|
Quotes & Info
|
| UCFC > SEC Filings for UCFC > Form 10-Q on 7-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
UNITED COMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP.
At or For the Three At or For the Six
Months Ended Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008
Selected financial ratios and other data:
(1)
Performance ratios:
Return on average assets (2) -0.46 % 0.40 % 0.03 % 0.49 %
Return on average equity (3) -4.74 % 3.82 % 0.29 % 4.77 %
Interest rate spread (4) 2.81 % 2.60 % 2.78 % 2.40 %
Net interest margin (5) 3.12 % 2.94 % 3.08 % 2.77 %
Non-interest expense to average assets 2.72 % 2.20 % 2.62 % 2.19 %
Efficiency ratio (6) 69.38 % 64.69 % 70.56 % 65.52 %
Average interest-earning assets to
average interest-bearing liabilities 112.66 % 111.38 % 112.08 % 111.47 %
Capital ratios:
Average equity to average assets 9.74 % 10.38 % 9.58 % 10.31 %
Equity to assets, end of period 9.43 % 9.76 % 9.43 % 9.76 %
Tier 1 leverage ratio 8.50 % 7.77 % 8.50 % 7.77 %
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio 11.50 % 9.86 % 11.50 % 9.86 %
Total risk-based capital ratio 12.76 % 11.77 % 12.76 % 11.77 %
Asset quality ratios:
Non-performing loans to total loans at
end of period (7) 5.02 % 4.44 % 5.02 % 4.44 %
Non-performing assets to average assets
(8) 5.35 % 4.35 % 5.26 % 4.34 %
Non-performing assets to total assets at
end of period 5.43 % 4.34 % 5.43 % 4.34 %
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of
loans 1.92 % 1.29 % 1.92 % 1.29 %
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of
nonperforming loans (7) 39.05 % 29.45 % 39.05 % 29.45 %
Office data:
Number of full service banking offices 39 39 39 39
Number of loan production offices 6 6 6 6
Per share data:
Basic earnings (loss) from continuing
operations (9) $ (0.10 ) $ 0.08 $ (0.16 ) $ 0.21
Basic earnings from discontinued
operations (9) - 0.02 0.17 0.03
Basic earnings (loss) (9) (0.10 ) 0.10 0.01 0.24
Diluted earnings (loss) from continuing
operations (9) (0.10 ) 0.08 (0.16 ) 0.21
Diluted earnings from discontinued
operations (9) - 0.02 0.17 0.03
Diluted earnings (loss) (9) (0.10 ) 0.10 0.01 0.24
Book value (10) 7.59 8.96 7.59 8.96
Tangible book value (11) 7.57 7.81 7.57 7.81
|
(1) Ratios for the three and six month periods are annualized where appropriate. Ratios for the period ending June 30, 2008 have been revised to reflect the impact of discontinued operations.
(2) Net income divided by average total assets.
(3) Net income divided by average total equity.
(4) Difference between weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
(5) Net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
(6) Noninterest expense, excluding the amortization of core deposit intangible, divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, excluding gains and losses on securities, other than temporary impairment charges and other.
(7) Nonperforming loans consist of nonaccrual loans, loans past due ninety days and still accruing, and restructured loans.
(8) Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans, real estate acquired in the settlement of loans and other repossessed assets.
(9) Net income divided by average number of basic or diluted shares outstanding.
(10) Shareholders' equity divided by number of shares outstanding.
(11) Historical per share dividends declared and paid for the period divided by the diluted earnings per share for the period.
The general component of the allowance covers pools of loans not reviewed specifically by management that are evaluated as a homogeneous group of loans (e.g., performing single-family residential mortgage loans) using a historical charge-off experience ratio applied to each pool of loans. The historical charge-off experience ratio considers historical loss rates adjusted for certain environmental factors.
Allowance For Loan Losses
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, June 30,
Real Estate Loans 2008 Provision Recovery Chargeoff 2009
Permanent
One-to four-family
residential $ 4,986 $ 2,487 $ 10 $ (2,364 ) $ 5,119
Multifamily residential 2,344 1,158 3 (2,036 ) 1,469
Nonresidential 4,870 1,548 3 (2,348 ) 4,073
Land 585 65 - - 650
Total 12,785 5,258 16 (6,748 ) 11,311
Construction Loans
One-to four-family
residential 10,620 12,173 9 (6,091 ) 16,711
Multifamily and
nonresidential 722 (435 ) - - 287
Total 11,342 11,738 9 (6,091 ) 16,998
Consumer Loans
Home Equity 1,386 1,473 1 (906 ) 1,954
Auto 242 14 10 (72 ) 194
Marine 1,504 216 331 (806 ) 1,245
Recreational vehicle 1,425 948 82 (1,015 ) 1,440
Other 313 139 172 (341 ) 283
Total 4,870 2,790 596 (3,140 ) 5,116
Commercial Loans
Secured 3,355 938 - (946 ) 3,347
Unsecured 3,610 31 - (581 ) 3,060
Total 6,965 969 - (1,527 ) 6,407
Total $ 35,962 $ 20,755 $ 621 $ (17,506 ) $ 39,832
|
Nonperforming loans consist of loans past due 90 days or more, loans past due less than 90 days that are on nonaccrual status, and restructured loans. Nonperforming loans were $102.0 million, or 5.02% of net loans, at June 30, 2009, compared to $106.7 million, or 4.84% of net loans, at December 31, 2008. The schedule below summarizes the change in nonperforming loans for the first six months of 2009.
Nonperforming Loans
(Dollars in thousands)
June 30, December 31,
Real Estate Loans 2009 2008 Change
Permanent
One-to four-family residential $ 23,081 $ 21,669 $ 1,412
Multifamily residential 5,349 8,724 (3,375 )
Nonresidential 15,046 15,246 (200 )
Land 5,169 4,840 329
Total 48,645 50,479 (1,834 )
Construction Loans
One-to four-family residential 36,806 43,167 (6,361 )
Multifamily and nonresidential 555 816 (261 )
Total 37,361 43,983 (6,622 )
Consumer Loans
Home Equity 2,931 2,312 619
Auto 119 154 (35 )
Marine 1,736 2,614 (878 )
Recreational vehicle 1,068 756 312
Other 35 33 2
Total 5,889 5,869 20
Commercial Loans
Secured 6,488 3,496 2,992
Unsecured 1,126 1,057 69
Total 7,614 4,553 3,061
Restructured Loans 2,494 1,797 697
Total Nonperforming Loans $ 102,003 $ 106,681 $ (4,678 )
|
The $1.4 million increase in nonperforming loans secured by one-to four-family
properties was primarily a result of an increase in the number of loans that
have become 90 days or more past due. During the first half of the year, Home
Savings has experienced an increase in the number of one-to four-family mortgage
loans that became delinquent and subsequently went into nonaccrual status. The
$6.4 million decrease in nonperforming construction loans was substantially the
result of Home Savings taking into possession two properties located in western
Pennsylvania in the second quarter of 2009. A large portion of the decrease in
nonperforming multifamily residential loans can also be attributable to Home
Savings taking into possession one property located in Michigan. The increase in
nonperforming commercial secured loans was primarily a result of the Company
placing a loan on nonaccrual status that was not yet ninety or more days past
due.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, Home Savings adopted the practice of determining
the past due status of loans based on the number of days the loan is past due,
rather than the number of calendar months the loan is past due. In the second
quarter of 2009, this practice was changed back to the number of calendar
months, which is more consistent with industry practice.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that Home Savings will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement and the loan is non-homogeneous in nature. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, the strength of guarantors (if any), and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the loans and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent, the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, or the market value of the loan. As shown in the following table, impaired loans increased to $89.6 million, or 2.7% at the end of June 2009, from December 2008. The largest increase was $6.0 million in one-to four-family mortgage loans.
Impaired Loans
(Dollars in thousands)
June 30, December 31,
Real Estate Loans 2009 2008 Change
Permanent
One-to four-family residential $ 18,709 $ 12,675 $ 6,034
Multifamily residential 5,349 8,724 (3,375 )
Nonresidential 14,903 14,855 48
Land 5,168 4,757 411
Total 44,129 41,011 3,118
Construction Loans
One-to four-family residential 34,570 36,903 (2,333 )
Multifamily and nonresidential 555 816 (261 )
Total 35,125 37,719 (2,594 )
Consumer Loans
Home Equity 1,895 1,657 238
Auto - - -
Boat 1,736 2,614 (878 )
Recreational vehicle 327 - 327
Other 8 - 8
Total 3,966 4,271 (305 )
Commercial Loans
Secured 5,330 3,496 1,834
Unsecured 1,040 751 289
Total 6,370 4,247 2,123
Total Impaired Loans $ 89,590 $ 87,248 $ 2,342
|
Other nonperforming assets, consisting of real estate and other consumer property acquired in the settlement of loans, totaled $33.1 million at June 30, 2009, compared to $29.3 million at December 31, 2008. The $3.8 million increase is primarily attributable to the acquisition of two properties having an estimated market value of $4.0 million that collateralized commercial construction loans primarily in southwestern Pennsylvania, ten properties having an estimated market value of $2.5 million in northern Ohio, one property with an estimated market value of $1.7 million that secured a commercial real estate loan in Michigan and four properties with an estimated value of $1.5 million that secured ten commercial real estate loans in northern Ohio. Home Savings disposed of property with a value of $6.3 million in the first six months of 2009, partially offsetting the increase. Other consumer property, such as boats, recreational vehicles, and automobiles that were received by Home Savings in the satisfaction of loans, makes up the remainder of the change.
Loans held for sale decreased $2.0 million, or 12.3%, to $14.1 million at
June 30, 2009, compared to $16.0 million at December 31, 2008. The change in
loans held for sale was due largely to the increase in volume of loan
originations and sales during the period because of the lower interest rate
environment. Home Savings sells a portion of newly originated loans into the
secondary market as part of its risk management strategy and anticipates
continuing to do so in the future.
Federal Home Loan Bank stock remained at $26.5 million for June 30, 2009, and
December 31, 2008. During the first six months of 2009, the Federal Home Loan
Bank paid a cash dividend in lieu of a stock dividend to its member banks.
Home Savings maintains a contra account for uncollected interest for loans on
non-accrual status. This account represents the reduction in interest income
from the time the borrower stopped making payments until the loan is either
repaid, charged off or the default is cured and performance resumes. The
increases in these reserves, from $14.8 million at December 31, 2008, to $15.8
million at June 30, 2009, and the impact of the reduction in loan balances
mentioned above, were the primary reasons that accrued interest receivable
decreased $1.0 million to $9.0 million at June 30, 2009, compared to
$10.1 million at December 31, 2008.
Other assets increased $3.8 million to $20.9 million at June 30, 2009, compared
to $17.1 million at December 31, 2008. Home Savings had increases in mortgage
servicing rights of $1.8 million, prepaid Ohio franchise tax of $1.1 million,
and a current federal income tax benefit of $364,000. These increases were
offset by cash due on payments of mortgage-backed securities of $1.4 million and
$767,000 in other prepaid assets.
Total deposits decreased $57.7 million to $1.8 billion at June 30, 2009,
compared to $1.9 billion at December 31, 2008. This change was due primarily to
a decrease of $52.9 million in brokered certificates of deposit and a
$35.1 million decrease in retail certificates of deposit offset by a
$16.8 million increase in savings accounts and a $13.5 million increase in money
market accounts and other demand deposit accounts. To supplement its funding
needs, United Community obtained brokered certificates of deposit in 2007 and
2008. Such deposits have maturities ranging from six months to two years from
the date they were issued. The total balance of brokered certificates of deposit
was $92.2 million at June 30, 2009 and $145.0 million at December 31, 2008. At
this time, regulatory approval would be required to replace these brokered
deposits with additional brokered deposits as they mature. The Company does not
anticipate on seeking approval to replace brokered deposits at this time.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $43.5 million during the first six
months of 2009, reflecting a decrease in overnight advances of $13.1 million and
a decrease in term advances of $30.4 million. Home Savings had approximately
$247.2 million in unused borrowing capacity at the FHLB at June 30, 2009.
Repurchase agreements and other borrowed funds, including United Community's
line of credit with JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JP Morgan Chase), decreased
$28.0 million to $97.3 million at June 30, 2009 from $125.3 million at
December 31, 2008. United Community's line of credit with JP Morgan Chase was
paid in full with proceeds from the sale of Butler Wick Trust on March 31, 2009.
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance decreased $5.8 million
during the first six months of 2009. Remittance of real estate taxes and
property insurance made on behalf of customers of Home Savings account for
$3.6 million of the decrease. In addition, funds held for payments received on
loans sold where servicing was retained by Home Savings decreased $2.2 million.
Accrued expenses and other liabilities increased $7.0 million, to $16.1 million
at June 30, 2009 from $9.1 million at December 31, 2008. United Community had an
increase in accrued liabilities for taxes related to the net income from Butler
Wick and sale of Butler Wick Trust in the first quarter of 2009. Home Savings
had an increase in liabilities of $2.9 million due to issuing official checks
for customers and accounts payable remittances. Home Savings also experienced
increases in deferred income taxes related to the valuation of the securities
available for sale portfolio of $575,000, along with accrued payroll and related
expenses of $514,000.
Shareholders' equity decreased $310,000 to $234.6 million at June 30, 2009, from
$234.9 million at December 31, 2008. An after-tax gain of $4.7 million from the
sale of Butler Wick Trust and net operating income of $238,000 from Butler Wick
for the first six months of 2009 were partially offset by a $4.0 million net
loss recognized by Home Savings in the period. A decrease in other comprehensive
income resulting from changes in available for sale securities, net of tax, of
$1.0 million also contributed to the decrease.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 Net Income. United Community recognized a net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2009, of $2.9 million, or $(0.10) per diluted share, compared to net income of $2.7 million, or $0.10 per share, for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Compared with the second quarter of 2008, net interest income decreased $229,000, the provision for loan losses increased $9.1 million, non-interest income increased $3.3 million, and non-interest expense increased $2.0 million. United Community's annualized return on average assets and return on average equity were (0.46)% and (4.74)%, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The annualized return on average assets and return on average equity for the comparable period in 2008 were 0.40% and 3.82%, respectively. Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2009, was $18.7 million, compared to $18.9 million for the same period last year. Both interest income and interest expense decreased, with a smaller decline in interest expense. Interest income decreased $4.8 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008. The change in interest income was due primarily to decreases in interest earned on net loans. . . .
|
|