Add
PSB to Portfolio
Set Alert
Email to a
Friend
| |||
|
|
Quotes & Info
|
| PSB > SEC Filings for PSB > Form 10-Q on 7-Aug-2009 | All Recent SEC Filings |
7-Aug-2009
Quarterly Report
In determining the fair value of the tangible assets of the acquired properties,
management considers the value of the properties as if vacant as of the
acquisition date. Management must make significant assumptions in determining
the value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Using different
assumptions in the allocation of the purchase cost of the acquired properties
would affect the timing of recognition of the related revenue and expenses.
Amounts allocated to land are derived from comparable sales of land within the
same region. Amounts allocated to buildings and improvements, tenant
improvements and unamortized lease commissions are based on current market
replacement costs and other market rate information.
The value allocable to the above-market or below-market in-place lease values of
acquired properties is determined based upon the present value (using a discount
rate which reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the
difference between (i) the contractual rents to be paid pursuant to the in-place
leases, and (ii) management's estimate of fair market lease rates for the
corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining
non-cancelable term of the lease. The amounts allocated to above-market or
below-market leases are included in other assets or other liabilities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized on a straight-line
basis as an increase or reduction of rental income over the remaining
non-cancelable term of the respective leases.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Rental revenue from our tenants is our
principal source of revenue. We monitor the collectability of our receivable
balances including the deferred rent receivable on an ongoing basis. Based on
these reviews, we maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the possible inability of our tenants to make required
rent payments to us. Tenant receivables and deferred rent receivables are
carried net of the allowances for uncollectible tenant receivables and deferred
rent. As discussed below, determination of the adequacy of these allowances
requires significant judgments and estimates. Our estimate of the required
allowance is subject to revision as the factors discussed below change and is
sensitive to the effect of economic and market conditions on our tenants.
Tenant receivables consist primarily of amounts due for contractual lease
payments, reimbursements of common area maintenance expenses, property taxes and
other expenses recoverable from tenants. Determination of the adequacy of the
allowance for uncollectible current tenant receivables is performed using a
methodology that incorporates specific identification, aging analysis, an
overall evaluation of the historical loss trends and the current economic and
business environment. The specific identification methodology relies on factors
such as the age and nature of the receivables, the payment history and financial
condition of the tenant, the assessment of the tenant's ability to meet its
lease obligations, and the status of negotiations of any disputes with the
tenant. The allowance also includes a reserve based on historical loss trends
not associated with any specific tenant. This reserve as well as the specific
identification reserve is reevaluated quarterly based on economic conditions and
the current business environment.
Deferred rent receivable represents the amount that the cumulative straight-line
rental income recorded to date exceeds cash rents billed to date under the lease
agreement. Given the long-term nature of these types of receivables,
determination of the adequacy of the allowance for unbilled deferred rent
receivable is based primarily on historical loss experience. Management
evaluates the allowance for unbilled deferred rent receivable using a specific
identification methodology for significant tenants designed to assess their
financial condition and ability to meet their lease obligations.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: The Company evaluates a property for potential
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its
carrying amount may not be recoverable. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate our
entire portfolio for impairment based on current operating information. In the
event that these periodic assessments reflect that the carrying amount of a
property exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows (excluding interest)
that are expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the
property, the Company would recognize an impairment loss to the extent the
carrying amount exceeded the estimated fair value of the property. The
estimation of expected future net cash
flows is inherently uncertain and relies on subjective assumptions dependent
upon future and current market conditions and events that affect the ultimate
value of the property. Management must make assumptions related to the property
such as future rental rates, tenant allowances, operating expenditures, property
taxes, capital improvements, occupancy levels and the estimated proceeds
generated from the future sale of the property. These assumptions could differ
materially from actual results in future periods. Since SFAS No. 144,
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," provides that
the future cash flows used in this analysis be considered on an undiscounted
basis, our intent to hold properties over the long-term directly decreases the
likelihood of recording an impairment loss. If our strategy changes or if market
conditions otherwise dictate an earlier sale date, an impairment loss could be
recognized, and such loss could be material.
Depreciation: We compute depreciation on our buildings and equipment using the
straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of generally 30 and five
years, respectively. A significant portion of the acquisition cost of each
property is allocated to building and building components. The allocation of the
acquisition cost to building and building components, as well as the
determination of their useful lives, are based on estimates. If we do not
appropriately allocate to these components or we incorrectly estimate the useful
lives of these components, our computation of depreciation expense may not
appropriately reflect the actual impact of these costs over future periods,
which will affect net income. In addition, the net book value of real estate
assets could be overstated or understated. The statement of cash flows, however,
would not be affected.
Accruals of Operating Expenses: The Company accrues for property tax expenses,
performance bonuses and other operating expenses each quarter based on
historical trends and anticipated disbursements. If these estimates are
incorrect, the timing and amount of expense recognized will be affected.
Accruals for Contingencies: The Company is exposed to business and legal
liability risks with respect to events that may have occurred, but in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") has not accrued for
such potential liabilities because the loss is either not probable or not
estimable. Future events and the result of pending litigation could result in
such potential losses becoming probable and estimable, which could have a
material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
Effect of Economic Conditions on the Company's Operations:
During the first six months of 2009, the severe recession and weak economic
conditions continued to impact commercial real estate as the Company experienced
a decrease in new rental rates over expiring rental rates on executed leases as
well as declining occupancy. Although it is uncertain what impact the current
recession will have on the Company's ability to maintain current occupancy
levels and rental rates, management expects that the decrease in rental rates on
new and renewal transactions combined with further reductions in occupancy will
result in a decrease in rental income for the third quarter of 2009 when
compared to the same period of 2008. A continued deepening economic recession
may have a significant impact on the Company, potentially resulting in further
reductions in occupancy and rental rates.
While the Company historically has experienced a moderate level of write-offs
due to business failures and bankruptcy filing, there is inherent uncertainty in
a tenant's ability to continue paying rent when in bankruptcy. As of July 31,
2009, the Company had approximately 42,000 square feet of leased space that is
occupied by tenants that are protected by Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code. In addition, the Company had tenants occupying approximately 628,000
square feet who vacated their space during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as
a result of business failures. A number of other tenants have contacted us,
requesting a reduction in space under lease, or rent deferment or abatement. At
this time, the Company cannot anticipate what impact, if any, the ultimate
outcome of these discussions will have on our operating results.
Company Performance and Effect of Economic Conditions on Primary Markets:
The Company's operations are substantially concentrated in 10 regions. Current
market conditions for each region are summarized below. During the six months
ended June 30, 2009, rental rates on new and renewed leases within the Company's
overall portfolio decreased 12.6% over expiring rents. Below is a summary of the
general market conditions as well as the Company's operating statistics for each
of the 10 regions in which the Company operates. The Company has compiled the
market information set forth below using third party reports for each respective
market. The Company considers these sources to be reliable, but there can be no
assurance that the information in these reports is accurate.
The Company owns approximately 4.0 million square feet in Southern California in
Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego Counties. Market vacancies have increased due
to the continued weakening in the economy combined with the lack of credit
availability and its effect on small businesses. These factors have also created
significantly more competition for tenants, which in turn has placed pressure on
rental rates. Vacancy rates in Southern California range from 4.1% to 18.2%. The
Company's vacancy rate in this region at June 30, 2009 was 8.6%. For the six
months ended June 30, 2009, the overall market experienced negative net
absorption of 0.5% for the reasons noted above as well as the completion of
newly constructed space in 2008. The Company's weighted average occupancy for
the region decreased from 94.7% for the first six months of 2008 to 90.4% for
the first six months of 2009. Annualized realized rent per square foot decreased
0.5% from $17.30 per square foot for the first six months of 2008 to $17.22 per
square foot for the first six months of 2009.
The Company owns approximately 1.8 million square feet in Northern California
with concentrations in Sacramento, the East Bay (Hayward and San Ramon) and
Silicon Valley (San Jose and Santa Clara). Vacancy rates in these submarkets are
22.3%, 20.1% and 17.8%, respectively. The Company's vacancy rate in its Northern
California portfolio at June 30, 2009 was 18.4%. Demand in these submarkets
slowed measurably in the second half of 2008 and continued to slow in the first
six months of 2009. The time necessary to execute a transaction has lengthened
as tenants weigh various options. During the second half of 2008 and continuing
into 2009, lease renewals and short-term leases were the most common leasing
activity in the market as firms are seeking ways of reducing costs. For the six
months ended June 30, 2009, the combined submarkets noted above experienced
negative net absorption of 2.1%. The Company's weighted average occupancy in
this region decreased from 92.1% for the first six months of 2008 to 86.7% for
the first six months of 2009 due in part to two large tenant defaults comprising
134,000 square feet. Annualized realized rent per square foot decreased 3.9%
from $14.28 per square foot for the first six months of 2008 to $13.72 per
square foot for the first six months of 2009.
The Company owns approximately 1.2 million square feet in Southern Texas,
specifically in the Austin and Houston markets. Market vacancy rates are 14.6%
in the Austin market and 13.9% in the Houston market. The Company's vacancy rate
for these combined markets at June 30, 2009 was 14.9%. During the second half of
2008 and continuing into 2009, demand eased in these markets due to the slowdown
in the oil and gas industry as a result of declining oil prices. For the six
months ended June 30, 2009, the combined markets experienced negative net
absorption of 0.9%. The Company's weighted average occupancy in this region
decreased from 95.6% for the first six months of 2008 to 86.5% for the first six
months of 2009 due in part to two large tenant defaults comprising 61,000 square
feet. Annualized realized rent per square foot increased 8.5% from $11.34 per
square foot for the first six months of 2008 to $12.30 per square foot for the
first six months of 2009.
The Company owns approximately 1.7 million square feet in Northern Texas,
primarily located in the Dallas Metroplex market. The market vacancy rate in Las
Colinas, where significant concentrations of the Company's properties are
located, is 10.7%. The Company's vacancy rate at June 30, 2009 in this market
was 10.1%. During the end of 2008 and continuing into 2009, this market began to
show signs of softening in fundamentals as a result of the impact of the
national recession. Vacancy is on the rise due to a high volume of construction
completed in 2008 and slowing job growth. As a result, the market experienced
negative net absorption of 0.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
Company's weighted average occupancy for the region decreased from 93.0% for the
first six months of 2008 to 91.8% for the first six months of 2009. Annualized
realized rent per square foot decreased 0.3% from $10.66 per square foot for the
first six months of 2008 to $10.63 per square foot for the first six months of
2009.
The Company owns approximately 3.6 million square feet in South Florida, which
consists of Miami International Commerce Center ("MICC") business park located
in the Airport West submarket of Miami-Dade County and two multi-tenant flex
parks located in Palm Beach County. MICC is located less than one mile from the
cargo entrance of the Miami International Airport, which is one of the most
active ports in the United States. The effect of the current economic recession
on the import/export business has had a measurable negative impact on demand in
Miami. Market vacancy rates for Miami-Dade County and Palm Beach County are 8.9%
and 11.9%, respectively, compared with the Company's South Florida vacancy rate
of 6.4% at June 30, 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the combined
markets experienced negative net absorption of 2.0%. The Company's weighted
average occupancy in this region outperformed the market, decreasing from 96.4%
for the first six months of 2008 to 95.4% for the first six months of 2009.
Annualized realized rent per square foot increased 2.4% from $9.23 per square
foot for the first six months of 2008 to $9.45 per square foot for the first six
months of 2009.
The Company owns approximately 3.0 million square feet in the Northern Virginia
submarket of Washington D.C., where the average market vacancy rate is 13.9%.
The Company's vacancy rate at June 30, 2009 was 7.4%. Vacancy rates in this
market increased as tenants downsize their existing space due to the economic
recession. The increase in sublease space and decrease in demand has lengthened
the time of lease negotiations. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the
market experienced negative net absorption of 0.4%. The Company's annualized
realized rent per square foot increased 4.3% from $19.99 per square foot for the
first six months of 2008 to $20.84 per square foot for the first six months of
2009. The Company's weighted average occupancy decreased from 97.2% for the
first six months of 2008 to 93.2% for the first six months of 2009.
The Company owns approximately 1.8 million square feet in the Maryland submarket
of Washington D.C. The Company's vacancy rate in the region at June 30, 2009 was
9.5% compared to 13.9% for the market as a whole. For the six months ended
June 30, 2009, the market experienced negative net absorption of 0.6%, which is
attributed to a decrease in demand for large blocks of space due to the slowing
economy. The Company's weighted average occupancy increased from 90.7% for the
first six months of 2008 to 92.0% for the first six months of 2009. Annualized
realized rent per square foot increased 2.9% from $23.08 per square foot for the
first six months of 2008 to $23.74 per square foot for the first six months of
2009.
The Company owns approximately 1.3 million square feet in the Beaverton
submarket of Portland, Oregon. The market vacancy rate in this region is 23.9%.
The Company's vacancy rate in the market was 21.6% at June 30, 2009. Recent
economic trends and the economic recession have resulted in increases in both
vacancy rates and rent concessions in the market. For the six months ended June
30, 2009, the market experienced negative net absorption of 0.9%. The Company's
weighted average occupancy decreased from 84.4% for the first six months of 2008
to 80.3% for the first six months of 2009. The decrease was primarily related to
a 120,000 square foot tenant vacating its space during the second quarter of
2008 and a 28,000 square foot tenant defaulting during the second quarter of
2009. As a result of the recent trends and slowdown, annualized realized rent
per square foot decreased 0.8% from $16.67 per square foot for the first six
months of 2008 to $16.54 per square foot for the first six months of 2009.
The Company owns approximately 679,000 square feet in the Phoenix and Tempe
submarkets of Arizona. Market vacancies increased significantly due in part to
the number of housing-related tenants who have vacated space combined with
companies contracting and reorganizing business operations. These factors have
also created significantly more competition for tenants, which may result in
higher lease concessions while limiting the Company's ability to generate rental
rate growth. The market vacancy rate is 15.2% compared to the Company's vacancy
rate of 13.0% at June 30, 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the
market experienced negative net absorption of 1.5%. Annualized realized rent per
square foot decreased 7.3% from $11.75 per square foot for the first six months
of 2008 to $10.89 per square foot for the first six months of 2009. The
Company's weighted average occupancy in the region decreased from 87.1% for the
first six months of 2008 to 86.9% for the first six months of 2009.
The Company owns approximately 521,000 square feet in the state of Washington
which mostly consists of Overlake Business Center, a 493,000 square foot
multi-tenant office and flex business park located in Redmond. The weakened
aerospace manufacturing industry and global economic slowdown has resulted in
fewer imports and exports resulting in a softened demand in this market. The
market vacancy rate is 11.6%. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, this
market experienced negative net absorption of 2.2%. The Company's vacancy rate
in this region at June 30, 2009 was 11.6%. The Company's weighted average
occupancy decreased from 94.3% for the first six months of 2008 to 90.8% for the
first six months of 2009. Annualized realized rent per square foot increased
3.5% from $19.10 per square foot for the first six months of 2008 to $19.77 per
square foot for the first six months of 2009.
Growth of the Company's Operations and Acquisitions and Dispositions of
Properties:
The Company is focused on maximizing cash flow from its existing portfolio of
properties by expanding its presence in existing and new markets through
strategic acquisitions and the disposition of non-strategic assets. The Company
has historically maintained a low-leverage-level approach intended to provide
the Company with the flexibility for future growth.
The Company made no acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008.
During May, 2009, the Company sold 3.4 acres of land held for development in
Portland, Oregon, for a gross sales price of $2.7 million, resulting in a net
gain of $1.5 million. The Company made no dispositions during the six months
ended June 30, 2008.
Scheduled Lease Expirations:
In addition to the 2.1 million square feet, or 10.6%, of space available in our
total portfolio as of June 30, 2009, leases representing approximately 10.7% of
the leased square footage of our total portfolio are scheduled to expire during
the remainder of 2009. Our ability to re-lease available space depends upon the
market conditions in the specific submarkets in which our properties are
located.
Impact of Inflation:
Although inflation has not been significant in recent years, it remains a factor
in our economy, and the Company continues to seek ways to mitigate its potential
impact. A substantial portion of the Company's leases require tenants to pay
operating expenses, including real estate taxes, utilities, and insurance, as
well as increases in common area expenses, partially reducing the Company's
exposure to inflation. During 2008 and 2009, the Company experienced modest
increases in certain operating costs, including repairs and maintenance, real
estate taxes, property insurance and utility costs affecting the Company's
overall profit margin.
Concentration of Portfolio by Region:
Rental income, cost of operations and rental income less cost of operations,
excluding depreciation and amortization, or net operating income prior to
depreciation and amortization (defined as "NOI" for purposes of the following
tables), are summarized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 by
major geographic region below. The Company uses NOI and its components as a
measurement of the performance of its commercial real estate. Management
believes that these financial measures provide them as well as the investor the
most consistent measurement on a comparative basis of the performance of the
commercial real estate and its contribution to the value of the Company.
Depreciation and amortization has been excluded from these financial measures as
they are generally not used in determining the value of commercial real estate
by management or the investment community. Depreciation and amortization is
generally not used in determining value as they consider the historical costs of
an asset compared to its current value; therefore, to understand the effect of
the assets' historical cost on the Company's
results, investors should look at GAAP financial measures, such as total operating costs including depreciation and amortization. The Company's calculation of NOI may not be comparable to those of other companies and should not be used as an alternative to measures of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP. The tables below reflect rental income, operating expenses . . .
|
|