|
Quotes & Info
|
| TRNS > SEC Filings for TRNS > Form 10-Q on 7-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table presents, for the first quarter of fiscal years 2010 and
2009, the components of our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(Unaudited)
First Quarter Ended
June 27, June 28,
2009 2008
Gross Profit Percentage:
Product Gross Profit 23.5 % 27.3 %
Service Gross Profit 20.2 % 21.0 %
Total Gross Profit 22.3 % 25.3 %
As a Percentage of Total Net Revenue:
Product Sales 65.5 % 69.0 %
Service Revenue 34.5 % 31.0 %
Total Net Revenue 100.0 % 100.0 %
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse Expenses 14.9 % 14.5 %
Administrative Expenses 8.1 % 8.6 %
Total Operating Expenses 23.0 % 23.1 %
Operating (Loss) Income (0.7 )% 2.2 %
Interest Expense 0.1 % - %
Total Other Expense, net 0.1 % - %
Total Other Expense 0.2 % - %
(Loss) Income Before Income Taxes (0.9 )% 2.2 %
(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes (0.3 )% 0.9 %
Net (Loss) Income (0.6 )% 1.3 %
|
FIRST QUARTER ENDED JUNE 27, 2009 COMPARED TO FIRST QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28, 2008
(dollars in thousands):
Revenue:
First Quarter Ended
June 27, June 28,
2009 2008
Net Revenue:
Product Sales $ 11,268 $ 12,311
Service Revenue 5,940 5,542
Total $ 17,208 $ 17,853
|
Net revenue decreased $0.6 million or 3.6% from the first quarter of fiscal year
2009 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.
Our product net sales accounted for 65.5% of our total net revenue in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2010 and 69.0% of our total net revenue in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009. For the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, product
sales decreased $1.0 million or 8.5% compared to the first quarter of fiscal
year 2009. We believe this decline is reflective of current economic conditions.
While we transacted with 2.2% more customers in the first quarter of fiscal year
2010 when compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, our average product
sales per customer declined by 9.8%. Our fiscal years 2010 and 2009 product
sales growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons is as follows:
Our average product sales per business day decreased to $176 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, compared with $192 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Our product sales per business day for each fiscal quarter during fiscal years 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, sales through our direct distribution channel decreased 10.0% from the same period in the prior fiscal year. Direct sales to U.S., International and Canadian markets all declined as a result of the current economic climate, but were partially offset by sales to wind energy industry customers. Wind energy product sales represented 10.6% of our total product net sales in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. While sales through our direct distribution channel declined, our reseller channel had comparable sales quarter-over-quarter for the first quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009. With declining direct sales and comparable reseller sales, the mix of reseller sales as a percent of our total product net sales increased 140 basis points from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. The following table presents the percent of net sales for the significant product distribution channels for each fiscal quarter during fiscal years 2010 and 2009:
FY 2010 FY 2009
Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Percent of Net Sales:
Direct 80.5 % 83.0 % 79.7 % 77.6 % 81.8 %
Reseller 18.0 % 15.6 % 19.1 % 20.8 % 16.6 %
Freight Billed to Customer 1.5 % 1.4 % 1.2 % 1.6 % 1.6 %
100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 %
|
Customer product orders include orders for instruments that we routinely stock in our inventory, customized products, and other products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock. Pending product shipments are primarily backorders, but also include products that are requested to be calibrated in our calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to be shipped complete, orders awaiting credit approval and orders required to be shipped at a future date. Our total pending product shipments for the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 increased 5.8% from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. This increase was primarily driven by orders required to be shipped complete associated with our wind energy business, partially offset by a reduction in products awaiting calibration prior to shipment. The following table presents the percentage of total
pending product shipments that are backorders at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and our historical trend of total pending product shipments:
FY 2010 FY 2009
Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Total Pending Product Shipments $ 1,445 $ 1,189 $ 1,701 $ 1,398 $ 1,366
% of Pending Product Shipments
that are Backorders 72.2 % 81.0 % 84.1 % 70.7 % 74.7 %
|
Service revenue increased $0.4 million, or 7.2%, from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. Within any year, while we add new customers, we also have customers from the prior year whose calibrations may not repeat for any number of factors. Among those factors are variations in the timing of customer periodic calibrations on instruments and other services, customer capital expenditures and customer outsourcing decisions. Because the timing of calibration orders and segment expenses can vary on a quarter-to-quarter basis, we believe a trailing twelve month trend provides a better indication of the progress of this segment. Service segment revenue for the twelve months ended June 27, 2009 were $24.3 million, up 4.9% when compared with $23.2 million for the twelve months ended June 28, 2008. Our fiscal years 2010 and 2009 service revenue growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons is as follows:
FY 2010 FY 2009
Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Service Revenue Growth (Decline) 7.2 % (0.9 %) 10.3 % 4.5 % 5.3 %
|
Within the calibration industry, there is a broad array of measurement disciplines making it costly and inefficient for any one provider to invest the needed capital for facilities, equipment and uniquely-trained personnel necessary to perform all measurement disciplines with in-house calibration capabilities. Our strategy has been to focus our investments in the core electrical, temperature, pressure and dimensional disciplines. Accordingly, 15% to 20% of our service segment revenue is generated from outsourcing customer equipment to third party vendors for calibration beyond our chosen scope of capabilities. The following table presents the source of our service segment revenue and the percent of service segment revenue for the first quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009:
FY 2010 First Quarter FY 2009 First Quarter
% of % of
Service Service Service Service
Segment Segment Segment Segment
Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue
Depot/On-Site $ 4,710 79.3 % $ 4,478 80.8 %
Outsourced 1,079 18.2 % 911 16.4 %
Freight Billed to Customers 151 2.5 % 153 2.8 %
Total $ 5,940 100.0 % $ 5,542 100.0 %
|
Gross Profit:
First Quarter Ended
June 27, June 28,
2009 2008
Gross Profit:
Product $ 2,646 $ 3,362
Service 1,197 1,163
Total $ 3,843 $ 4,525
|
Total gross profit dollars in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 declined
$0.7 million, or 15.1%, from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. As a
percentage of total net revenue, total gross profit declined 300 basis points
over the same time period.
We evaluate product gross profit from two perspectives. Channel gross profit
includes net sales less the direct cost of inventory sold. Our total product
gross profit includes channel gross profit as well as the impact of vendor
rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight billed to customers, freight
expenses and direct shipping costs. In general, our total product gross profit
can vary based upon price discounting; the mix of sales to our reseller channel,
which have lower margins than our direct customer base; and the timing of
periodic vendor rebates and cooperative advertising income received from
suppliers.
The channel gross profit percentage in our direct distribution channel declined
140 basis points from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to the first quarter
of fiscal year 2010 as we increased discounting in efforts to maintain
competitive pricing in the current economic environment. Within the reseller
channel, we maintained a relatively consistent quarter-over-quarter channel
gross profit percentage as a result of our continued use of a volume-based
pricing structure.
Total product gross profit in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 was 23.5% of
total product sales and declined 380 basis points when compared with 27.3% of
total product sales in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Product gross
profit declined $0.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared
to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, which was the result of reduced
volume, increased price discounting and lower vendor point-of-sale rebates.
Vendor point-of-sale rebates are based on year-over-year growth in product
segment sales. We did not qualify for this type of rebate in the first quarter
of fiscal year 2010. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, point-of-sale
rebates were $0.1 million. The following table reflects the quarterly historical
trend of our product gross profit as a percent of total product sales:
FY 2010 FY 2009
Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Channel Gross Profit % - Direct (1) 23.8 % 23.6 % 23.9 % 25.8 % 25.2 %
Channel Gross Profit % - Reseller (1) 17.4 % 18.7 % 18.1 % 18.2 % 17.5 %
Channel Gross Profit % - Combined (2) 22.6 % 22.8 % 22.8 % 24.2 % 23.9 %
Other Items % (3) 0.9 % 1.2 % 1.6 % 1.8 % 3.4 %
Total Product Gross Profit % 23.5 % 24.0 % 24.4 % 26.0 % 27.3 %
|
(1) Channel gross profit % calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales.
(2) Represents aggregate gross profit % for direct and reseller channels, calculated as net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales.
(3) Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight billed to customers, freight expenses, and direct shipping costs.
Calibration service gross profit dollars increased 2.9% from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. As a percent of service revenue, calibration service gross profit decreased 80 basis points over the same time period. We realized a quarter-over-quarter increase in cost of calibration services sold of 8.3% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, which was primarily the result of costs associated with adding a lab in Portland, Oregon. The following table reflects our calibration services gross profit growth in relation to prior fiscal year quarters:
FY 2010 FY 2009
Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1
Service Gross Profit Dollar
Growth (Decline) 2.9 % 5.7 % 16.8 % 4.8 % (0.3 %)
Operating Expenses:
First Quarter Ended
June 27, June 28,
2009 2008
Operating Expenses:
Selling, Marketing and Warehouse $ 2,559 $ 2,595
Administrative 1,400 1,542
Total $ 3,959 $ 4,137
|
Operating expenses decreased $0.2 million, or 4.3%, from the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. Sales, Marketing and Warehouse expenses as a percent of total revenue increased slightly from 14.5% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to 14.9% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. The increase is primarily driven by incremental costs associated with adding Westcon selling and warehouse personnel, partially offset by reduced spending on selling and marketing initiatives. Administrative expenses as a percent of total revenue decreased from 8.6% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to 8.1% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 primarily due to a reduction in performance-based management bonus and employee profit sharing expense.
Taxes:
First Quarter Ended
June 27, June 28,
2009 2008
(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes $ (56 ) $ 153
|
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we realized a $0.1 million benefit from income taxes, compared with a $0.2 million provision for income taxes in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. We continue to evaluate our tax provision on a quarterly basis and make adjustments, as deemed necessary, to our effective tax rate given changes in facts and circumstances expected for the entire fiscal year.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We believe that amounts available under our current credit facility and our cash
on hand are sufficient to satisfy our expected working capital and capital
expenditure needs as well as our lease commitments for the foreseeable future.
Cash Flows. The following table is a summary of our Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows (dollars in thousands):
First Quarter Ended
June 27, June 28,
2009 2008
Cash Provided by (Used in):
Operating Activities $ 1,549 $ 359
Investing Activities (290 ) (195 )
Financing Activities (1,282 ) (244 )
|
Operating Activities: Cash provided by operating activities for the first
quarter of fiscal year 2010 was $1.5 million compared to the $0.4 million of
cash provided by operating activities in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
Significant working capital fluctuations were as follows:
• Inventory/Accounts Payable: Due to recent recessionary economic conditions,
we have implemented tight monitoring controls to drive down inventory
levels. These efforts provided approximately $0.6 million of cash from
operations in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to cash used of
approximately $1.1 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. In
general, our accounts payable balance increases or decreases as a result of
timing of vendor payments for inventory receipts.
• Receivables: We continue to generate positive operating cash flows and maintain strong collections on our accounts receivable.
June 27, June 28,
2009 2008
Net Sales, for the last two fiscal months $ 12,394 $ 12,317
Accounts Receivable, net $ 8,116 $ 7,501
Days Sales Outstanding 39 37
|
• Accrued Compensation and Other Liabilities: During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we used $0.2 million in cash to pay accrued compensation and other liabilities compared with $1.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. This decline was primarily attributable to lower payments for employee profit sharing and performance-based management bonuses.
Investing Activities: The $0.3 million of cash used in investing activities in
the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, an increase of approximately $0.1 million
when compared to the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, was primarily for
expansion of capabilities in our calibration laboratories and equipment
replacement.
Financing Activities: During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we used
approximately $1.3 million in cash from operations to reduce our debt, compared
to $0.3 million used in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.
OUTLOOK
We believe that our next two fiscal quarters will continue to be soft and
anticipate some recovery in our fiscal fourth quarter. Our strong balance sheet
and cash flow have positioned us to take advantage of opportunities that may
present themselves, as we prudently seek appropriate acquisition candidates to
further grow our service segment. We expect product sales to wind energy
customers to continue to grow at a faster rate than product sales to customers
in other industries for the rest of fiscal year 2010.
Most critical in our decision making is our commitment to our longer-term
strategy where we believe the investments in our sales team, calibration
technicians and support staff are fundamental in achieving our growth
objectives.
|
|