaling 0.05% of total assets, or approximately $496,000. The special assessment is intended to re-build the federal financial institutions insurance fund following the rise in financial institution failures in 2008 and the first quarter of 2009.
• Reduced salaries and employee benefits. Salaries and employee benefits decreased 9%, or $457,000, for the three months ended June 30, 2009 in comparison to the same period in 2008. Contributing to the decrease was the cost cutting measure to discontinue the 401(k) match along with the overall reduction in full-time equivalents ("FTE"). FTEs have decreased by 93, or 22%, from 407 FTEs as of June 30, 2008 to 314 FTE's as of June 30, 2009. We have made strategic efforts to reduce our salary and benefit expense, while maintaining high quality customer service; as such many of the FTE reductions were made in areas not affecting our service delivery. Included in the decrease in FTE's were two executive positions, eliminated as part of a strategic re-alignment. As we continue to actively manage our growing non-performing asset portfolio, we expect to hire additional employees and experts to assist where necessary. These additional resources may offset a portion of our previously expected savings.
• Net interest margin lower due to interest rate cuts and higher levels of non-accrual loans. Compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008, our net interest margin decreased for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease is primarily attributable to the impact of Federal Funds rate cuts since June 30, 2008, the effect of reversing previously recognized interest on loans placed on non-accrual status along with the loss of interest on existing non-accrual loans, and the shift from higher yielding loans to lower yielding cash and liquid investments. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, approximately $2.66 million of interest income was not recognized for loans on non-accrual status. This resulted in a 109 basis point reduction in our net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2009. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, approximately $4.20 million of interest income was not recognized for loans on non-accrual status. This resulted in an 85 basis point reduction in our net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
• Established valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. During the second quarter of 2009, we recognized a valuation allowance against previously recognized deferred tax assets totaling $12.00 million, bringing our net deferred tax assets to zero. Recognition of the valuation allowance resulted primarily from significant losses incurred during 2008 and the first half of 2009.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Income (Loss)
Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $23.28 million, or
$2.31 per share, which represents a decrease of $16.38 million from a net loss
of $6.90 million, or $0.69 per share, for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
and a decrease of $23.08 million from a net loss of $205,000 for the three
months ended June 30, 2008.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net loss totaled $30.18 million, or
$3.00 per share, which represents a decrease of $31.19 million from net income
of $1.01 million, or $0.10 per share, for the same period in 2008.
Net losses for the second quarter of 2009 are primarily related to
$14.40 million of provision for loan losses and the establishment of
$12.00 million valuation allowance against deferred tax assets.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, our primary source of operating income, is the difference
between interest income and interest expense. Interest income is earned
primarily from our loan and investment security portfolios. Interest expense
results primarily from customer deposits and borrowings from other sources,
including Federal Home Loan Bank advances and wholesale deposits. Like most
financial institutions, our net interest income increases when we are able to
charge higher interest rates on loans while paying relatively lower interest
rates on deposits and other borrowings.
The following table presents a comparison of average balances and interest
rates:
Net Interest Income Average Balances and Rates:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, Three Months Ended June 30,
Average Balances Average Yields/Costs Tax Equivalent
2009 2008 Change 2009 2008 Change
Taxable securities $ 34,324 $ 21,067 $ 13,257 2.43 % 4.70 % -2.27 %
Nontaxable securities
(1) 5,677 8,776 (3,099 ) 5.50 % 6.96 % -1.46 %
Interest bearing
deposits 44,892 18,720 26,172 0.11 % 2.44 % -2.33 %
Federal funds sold 79,522 22,783 56,739 0.28 % 2.02 % -1.74 %
Loans (2) (3) 824,217 921,096 (96,879 ) 5.80 % 7.04 % -1.24 %
Interest earning assets 988,632 992,442 (3,810 ) 4.98 % 6.79 % -1.81 %
Non-earning assets 71,405 70,611 794
Total assets $ 1,060,037 $ 1,063,053 $ (3,016 )
Savings & interest
bearing deposits $ 309,462 $ 368,791 $ (59,329 ) 1.41 % 1.82 % -0.41 %
Time certificates 469,978 330,215 139,763 3.64 % 4.25 % -0.61 %
Borrowed funds 23,428 47,545 (24,117 ) 3.03 % 2.72 % 0.31 %
Interest bearing
liabilities 802,868 746,551 56,317 2.76 % 2.95 % -0.19 %
Non-interest bearing
demand deposits 184,201 207,741 (23,540 )
Other liabilities 10,258 6,126 4,132
Shareholders' equity 62,710 102,635 (39,925 )
Total liabilities and
shareholders' equity $ 1,060,037 $ 1,063,053 $ (3,016 )
Six Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
Average Balances Average Yields/Costs Tax Equivalent
2009 2008 Change 2009 2008 Change
Taxable securities $ 33,198 $ 22,038 $ 11,160 2.49 % 4.69 % -2.20 %
Nontaxable securities 6,091 8,889 (2,798 ) 6.93 % 7.00 % -0.07 %
Interest bearing
deposits 42,251 19,033 23,218 0.15 % 2.82 % -2.67 %
Federal funds sold 79,644 24,241 55,403 0.26 % 2.62 % -2.36 %
Loans 839,931 906,410 (66,479 ) 5.84 % 7.51 % -1.67 %
Interest-earning assets 1,001,115 980,611 20,504 5.02 % 7.23 % -2.21 %
Nonearning assets 68,424 66,506 1,918
Total assets $ 1,069,539 $ 1,047,117 $ 22,422
Savings & interest
bearing deposits $ 308,206 $ 357,431 $ (49,225 ) 1.50 % 1.96 % -0.46 %
Time certificates 469,924 342,402 127,522 3.82 % 4.50 % -0.68 %
Borrowed funds 27,144 31,423 (4,279 ) 2.96 % 2.77 % 0.19 %
Interest bearing
liabilities 805,274 731,256 74,018 2.90 % 3.19 % -0.29 %
Non-interest bearing
demand deposits 188,563 206,710 (18,147 )
Other liabilities 8,120 6,195 1,925
Shareholders' equity 67,582 102,956 (35,374 )
Total liabilities and
shareholders' equity $ 1,069,539 $ 1,047,117 $ 22,422
|
(1) In calculation of average yield, tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax-equivelant basis at a rate of 35%.
(2) Non-accrual loans and loans held-for-sale are included in the average balance.
(3) Loan fee income is included in interest income and in calculation of average yield, three months and six months ended June 30; 2009, $106, $127; 2008, $489, $835.
Net interest margin (net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets) measures how well a bank manages its asset and liability pricing and duration, but is also subject to fluctuations in the volume of earning assets, particularly during economic times in which loan performance deteriorates on a widespread basis. Our tax equivalent net interest margin measured 2.74% and 2.71% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, compared . . .
|
|